throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`In re Patent of: Walter G. Mayfield, et al.
`U.S. Patent No.:
`10,589,320 Attorney Docket No.: 50095-0031IP1
`Issue Date:
`March 17, 2020
`
`Appl. Serial No.: 16/698,223
`
`Filing Date:
`November 27, 2019
`
`Title:
`SYSTEM COMPRISING A PORTABLE SWITCHING
`DEVICE FOR USE WITH A PORTABLE ELECTRONIC
`DEVICE
`
`
`
`Mail Stop Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF UNITED STATES PATENT
`NO. 10,589,320 PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. §§ 311–319, 37 C.F.R. § 42
`
`
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`REQUIREMENTS FOR IPR—37 C.F.R. § 42.104 ........................................ 1
`A. Standing—37 C.F.R. § 42.104(a) ............................................................. 1
`B. The Challenge and Relief Requested—37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b) ................ 1
`SUMMARY OF THE ’320 PATENT ............................................................. 3
`A. Brief Description ....................................................................................... 3
`B. Claimed Subject Matter ............................................................................ 4
`C. Prosecution History ................................................................................... 5
`III. LEVEL OF ORDINARY SKILL .................................................................... 6
`IV. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................ 6
`V.
`THE CHALLENGED CLAIMS ARE UNPATENTABLE ............................ 7
`A. GROUND 1A—Gundlach and Lee render claims 1, 2, 8, 9, and 11
`obvious. ..................................................................................................... 7
`1. Overview of Gundlach .................................................................... 7
`2. Overview of Lee ............................................................................ 10
`3.
`The Gundlach-Lee Combination ................................................... 12
`4.
`Element-by-Element Analysis ....................................................... 17
`B. GROUND 1B—Grundlach, Lee, and Nishikawa render claims 2 and 8
`obvious. ................................................................................................... 48
`1. Overview of Nishikawa ................................................................. 48
`2.
`The Gundlach-Lee-Nishikawa Combination ................................ 49
`3.
`Element-By-Element Analysis ...................................................... 49
`C. GROUND 1C—Gundlach, Lee, and Rosener render claim 11 obvious.
`
`50
`1. Overview of Rosener ..................................................................... 50
`2.
`The Gundlach-Lee-Rosener Combination .................................... 51
`3.
`Element-by-Element Analysis ....................................................... 52
`D. GROUND 1D—Gundlach, Lee, and Brown render claims 3 and 7
`obvious. ................................................................................................... 53
`1. Overview of Brown ....................................................................... 53
`2.
`The Gundlach-Lee-Brown Combination ....................................... 54
`3.
`Element-by-Element Analysis ....................................................... 56
`E. GROUND 1E—Gundlach, Lee, and Mak-Fan render claims 4, 5, 10, 12,
`and 13 obvious. ....................................................................................... 58
`1. Overview of Mak-Fan ................................................................... 58
`2.
`The Gundlach-Lee-Mak-Fan Combination ................................... 59
`3.
`Element-by-Element Analysis ....................................................... 62
`
`i
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`F. GROUND 2A—Gundlach, Lee, and Kim render claims 1, 2, 8, 9, and
`11 obvious. .............................................................................................. 65
`1. Overview of Kim ........................................................................... 66
`2.
`The Gundlach-Lee-Kim Combination .......................................... 66
`3.
`Element-by-Element Analysis ....................................................... 68
`G. GROUND 2B—Gundlach, Lee, Kim, and Nishikawa render claims 2
`and 8 obvious. ......................................................................................... 69
`H. GROUND 2C—Gundlach, Lee, Kim, and Rosener render claim 11
`obvious. ................................................................................................... 69
`I. GROUND 2D—Gundlach, Lee, Kim, and Brown render claims 3 and 7
`obvious. ................................................................................................... 70
`J. GROUND 2E— Gundlach, Lee, Kim, and Mak-Fan render claims 4, 5,
`10, 12, and 13 obvious. ........................................................................... 70
`VI. DISCRETION SHOULD NOT PRECLUDE INSTITUTION ..................... 71
`A. Relevant Facts ......................................................................................... 71
`B. The Advanced Bionics Test Favors Institution—§ 325(d) ..................... 73
`C. The General Plastic Factors Favor Institution—§ 314(a) ....................... 73
`1.
`Factor 1: Petitioner Apple and Samsung Are Separate, Unrelated
`Petitioners ...................................................................................... 74
`Factors 2 & 4: Petitioner Apple Filed This Petition Promptly
`Following Samsung’s Petition, After Searching Revealed the
`Applied Art .................................................................................... 75
`Factor 3: This Petition Does Not Implicate Road-Mapping
`Concerns ........................................................................................ 76
`Factor 5: Petitioner Diligently Prepared Its Petition in the
`Intervening Month ......................................................................... 76
`Factors 6 and 7: Institution would Efficiently Promote Patent
`Quality ........................................................................................... 76
`6. Additional Factor: Institution Denial would Potentially Prejudice
`Petitioner ....................................................................................... 77
`D. The Fintiv Factors Favor Institution—§ 314(a) ..................................... 77
`1.
`Factor 1: Either Party May Request Stay ...................................... 77
`2.
`Factor 2: With No Set Trial Date, The Board’s Final Written
`Decision Will Likely Issue Many Months in Advance of Trial .... 78
`Factor 3: Petitioner’s Diligence and Investment in IPR Outweighs
`the Parties’ Minimal Investment in Litigation .............................. 79
`Factor 4: The Petition’s Grounds Are Materially Different From
`Any That Might Be Raised in Litigation ....................................... 80
`Factor 5: Institution Would Promote Judicial Efficiency ............. 81
`
`5.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`ii
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`Factor 6: The Merits of this Petition Strongly Favor Institution .. 81
`6.
`VII. PAYMENT OF FEES—37 C.F.R. § 42.103 ................................................. 82
`VIII. MANDATORY NOTICES—37 C.F.R § 42.8(a)(1) .................................... 82
`A. Real Party-In-Interest—37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1) ...................................... 82
`B. Related Matters—37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2) ............................................... 82
`C. Lead And Back-Up Counsel—37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3) ........................... 83
`D. Service Information ................................................................................ 83 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iii
`
`

`

`APPLE-1001
`APPLE-1002
`APPLE-1003
`APPLE-1004
`APPLE-1005
`APPLE-1006
`APPLE-1007
`APPLE-1008
`APPLE-1009
`APPLE-1010
`APPLE-1011
`APPLE-1012
`APPLE-1013
`APPLE-1014
`APPLE-1015
`APPLE-1016
`APPLE-1017
`APPLE-1018
`APPLE-1019
`APPLE-1020
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`
`EXHIBITS
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320 to Walter G. Mayfield, et al.
`Excerpts from the Prosecution History of the ’320 patent
`Declaration of Dr. Jeremy Cooperstock
`Reserved
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0132293 to Gundlach, et al.
`U.S. Patent No. 7,548,040 to Lee, et al.
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2011/0117851 to Kim
`U.S. Patent No. 7,631,811 to Brown
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2009/0124308
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0012706 to Mak-Fan, et al.
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/515,752
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/555,310
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/561,087
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/568,031
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/569,093
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/576,834
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/592,344
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/619,229
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/661,090
`
`Wireless charging mats and receivers for your iPhone, iPod,
`BlackBerry and other devices, Powermat,
`https://web.archive.org/web/20110103055034/http://www.powe
`rmat.com/
`
`iv
`
`

`

`APPLE-1021
`
`APPLE-1022
`
`APPLE-1023
`APPLE-1024
`APPLE-1025
`
`APPLE-1026
`APPLE-1027
`APPLE-1028
`
`APPLE-1029
`APPLE-1030
`APPLE-1031
`
`APPLE-1032
`
`APPLE-1033
`APPLE-1034
`
`APPLE-1035
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`
`Palm | HP® Official Store,
`https://web.archive.org/.../http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp
`/shopping/can.do?storeName=accessories&landing=handheld&
`category=categories&subcat1=palm&orderflow=1&sort=top_se
`llers
`Palm Touchstone Kit Review,
`http://www.palminfocenter.com/news/9819/palm-touchstone-
`kit-review/
`U.S. Pat. No. 7,211,986
`U.S. Publication. No. 2008/0085617
`Newton’s Telecom Dictionary (26th Expanded and Updated
`Edition) (excerpt)
`Chambers Dictionary of Science and Technology (excerpt)
`U.S. Publication No. 2008/0152182
`Lecture 10: Magnetic Force; Magnetic Fields; Ampere’s Law,
`Massachusetts Institute of Technology—Department of Physics
`(8.022 Spring 2004)
`U.S. Pat. No. 7,627,289
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,076,790
`
`Inclusive design and human factors: designing mobile phones
`for older users (Vol. 4, No. 3), PsychNology Journal
`Inductive Power Transmission, Wireless Power Consortium,
`https://web.archive.org/...b/20110821051544/http://www.wirele
`sspowerconsortium.com/technology/basic-principle-of-
`inductive-power-transmission.html
`U.S. Publication No. 2011/0151941
`AUDIO/VIDEO REMOTE CONTROL PROFILE (Version 1.0
`Adopted), Bluetooth Audio Video Working Group
`U.S. Publication No. 2006/0166715
`
`v
`
`

`

`APPLE-1036
`APPLE-1037
`APPLE-1038
`
`APPLE-1039
`APPLE-1040
`APPLE-1041
`
`APPLE-1042
`APPLE-1043
`APPLE-1044
`APPLE-1045
`
`APPLE-1046
`APPLE-1047
`APPLE-1048
`APPLE-1049
`
`APPLE-1050
`APPLE-1051
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`U.S. Publication No. 2008/0070501
`U.S. Pat. No. 7,761,091
`Voyager 855 Bluetooth Headset—User Guide, Plantronics
`Sound Innovation
`Jabra Sport—User Manual, Jabra
`Plantronics Discovery 975—User Guide, Plantronics
`Plantronics Discovery 975 Storage Case & Charger 79413-02,
`https://web.archive.org/web/20101124231910/https://headsetpl
`us.com/product1200/product_info.html
`U.S. Pat. No. 7,012,802
`U.S. Publication No. 2008/0167088
`U.S. Publication No. 2008/0157110
`Advantages and Weaknesses of LED Application, LEDinside,
`https://web.archive.org/web/20121102080414/https://www.ledi
`nside.com/knowledge/2007/12/Advantages_and_weaknesses_o
`f_LED_Application_200712
`U.S. Publication No. 2007/0135185
`U.S. Pat. No. 7,130,654
`U.S. Publication No. 2008/0132168
`Plastics in Electrical and Electronic Applications, BPF: British
`Plastics Federation,
`https://web.archive.org/web/20110811172429/https://www.bpf.
`co.uk/innovation/plastics_in_electrical_and_electronic_applicat
`ions.aspx
`U.S. Publication No. 2008/0076489 to Rosener, et al.
`Next-Generation Stereo Bluetooth Headsets, TechHive,
`https://www.techhive.com/article/162341/stereo_bluetooth_hea
`dsets.html
`
`vi
`
`

`

`APPLE-1052
`APPLE-1053
`APPLE-1054
`
`APPLE-1055
`APPLE-1056
`
`APPLE-1057
`
`APPLE-1058
`
`APPLE-1059
`APPLE-1060
`APPLE-1061
`APPLE-1062
`APPLE-1063
`APPLE-1064
`APPLE-1065
`APPLE-1066
`
`APPLE-1067
`
`APPLE-1068
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`Motorola Elite Sliver—User Guide, Motorola
`U.S. Publication No. 2011/0199727
`Magnetic Closures For Packaging, Adams Magnetic Products,
`https://www.adamsmagnetic.com/blogs/magnet-blog-magnets-
`packaging-closures
`U.S. Pat. No. 3,716,091
`MacBook Air shells and sleeves Review, Macworld,
`https://web.archive.org/web/20120403022106/https://www.mac
`world.com/article/1134919/airshellsleeve.html
`
`Applications for Hall Effect IC Switches in Portable
`Applications, ROHM Semiconductor
`ASTM Dictionary of Engineering Science & Technology (10th
`Edition), ASTM Committee E02 on Terminology (excerpt)
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0145255 to Nishikawa, et al.
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2011/0167287
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0168286
`U.S. Patent No. 7,195,362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,064,194
`EP Patent Publication No. 0 517 497
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2010/0195860
`Plugfones.com,
`https://web.archive.org/web/20110820072700/https://www.plug
`fones.com/
`CES: Hands On with the Kleer Wireless Earbuds, Gadget Lab |
`WIRED,
`https://web.archive.org/web/20140721204820/http://www.wire
`d.com/2007/01/ces_hands_on_wi/
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2006/0111044
`
`vii
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`
`APPLE-1101
`
`APPLE-1102
`
`APPLE-1103
`
`APPLE-1104
`
`APPLE-1105
`
`Reserved
`APPLE-1069-1099
`APPLE-1100
`Complaint for Patent Infringement, GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`D/B/A Gwee v. Apple Inc., Case No. 4:20-cv-02652 (SDTX)
`Complaint for Patent Infringement, GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`D/B/A Gwee v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd, et al., Case No.
`4:20-cv-02624 (SDTX)
`Joint Motion to Consolidate, GUI Global Products, Ltd. D/B/A
`Gwee v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd, et al., Case No. 4:20-cv-
`02624 (SDTX)
`Response to Joint Motion to Consolidate, GUI Global
`Products, Ltd. D/B/A Gwee v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd, et
`al., Case No. 4:20-cv-02624 (SDTX)
`Order re Joint Motion to Consolidate, GUI Global Products,
`Ltd. D/B/A Gwee v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd, et al., Case
`No. 4:20-cv-02624 (SDTX)
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the
`Northern District of California, GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`D/B/A Gwee v. Apple Inc., Case No. 4:20-cv-02652 (SDTX)
`Defendant Samsung’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the
`Northern District of California, GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`D/B/A Gwee v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd, et al., Case No.
`4:20-cv-02624 (SDTX)
`Joint Submission Regarding Agreed and Non-Agreed
`Scheduling Dates, GUI Global Products, Ltd. D/B/A Gwee v.
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd, et al., Case No. 4:20-cv-02624
`(SDTX)
`Amended Scheduling Order, GUI Global Products, Ltd. D/B/A
`Gwee v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd, et al., Case No. 4:20-cv-
`02624 (SDTX)
`Stipulation by Apple Inc.
`
`APPLE-1109
`
`APPLE-1106
`
`APPLE-1107
`
`APPLE-1108
`
`viii
`
`

`

`APPLE-1110
`
`APPLE-1111
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`Transcript of Discovery Hearing, GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`D/B/A Gwee v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd, et al., Case No.
`4:20-cv-02624 (SDTX)
`SDTX 2011 Onward – Time to Milestones Search, Docket
`Navigator
`
`ix
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`
`Apple Inc. (“Petitioner”) petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”) of claims
`
`1-5 and 7-13 (“the Challenged Claims”) of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320 (“the ’320
`
`patent”).
`
`I.
`
`REQUIREMENTS FOR IPR—37 C.F.R. § 42.104
`A.
`Standing—37 C.F.R. § 42.104(a)
`Petitioner certifies that the ’320 patent is available for IPR and Petitioner is
`
`not barred or estopped from requesting IPR on the grounds identified below.
`
`B.
`The Challenge and Relief Requested—37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)
`Petitioner requests IPR of the Challenged Claims on the grounds listed below.
`
`A declaration from Dr. Jeremy Cooperstock (APPLE-1003) supports this Petition.
`
`Ground
`1A
`
`1B
`
`1C
`
`1D
`
`1E
`
`2A
`
`2B
`
`Basis
`Claims 1, 2, 8, 9, 11 are obvious in view of US 2008/0132293
`(“Gundlach”; APPLE-1005), US 7,548,040 (“Lee”; APPLE-1006)
`Claims 2 and 8 are obvious in view of Gundlach, Lee, US
`2007/0145255 (“Nishikawa”; APPLE-1059)
`Claim 11 is obvious in view of Gundlach, Lee, US 2008/0076489
`(“Rosener”; APPLE-1050)
`Claims 3, 7 are obvious in view of Gundlach, Lee, US 7,631,811
`(“Brown”; APPLE-1008)
`Claims 4, 5, 10, 12, 13 are obvious in view of Gundlach, Lee, US
`2008/0012706 (“Mak-Fan”; APPLE-1010)
`Claims 1, 2, 8, 9, 11 are obvious in view of Gundlach, Lee, US
`2011/0117851 (“Kim”; APPLE-1007)
`Claims 2 and 8 are obvious in view of Gundlach, Lee, Kim,
`Nishikawa
`
`1
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`
`Ground
`2C
`2D
`2E
`
`Basis
`Claim 11 is obvious in view of Gundlach, Lee, Kim, Rosener
`Claims 3, 7 are obvious in view of Gundlach, Lee, Kim, Brown
`Claims 4, 5, 10, 12, 13 are obvious in view of Gundlach, Lee, Kim,
`Mak-Fan
`
`As shown below, each reference pre-dates the ’320 patent’s earliest
`
`proclaimed priority date (August 5, 2011; “Critical Date”), which Petitioner does not
`
`concede.
`
`Reference
`Gundlach
`(APPLE-1005)
`Lee
`(APPLE-1006)
`Kim
`(APPLE-1007)
`Brown
`(APPLE-1008)
`Nishikawa
`(APPLE-1059)
`Rosener
`(APPLE-1050)
`Mak-Fan
`(APPLE-1010)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Filing
`
`Publication
`
`Status
`
`Sep. 6, 2007
`
`Jun. 5, 2008
`
`§ 102(b)
`
`Jul. 28, 2006
`
`Jun. 16, 2009
`
`§ 102(b)
`
`Nov. 12, 2010 May 19, 2011
`
`§ 102(e)
`
`Oct. 4, 2007 Dec. 15, 2009
`
`§ 102(b)
`
`Dec. 20, 2006
`
`Jun. 28, 2007
`
`§ 102(b)
`
`Aug. 7, 2006 Mar. 27, 2008
`
`§ 102(b)
`
`Jul. 12, 2006
`
`Jan. 17, 2008
`
`§ 102(b)
`
`2
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`
`II.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE ’320 PATENT
`A. Brief Description
`The ’320 patent traces its lineage back to the disclosures of nine provisional
`
`applications filed between August 2011 and June 2012. Eight of those provisional
`
`applications are directed to embodiments of a “cleaning device” for view screens.
`
`(See APPLE-1011-APPLE-1019; APPLE-1001, 3:58-67.) The single remaining
`
`provisional application discloses embodiments of a “switching device” for
`
`activating/deactivating a magnetic switch of a portable electronic device. (See
`
`APPLE-1016, p.8.) This “switching device” provisional disclosure is what most
`
`closely resembles the ’320 patent’s claimed subject matter. (See, e.g., APPLE-1001,
`
`21:37-39.)
`
`The ’320 patent describes “a switching device for use with a portable
`
`electronic device having...at least one switch that can be activated or de-activated.”
`
`(APPLE-1001, 4:1-7; APPLE-1003, ¶¶21-25.) As one example, the switch of the
`
`portable electronic device can be activated/deactivated “by introducing a magnetic
`
`field to the at least one switch” via a magnet in the switching device. (Id.)
`
`Figure 24 (below) is a front view of a switching device 2401 and a portable
`
`electronic device 2402 discussed in the ’320 patent. (Id., 18:6-31.)
`
`3
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`
`
`
`The switching device 2401 “is selectively coupled to the front of the portable
`
`electronic device 2402”; and the electronic device 2402 includes a magnetic switch
`
`2404 that is activated/deactivated by the switching device 2401 . (Id., 18:7-18;
`
`17:55-59, 20:14-16.) In one embodiment, activation/deactivation of the switch
`
`causes the device to turn on/off. (Id., 17:55-59.)
`
`B. Claimed Subject Matter
`The ’320 patent’s claims are directed to a “system” comprising a “portable
`
`switching device coupled to a portable electronic device.” As recited in Claim 1,
`
`“the switching device includes a lid...[that] is recessed to configure to the electronic
`
`device,” such that “[a] first case [of the switching device] functions to protect [a]
`
`second case [of the electronic device].” Claim 1 also specifies, inter alia, that “the
`
`portable switching device is configured to activate, deactivate, or send into
`
`4
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`hibernation the portable electronic device.” Claim 11 further narrows Claim 1 to a
`
`configuration where “the electronic device is wireless earplugs.”
`
`Claim 11 therefore implicates a protective case (switching device) for wireless
`
`earplugs (electronic device), where the case is configured to activate/deactivate the
`
`earplugs. But the ’320 patent does not describe, or even suggest, such an
`
`embodiment. And it appears Patent Owner only attempted to pursue claims to a case
`
`for earplugs after Petitioner’s Apple AirPods—the product line named in Patent
`
`Owner’s
`
`infringement allegations 1 —popularized “true wireless earbuds.”
`
`Regardless, the aspects of a protective earplugs case recited in the ’320 patent’s
`
`Challenged Claims were already known to those of skill in the pre-existing wireless
`
`headset art, as detailed below in Section V with reference to Gundlach, Lee, and
`
`other complementary publications.
`
`C.
`Prosecution History
`The ’320 patent was filed on November 27, 2019 as U.S. Appl. No.
`
`16/698,223 (“the ’223 application”). (APPLE-1002, p.92.) The ’223 application
`
`was accompanied by a Petition to Make Special Based on Age, which was duly
`
`granted. (Id., pp.84-85, 157.) With prioritized examination, the ’223 application
`
`received a first action just two months later on January 29, 2020. (Id., pp.17-24.)
`
`
`1 See generally APPLE-1100, ¶¶17-46.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`The action was a Notice of Allowance immediately endorsing the as-filed claims
`
`without substantive analysis. (Id.) The Examiner simply stated in conclusory
`
`fashion that: “Claims 1-13 are considered to be allowable because the prior art of
`
`record neither anticipates nor renders obvious the limitations of base claim 1.” (Id.,
`
`p.22.)
`
`III. LEVEL OF ORDINARY SKILL
`A person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the ’320 patent (a
`
`“POSITA”) would have had at least a Bachelor’s degree in an academic area
`
`emphasizing electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, or a similar discipline,
`
`and at least two years of experience in the field working with electronic devices.
`
`(APPLE-1003, ¶20.) Superior education could compensate for a deficiency in work
`
`experience, and vice-versa. Id.
`
`IV. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`Based on the well-established principal that “claim terms need only be
`
`construed to the extent necessary to resolve the controversy,” no express
`
`constructions are required to institute review and find the Challenged Claims
`
`unpatentable. Wellman, Inc. v. Eastman Chem. Co., 642 F.3d 1355, 1361 (Fed. Cir.
`
`2011). As discussed throughout Section V, the Challenged Claims are obvious under
`
`any reasonable interpretation.
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`V. THE CHALLENGED CLAIMS ARE UNPATENTABLE
`A. GROUND 1A—Gundlach and Lee render claims 1, 2, 8, 9,
`and 11 obvious.
`1. Overview of Gundlach
`Gundlach discloses a variety of expandable/collapsible wireless headset
`
`embodiments having “relatively thin shape[s] [that] may allow the headset[s] to be
`
`stored and charged in a portable cradle….” (APPLE-1005, [0003], [0005], [0055-
`
`0056]; see also APPLE-1003, ¶¶26-30.)
`
`Gundlach describes one example of a wireless headset with reference to
`
`Figure 1 (below). (See APPLE-1005, [0058].) Gundlach’s wireless headset 100
`
`includes a housing 101 for supporting functional components, including a
`
`microphone 102 and a speaker 105 directing sound through an earpiece 104. (Id.)
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`The housing 101 further supports “a transceiver 106 for sending and receiving
`
`information 108 from a host device 110, such as a computer, a cell phone or a media
`
`player,” and a power source 111 in the form of a rechargeable battery. (Id.)
`
`Gundlach’s Figures 2a-2d (below) provide perspective, front, bottom, and top
`
`views of a wireless headset 200, highlighting its compact design.
`
`Figures 3a-3b (below) illustrate expanded and collapsed states of Gundlach’s
`
`wireless headset 300. (APPLE-1005, [0055-0056], [0060].)
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`Gundlach broadly notes that the wireless headset can be “stored and charged
`
`in a portable cradle,” such as “a holder, clip, case or card.” (APPLE-1005, [0056].)
`
`Gundlach discloses a variety of cradles with embedded magnets and/or mechanical
`
`elements for retaining a wireless headset. (E.g., id., [0068], [0073], [0075], Figures
`
`10a-19b.) As one example, in Figures 18a-18b (below) the “portable cradle” is a
`
`clamshell case 1860 that retains the wireless headset 1800 within a contoured recess
`
`1846 in one of two opposing lids. (Id., [0080].)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`
`2. Overview of Lee
`Similar to Gundlach, Lee “relates to wireless battery charging of wireless
`
`headphones/headsets.” (APPLE-1006, 3:21-22, 1:14-29; APPLE-1003, ¶¶31-34.)
`
`While Gundlach was more concerned with the physical form of the wireless headset
`
`and charging case, Lee sought improvements relating to energy transfer. (Id., 1:62-
`
`2:2, 3:17-20.)
`
`Figures 5 and 18 (below) illustrate Lee’s solution: “[t]he power source 200
`
`provides energy via a conductive means 202 to a power adapter 201,” and “[t]he
`
`power adapter 201 provides power to the wireless headphone/headset apparatus 204
`
`via non-conductive means 203, typically inductive coupling.” (APPLE-1006, 3:32-
`
`37.) Notably, and consistent with Gundlach, Lee’s “power adapter” is illustrated in
`
`certain embodiments as a protective charging case. (Id., 6:31-38.)
`
`Lee provides more detail about its inductive charging solution with reference
`
`to Figure 12 (below). As shown, energy transferred to the headset apparatus 460 is
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`received by an energy collection element 465 via inductive coupling 461. (APPLE-
`
`1006, 4:51-57.) Energy received by collection element 465 is converted from AC
`
`voltage to DC voltage by rectifier 464 and filtered using an energy storage capacitor
`
`469 en route to a battery charging circuit 462 that provides the proper voltage to the
`
`battery 463. (Id., 4:59-5:66.)
`
`Recognizing that “audio distortion” may occur when the energy collection
`
`element 465, a speaker transducer coil, is connected to the above-discussed charging
`
`components, Lee provides an isolation switch 470. (APPLE-1006, 5:12-26.)
`
`Closing switch 470 places the headset apparatus 460 in a “charging mode” and
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`opening switch 470 places headset apparatus 460 in a “non-charging mode.” (Id.)
`
`Operation of switch 470 occurs either automatically when the power adapter is
`
`“sense[d]” near the headset apparatus 460, or in response to a wireless control signal
`
`from the power adapter. (Id., 5:30-40.)
`
`3.
`The Gundlach-Lee Combination
`Gundlach teaches a variety of embodiments featuring “a wireless mono or
`
`stereo headset” that is “stored and charged” in a “portable cradle.” (APPLE-1005,
`
`[0055].) But beyond noting that “[t]he case may contain...charging circuitry” and
`
`“electrical contacts,” Gundlach is largely unconcerned with implementation details
`
`of charging. (APPLE-1005, [0069], [0073], [0079]-[0080]; APPLE-1003, ¶35.) For
`
`example, although a POSITA would have found it obvious that Gundlach’s wireless
`
`headset includes “an electronic circuit that is responsive to the” portable cradle
`
`([1d]), Gundlach does not expressly describe the manner in which the headset’s
`
`“charging circuitry” responds when placed in the cradle for charging.
`
`A POSITA considering Gundlach, and noting its limited disclosure on
`
`charging, would have seen a need for elaboration and description of design options.
`
`(APPLE-1003, ¶35.) In seeking a supplement to Gundlach, the POSITA would have
`
`encountered Lee’s disclosure on charging in the familiar context of wireless
`
`headsets. (Id.)
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`Like Gundlach, Lee also discloses multiple embodiments for storing and
`
`charging a wireless headset in a protective case. (E.g., APPLE-1006, 3:32-37, 3:50-
`
`62, 6:31-38.) Although otherwise similar, one notable distinction between Gundlach
`
`and Lee is the technology used to effect charging. (APPLE-1003, ¶¶36-37.) The
`
`embodiments described in Gundlach include electrical contacts for conductive
`
`charging, while Lee’s charging case and headset employ inductive charging.
`
`(Compare APPLE-1005, [0066], [0069], [0073], [0079] with APPLE-1006, 3:32-37,
`
`3:50-62, 4:11-5:40.) A POSITA motivated to combine Gundlach and Lee (for at
`
`least the reasons below) would have done so by exchanging the conductive charging
`
`components hinted at by Gundlach with the more thoroughly explained inductive
`
`charging components of Lee. (APPLE-1003, ¶37.) These modifications would have
`
`been well within a POSITA’s skill. (Id., ¶38.)
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`The resulting Gundlach-Lee combination (diagrammed above 2 ) would
`
`facilitate inductive charging in the manner described by Lee. (APPLE-1003, ¶39.)
`
`As discussed (see Section V.A.2), when the isolation switch (Lee’s element 470) is
`
`closed, the battery charging circuit (Lee’s element 462) in the headset is activated to
`
`provide energy to the battery at the proper voltage for charging (Lee’s element 463).
`
`(Id.)
`
`A POSITA would have been amply motivated to pursue the above-discussed
`
`Gundlach-Lee combination. First, a POSITA would have recognized inductive
`
`charging as a suitable alternative to conductive charging that was known to produce
`
`similar results. (APPLE-1003, ¶¶40-41 (citing APPLE-1020; APPLE-1021,
`
`APPLE-1022).) The routine design process of a POSITA developing a headset and
`
`charging case in view of Gundlach would have, therefore, contemplated an inductive
`
`charging solution like Lee’s. (Id.)
`
`Second, given Gundlach and Lee’s clear similarities—i.e., both disclose a
`
`charging case for a wireless headset—a POSITA would have appreciated that the
`
`benefits of inductive charging disclosed by Lee, such as enhanced reliability, would
`
`apply to Gundlach’s embodiments. (APPLE-1003, ¶¶42-43 (citing APPLE-1006,
`
`
`2 Petitioner provides this visual aid for the Board’s convenience. In doing so,
`
`Petitioner does not intend to represent a bodily incorporation of Lee with Gundlach.
`
`14
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0031IP1
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320
`
`1:62-2:2; APPLE-1023).)
`
`Third, a POSITA would have appreciated that Lee’s inductive charging
`
`solution was consistent with Gundlach’s goal of providing a compact form factor.
`
`(APPLE-1003, ¶44 (citing APPLE-1005, [0056-0057] (noting the headset’s
`
`“relatively thin shape”)).) Lee, for example, utilized a single coil for both audio
`
`transmission and inductive charging, which avoided unnecessary bulk and achieved
`
`“a reduction of size and weight.” (Id. (citing APPLE-1006, 2:62-66, 4:55-57, Figure
`
`12; APPLE-1029).)
`
`Fourth, a POSITA would have viewed Lee’s inductive charging solution as
`
`providing yet another advantage to Gundlach’s wireless headset—i.e., charger
`
`interoperability absent the added bulk of a standardized connection (e.g., USB).
`
`(APPLE-1003, ¶45 (citing APPLE-1005, [0066]; APPLE-1006, Figures 16, 18, 19).)
`
`By employing Lee’s space-efficient dual-purpose coil for inductive charging in the
`
`context of Gundlach, the wireless headset could be recharged using other types of
`
`chargers (e.g., a charging pad) beyond the clamshell case without the size penalty of
`
`additional hardware. (Id.)
`
`This predictable combination of Gundlach and Lee renders obvious each and
`
`every feat

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket