throbber
From:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Taylor Mauze
`aabsher@kilpatricktownsend.com; tom@gillamsmithlaw.com; arinehart@kilpatricktownsend.com; Bryan Kohm;
`Chris Larson; ddacus; Geoff Miller; gil@gillamsmithlaw.com; jalemanni@kilpatricktownsend.com; Jon McMichael;
`jlee@kilpatricktownsend.com; mmorlock@kilpatricktownsend.com; nboothe@kilpatricktownsend.com;
`pam@tacticallawgroup.com; Jeffrey Ware; Jennifer Bush; Jessica Kaempf; kkoballa@kilpatricktownsend.com;
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com; Michael Sacksteder; rgupta@kilpatricktownsend.com; Shannon Turner;
`sdacus@dacusfirm.com; smoore@kilpatricktownsend.com; taludlam@kilpatricktownsend.com;
`tpfingst@kilpatricktownsend.com; Winnie Wong; tom@gillamsmithlaw.com; Chris.Joe@bjciplaw.com;
`eric.buresh_eriseip.com; eric.buether@bjciplaw.com; gil@gillamsmithlaw.com; jason.mudd_eriseip.com;
`kelly.hughes@eriseip.com; ken.kula_bjciplaw.com; mark.lang@eriseip.com; melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com;
`michael.pomeroy@bjciplaw.com; michelle.marriott_eriseip.com; nick.kliewer@BJCIPLaw.com;
`Theresa.Dawson@BJCIPLaw.com; tj.gohn@bjciplaw.com; alan.rabinowitz@kirkland.com;
`abonn@susmangodfrey.com; aong_goodwinlaw.com; tom@gillamsmithlaw.com;
`asubramanian@susmangodfrey.com; asoucy@goodwinlaw.com; cli@goodwinprocter.com; dkheyfits@kblit.com;
`dkline@goodwinlaw.com; edward.donovan@kirkland.com; ederieux@capshawlaw.com;
`ellisen.turner_kirkland.com; greg.polins@kirkland.com; greg.arovas@kirkland.com; gil@gillamsmithlaw.com;
`jake.rambeau@kirkland.com; jdowns@goodwinlaw.com; joel.merkin@kirkland.com; jonathan.brit@kirkland.com;
`jgrinstein@susmangodfrey.com; kmartin@goodwinprocter.com; lshiferman@goodwinlaw.com;
`ldauchot_kirkland.com; marc.sernel@kirkland.com; melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com; mxi@susmangodfrey.com;
`meredith.zinanni@kirkland.com; NBirbach@goodwinlaw.com; pdinh@goodwinprocter.com;
`rfrederickson@goodwinprocter.com; robert.appleby@kirkland.com; rnath_susmangodfrey.com;
`sfischer@goodwinlaw.com; sean.mceldowney@kirkland.com; ccapshaw@capshawlaw.com;
`sschreiner@goodwinprocter.com; tdewitt@24ipusa.com
`Adrienne Dellinger; William Nilsson; Lee Matalon; Thomas Derbish; Cason Cole
`March 15, 2021 Jury Selection and Trial Procedures
`Tuesday, March 2, 2021 5:10:03 PM
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL **
`
`Counsel,
`
`PMC v. Apple (2:15-cv-1366), Infernal v. Sony (2:19-cv-248), and GREE v. Supercell Oy (2:19-cv-
`200, 237, 310, 311) are set, in the recited order, for jury selection followed by trial on Monday,
`March 15, 2021. To facilitate such and assuage any public health concerns, the Court has put into
`place various mitigation protocols. During the jury trial, you and all persons attending with you are
`required to comply with the following:
`
`First, the Court will continue to adhere to the following specific visitor restrictions:
`Persons who have traveled to or from any of the following countries listed on the
`Centers
`for
`Disease
`Control
`and
`Prevention
`website
`[https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/travelers/from-other-countries.html]
`as
`“Travelers Prohibited from Entry to the United States” within the preceding 14 days;
`Persons who have had close contact with someone who has traveled to or from one of
`the countries referenced above within the preceding 14 days;
`Persons who a medical doctor, doctor of osteopathy, hospital or public health agency
`has directed to self-quarantine, and such period of self-quarantining is ongoing;
`Persons who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 and who have not obtained express
`medical verification as now being non-communicative/non-contagious from a medical
`doctor, doctor of osteopathy, hospital or public health agency;
`Persons who exhibit fever, cough or shortness of breath; and
`If you or anyone attending court with you falls within one or more of the above
`restricted categories, you must advise the Court by email (copying all counsel of
`record) within 24 hours. All such persons will not be granted admission to the
`courthouse.
`
`Second, the Court will be enforcing social distancing protocols among parties, counsel, and
`
`Supercell
`Exhibit 1042
`Page 1
`
`

`

`court staff. To the greatest extent reasonably possible, the Court will strive to maintain a
`six(cid:4137)foot distance between all those present. The Court will also be implementing various
`mitigation strategies in the courtroom, including limiting the number of persons seated at
`counsel tables to three persons per party per table. The parties are each responsible for
`determining which persons are to sit at their respective counsel tables; all other party
`representatives, counsel, consultants, and observers should sit in the gallery or inside the bar
`after the jury is seated. Those not at counsel table are encouraged to wear a face covering
`while inside the courtroom, but the Court will neither require nor provide one.
`
`Third, the Court encourages all participants to follow the CDC’s community-mitigation
`guidelines before attending the proceeding. That includes washing hands often; avoiding
`close contact with people who are sick and practicing social distancing; covering mouth and
`nose with a cloth face cover when around others; covering coughs and sneezes; and cleaning
`and disinfecting frequently touched surfaces daily.
`
`Additionally, in light of the health and safety precautions to be taken during the jury trial, the Court
`directs all counsel to delay their arrival at the Courthouse for voir dire on Monday, March 15, 2021
`until you are instructed to appear. This will prevent unintended mixing of trial teams with the venire
`panel during the lengthy individualized check-in process. On Monday, after the venire panel has
`been checked in and is positioned in the courtroom, I will call counsel via their cell numbers
`provided to the Court to convey an appropriate time for counsel to arrive at the Courthouse, as well
`as any further instructions. The Court anticipates this call will occur no earlier than 8:15 a.m. On
`subsequent days, counsel are directed to arrive at the Courthouse as normal.
`
`Until the Court enters the Courtroom on Monday, Mrs. Kecia Clendening—deputy clerk in charge—
`will control your entrance and access to the courtroom itself. She will send word to both sides when
`your three person voir dire teams may enter the courtroom and set up at counsel table.
`
`Additionally and as you are aware, the Court’s practice is to provide jurors with contact information
`for one attorney on each side after the conclusion of trial, so that jurors may call either or both sides
`—if they choose—to discuss the trial after they have been discharged by the Court. Accordingly,
`please provide me (Taylor_Mauze@txed.uscourts.gov) with the name and contact information of
`such a designated attorney for this purpose by Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 6:00 p.m.
`
`Please let me know if you have any questions.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Taylor Mauze
`Law Clerk to Chief Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
`100 E. Houston Street
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Taylor_Mauze@txed.uscourts.gov
`
`Supercell
`Exhibit 1042
`Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket