throbber
12/14/2020
`
`'Clash Of Clans' Game Maker Owes $8.5M, Texas Jury Says - Law360
`
`Kilpatrick, ...
`News, cases, companies, firm
`
`Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
`
`Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stoc... | my account
`
`News, cases, companies, firm
`Search Toggle Dropdown
`
`Search Law360
`Search News Only
`Search Cases Only
`Search PTAB Only
`Search TTAB Only
`
`Advanced Search
`Intellectual Property Securities Bankruptcy Competition Employment White Collar Legal Industry Access To
`Justice In-Depth Law360 UK || See all 61 sections
`
`
`
`
`Close
`
`Products
`Lexis®
`Law360 In-Depth
`Law360 UK
`Law360 Updates
`Law360 Podcasts
`Beta Tools
`Track docs
`Track attorneys
`Track judges
`
`Adv. Search & Platform Tools
`Browse all sections
`Banking
`Bankruptcy
`Class Action
`Competition
`Employment
`Energy
`Expert Analysis
`Insurance
`Intellectual Property
`Product Liability
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1311655
`
`1/9
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 1 of 9
`
`

`

`'Clash Of Clans' Game Maker Owes $8.5M, Texas Jury Says - Law360
`
`12/14/2020
`Securities
`Rankings
`Data-Driven Lawyers
`Regional Powerhouses
`Law360's MVPs
`Glass Ceiling Report
`Global 20
`Law360 400
`Diversity Snapshot
`Practice Groups of the Year
`Rising Stars
`Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
`Site Menu
`Join the Law360 team
`Search legal jobs
`Learn more about Law360
`Read testimonials
`Contact Law360
`Sign up for our newsletters
`Site Map
`Help
`
`Law360 is excited to announce the launch of Law360 Employment Authority!
`Click here to learn more and opt-in to in-depth news coverage of employment law and policy.
`
`'Clash Of Clans' Game Maker Owes $8.5M,
`Texas Jury Says
`
`By Katie Buehler
`
`Share us on: By Katie Buehler
`
`Law360 (September 18, 2020, 11:58 AM EDT) -- A Texas federal jury on Friday morning found the company
`behind the wildly popular "Clash of Clans" mobile game infringed at least one claim of five patents held by
`Japanese game maker Gree Inc. and awarded Gree a lump sum of $8.5 million in damages, according to a jury
`verdict form.
`
`After more than seven hours of deliberation that started late Thursday morning, the eight-person Eastern District
`of Texas jury found Supercell Oy — the creator of city-building and battle game "Clash of Clans," mobile card
`game "Clash Royale" and battle game "Brawl Stars" — had willfully infringed at least one patent claim held by
`Gree. While the jury decided in Gree's favor, it awarded a much smaller damages amount than the $18.5 million
`to $24.6 million the Japanese company had asked for during closing arguments Thursday.
`
`The five patents-in-suit relate to the ability of "Clash of Clans" players to easily copy city templates; a formula
`for calculating available funds, or elixir, to pay for cards in "Clash Royale;" code to help players easily aim and
`shoot in "Brawl Stars" while playing on a mobile device; and systems that allow players to engage with one
`another.
`
`The verdict form didn't ask the jury to review each asserted patent claim on the issue of infringement, but instead
`asked whether Supercell infringed any of the asserted claims of the five patents. The jury checked "yes" for that
`question, according to the form.
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1311655
`
`2/9
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 2 of 9
`
`

`

`12/14/2020
`
`'Clash Of Clans' Game Maker Owes $8.5M, Texas Jury Says - Law360
`
`The jury also denied Supercell's counterclaims of invalidity on four of the five asserted patents, according to the
`form. Supercell didn't challenge the validity of U.S. Patent No. 9,597,594, which relates to the ability for players
`to easily copy city templates.
`
`Counsel for Gree and Supercell declined to comment on the verdict. Representatives for both companies didn't
`immediately respond to requests for comment Friday.
`
`This was the second in-person trial Chief U.S. District Judge Rodeny Gilstrap has held in Marshall, Texas, since
`the COVID-19 pandemic shut down courtrooms in early March. Attendees sitting in the gallery were asked to
`wear face masks while jury members were given face shields, but not face masks, to wear.
`
`The attorneys sitting at counsel tables, the judge and his courtroom staff didn't wear face masks during closing
`arguments Thursday.
`
`Gree and Supercell had sought to postpone the trial due to COVID-19-related restrictions that wouldn't allow
`some witnesses to travel and that they said would create an unfair and unjust trial, according to court filings.
`Judge Gilstrap agreed to push the trial from its original start date of Aug. 3, but denied a second request from
`Supercell to postpone it further.
`
`During the trial, which started Sept. 10, the jury heard five days of testimony and evidence, including detailed
`videos on how Supercell's games work and on its profits, which totaled $450 million from the three games in
`2019.
`
`Gree's attorney Steven D. Moore of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP delivered closing arguments for the
`company Thursday and urged the jury to compensate Gree for "doing the right thing."
`
`"Gree played by the rules," he said. "When it came up with ideas, it got those patents. Supercell did not play by
`the rules."
`
`Supercell argued Gree's patents were invalid because they involve technology used in previously developed
`games, such as "FarmVille" and mobile card game "Magic."
`
`Sacksteder took shots at the value of Gree's patents during his closing arguments, saying if the patents were so
`valuable, Gree's games — such as its answer to "Clash of Clans," "Tenmega" — wouldn't have failed in the U.S.
`
`"If these patents are so valuable to games, how come you didn't put them in games or the games they were put in
`flopped?" he said.
`
`The companies have a long history of court battles, which includes Gree filing 32 preliminary injunction actions
`and six lawsuits alleging patent infringement against Supercell in 2017 and 2018. During that same time period,
`Supercell filed seven inter partes review petitions and 16 post-grant review petitions with the Patent Trial and
`Appeal Board.
`
`There are seven pending cases in the Eastern District of Texas involving at least 10 additional patents that Gree
`claims Supercell has infringed with its "Clash of Clans," "Clash Royale" and other games, according to court
`records. The next set of claims is set for trial in March 2021.
`
`The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 9,604,137; 9,956,481; 9,774,655; 9,795,873; and 9,597,594.
`
`Gree is represented by Melissa R. Smith and Harry L. Gillam Jr. of Gillam & Smith LLP and Steven D. Moore,
`Rishi Gupta, Taylor J. Pfingst, Norris P. Booth, John C. Alemanni, Taylor Higgins Ludlam, Kasey E. Koballa,
`Michael T. Morlock, Alton L. Absher III and Andrew W. Rinehart of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP.
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1311655
`
`3/9
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 3 of 9
`
`

`

`'Clash Of Clans' Game Maker Owes $8.5M, Texas Jury Says - Law360
`12/14/2020
`--Additional reporting by Dave Simpson, Jack Queen and Tiffany Hu. Editing by Alyssa Miller.
`
`Update: This story has been updated with more details from the trial.
`
`For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com.
`
`0 Comments
`
`Sign In To Comment
`
`Attached Documents
`
`Verdict
`
`Useful Tools & Links
`
`Add to Briefcase
`Save to PDF & Print
`Rights/Reprints
`Editorial Contacts
`
`Related Sections
`
`Intellectual Property
`Media & Entertainment
`Technology
`Texas
`Trials
`
`Case Information
`
`Case Title
`
`GREE, INC v. SUPERCELL OY
`
`Case Number
`
`2:19-cv-00070
`
`Court
`
`Texas Eastern
`
`Nature of Suit
`
`Patent
`
`Judge
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1311655
`
`4/9
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 4 of 9
`
`

`

`'Clash Of Clans' Game Maker Owes $8.5M, Texas Jury Says - Law360
`
`12/14/2020
`Rodney Gilstrap
`
`Date Filed
`
`February 27, 2019
`
`PTAB Case Information
`
`Case Title
`
`Supercell Oy v. GREE, Inc.,
`
`Case Number
`
`PGR2018-00008
`
`Date Filed
`
`November 07, 2017
`
`Case Title
`
`Supercell Oy v. GREE, Inc.
`
`Case Number
`
`IPR2019-00754
`
`Date Filed
`
`March 01, 2019
`
`Case Title
`
`Supercell Oy v. GREE, Inc.
`
`Case Number
`
`IPR2019-00756
`
`Date Filed
`
`March 01, 2019
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1311655
`
`5/9
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 5 of 9
`
`

`

`'Clash Of Clans' Game Maker Owes $8.5M, Texas Jury Says - Law360
`
`12/14/2020
`Case Title
`
`Supercell Oy v. GREE, Inc
`
`Case Number
`
`IPR2020-00215
`
`Date Filed
`
`December 04, 2019
`
`Case Title
`
`Supercell Oy v. Gree, Inc.
`
`Case Number
`
`IPR2020-00513
`
`Date Filed
`
`February 03, 2020
`
`Law Firms
`
`Gillam Smith
`Kilpatrick Townsend
`
`Companies
`
`GREE Inc.
`
`Patents
`
`9,597,594 - Computer control method, control program and computer
`9,956,481 - Server, control method therefor, computer-readable recording medium, and game system
`9,774,655 - Server and method for transferring an object between users in a service provided by the server
`9,795,873 - Shooting game control method and game system
`
`Law360 Names Practice Groups Of The Year
`
`Law360 congratulates the winners of its 2020 Practice Groups of the Year awards, which honor the law firms
`behind the litigation wins and major deals that resonated throughout the legal industry in the past year.
`
`Top 10 trending in Intellectual Property
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1311655
`
`6/9
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 6 of 9
`
`

`

`12/14/2020
`
`'Clash Of Clans' Game Maker Owes $8.5M, Texas Jury Says - Law360
`
`1Judges Stoll, Albright Dish On Litigating During COVID-19
`2Del. Chief Urges Creativity When Litigating Patent Eligibility
`3Fed. Circ. OKs 'Bling It On' IP Win Over Sparkly Pepper Sprays
`4Chinese National Admits Stealing Lab Trade Secrets With Wife
`5IP Owners Have Usually Found Ally In Trump Administration
`6Muhammad Ali Photographers Say Walmart Stole Print Design
`7Fed. Circ. Ruling May Reshape Hatch-Waxman Litigation Map
`8Fed. Circ. Backs TTAB's Rejection Of Beer Show TM
`9Allergan Must Face FCA Claims Over Dementia Drug Patents
`10Phillies Say Redesigned Phanatic Is Legal No Matter What
`
`Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.
`
`How can I help you today?
`
`For example, you can type:
`
`I forgot my password
`I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
`How do I sign up for a newsletter?
`
`Ask a question!
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1311655
`
`7/9
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 7 of 9
`
`

`

`'Clash Of Clans' Game Maker Owes $8.5M, Texas Jury Says - Law360
`
`12/14/2020
`Beta
`
`Ask a question!
`
`
`
`© 2020, Portfolio Media, Inc. About | Contact Us | Legal Jobs | Careers at Law360 | Advertise with Law360 |
`Terms | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings | Help | Site Map
`

`
`Already have access? Click here to login
`Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business
`lawyers
`
`Register Now!
`Sign up now for free access to this content
`
`Enter your details below and select your area(s) of interest to stay ahead of the curve and receive Law360's daily newsletters
`
`Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
`
`First Name
`
`Last Name
`
`Password (at least 8 characters required)
`
`Confirm Password
`
`Select at least one primary interest:
` Access To Justice
` Asset Management
` Benefits
` Capital Markets
` Commercial Litigation Uk
` Construction
` Corporate Crime & Compliance
`
`Uk
`
` Environmental
` Florida
` Health
`
` Aerospace & Defense
` Banking
` California
` Class Action
` Competition
` Consumer Protection
` Cybersecurity & Privacy
` Employment
` Financial Services Uk
` Food & Beverage
` Hospitality
`
` Appellate
` Bankruptcy
` Cannabis
` Commercial Contracts
` Compliance
` Corporate
` Delaware
` Energy
` Fintech
` Government Contracts
` Illinois
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1311655
`
`8/9
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 8 of 9
`
`

`

`12/14/2020
` Immigration
` Intellectual Property
` Law360 In Depth
` Massachusetts
` Native American
` Pennsylvania
`
`'Clash Of Clans' Game Maker Owes $8.5M, Texas Jury Says - Law360
` Insurance
` Insurance Uk
` International Arbitration
` International Trade
` Legal Ethics
` Life Sciences
` Media & Entertainment
` Mergers & Acquisitions
` New Jersey
` New York
` Personal Injury & Medical
` Private Equity
`Malpractice
` Product Liability
` Real Estate
` Public Policy
` Sports & Betting
` Securities
` Telecommunications
` Technology
` Trials
` Transportation
`Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services
`and events that we believe may be of interest.
`
`You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.
`
` Project Finance
` Retail & E Commerce
` Tax
` Texas
` White Collar
`
`We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.
`Register

`
`Sign up for our Intellectual Property newsletter
`
`You must correct or enter the following before you can sign up:
`
`Please provide a professional email:
`Select more newsletters to receive for free
`
`Law360 takes your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.
`No Thanks Sign up now
`
`Thank You!
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1311655
`
`9/9
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 9 of 9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket