throbber
E E l
`
`— E Z G
`
`3
`
`m
`
`03
`,_
`
`O (
`
`1
`7s
`
`Carbon Fiber Reinforcing
`Making Double Tees in Parking Siruciures lighter and Sironger
`iii}! Harry A. Gieiofi. RE” FACI. FPCi
`
`As a lightweight. non—corrosive "enabling teclmology," car—
`bon fiber grid reinfirtcement allovvs double tees to be lighter.
`more durable and often less costly in the long run than
`conventional precast products that rely on steel reinforce-
`ment. Exceptionally strong, carbon fiber delivers 6,000 lbs;Ir
`lf of strength {comparable with steel reinforcement used in
`reinforced concrete design} and has tensile strength over five
`times that of steel. (Diil’iErent strengths are available, though
`the strength is consistent throughout the same sheet.) A car-
`bon fiber grid displays linear elastic behavior until failure.
`Epoxy coating chemistry and small—aperture grid design pro—
`vide excellent bonding to concrete and superior crack control.
`
`Carbon Fiber Reduces Concrete Cover
`'12.! minimize corrosion of steel reinforcement, double tee
`
`into the flange to
`manufiicturers incorporate concrete cover
`protect
`the steel mesh From water and corrosive chemical
`compounds.
`In Fact. most pretopped double tees have a
`minimum Hange depth ol‘l’i inches to provide ample cover for
`the steel mesh. In many cases, manufacturers put more concrete
`in the flange than is necessary to support expected loading. The
`extra concrete protects the reinforcement. it also adds weight,
`which until now has been largely unavoidable.
`it allows precast
`Because carbon fiber is corrosion-resistant.
`manufiicturets to reduce the amount of concrete cover in each
`
`double tee flange by up to 3% inch. Conventional prestl'essed
`strands in the stems are protected by more than 12 inches of
`concrete as measured fitom the top oFthe flange.
`Reducing the Flange thickness by 5/3 inch remiwes 9 pounds
`per square foot of dead load, which can either provide more
`reserve capacity or reduce the amount ofprestress required. And
`by eliminating the need to add cover over the reinforcement
`to resist corrosion. precastcrs can optimize the position of
`the reinforcement. moving it closer to the top surface of the
`flange to maximize performance and provide even better crack
`control. By moving the reinforcement toward the top of. the
`flange, precasters have been able to provide up to 2 'fr inches of
`
`E—GHID Reinforcing
`Concrete
`
`i---------------------4
`
`C :
`
`I
`
`.._ Presttessmg Strand
`
`arising structures represent one of the most demand-
`ing applications For concrete. They're exposed to the
`weather 24 hours a day. seven days a week. They’re
`expected to support hundreds or even thousands of vehicles.
`including today's heavyweight SUVs. And they‘re constantly
`exposed to corrosive agents such as salt used to clear roads
`during winter and chloride—laden air and ntoi5ture along the
`coastlines, or both in places like Boston and New Yorlc City.
`
`
`
`.
`t
`£9 rein!” in dc'iiiuiidin I re riuiu iii-r rouse near nmrine environments.
`grin-cg: declining is sim'ryiriiir’r m ju‘niiirim trim-(i in tire ammo».-
`nfiriaifiirrmrur
`
`Regardless of their source. chlorides have the potential to
`cause corrosion in some of the steel reinforcing. generally the
`secondary flange reinforcement. When the steel cortodes.
`it [Here than doubles 11-1 VDl'LUTlC and C311 Cause Cracking Dr
`spalling as well as unsightly staining — problems the building
`or garage owner would like to avoid. Corrosion isn't a problem
`everywhere, but in geographic areas where it
`is common, it has
`die potential to be a garage owner's Worst nightmare.
`A new approach to reinforcing double tee flanges involves
`die use of carbon fiber grid as a replacetnent for conventional
`steel mesh reinforcement. Carbon fiberis non-corrosive which
`
`virtually eliminates the problems noted above. as well as the
`cost of admixtures and barriers used to inhibit corrosion. Pit
`die same time, carbon fiber reinforcement can reduce the
`
`amount of concrete necessary in the flangewleading to a 12
`percent reduction in double tee weight—without compromising
`structural performance: the flanges have been tested For both
`point loads and un iform loads to meet the test load requirements
`of'both [BC and AC1.
`
`High—Tech Fibers Come to Precast
`Say the words “carbon fiber" and most people thinlc of
`items such as
`jet
`fighters,
`tennis racquets. bicycles, golf
`clubs and motorcycle components. Within the past decade.
`manufacturers have developed lower cost.
`industrial—grade
`carbon fiber For broader use in demanding construction
`applications. As a result, the precast concrete industry has been
`able to benefit from the same outstanding strength—to-weight
`ratios and durability characteristics that have made carbon
`fiber an ideal material to take a jet fighter to Mach 2 or propel
`Lance Armstrong through the French Alps.
`
`Cross Sectlon
`
`Double Tee—Narrow Leg
`
`Hermite mrimn fiber is corrosion resistant. irniinriopri'ritrrrrr to reduce
`die anterior dft‘tiiifit‘i'fft‘ {'QLI’P‘iH weir dntrbie reefbngr by up to Mind;
`
`STRUCTURE mogozine
`
`July 2006
`
`Metromont Ex-1003, p.1
`
`Metromont Ex-1003, p.1
`
`

`

`
`
`stnictural concrete below the mesh reinforcement, compared to only 2
`inches of concrete in typical precast double tees — important because
`the flange is designed as a prop cantilever.
`
`Strong and Durable Reinforcing
`Protecting the steel mesh reinforcement in conventional concrete
`double tees costs money. A number of chemical
`treatments are
`typically used during double tee Fabrication and after installation to
`inhibit and delay the corrosion of steel mesh in the flange.
`With non-corrosive carbon fiber reinforcing, manufacturers can
`avoid the cost of sacrificial barrier coatings on the steel and eliminate
`the need to add corrosion inhibiting admixtures to the concrete.
`Meanwhile. owners can forego the application of sealers to the precast
`deck surface after installation and also avoid re-applying these sealers
`every five to ten yea rs.
`From an initial cost standpoint, carbon fiber tends to be more
`expensive than steel mesh. However. when one considers the increasing
`cost of steel.
`the cost for corrosion inhibitors. potential reductions
`in substructure and site costs, and increased life span, carbon fiber
`reinforcing can lower life cycle costs dramatically, especially after the
`first decade of operation.
`Laboratory testing has affirmed the performance of double tees
`with carbon fiber reinforcement. Load testing demonstrates they can
`stand up to the heaviest sport utility vehicles. Fire tests confirm that
`they can meet ASTM E-ll9 fire rating for one-hour performance,
`and calculations show that. just like steel mesh reinforced tees, they
`can provide a two-hour fire rating with 4 5/3 to 4 3/3 inch thick flanges.
`'l'est reports are available.
`
`Practical Applications
`A 27fl.llflll-square-foot.
`four-level parking structure in suburban
`Milwaukee has carbon fiber reinforced double tees on the top deck.
`The owner. a developer that leases to a Fortune 500 company. opted
`for carbon fiber reinforced double tees because of their long-term
`durability and resistance to corrosion- The owners choice was especially
`important considering the top deck is exposed to Milwaukee's harsh
`weather. everything from ice storms and severe snow to summer heat
`waves. The 15-foot wide double tees have a two—hour lire rating to
`match the balance of the garage.
`Another precast project. designed to replace a badly corroded,
`condemned cast—in-place structure located near the New Jersey shore,
`is also being constructed with pre-topped carbon fiber reinforced
`double tees. Several odier projects are currently in the engineering and
`evaluation phases.
`
`A New Technology... A New Delivery Model
`The application of carbon fiber reinforcement heralds the first
`major advancement in precasr technology in decades—perhaps since
`
`
`
`A 270,000—5gome—flror. firrr—frodporl'rng structure in wombat: Mineral?“ om
`carborrfifurr reirrfirccd dam”: rm
`
`
`
`_-‘.'d.
`
`fkrbonfiéfl deft-wry 6.000 fésféfiofstrcrz‘g'tb and )5er tmrife strength oycrfitlc
`mm: dim ofrrrer’
`
`the introduction ofprecast itself: Several of the nation's leading precast
`companies have collaborated to develop,
`rest and market carbon
`fiber reinforced products such as pretopped double tees, architectural
`cladding panels. high perliirmance insulated wall panels and precast
`components for residential uses.
`Their partnership establishes a new model for the introduction
`of new technologies to the precast concrete industry. By pooling
`resources. expertise. and technical knowledge. and by working
`together to develop best practices. these companies have expedited
`the introduction of carbon-fiber reinforced precast concrete. The
`daunting cost and time to bring this technology to market could haVe
`been too much for one company to absorb. But as a collaborative
`unit. the partner companies' commercialized carbon fiber reinforced
`precast concrete in only two years.
`The use of carbon fiber reinforcement is an important innovation
`because it promises improved corrosion resistance by eliminating steel
`reinforcement
`in double tee flanges. Compared with conventional
`precast concrete, poured-in-place and other options, carbon fiber
`reinforced pretopped double ters can deliver reduced weight and life
`cycle improvements, especially in highly corrosive environments.
`[t is likely that the use of carbon fiber reinforcement will grow in
`popularity as its elfectiveness is validated by a variety of installations.
`With architects and engineers clamoring to be the “first one to be
`the second one in." carbon fiber reinforcement should gain a rapid
`following as the innovators give way to early adopters and the early
`majority — and possibly one day make this novel precasting technology
`the new industry standard.I
`
`Him)! Clark. VP ofEngincerirrgfor the Metromont Corporation. he:
`more taboo 20 years crazier-Emir: in rbeprcmsr concrete industry He is or:
`mine memo” 1'n the Promo/Betweed Concrete Industry (PCB, booing
`served on the rcvmdPCI Design Handéooil' Commizm and currentrlyar
`Charmer: ofrbc Parking Structure: Committee. He rir r: member ofrbc
`technology committee and boardof—dircdonfirfllmGroup, opal-rumba}
`ofpier-err concrete momfimramr that have collooomrcd to expertise the
`commercialization ofmroonfiocr rer'nfirccdprrcarr concrete.
`
`ALWSGROUP IS a CONSORTIUM OF Lemme PRECAST
`COMPANIES COILABORA'ITNG TO DEVELOP, TEST AND
`MARKET CARBON FIBER REINFORCED PRODUCTS-
`
`THIS COLLABORATION HAS ENABLED THE FIRSTeEVER
`NATIONAL ROLLOUT OF A NOVEL PRECAST BRAND,
`CARBONCAST. manuspmszcm
`
`PRECAST, HELDENFELS ENTERPRISES AND MORSE BROTHERS.
`
`NIEMBBRS OF THE Accuanouo INCLUDE: OLDCASTLE,
`HIGH CONCRETE GROUP, METROMONT Coaeonimon.
`GATE PRECAST, SHOCKEY PREcas'r GROUP, BLAKESLEE
`
`STRUCTURE mogozine m July 2006
`
`Metromont Ex—1003, p.2
`
`Metromont Ex-1003, p.2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket