throbber
REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING
`PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`SIKA – STRIVING FOR EXCELLENCE IN CONCRETE REFURBISHMENT
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.1
`
`

`

`SIKA AND ICRI –
`ONE COMMON GOAL
`
`Sika as well as the International Concrete Repair Institute (ICRI) share the same goal:
`To achieve excellence in concrete renovation projects through innovative products and
`systems, outstanding customer advice and trainings worldwide.
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.2
`
`

`

`CONTENT
`
`INTERNATIONAL CONCRETE REPAIR INSTITUTE (ICRI)
`SIKA TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE
`84 AWARDS FOR SIKA
`AWARDS 2013
`AWARDS 2012
`AWARDS 2011
`AWARDS 2010
`AWARDS 2009
`AWARDS 2008
`AWARDS 2007
`AWARDS 2006
`AWARDS 2005
`AWARDS 2004
`AWARDS 2003
`AWARDS 2002
`AWARDS 2001
`AWARDS 1998 – 2000
`SIKA ICRI AWARDS – STATISTICS
`
`4/5
`6/7
`8/9
`10 – 13
`14/15
`16/17
`18/19
`20/21
`22 – 25
`26 – 29
`30/3 30/31
`32/33
`34/35
`36/37
`38/39
`40/41
`42
`43
`
`3
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.3
`
`

`

`ICRI AWARDS PROGRAM
`
`ICRI awards program honors and recognizes outstanding projects in the concrete repair
`industry since 1997.
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.4
`
`

`

`INTERNATIONAL CONCRETE REPAIR INSTITUTE
`
`The International Concrete Repair Institute (ICRI) was formed in 1988 as the Interna-
`tional Association of Concrete Repair Specialists, by a group of pioneers who raised con-
`cerns over the proliferation of unqualified contractors entering the industry and the lack of
`standards and guidelines for concrete repair.
`
`Since that time, ICRI has grown into a 2000-member strong international association de-
`voted solely to concrete repair and restoration.
`
`ICRI Mission Statement:
`THE MISSION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONCRETE REPAIR INSTITUTE IS TO BE A
`LEADING RESOURCE FOR EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY
`OF REPAIR, RESTORATION, AND PROTECTION OF CONCRETE AND OTHER STRUC-
`TURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONSENSUS CRITERIA.
`
`The philosophy of the group is that if the quality of work is improved, and purchasers of re-
`pair services feel that they are obtaining a durable product, the demand for their products
`and services will increase and the image of the concrete repair industry will be elevated.
`From its inception, the organization has strived on include the interests of contractors,
`engineers, and manufacturers in every aspect of its operations. The object is to bring
`together those who are truly interested in improving the concrete repair industry and use
`their concerted efforts to bring about meaningful change. Every attempt is made to ensure
`equitable representation for all in the organization's leadership, committee representation
`and the dissemination of technical expertise.
`
`Obviously focussed in the North American market, ICRI is nevertheless well known in-
`ternationally especially in Latin America, Middle East, South East Asia and Pacific. This
`association like Sika strives to improve the quality of the repair works in the refurbishment
`business.
`
`Prizes are awarded in the following categories:
`
` ́ High-Rise
` ́ Low-Rise
` ́ Historic
` ́ Industrial
` ́ Longevity
` ́ Masonry
`
` ́ Parking Structures
` ́ Special Projects
` ́ Transportation
` ́ Water Systems
` ́ Sustainability (added in 2012)
`
`5
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.5
`
`

`

`SIKA TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE
`
`With 84 ICRI awards in 16 years Sika is the company with the most concrete repair projects
`awarded by the International Concrete Repair Institute (ICRI).
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.6
`
`

`

`REFURBISHMENT - EXTENDING THE LIFE CYCLE
`The built environment is in need of refurbishment. Maintenance and renewal make both
`economic and ecological sense. Sika has embraced the challenge. Armed with innovative
`products and new processes, we are well prepared to make ageing buildings and infra-
`structure facilities fit for the decades ahead.
`
`As a single-source provider for the full range of concrete renovation products, Sika is ide-
`ally positioned. Not only do we offer mutually compatible products and systems to meet
`any particular requirement, we are above all able to provide customer advice and support
`based on in-depth know-how and more than a century of experience. These are indispens-
`able prerequisites for sustainable solutions on projects.
`
`INNOVATION THROUGH MOTIVATION, INSPIRATION AND TEAM WORK
`Our Technology Centre takes global trends and local market needs into consideration
`when developing technologically advanced products and systems. The goal is to develop
`successful products for the refurbishment of buildings and infrastructure facilities.
`
`SUSTAINABILITY
`Refurbishing a structure is the best sustainable solution when compared to other options.
`ICRI did recognize this trend as since 2012, they introduced a new category: the sustain-
`ability award.
`
`EXPERIENCE ALL OVER THE WORLD
`Sika is a globally active company in the speciality and construction chemicals business. It
`has subsidiary manufacturing, sales and technical support facilities in over 70 countries
`around the world. Sika is the global market and technology leader in waterproofing, seal-
`ing, bonding, dampening, strengthening and the protection of buildings and civil engi-
`neering structures.
`
`7
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.7
`
`

`

`84 AWARDS FOR SIKA
`SUCCESSFUL IN THE PAST –
`COMMITTED FOR THE FUTURE
`
`2005 3 Awards of Excellence:
` ́ High-Rise
` ́ Historic
` ́ Longevity
`3 Awards of Merit:
` ́ Longevity
` ́ Parking Structures
` ́ Special Projects
`2006 Project of the Year:
` ́ Parking Structures
`2 Awards of Excellence:
` ́ Longevity
` ́ Transportation
`3 Awards of Merit:
` ́ Historic
` ́ Longevity
` ́ Water Structures
`2007 3 Awards of Excellence:
` ́ Low-Rise
` ́ Historic
` ́ Water Structures
`5 Awards of Merit:
` ́ Low-Rise
` ́ Transportation
` ́ Parking Structures
` ́ Strengthening
` ́ Special Projects
`
`1998 Award of Excellence:
` ́ Municipal
`1999 2 Awards of Excellence:
` ́ Municipal
` ́ Special Projects
`2000 Honorable Mention:
` ́ Municipal
`
`2001
`
`Project of the Year:
` ́ Special Projects
`2 Awards of Excellence:
` ́ High-Rise
` ́ Municipal
`2002 3 Awards of Excellence:
` ́ High-Rise
` ́ Longevity
` ́ Transportation
`2003 Award of Excellence:
` ́ Water Structures
`3 Honorable Mentions:
` ́ High-Rise
` ́ Transportation
` ́ Water Structures
`2004 Project of the year:
` ́ Industrial
`Award of Excellence:
` ́ Transportation
`5 Awards of Merit:
` ́ Historic (3 awards)
` ́ Strengthening
` ́ Water Structures
`
`8
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.8
`
`

`

`2011
`
`2012
`
`2013
`
`2008 3 Awards of Excellence:
` ́ Parking Structures
` ́ Strengthening
` ́ Transportation
`7 Awards of Merit:
` ́ Historic
` ́ Longevity
` ́ Parking Structures
` ́ Special Projects
` ́ Strengthening (2 awards)
` ́ Water Structures
`2009 Award of Excellence:
` ́ Strengthening
`5 Awards of Merit:
` ́ High-Rise
` ́ Longevity
` ́ Parking Structures
` ́ Special Projects (2 awards)
`2010 3 Awards of Excellence:
` ́ High-Rise
` ́ Special Projects
` ́ Strengthening
`2 Awards of Merit:
` ́ Low-Rise
` ́ Water Structures
`
`3 Awards of Excellence:
` ́ High-Rise
` ́ Low-Rise
` ́ Special Projects
`Award of Merit:
` ́ Historic
`
`2 Awards of Sustainability incl.
`Project of the Year:
`5 Awards of Merit:
` ́ High-Rise
` ́ Historic
` ́ Longevity
` ́ Special Projects
` ́ Parking Structures
`
`Award of Sustainability
`3 Awards of Excellence:
` ́ High-Rise
` ́ Low-Rise
` ́ Historic
`7 Awards of Merit:
` ́ High-Rise
` ́ Low-Rise
` ́ Historic (2 Awards)
` ́ Industrial
` ́ Special Projects
` ́ Parking Structures
`
`9
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.9
`
`

`

`AWARDS 2013
`
`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE: HISTORIC CATEGORY
`
`Strengthening the Structure of St. Nicholas Church
`Cracow, Poland
`
`St. Nicholas Church, located in Krakow (Cracow), Poland, is
`one of the oldest monuments in Cracow. The oldest men-
`tion of the church dates back to 1229. It was designated as
`a parish church in 1327. After much redesign and rebuilding
`over the centuries, the church is currently classified as a
`baroque and neo-baroque three-nave, three-bay basilica.
`
`The current construction was built on an already-existing
`foundation from the structure destroyed in the past. The
`stones used for the foundation and the limestone rock on
`which the church is located were subjected to washout
`and karst phenomenon over the centuries, leaving severe
`degradation. Acid water washout, as well as vibrations
`caused by increasing traffic—especially on the train track
`located just behind the church—were other causes of the
`severe deterioration of the foundation. This all led to the
`front wall deviating from vertical and falling away from
`the structural walls.
`
`Cracking was seen in the chancel vaults, main nave, and
`the aisles, which resulted from a lack of rigid support, re-
`ceiving the strutting forces through the walls. The original
`timber framing was not enough to stabilize the structure,
`so steel framing and braces were installed throughout
`the attic of the church, hidden to normal visitors. This
`new reinforcement allowed even transfer of the strutting
`forces through the walls, and movement of the church was
`decreased significantly. After the repairs were completed,
`the building was reopened to the public in 2012.
`
`Owner
`Ks. Dr Tadeusz Nosek
`Cracow, Poland
`
`Project Engineers/
`Designers
`Sika Poland Sp. Zo.o.
`Warszawa, Poland
`
`Repair Contractor
`Firma Konstrukcy Jna L.
`Sobieszek Cracow, Poland
`
`Material Supplier/
`Manufacturer
`Sika Poland Sp. Zo.o.
`Warszawa, Poland
`
`10
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.10
`
`

`

`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE:
`High-Rise Category
`
`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE:
`Low-Rise Category
`
`One Biscayne Tower Facade Restoration
`and Repair
`Miami, Florida
`
`Reincarnation: The Nylo South Side Hotel
`Dallas, Texas
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`High-Rise Category
`
`Renovation of Soho Beach House
`Miami Beach, Florida
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Historic Category
`
`Restoration of the Leeper
`Bridge (Sr 933)
`South Bend, Indiana
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Historic Category
`
`Liberty Memorial Masonry Repairs
`Kansas City, Missouri
`
`11
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.11
`
`

`

`AWARDS 2013
`
`AWARD OF MERIT: LOW-RISE CATEGORY
`
`Maypo Office and Laboratory Building Seismic Upgrade
`Mexico City, Mexico
`
`The fourstory office and laboratory building was con-
`structed in the early 1980s. Progress in the investigation
`of soil characteristics in Mexico City and state-of-the-art
`earthquake engineering have generated new design stan-
`dards and construction methods that have improved the
`level of seismic safety of new buildings. However, existing
`buildings constructed with less stringent design standards
`present a challenge. Worried about the safety of their
`building, Maypo initiated a structural assessment and
`seismic upgrade for the property.
`Because original building design information did not exist,
`diagnostic studies were performed, including planimetry
`and altimetry surveys to estimate the magnitude of dif-
`ferential settlements, bibliographic research of soil me-
`chanics in the area, concrete excavation for steel reinforce-
`ment assessment, extraction of concrete cores, visual
`inspection, and three-dimensional computer modeling for
`a dynamic structural analysis. The studies revealed that
`the nonstructural masonry walls interfered with the free
`deformation of the main structure; the concrete slabs ex-
`hibited cracking, deflections, and excessive vibration; and
`the beams exhibited shear cracking at their ends. Further-
`more, the computer model revealed that the columns were
`overloaded.
`To structurally strengthen and seismically upgrade the
`building, new steel beams were retrofitted to stiffen the
`concrete slabs and surface flatness was recovered by in-
`stalling a reinforced concrete overlay. Beam cracking was
`epoxy-injected to restore structural stiffness and improve
`behavior. Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) fabric
`was installed at beams to increase shear strength and at
`columns to increase strength and ductility.
`
`Owner
`Farmacéuticos MAYPO S.A.
`de C.V.Mexico, D.F.Project
`
`Engineer/Designer
`Eng. Ma. Del Carmen
`Saldaña Serrano
`
`Repair Contractor
`Quimec S.A. de
`C.V.Naucalpan, Mexico
`
`Material Supplier/
`Manufacturer
`Sika Mexicana S.A. de
`C.V.Querétaro, Mexico
`
`12
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.12
`
`

`

`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Industrial Category
`
`University of Missouri Power
`Plantconcrete Chimneys Rehabili-
`tation
`Columbia, Missouri
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Parking Structures Category
`
`One Biscayne Tower Parking Garage
`Repairs
`Miami, Florida
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Special Projects Category
`
`Preservation of LSU Tiger Stadium
`Baton Rouge, Louisiana
`
`AWARD OF SUSTAINABILITY:
`
`Gold Bar Primary Clarifiers No. 7 and 8:
`Concrete Beam and Wall Repairs
`Edmonton, AB, Canada
`
`13
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.13
`
`

`

`AWARDS 2012
`
`AWARD OF MERIT: LONGEVITY CATEGORY
`
`Evans Hall Restoration — 12 Years Later
`Berkeley, California
`
`Evans Hall, at the University of California in Berkeley, is a
`10-story building that in 1999, after almost 30 years in use
`with little maintenance done, safety concerns were raised
`as a result of pieces of concrete falling from the building’s
`facade. Poor initial concrete placement with minimal cover-
`age of reinforcing steel, combined with exposure to CO²
`and moist salty air from nearby San Francisco Bay, led to
`rapidly accelerated corrosion of the building’s reinforcing
`bars. Because the building sits on a major seismic fault line,
`the repairs were needed to maintain the structural integ-
`rity of the building. The initial work on the building was di-
`vided into two phases. In Phase I, hundreds of spall repairs
`were made to the structure; then, the entire building was
`re-leveled with polymer-modified mortar with a spray-ap-
`plied method. Phase II consisted of applying a high-perfor-
`mance, anti-carbonation, crack-bridging, elastomeric wall-
`coating system for waterproofing and corrosion protection,
`as well as a much-needed aesthetic upgrade.
`
`Twelve years later, all of the spall repairs are performing
`well and there are no signs of new spalls occurring. Evans
`Hall is expected to last another 41 or more years without
`major repair or restoration. There are no signs of cracks or
`rust stains on the building, and the custom colors chosen
`show no signs of deterioration. This coating system seems
`to have made a significant impact on the building’s ability
`to stay watertight and resist corrosion, which should pre-
`vent new corrosion from occurring.
`
`Owner
`University of California,
`Berkeley, California
`
`Project Engineer/Designer
`Degenkolb Engineers
`San Francisco, California
`
`Repair Contractor
`Valentine Corp.
`San Rafael, California
`
`Material Supplier/Manu-
`facturer
`Sika Corporation
`Lyndhurst, New Jersey
`
`14
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.14
`
`

`

`PROJECT OF THE YEAR:
`AWARD OF SUSTAINABILITY
`Low-Rise Category
`The Todd Bolender Center for Dance and
`Creativity
`Kansas City, Missouri
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`High-Rise Category
`
`Marriott Frenchman’s Reef – Ocean Tower
`and Water Cistern Repairs
`St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Historic Category
`
`Point Arena Lighthouse Restoration
`Point Arena, California
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Special Projects Category
`
`Bayshore Boulevard Balustrade
`Restoration
`Tampa, Florida
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Parking Structures Category
`
`AWARD OF SUSTAINABILITY
`
`Rehabilitation of the Jordan Commons
`Parking Structures
`Sandy, Utah
`
`Commonwealth Stadium Structural
`Repairs And Rehabilitation
`Edmonton, AB, Canada
`
`15
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.15
`
`

`

`AWARDS 2011
`
`AWARD OF MERIT: HISTORIC CATEGORY
`
`Rehabilitation of the Missouri/Ohio Historic Bridge
`Mile Marker 39.0 of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail
`
`More than a century ago, Henry Flagler had the desire and
`vision to connect the East Coast railroad network to Key
`West. The project started in 1905 and was completed in
`1912. The Missouri/Ohio Historic Bridge is one of the many
`railroad bridges that were constructed as part of this enor-
`mous construction effort.
`
`While the railroad initially led to boom years, numerous
`external factors led to the decline of the railroad economy.
`The storm of the century (1935) struck the Florida Keys
`and washed away much of the railroad network. The bridge
`survived, but the railroad could not afford to rebuild the
`entire network. The concrete bridges, such as the Missouri/
`Ohio Historic Bridge, were then widened by placing steel
`beams across them and encasing them with concrete, open-
`ing them to vehicular traffic. In the late 1990s, a new bridge
`was built to replace the 90-year-old Missouri/Ohio Historic
`Bridge.
`
`The Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail (FKOHT) decided
`to restore this bridge and make it part of the planned 60
`mile (96.5 km) long trail. The steel columns had severely
`corroded and the structure became a safety concern. Cracks
`and spalls had to be repaired to restore the structure. Car-
`bon fiber-reinforced polymer rods were embedded in the
`structure to make it safe. This project represents the ideal
`example of sustainability in the construction industry—a
`century-old structure is repurposed after 30 years and, 70
`years later, is remodeled once again to serve a new purpose
`and will be preserved for many more years to come.
`
`Owner
`Florida DEP — Office of
`Greenways & Trails,
`Tallahassee, Florida
`
`Project Engineer/Designer
`Wilson Miller Stantec,
`Tallahassee, Florida
`
`Repair Contractor
`Intron Technologies,
`Inc.,Jacksonville, Florida
`
`Material Supplier/
`Manufacturer
`Sika Corporation
`Lyndhurst, New Jersey
`
`16
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.16
`
`

`

`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE:
`High-Rise Category
`
`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE:
`Special Projects Category
`
`Bellaire Tower — The Jewel of Russian Hill
`San Francisco, California
`
`A Job That Nobody Wanted
`San Francisco, California
`
`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE:
`Low-Rise Category
`
`Baylor Cancer Hospital Concrete
`Strengthening for Collins Family
`Bridge of Hope
`Dallas, Texas
`
`17
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.17
`
`

`

`AWARDS 2010
`
`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE: STRENGTHENING CATEGORY
`
`Camp Verde Wastewater Treatment Plant Repair
`Camp Verde, Arizona
`
`A newly constructed wastewater treatment facility in
`Camp Verde, AZ, was identified as being under designed
`when large cracks formed on two of the concrete walls
`during its initial water test. The 128 x 92.5 ft (39 x 28 m)
`water treatment tank is a reinforced concrete wall and slab
`system comprised of 10 individual cells. The concrete is re-
`inforced with steel reinforcement. The walls are 18 ft
`(5.5 m) tall and some reach an unsupported length of over
`90 ft (27.4 m). The large spans result in high bending forces,
`which must be developed without allowing cracking.
`
`Evaluations of the structure determined that filling the
`tank would overload the structural walls due to insufficient
`horizontal reinforcement at the wall intersections. A con-
`ventional repair method had been previously developed
`using reinforced concrete bolsters at all of the intersecting
`walls and at the wall-to-slab connections. This option was
`extremely costly and would have resulted in a substantial
`reduction to the tank’s capacity.
`A new design build team was tasked with developing an
`alternate strengthening solution that considered the
`strength requirements associated with various deficiencies,
`load conditions, and future operations while maintaining
`the desired volume capacity of the tank, all with minimal
`impact to the construction schedule.
`After weeks of evaluation and design work, the strength-
`ening project was completed in approximately 2 months. At
`several junctures, the project was nearly scrapped, and if
`not for the creative curtailing of the carbon fiber-reinforced
`polymer and the unique application of bolts and steel
`plates, combined with the appropriate use of traditional
`concrete dowels, this project would not have succeeded.
`
`Owner
`Camp Verde Sanitary
`District of Yavapai County
`Camp Verde, Arizona
`
`Project Engineer/Designer
`Structural Technology
`Consultants
`San Diego, California
`
`Repair Contractor
`Truesdell Corporation
`Tempe, Arizona
`
`Material Supplier/
`Manufacturer
`Sika Corporation
`Lyndhurst, New Jersey
`
`18
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.18
`
`

`

`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE:
`High-Rise Category
`
`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE:
`Special Projects Category
`
`Terminal Tower Facade Repairs
`Cleveland, Ohio
`
`SCDNR Marine Resources Research
`Institute Corrosion Mitigation
`Columbia, South Carolina
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Low-Rise Category
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Water Structures Category
`
`Repair of the Sea Vista Condominiums
`South Padre Island, Texas
`
`David L. Tippin Water Treatment Facility
`Rehabilitation
`Tampa, Florida
`
`19
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.19
`
`

`

`AWARDS 2009
`
`AWARD OF MERIT: STRENGTHENING CATEGORY
`
`Rehabilitation of the Pumarejo Bridge
`Colombia, South America
`
`The Pumarejo Bridge is the largest bridge in Colombia,
`South America. Constructed 35 years ago to allow devel-
`opment to the northern region and to link Barranquilla City
`with the eastern shore of the Magdalena River, it was con-
`sidered one of the concrete marvels in the country in 2006
`by the Colombian Ready Mixed Concrete Association.
`
`Located at a distance of 12.4 miles (20 km) from the Carib-
`bean Sea, the Pumarejo Bridge has withstood a harsh envi-
`ronment of marine breeze full of chlorides, which has dete-
`riorated the concrete surface little by little. In addition, the
`strong stream of the Magdalena River (the largest in the
`country) has eroded the concrete surface of the columns
`placed in the water.
`
`The damages comprised spalled concrete in longitudinal
`beams, cap beams, and columns due to the corrosion pro-
`cess inside the structure and a loss of coarse aggregates in
`the concrete of the columns placed in the water due to the
`stream of the river.
`
`The rehabilitation procedure included the with drawal of
`spalled concretes; the cleaning and protection of the steel
`reinforcement bars; the addition of repair mortars; steel
`jacketing of columns; the addition of impregnation corro-
`sion inhibitors; and the application of a protective coating
`over a surface of 538,196 square feet (50,000 square me-
`ters). The total investment was $3 million (U.S.).
`
`Owner
`Instituto Nacional de Vias
`Bogota, Colombia
`
`Project Engineer/Designer
`Consorcio Camacho Gomez
`Bogota, Colombia
`
`Repair Contractor
`Noarco S.A.
`Cartagena, Colombia
`
`Material Supplier/
`Manufacturer
`Sika Colombia
`Tocancipa, Colombia
`
`20
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.20
`
`

`

`AWARD OF MERIT:
`High-Rise Category
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Longevity Category
`
`The LGR Center Renovation of Exterior
`Facade and Structure
`Amherst, Massachusetts
`
`The Renovation of Cassell Coliseum at
`Virginia Polytechnic Institute – 11 Years
`Later
`Blacksburg, Virginia
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Parking Structures Category
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Special Projects Category
`
`Chapel Hill Street Parking Garage Repair
`Durham, North Carolina
`
`Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum
`Roof Repairs
`Phoenix, Arizona
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Special Projects Category
`
`Lake Merritt Boat House Restoration
`Oakland, California
`
`21
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.21
`
`

`

`AWARDS 2008
`
`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE: TRANSPORTATION CATEGORY
`
`Sunshine Skyway Bridge Trestle Span Repairs
`Tampa Bay, Florida
`
`The Sunshine Skyway Bridge is one of the most recognized
`structures in the United States. With its signature bright
`yellow stay cables, the bridge resembles a sailboat, with
`its towers holding up the triangular sails across Tampa
`Bay. At the time of construction, it was the world’s lon-
`gest bridge, having a cable-stay main span with an overall
`length of 5-1/2 miles (8.8 km). The main span is 1200 ft
`(366 m) and the vertical clearance is over 190 ft (58 m).
`
`Shear cracking was observed during routine inspections of
`the trestle span girders. The inspection history indicated
`that the number of cracked beams had increased over
`time. In addition to the deficient AASHTO girders, cracks
`were observed in numerous pier caps. In some cases, these
`cracks were very large and exhibited visible signs of water
`penetration and damage. The shear cracks in the AASHTO
`girders and the pile caps were epoxy injected. All spalls
`were patched using a cementitious repair mortar. All un-
`even surfaces were filled in with a leveling mortar and all
`bugholes and smaller cavities were repaired using an epoxy
`paste. In addition, a clear protective sealer was applied to
`protect the concrete further from moisture and chloride
`intrusion.
`
`The deficient girders also needed to be structurally
`strengthened to carry additional loads. The use of a carbon
`fiber system was chosen to structurally repair the girders.
`By planning out the construction sequence and using a well
`trained work force that had previous experience working
`with CFRP materials, the job was completed one month
`ahead of schedule.
`
`Owner
`Florida DOT
`Tampa, Florida
`
`Project Engineer/Designer
`SDR Engineering Consul-
`tants, Inc.
`Tallahassee, Florida
`
`Repair Contractor
`Intron Technologies, Inc.
`Jacksonville, Florida
`
`Material Suppliers/
`Manufacturers
`Sika Corporation
`Lyndhurst, New Jersey
`University of Florida
`Gainsville, Florida
`
`22
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.22
`
`

`

`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE:
`Parking Structures Category
`
`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE:
`Strengthening Category
`
`Rehabilitation of 55 E. Monroe Street
`Parking Garage
`Chicago, Illinois
`
`Suny Health & Science Center Brooklyn
`Parking Structure Restoration
`Brooklyn, New York
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Historic Category
`
`Restoration of Miami City Hall
`Miami Beach, Florida
`
`23
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.23
`
`

`

`AWARDS 2008
`
`AWARD OF MERIT: LONGEVITY CATEGORY
`
`The Rose Bowl Stadium Restoration
`Pasadena, California
`
`When one thinks of iconic sporting venues in the U.S.,
`there are few that are larger or more historic than the Rose
`Bowl Stadium in Pasadena, CA. Originally built in 1922, the
`original capacity for the stadium was 57,000 people. In
`1930, the wood bleachers were replaced with cast-in-place
`reinforced concrete bleachers with wooden benches. Ad-
`ditional rows at the back of the seating bowl were added
`increasing the capacity up to 80,000 people. Eventually,
`the total capacity of the stadium was increased to over
`100,000 people, but no major repairs were ever made to
`the concrete structure of the stadium itself.
`
`Over years of use and wear and tear, there were a few is-
`sues with the concrete deterioration that needed to be
`addressed. The repair work, which began in March of 1998,
`selected a system approach to repair both the damage
`of the entire concrete surface and the spalls and cracks
`caused by the corrosion of the steel reinforcing in the
`concrete risers and treads. 2008 marks the 10-year anni-
`versary of the Rose Bowl Stadium concrete repair project.
`Over that time, the stadium has continued to be a highly
`visible, greatly used sports arena hosting major sporting
`events such as the 1999 women’s FIFA World Cup final and
`the 2002 and 2006 NCAA BCS college football champion-
`ship games.
`
`After 10 years of use, the repairs that were made to the
`stadium are still standing up to the test of time and other
`than dirt pick up, still look as good today as they did when
`they were made.
`
`Owner
`Rose Bowl Operating
`Company
`Pasadena, California
`
`Project Engineer/Designer
`Wheeler & Gray
`Pasadena, California
`
`Repair Contractor
`Western Waterproofing
`Anaheim, California
`
`Material Suppliers/
`Manufacturers
`Sika Corporation
`Lyndhurst, New Jersey
`
`24
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.24
`
`

`

`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Parking Structures Category
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Special Projects Category
`
`Repair and Waterproofing of Parking
`Deck at UPS
`New York, New York
`
`Original Philadelphia School Bus Parking
`and Repair Facility
`Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Strengthening Category
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Strengthening Category
`
`Rehabilitation and Seismic Retrofit
`of Residencias Galileo
`Caracas, Venezuela
`
`Strengthening of Two Bridges
`in Bogota City
`Bogota City, Colombia
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Water Structures Category
`
`Repairs to the Morris Sheppard Dam and
`Powerhouse at Possum Kingdom Lake
`Graford, Texas
`
`25
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.25
`
`

`

`AWARDS 2007
`
`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE: WATER STRUCTURES CATEGORY
`
`Concrete Restoration of three Underground Water
`Storage Tanks
`Boston, Massachusetts
`
`The water storage tanks, with an approximate capacity of
`225,000 galons (851,718l) each, were constructed in the
`mid-1980s. They are located three stories below-grade
`beneath a ten-story building in Boston. The tanks consist
`of concrete walls, base slab, and mid-height level concrete
`beam grids. Historically, the tanks had been used to store
`clean water for use by the building’s mechanical air condi-
`tioning equipment. Each tank was leaking thousands of gal-
`lons every day, causing concern about the possible under-
`mining of the structure.
`Examination of the tanks revealed delamination of a crys-
`talline parge coat applied during an earlier repair attempt.
`The coating was flaking off the surface of the concrete. Re-
`flective cracking through the waterproof coating was wide-
`spread. Exposed wire mesh reinforcement was observed at
`column and beam locations. There was widespread cracking
`of the surface, with multiple spalls and delaminated con-
`crete at structural steel wide-flange columns. A cementi-
`tious paste appeared to have leached from the bottom of
`several wall cracks. Due to the amount of surface loss to
`the concrete, it was decided to apply resurfacing mortar to
`the entire surface of the tank interior, overlaid with a fiber-
`glass reinforced epoxy coating.
`Access limitations, including “confined access” require-
`ments, presented logistical and manpower issues. A variety
`of different products required a contractor experienced
`with several different waterproofing techniques. The
`success of the project has been highlighted by no loss of
`water and was only achievable by having a team approach
`between the engineer, owner, and the contractor.
`
`Owner
`Division of Capital Asset
`Management
`Boston, Massachusetts
`
`Project Engineer/
`Designer
`Gale Associates, Inc.
`Weymouth, Massachusetts
`
`Repair Contractor
`Architectural Building &
`Restoration
`Boston, Massachusetts
`
`Material Supplier/
`Manufacturer
`Sika Corporation
`Scituate, Rhode Island
`
`26
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.26
`
`

`

`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Special Projects Category
`
`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE:
`Low-Rise Category
`
`Arizona State University Sun Devil
`Stadium Repairs
`Tempe, Arizona
`
`Marriott Frenchman’s Reef and
`Morningstar Beach Resort Balcony Repairs
`St.Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
`
`AWARD OF MERIT:
`Low-Rise Category
`
`United States Air Force Harmon Hall
`Repair Project
`Colorado Springs, Colorado
`
`27
`
`REFURBISHMENT
`ICRI AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS 1998 – 2013
`
`Metromont Ex-1021, p.27
`
`

`

`AWARDS 2007
`
`AWARD OF EXCELLENCE: HISTORIC CATEGORY
`
`Bok Tower Restoration
`Lake Wales, Florida
`
`Bok Tower was constructed between 1927 and 1929 and
`houses a 60-bell carillon (set of tuned bells). The tower is
`205 ft (62 m) tall, has seven floors, and is constructed of
`a masonry-encased steel frame. On August 21, 1972, Bok
`Tower was listed as a National Historic Landmark and with
`the National Register of Historic Places.
`
`Cracks developed in the coquina brick, largely in the areas
`of the spandrel beams. Highly distressed areas showed
`signs of bowing or displacement from the beam and ma-
`sonry backup. In some cases the coquina brick had failed
`completely, creating a dangerous condition.
`
`Corrosion of horizontal structural steel members caused
`the coquina brick and underlying masonry to separate from
`the tower. The primary areas of concern for corrosion were
`the top plate on the horizontal beams and the intersec-
`tion between the columns and beams. A secondary but
`still important consideration was the full perimeter of the
`spandrel beams including the variable corrosion condition
`of the web and exposed flanges.
`
`To address the corrosion and preserve the appearance of
`this historic landmark, the coquina brick was stripped and
`rebuilt around the spandrel beams and an impressed cur-
`rent cathodic protection system was installed using a dis-
`crete anode system and advanced network management
`and cont

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket