`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 25
`Date: January 5, 2022
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MASIMO CORPORATION,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01713 (Patent 10,624,564 B1)
`IPR2020-01716 (Patent10,702,194 B1)
`IPR2020-01722 (Patent 10,470,695 B2)
`IPR2020-01733 (Patent 10,702,195 B1)
`IPR2020-01737 (Patent 10,709,366 B1)
`
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, ROBERT L. KINDER, and
`AMANDA F. WIEKER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WIEKER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Setting Oral Argument
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01713 (Patent 10,624,564 B1)
`IPR2020-01716 (Patent10,702,194 B1)
`IPR2020-01722 (Patent 10,470,695 B2)
`IPR2020-01733 (Patent 10,702,195 B1)
`IPR2020-01737 (Patent 10,709,366 B1)
`
`
`Time and Format
`
`ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`The Board has considered Petitioner’s and Patent Owner’s requests
`
`for oral argument in these proceedings.1 Taking into consideration these
`
`requests, and the time constraints for oral hearings on this day, the oral
`
`arguments will commence at 10:00 am Eastern Time on February 9, 2022,
`
`by videoconference.2 USPTO facilities remain closed to the public due to
`
`the state of affairs relating to COVID-19. The Board will provide a court
`
`reporter for the hearing, and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the
`
`official record of the hearing.
`
`Petitioner requests, for each proceeding captioned above, no more
`
`than one hour per side for oral argument time, i.e., five hours of total
`
`argument time per side across all five cases. See, e.g., IPR2020-01733,
`
`Paper 24.
`
`Patent Owner requests a consolidated argument for IPR1713,
`
`IPR1716, IPR1733, and IPR1737, due to overlap across the four
`
`proceedings, with one hour per side of total oral argument time for all four
`
`cases. See, e.g., IPR2020-01733, Paper 25. For IPR1722, Patent Owner
`
`
`1 See IPR2020-01713 (“IPR1713”) (Papers 23, 24); IPR2020-01716
`(“IPR1716”) (Papers 25, 26); IPR2020-01722 (“IPR1722”) (Papers 20, 21);
`IPR2020-01733 (“IPR1733”) (Papers 24, 25); IPR2020-01737 (“IPR1737”)
`(Papers 24, 25).
`
`2 If there are any concerns about disclosing confidential information, the
`parties must contact the Board at Trials@uspto.gov at least ten (10) business
`days before the hearing date.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01713 (Patent 10,624,564 B1)
`IPR2020-01716 (Patent10,702,194 B1)
`IPR2020-01722 (Patent 10,470,695 B2)
`IPR2020-01733 (Patent 10,702,195 B1)
`IPR2020-01737 (Patent 10,709,366 B1)
`
`requests 30 minutes per side for oral argument time. See IPR2020-01722,
`
`Paper 20.
`
`Upon considering these requests, we grant oral argument according to
`
`the following schedule and groupings of proceedings to be argued together.
`
`Proceeding(s)
`
`Time Per Side
`
`Start Time
`
`2 hours
`
`IPR2020-01713
`IPR2020-01716
`IPR2020-01733
`IPR2020-01737
`
`IPR2020-01722
`
`1 hour
`
`10:00 AM ET, with a 30 minute
`break during this portion of the
`hearing
`
`10 minutes after conclusion of
`prior argument
`
`The first four proceedings (IPR2020-01713, IPR2020-01716, IPR2020-
`
`01733, IPR2020-01737) will be argued together and will share a single
`
`transcript. Given the overlap in these first four proceedings, statements
`
`made during during this portion of the hearing are applicable to each of the
`
`four proceedings, unless it is explicitly noted that a statement applies to a
`
`specific proceeding only.
`
`IPR2020-01722 will be argued separately and will have its own
`
`transcript. As a reminder, even if an argument was made during the portion
`
`of the hearing devoted to the first four proceedings, the argument must also
`
`be made and put on record during the portion of the hearing devoted to
`
`IPR2020-01722, for it to be considered in that proceeding.
`
`For each portion of the hearing, Petitioner will open by presenting its
`
`case for unpatentability of the challenged patent(s). Thereafter, Patent
`
`Owner will respond to Petitioner’s argument. Petitioner may reserve
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01713 (Patent 10,624,564 B1)
`IPR2020-01716 (Patent10,702,194 B1)
`IPR2020-01722 (Patent 10,470,695 B2)
`IPR2020-01733 (Patent 10,702,195 B1)
`IPR2020-01737 (Patent 10,709,366 B1)
`
`rebuttal time to respond to arguments presented by Patent Owner. In
`
`accordance with the Consolidated Trial Practice Guide3 (“CTPG”), issued in
`
`November 2019, Patent Owner may request to reserve time for a brief
`
`sur-rebuttal. See CTPG 83.
`
`The parties may request a pre-hearing conference in advance of the
`
`hearing. See id. at 82. “The purpose of the pre-hearing conference is to
`
`afford the parties the opportunity to preview (but not argue) the issues to be
`
`discussed at the oral hearing, and to seek the Board’s guidance as to
`
`particular issues that the panel would like addressed by the parties.” Id.
`
`If either party desires a pre-hearing conference, the parties should jointly
`
`contact the Board at Trials@uspto.gov at least seven (7) business days
`
`before the hearing date to request a conference call for that purpose. If no
`
`response is received within two (2) days from the Board, the party
`
`requesting the conference should call the Board directly to ensure the request
`
`is being processed.
`
`Demonstratives
`
`As set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstratives shall be served on
`
`opposing counsel at least seven (7) business days before the hearing date and
`
`filed on or before Friday, February 4, 2022.4
`
`
`3 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
`4 The parties may stipulate to an alternative schedule for serving and filing
`demonstratives, and request the Board to modify the schedule for filing
`demonstratives, at least seven (7) business days before the hearing date.
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01713 (Patent 10,624,564 B1)
`IPR2020-01716 (Patent10,702,194 B1)
`IPR2020-01722 (Patent 10,470,695 B2)
`IPR2020-01733 (Patent 10,702,195 B1)
`IPR2020-01737 (Patent 10,709,366 B1)
`
`
`Demonstratives are not a mechanism for making new arguments.
`
`Demonstratives are also not evidence, and will not be relied upon as
`
`evidence. Rather, demonstratives are visual aids to a party’s oral
`
`presentation regarding arguments and evidence previously presented and
`
`discussed in the papers. Accordingly, demonstratives shall be clearly
`
`marked with the words “DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT
`
`EVIDENCE” in the footer. See Dell Inc. v. Acceleron, LLC, 884 F.3d 1364,
`
`1369 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (holding that the Board is obligated under its own
`
`regulations to dismiss untimely argument “raised for the first time during
`
`oral argument”). “[N]o new evidence may be presented at the oral
`
`argument.” CTPG 85–86; see also St. Jude Med., Cardiology Div., Inc. v.
`
`The Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Mich., IPR2013-00041, Paper 65, 2–3
`
`(PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (explaining that “new” evidence includes evidence
`
`already of record but not previously discussed in any paper of record).
`
`Furthermore, because of the strict prohibition against the presentation
`
`of new evidence or arguments at a hearing, it is strongly recommended that
`
`each demonstrative includes a citation to a paper in the record, which allows
`
`the Board to easily ascertain whether a given demonstrative contains “new”
`
`argument or evidence or, instead, contains only that which is developed in
`
`the existing record.
`
`Due to the nature of the Board’s consideration of demonstratives and
`
`the opportunity afforded for the parties to reach an agreement without
`
`involving the Board, the Board does not anticipate that objections to
`
`demonstratives are likely to be sustained. Nevertheless, to the extent that a
`
`5
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01713 (Patent 10,624,564 B1)
`IPR2020-01716 (Patent10,702,194 B1)
`IPR2020-01722 (Patent 10,470,695 B2)
`IPR2020-01733 (Patent 10,702,195 B1)
`IPR2020-01737 (Patent 10,709,366 B1)
`
`party objects to the propriety of any demonstrative, the parties shall meet
`
`and confer in good faith to resolve any objections to demonstratives prior to
`
`filing the objections with the Board. If such objections cannot be resolved,
`
`the parties may file any objections to demonstratives with the Board no later
`
`than the time of the hearing. The objections shall identify with particularity
`
`which portions of the demonstratives are subject to objection and include a
`
`one (1) sentence statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or
`
`further explanation is permitted. The Board will consider any objections,
`
`and may reserve ruling on the objections.5 Any objection to demonstratives
`
`that is not timely presented will be considered waived.
`
`Finally, the parties are reminded that each presenter should identify
`
`clearly and specifically each paper (e.g., by slide or screen number for a
`
`demonstrative) referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and
`
`accuracy of the court reporter’s transcript and for the benefit of all
`
`participants appearing electronically.
`
`Presenting Counsel
`
`The Board generally expects lead counsel for each party to be present
`
`at the hearing. See CTPG 11. Any counsel of record may present the
`
`party’s argument as long as that counsel is present by video.
`
`
`5 If time permits, the Board may schedule a conference call with the parties
`to discuss any filed objections.
`
`6
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01713 (Patent 10,624,564 B1)
`IPR2020-01716 (Patent10,702,194 B1)
`IPR2020-01722 (Patent 10,470,695 B2)
`IPR2020-01733 (Patent 10,702,195 B1)
`IPR2020-01737 (Patent 10,709,366 B1)
`
`Video Hearing Details
`
`To facilitate planning, each party must contact the Board at
`
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov at least five (5) business days prior to the
`
`hearing date to receive video set-up information.
`
`As a reminder, all arrangements and the expenses involved with
`
`appearing by video, such as the selection of the facility from which a party
`
`will attend by video, must be borne by that party. If a video connection
`
`cannot be established, the parties will be provided with dial-in connection
`
`information, and the hearing will be conducted telephonically.
`
`If one or both parties would prefer to participate in the hearing
`
`telephonically, they must contact the Board at PTABHearings@uspto.gov at
`
`least five (5) business days prior to the hearing date to receive dial-in
`
`connection information.
`
`Counsel should unmute only when speaking. The panel will have
`
`access to all papers filed with the Board, including demonstratives. During
`
`the hearing, the parties are reminded to identify clearly and specifically each
`
`paper referenced (e.g., by slide or screen number for a demonstrative) to
`
`ensure the clarity and accuracy of the court reporter’s transcript and for the
`
`benefit of all participants appearing electronically. In addition, the parties
`
`are advised to identify themselves each time they speak. Furthermore, the
`
`remote nature of the hearing may also result in an audio lag, and thus the
`
`parties are advised to observe a pause prior to speaking, so as to avoid
`
`speaking over others.
`
`7
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01713 (Patent 10,624,564 B1)
`IPR2020-01716 (Patent10,702,194 B1)
`IPR2020-01722 (Patent 10,470,695 B2)
`IPR2020-01733 (Patent 10,702,195 B1)
`IPR2020-01737 (Patent 10,709,366 B1)
`
`
`If at any time during the hearing, counsel encounters technical or
`
`other difficulties that fundamentally undermine counsel’s ability to
`
`adequately represent its client, please let the panel know immediately, and
`
`adjustments will be made.6
`
`Remote Attendance Requests
`
`Members of the public may request to listen to this hearing. If
`
`resources are available, the Board generally expects to grant such requests.
`
`If either party objects to the Board granting such requests, for example,
`
`because confidential information may be discussed, the party must notify the
`
`Board at PTABHearings@uspto.gov at least ten (10) business days prior to
`
`the hearing date.
`
`Audio / Visual Equipment Requests
`
`Any special requests for audio-visual equipment should be directed to
`
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov. A party may also indicate any special requests
`
`related to appearing at a video hearing, such as a request to accommodate
`
`visual or hearing impairments, and indicate how the PTAB may
`
`accommodate the special request. Any special requests must be presented in
`
`a separate communication at least five (5) business days before the hearing
`
`date.
`
`
`6 For example, if a party is experiencing poor video quality, the Board may
`provide alternate dial-in information.
`
`8
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01713 (Patent 10,624,564 B1)
`IPR2020-01716 (Patent10,702,194 B1)
`IPR2020-01722 (Patent 10,470,695 B2)
`IPR2020-01733 (Patent 10,702,195 B1)
`IPR2020-01737 (Patent 10,709,366 B1)
`
`Legal Experience and Advancement Program (LEAP)
`
`The Board has established the “Legal Experience and Advancement
`
`Program,” or “LEAP,” to encourage advocates with less legal experience to
`
`argue before the Board to develop their skills. Either party may request that
`
`a qualifying LEAP practitioner participate in the program and conduct at
`
`least a portion of the party’s oral argument. The Board will grant additional
`
`argument time to that party, depending on the length of the proceeding and
`
`the PTAB’s hearing schedule. A party should submit a request, no later than
`
`five (5) business days before the oral hearing, by email to the Board at
`
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov. Additional information and a combined LEAP
`
`Practitioner Request for Oral Hearing Participation and Verification Form is
`
`available on the LEAP website, www.uspto.gov/leap.
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDERED that oral argument for this proceeding shall commence at
`
`10:00 am Eastern Time on February 9, 2022, by videoconference, and
`
`proceed in the manner set forth herein.
`
`9
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01713 (Patent 10,624,564 B1)
`IPR2020-01716 (Patent10,702,194 B1)
`IPR2020-01722 (Patent 10,470,695 B2)
`IPR2020-01733 (Patent 10,702,195 B1)
`IPR2020-01737 (Patent 10,709,366 B1)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Walter Renner
`Roberto Devoto
`Hyun Jin In
`Andrew Patrick
`Usman Khan
`Dan Smith
`Kenneth Hoover
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`Axf-ptab@fr.com
`devoto@fr.com
`in@fr.com
`patrick@fr.com
`khan@fr.com
`dsmith@fr.com
`hoover@fr.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Joseph Re
`Stephen Larson
`Jarom Kesler
`Jack Peterson
`Shannon Lam
`Ben Katzenellenbogen
`Jacob Peterson
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON, & BEAR, LLP
`2jrr@knobbe.com
`2swl@knobbe.com
`2jzk@knobbe.com
`2jup@knobbe.com
`2sxl@knobbe.com
`2bak@knobbe.com
`2jup@knobbe.com
`
`
`10
`
`