throbber
[CANCER RESEARCH 50, 5269-5274. September 1. 1990]
`
`Tiazofurin Is Phosphorylated
`Cells1
`
`by Three Enzymes from Chinese Hamster Ovary
`
`Priscilla P. Saunders,2 Christy D. Spindler, Mei-Tao Tan, Esperanza Alvarez, and Roland K. Robins
`
`Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 [P. P. S., C. D. S., M-T. T., E. A.], and Nucleic Acid
`Research Institute, Costa Mesa, California 92626 [R. K. RJ
`
`to these agents.
`kinase deficient cell lines are highly resistant
`Studies have shown, however,
`that a deficiency of adenosine
`kinase does not render CHO cells resistant
`to tiazofurin (9).
`Human lymphoblastoid cells phosphorylate
`tiazofurin via aden
`osine kinase and another enzyme,
`tentatively identified as 5'-
`nucleotidase (15). Recent data from this laboratory have indi
`cated that,
`in CHO cells, another unusual nucleoside, 3-deaza
`guanosine, can be phosphorylated
`by a nicotinamide
`ribonucle
`oside kinase (16) that also demonstrated
`some activity with
`tiazofurin.
`In this communication we describe the phosphoryl
`ation of tiazofurin by this enzyme, as well as by two others.
`Physical
`separation
`of the three cellular enzymes capable of
`catalyzing this reaction, adenosine kinase, nicotinamide
`ribo
`nucleoside kinase, and 5'-nucleotidase,
`is demonstrated.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The growth inhibitory activity of tiazofurin toward adenosine kinase
`deficient Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells was partially reversed by
`the presence of nicotinamide riboside. Similarly,
`the formation of tiazo
`furin 5'-monophosphate
`and the active metabolite,
`tiazofurin 5'-adenine
`dinucleotide could be partially inhibited by 100 MMnicotinamide riboside
`in CHO cells and substantially inhibited (80-90%)
`in adenosine kinase
`deficient cells. Tiazofurin phosphorylating activity from CHO cell ex
`tracts was resolved into two peaks by DEAE-cellulose chromatography.
`The
`first
`peak
`of activity was
`identified
`as
`adenosine
`kinase
`(ATP:adenosine S'-phosphotransferase,
`EC 2.7.1.20). The second peak
`of activity correlated with a previously described 3-deazaguanosine phos
`phorylating activity that was identified as a nicotinamide ribonucleoside
`kinase. Contaminating purine nucleoside phosphorylase was removed by
`sedimentation through a sucrose density gradient which also resolved the
`tiazofurin phosphorylating activity into two peaks, one requiring just
`ATP and the other
`requiring both ATP and IMP. Of the substrates
`tested with the lower density peak, nicotinamide riboside was most
`efficient and was the only natural substance that competed well with
`tiazofurin for phosphorylation, substantiating its suggested identity as a
`nicotinamide ribonucleoside kinase. The apparent Ä,„value for nicotina
`mide riboside (2 /IM) was significantly less than that for tiazofurin (13.6
`MM).ATP was the best phosphate donor; CTP and UTP were utilized
`less efficiently and IMP did not support the reaction. The best substrate
`for the higher density peak of tiazofurin phosphorylation was inosine and
`both ATP and IMP were required for the reaction, suggesting its identity
`as a S'-nucleotidase.
`In summary,
`it appears
`that adenosine kinase,
`nicotinamide ribonucleoside kinase, and 5'-nucleotidase may all contrib
`ute to the phosphorylation of tiazofurin in CHO cells.
`
`Chemicals. Selenazofurin (2-/3-D-ribofuranosylthiazole-4-carboxam-
`ide),
`ribavirin (l-;3-D-ribofuranosyl-l,2,4-triazoIe-3-carboxamide),
`3-
`deazaguanosine,
`tiazofurin 5'-monophosphate,
`and tiazofurin 5'-ade-
`nine dinucleotide were prepared as described elsewhere (16-20).
`[3H]
`Tiazofurin (0.5-1.5 Ci/mmol) was obtained from Research Triangle
`Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, through the Drug Synthesis and
`Chemistry Branch of the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. [8-
`3H]Deoxyguanosine (7 Ci/mmol),
`[8-3H]deoxyadenosine (11 Ci/mmol),
`[5-3H]deoxycytidine
`(27 Ci/mmol),
`[me/A>>/-3H]thymidine (50 Ci/
`mmol), and [4,5-3H]uridine (42 Ci/mmol) were purchased from ICN
`Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc. (Irvine, CA). [4-3H]Nicotinamide adenine dinu
`cleotide (2.2 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Amersham (Arlington
`Heights,
`IL). [Ã(cid:173)/-nAoÃ(cid:173)>'/-1''C]-3-Deazaguanosinewas prepared as previ
`ously described (21).
`Cells and Media. CHO cells were carried as monolayers in McCoy's
`5a medium as described previously (16). Mutant cell lines were derived
`in this laboratory from CHO cells as indicated previously (4). Cell line
`RbR-l is deficient in adenosine kinase and has been described elsewhere
`(23); line RbM/AAR-10/TGR-6
`(RAT) was derived from RbR-l, se
`lected sequentially with 8-azaadenine and 6-thioguanine,
`and is defi
`cient in adenosine kinase, adenine phosphoribosyltransferase,
`and hy-
`poxanthine-guanine
`phosphoribosyltransferase. Both mutant cell lines
`are stable, were derived from the same parent CHO lines, and demon
`strate sensitivity to tiazofurin and 3-deazaguanosine. Determination of
`minimum inhibitory concentration was as previously described (21).
`Although the nature of the method precludes statistical evaluation the
`data obtained are highly reproducible.
`Metabolic Experiments. Logarithmically growing cultures were de
`tached with trypsin and dispensed into 125-rnl plastic tissue culture
`flasks, 2.5 x IO6cells/flask in 5 ml medium. After incubation for 18 h
`the media were removed and replaced with 5 ml fresh medium contain
`ing dialyzed serum and the desired additions. After
`incubation as
`indicated the media were removed,
`the monolayers were washed with
`solution A, and the cells were extracted directly with 0.4 N perchloric
`acid as described previously (21). Extracts were analyzed by HPLC as
`described below.
`Analyses of Metabolites and Reaction Products by HPLC. Method
`A: tiazofurin and its metabolites in neutralized perchloric acid extracts
`were separated by using Water's Associates equipment described pre
`viously (16) and a column of Partisil-10 SAX aniónexchange resin (25
`x 4.6 mm; Whatman,
`Inc.). Extracts were injected as described and
`5269
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Tiazofurin (1), a C-nucleoside, was initially observed to have
`unusual antitumor
`activity (2) and to interfere with guanine
`nucleotide synthesis (3). It has since been shown to be uniquely
`metabolized by mammalian
`cells to tiazofurin 5'-adenine
`di
`nucleotide,
`an analogue of NAD in which the nicotinamide
`moiety is replaced by the thiazole of tiazofurin (4, 5). The latter
`is a very potent
`inhibitor of IMP dehydrogenase
`(4-9), and
`depletes cellular GTP pools (10). Phosphorylation
`of tiazofurin
`to form the 5'-monophosphate
`derivative, assumed to be the
`immediate precursor of TAD,3 appears to occur readily in most
`cells (6, 9, 11, 12); however,
`the identity of enzyme(s)
`involved
`has been unclear. The ability of cells to metabolize tiazofurin
`to TAD appears to vary considerably among different cell lines
`(11). Other compounds having structural
`similarities
`to tiazo
`furin, such as ribavirin and pyrazofurin,
`appear
`to be phos-
`phorylated exclusively by adenosine kinase (13, 14); adenosine
`
`revised 5/30/90.
`Received 3/20/90;
`The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment
`of page charges. This article must
`therefore be hereby marked advertisement
`in
`accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`1Supported by Grant CA 35788 from the National
`Institutes of Health and
`by Grant CH-283 from the American Cancer Society.
`2To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.
`3The abbreviations used are: TAD, tiazofurin 5'-adenine dinucleotide; HPLC,
`high pressure liquid chromatography; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; NR, nicotin
`amide ribonucleoside.
`
`
`
`Downloaded from on October 2, 2020. © 1990 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`THORNE - EXHIBIT 1028
`
`

`

`TIAZOFL'RIN PHOSPHORYLATION
`
`from
`eluted with a concave gradient (curve 7 on the System Controller)
`100% 0.005 M ammonium phosphate, pH 2.8, to 30% 0.75 M ammo
`nium phosphate, pH 3.5, at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. Absorbance was
`monitored at 254 nm. Method B: tiazofurin and tiazofurin S'-mono-
`phosphate could also be separated on a 3.9- x 30-cm reversed phase
`column of Ci8-¿iBondapak(Waters Associates) and isocratic elution
`with 0.5 M ammonium acetate, pH 6.4. This method was used primarily
`to determine [3H]tiazofurin 5'-monophosphate
`formed in enzyme as
`says because the latter could be easily eluted from DE81 disks with the
`ammonium acetate buffer used for the HPLC analysis.
`of [4-3H]
`Preparation of Nicotinamide Riboside. The preparation
`nicotinamide riboside, [car¿>o/i}7-14C]nicotinamideriboside, as well as
`the unlabeled compound was by enzymatic degradation of correspond
`ingly labeled NAD. The procedure was derived from that of Kaplan
`and Stolzenbach (22) and has been described previously (16).
`I nu-ticmation of Cell Extracts by DEAE-Cellulose Chromatograph}-.
`Growth of cells in roller bottles, preparation
`of crude extracts and
`fractionation on DEAE-cellulose are described in a previous commu
`nication (23), with the following modifications: a 1.5- x 20-cm column
`was used with a 250-ml gradient
`(125 ml each of 0 and 0.3 M KC1 in
`buffer A) and approximately
`90 fractions
`containing
`2.7 ml were
`collected and (usually each fourth) analyzed for enzyme activities.
`Buffer A (0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 1 m\i 2-mercaptoethanol,
`or 0.5
`HIM dithiothreitol), with the indicated additions, was used for all
`manipulations of the enzyme preparation.
`Analysis of Enzyme Activities. Assay mixtures for nucleoside phos-
`phorylation contained 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 5 mM MgCI2, 5 mM
`2-mercaptoethanol,
`8 mM ATP (adjusted to pH 7), and 10-100 MM3H-
`or 14C-labeled nucleoside (1-100 ^M) unless indicated otherwise, and
`were incubated 1-3 h at 37°C.At the indicated time(s) aliquots were
`removed and applied to Whatman DE81 filter paper disks which were
`washed 3 times, 10 min each, with 1 mM ammonium formate,
`twice
`with distilled water, and once with 95% ethanol. The disks were allowed
`to partially dry and then were added to scintillation vials containing 1
`ml of l N HCI. After 10 min counting solution was added and the
`radioactivity was determined. For analysis of [I4C]NMN formation,
`reactions were terminated with 0.4 N perchloric
`acid followed by
`neutralization and analysis by HPLC method B. The reaction proceeds
`linearly for at least 3 h, is proportional
`to the amount of enzyme added,
`and is dependent on ATP. Assays for other enzymes are described
`elsewhere (21, 23).
`Sucrose Density Gradient Centrifugation. The Peak II fractions from
`DEAE-cellulose chromatography were combined and concentrated by
`ultrafiltration, using an Amicon device with a PM10 filter. The concen
`trated preparation (0.5-1.0 ml) was then layered onto a 12-ml 5-20%
`sucrose gradient
`in 0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1 M KCI, and 1 mM
`dithiothreitol,
`and centrifuged in a Beckman Model L5-75 ultracentri-
`fuge at 37,000 rpm for 24 h in a SW 40 rotor. Gradients were
`fractionated with the aid of a Buchler Gradient Fractionator.
`
`RESULTS
`
`can give valuable
`reversal experiments
`Growth inhibition
`leads
`in studies of drug metabolism. The observation
`that
`nicotinamide riboside effectively reversed the inhibitory activity
`of 3-deazaguanosine
`( 16) stimulated a similar investigation with
`tiazofurin,
`since the mechanism of phosphorylation
`of both of
`these agents remained unclear. Although the growth inhibitory
`activity of tiazofurin could not be totally reversed by the pres
`ence of nicotinamide
`riboside (Table 1), a very slight effect
`could be seen with CHO cells and a somewhat more significant
`effect, a 10-fold increase in the minimum inhibitory' drug con
`centration, with RAT cells. The latter are deficient
`in adenosine
`kinase,
`adenine
`phosphoribosyltransferase,
`and
`hypoxan-
`and
`thine:guanine
`phosphoribosyltransferase
`demonstrate
`greater
`sensitivity to tiazofurin
`than the parent CHO cells,
`presumably because of the inability to salvage guanine.
`
`the toxicity of
`riboside to affect
`The ability of nicotinamide
`either by competition
`at
`the
`tiazofurin
`could be explained
`mononucleotide
`level (nicotinamide mononucleotide
`formed
`from the riboside would compete with tiazofurin 5'-monophos-
`phate for NAD* pyrophosphorylase)
`or perhaps at the level of
`phosphorylation.
`The observation (Table 1) that growth inhi
`bition by tiazofurin was unaffected by nicotinamide is suggestive
`that
`it is not the production of increased levels of nicotinamide
`mononucleotide
`that
`results in reversal since nicotinamide
`is
`utilized via this intermediate. The metabolic
`experiment
`of
`Table 2 is consistent with this and shows that nicotinamide
`riboside was able to effectively inhibit
`formation of tiazofurin
`5'-monophosphate
`in CHO cells resulting in significantly de
`pressed, but not totally eliminated, TAD formation. The earlier
`observation that
`tiazofurin toxicity was only partially affected
`by 100 nM nicotinamide
`riboside can be explained
`by the
`residual TAD synthesis which, although substantially reduced,
`was probably sufficient
`to inhibit
`IMP dehydrogenase. This
`experiment was carried out
`in Ham's F12 medium which con
`tains only nicotinamide
`at
`low concentration
`(0.3 /¿M)as pri
`mary precursor of NAD. Since it has been shown (15) that
`tiazofurin is phosphorylated
`by adenosine kinase, and also that
`an adenosine kinase deficient mutant
`is not resistant
`to tiazo
`furin, an experiment
`similar to that of Table 2 was carried out
`with the adenosine kinase deficient RAT cell line that
`is also
`unable to salvage guanine. Table 3 shows that TAD formation
`
`Table 1 Reversal of tiazofurin toxicity to CHO and adenosine kinase deficient
`(RA T) cells by nicotinamide riboside
`The minimum inhibitory drug concentration (MIC) was determined by allow
`ing cells to clone for 7-8 days in the presence of drug in medium containing
`dialyzed fetal bovine serum as previously described (9). The MIC is the lowest
`tested concentration of drug in which clones contain less than 50 cells.
`MIC of tiazofurin
`
`AdditionsNoneNicotinamide
`
`Concentration
`
`ribosideNicotinamide(MM)51050100100CHO55557.55RAT15510105
`
`Table 2 Cellularmetabolism of [5-3Hftiazofurin to tiazofurin 5'-monophosphate
`(TRMP) and TAD; effects of nicotinamide and nicotinamide riboside
`CHO cells were dispensed into 25-ml
`tissue culture flasks, 3 x lO'/lask,
`incubated overnight,
`and treated with Ham's F12 medium containing
`5 u\i
`|5-3H]tiazofurin (500 mCi/mmol) and the indicated additions
`for 3 h. Cells were
`then extracted as described in "Materials
`and Methods" and were analyzed by
`HPLC. Values given are the mean ±SD of duplicate determinations.
`Concentration
`[JH]TRMP formed |3H]TAD formed
`(MM)
`(pmol)
`(pmol)
`±0.08
`±0.09
`1.19±0.11
`4.79 ±0.09
`0.32 ±0.044.61
`2.33 ±0.03
`
`None
`Nicotinamide
`Nicotinamide riboside100too1.18
`
`Additions
`
`to TAD in CHO and adenosine
`Table 3 Cellular metabolism of['H]tiazofurin
`kinase deficient (RA T) cells; inhibition by nicotinamide riboside
`treated
`CHO and RAT cells were dispensed into flasks, incubated overnight,
`with medium containing
`5 ><M['H]tiazofurin
`(500 mCi/mmol)
`for 3 h and
`extracted as described. Extracts were analyzed by HPLC; values reflect 4x10*
`cell equivalents. Values are representative of three similar experiments
`carried
`out.
`
`['HITAD formed
`
`(pmol)AdditionsNone
`
`Nicotinamide ribosideConcentration10
`50100CHO4.48
`
`1.09
`2.53
`2.19
`0.54
`1.82RAT3.15
`0.51
`
`5270
`
`
`
`Downloaded from on October 2, 2020. © 1990 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`

`

`TIAZOFURIN PHOSPHORYLATION
`
`riboside to a much greater extent
`was inhibited by nicotinamide
`in these cells than in the CHO line. Taken together,
`these data
`suggest
`that
`the amount of TAD formed in a cell is a function
`of the amount of tiazofurin phosphorylated
`by more than one
`enzyme. Loss of one of these is apparently
`not sufficient
`to
`render a cell resistant
`to the drug.
`by
`The major nucleoside
`kinases can be easily separated
`conventional DEAE-cellulose
`chromatography
`as described
`elsewhere (23); a typical
`fractionation
`of a CHO cell crude
`extract
`is shown in Fig.
`\A. Under these conditions,
`tiazofurin
`phosphorylating
`activity from CHO cells was resolved into two
`peaks
`(Fig.
`IB), one (Peak
`I)
`that eluted coincident with
`adenosine kinase and another
`(Peak II)
`that eluted more or
`less with purine nucleoside phosphorylase
`and coincident with
`the 3-deazaguanosine
`phosphorylating
`activity (Fig.
`ID) that
`we have identified previously as a nicotinamide
`ribonucleoside
`kinase (16). Although some stimulation of the Peak II activity
`was observed upon addition of IMP to the reaction mixtures
`(not shown), a phosphorylating
`activity dependent
`on IMP
`alone (which would reflect a 5'-nucleotidase) was not observed.
`The identity of Peak I as adenosine kinase was verified by the
`absence of the peak in an extract of the adenosine
`kinase
`deficient cell line, RbR-l (Fig. 1C). To eliminate the possibility
`
`-
`
`15
`ni wihp"
`
`20
`
`55
`
`activity from purine
`Fig. 2. Separation of Peak II tiazofurin phosphorylating
`nucleoside phosphorylase by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. The method
`is described in "Materials and Methods." The top of the gradient
`is on the left,
`the bottom is on the right. (•)Tiazofurin phosphorylation;
`(A) purine nucleoside
`phosphorylase activity. TRMP, tiazofurin 5'-monophosphate.
`
`20r-
`
`••
`
`:
`
`m
`25 O
`
`X
`20 -°
`
`E
`
`»i
`
`S103
`£
`5 E
`
`0123
`
`Hours Incuaatiof.
`Fig. 3. Effect of time and enzyme concentration on tiazofurin phosphorylation
`by the SG-A enzyme; requirement
`for ATP. Reaction mixtures, 100 pi, were as
`described in "Materials and Methods" with (•)26 ^g, (A) 78 fig, or (•)260 /ug
`of SG-enzyme. Other reaction mixtures contained 260 fig of protein: (A) without
`ATP; (O) without ATP. with 8 mM IMP; (d) without enzyme. Points represent
`IO M!of reaction mixture. TRMP, tiazofurin 5'-monophosphate.
`
`l
`
`tiazofurin phosphorylation might actually
`the apparent
`that
`reflect phosphorylation
`of a contaminant,
`the products of the
`reactions of both peaks were characterized by two HPLC meth
`ods.
`In each case,
`tiazofurin
`5'-monophosphate
`was clearly
`formed,
`indicating that
`there are indeed at
`least
`two enzyme
`activities in CHO cell extracts that catalyze the same reaction.
`Initial competition
`experiments with the Peak II enzyme
`raised concerns that the contaminating
`purine nucleoside phos
`phorylase might affect
`the accuracy of the determinations,
`particularly with guanosine and related compounds,
`and give
`misleading results. To eliminate this complication the Peak II
`fractions were combined, concentrated, and subjected to sucrose
`density gradient
`centrifugation which effected a reasonable
`separation of the two enzyme activities (Fig. 2). The tiazofurin
`phosphorylating
`activity remained near the top of the gradient
`in Fractions 4-6, while purine nucleoside phosphorylase was
`entirely in Fractions 8-10. Fractions 4-6 were pooled and are
`referred to here as SG-A enzyme. This fraction is the same as
`that described in an earlier communication
`that was designated
`Peak A and was identified as a nicotinamide
`ribonucleoside
`kinase. Characterization
`of the reaction catalyzed by the SG-A
`enzyme preparation, with [3H]tiazofurin as substrate (Fig. 3),
`indicated that
`it was linear with time, proportional
`to the
`amount of enzyme added, and dependent upon the presence of
`ATP.
`sub
`A variety of compounds were considered as potential
`strates of both the Peak II preparation and the sucrose gradient
`5271
`
`20
`
`80
`
`60
`40
`Fraction Number
`Fig. 1. DEAE-cellulose chromatography of known nucleoside kinase activities
`of CHO cells (A); tiazofurin phosphorylating activities of CHO cells (B); adeno
`sine kinase deficient RbR-l cells (C); 3-deazaguanosine phosphorylating activity
`of CHO cells (D). Crude, dialyzed cell extracts containing 51 mg protein (A) or
`15 mg protein (B and C) were applied to the columns which were developed as
`described in "Materials and Methods." Indicated enzyme activities were measured
`as described. AK, adenosine kinase; PNPase, purine nucleoside phosphorylase.
`
`
`
`Downloaded from on October 2, 2020. © 1990 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`

`

`TIAZOFURIN PHOSPHORYLATION
`
`Table 4 Comparative substrate activities of SG-A and SG-C in the presence of
`both ATP and IMP
`The activities of SG-A [nicotinamide
`riboside kinase (NRK). 4.6 ng protein/
`reaction mixture] and SG-C (5'-nucleotidase
`(5'-NTase),
`0.8 ^g protein/reaction
`mixture] were determined with the indicated substrates. Enzyme activity was
`determined as described in "Materials
`and Methods" with one exception; ATP
`and IMP were present
`in all
`reaction mixtures at 4 mM concentration
`each.
`Incubation was for 1 h; values reflect 40-(;I aliquots of 100 /il reaction mixtures.
`[MC]Nicotinamide
`mononucleotide
`formation was measured by HPLC as de
`scribed, and is given as mean ±SD of two determinations.
`
`Phosphorylated
`(pmol)
`
`product
`
`Substrate3H]Tiazofurin
`
`CIM)1225
`
`3H]Adenosine
`3H]Guanosine
`l4C]-3-Deazaguanosine
`14C]Nicotinamide riboside
`'"CJInosineConcentration
`
`±0.1
`9 ±0.3
`1.9+ 0.3
`2.0±0.01
`25
`62.5 ±0.5
`20.3 ±0.1
`14.4±0.9
`21.2 ±0.3
`10
`2.0 ±0.9
`78.6 ±3.6
`20
`25SG-A(NRK)11.
`150.3±10.3
`0.0SG-C(S'-NTase)27.4
`
`(SG-A) enzyme and were tested for their abilities to compete
`with (or inhibit)
`tiazofurin phosphorylation
`in the presence of
`ATP as phosphate
`donor. As expected, adenosine
`competed
`well with tiazofurin for phosphorylation
`by Peak I (adenosine
`kinase). but poorly with the reactions catalyzed by Peak II and
`the SG-A preparation. Conversely, nicotinamide riboside inter
`fered with Peak II and SG-A activity but did not affect the Peak
`I catalyzed reaction. The apparent
`affinity of nicotinamide
`riboside for this enzyme activity again suggested the importance
`of
`the enzyme
`in nicotinamide
`ribonucleoside metabolism.
`Other compounds demonstrating
`significant
`interference with
`the Peak II and SG-A activities include selenazofurin,
`an ana
`logue of tiazofurin which is metabolized similarly, and 3-dea-
`zaguanosine. Agents demonstrating
`little or no competition
`with tiazofurin included ribavirin,
`inosine, and all of the deox-
`yribonucleosides
`tested.
`as indicated in
`The best substrate for the SG-A preparation,
`our earlier communication
`( 16), was NR, followed by tiazofurin
`(12% of NR), guanosine (8.9% of NR), and 3-deazaguanosine,
`which could not be directly compared because it was not pos
`sible to test
`it at comparable
`concentrations
`(owing to the
`method of its preparation). Deoxyguanosine,
`deoxycytidine,
`and adenosine demonstrated little, if any, activity. Apparent Km
`values for nicotinamide riboside,
`tiazofurin, and guanosine have
`since been determined to be 2.0, 13.6, and 102 /¿M,respectively.
`ATP was the most efficient phosphate donor
`in the reaction
`catalyzed by the SG-A preparation (not shown). CTP and UTP
`were somewhat
`less efficient (47 and 36% of ATP, respectively)
`and GTP, AMP, and IMP supported little,
`if any, phosphoryl
`ation.
`To clarify the earlier observation that Peak II phosphoryla
`tion was stimulated by addition of IMP, a larger scale prepa
`ration was carried out and the sucrose gradient
`fractions were
`analyzed with a variety of conditions and substrates
`(Fig. 4). In
`the presence of ATP alone (Fig. 4A) there was a single peak
`(Fractions 4-6, SG-A) of tiazofurin phosphorylation; with IMP
`alone there was no activity observed in Fractions 4-6 and a
`trace of apparent phosphorylation
`in Fractions 15-17 (SG-C).
`With both ATP and IMP present
`(Fig. 4B) there were clearly
`two substantial, well separated, peaks of activity. 3-Deazagu-
`anosine was similarly phosphorylated
`by both activities
`(Fig.
`4C). Inosine, on the other hand, was phosphorylated exclusively
`
`therefore levels of activity are not directly comparable from one graph to another.
`TRMP,
`tiazofurin
`5'-monophosphate;
`3-DeazaGTP, 3-deazaguanosine triphos-
`phate;
`jVA/7V. nicotinamide mononucleotide;
`3-Dea:aGuo.
`3-deazaguanosine:
`WO.
`inosine, TR, tiazofurin.
`5272
`
`15
`
`t ATP
`
`l \
`
`t
`
`IMP
`
`poo.
`
`[3H]TH t ATP »IMP
`
`I
`
`,0
`
`Ii 5
`
`0
`
`25
`
`I
`
`* "
`Ia
`
`I
`
`10
`5
`
`15
`
`H s io
`
`1.00
`
`0.75
`
`114C|INO
`t ATPt IMP
`
`r 0.50
`
`0.25
`
`0.00
`
`50
`
`30
`
`l««C|NHt ATP
`
`I L
`
`20
`1 io
`
`1.0
`
`L 0.5
`
`20
`
`0.0
`
`0 T
`
`15
`10
`BOTTOM
`numoer
`traction
`OP
`Fraction Number
`activities detectable after sucrose gradient
`fractiona-
`Fig. 4. Phosphorylating
`tion of Peak II assayed in the presence of ATP and IMP. Gradients were layered
`with 2.5 mg of Peak II protein.
`Incubation mixtures were as described with the
`following variations: A, 6.7 <JM[3H|tiazofurin
`(0.88 Ci/mmol).
`8 HIM ATP (*) or
`8 mivi IMP (O); B, 6.7 MM [3H]tiazofurin.
`8 mM ATP. 3 mM IMP; C, 3 »JM(14C]-
`3-deazaguanosine (23 mCi/mmol).
`6 mM ATP, 3 ITEMIMP; 0. 73 pM |'*C|inosine
`(57 mCi/mmol).
`6 mM ATP. 3 mM IMP; E. 10.5 JIM |"C|nicotinamide
`riboside
`(44 mCi/mmol).
`6 mM ATP; F, 133 /iM [8-MC]IMP (8 mCi/mmol).
`no other
`nucleotides.
`Incubation mixtures
`contained 25 ¡i\of sucrose gradient
`fractions
`and incubation was for 2.5 h at 37'C. Aliquots
`of each (35 ^1) were applied to
`DE81 disks which were treated as described for nucleoside kinase assays. Assays
`were carried out over a period of
`ten days (enzyme was stored at
`-20°C):
`
`
`
`Downloaded from on October 2, 2020. © 1990 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`

`

`15-17, Fig. 4D), which
`by the second peak, SG-C (Fractions
`corresponded with IMP hydrolytic activity (Fig. 4F), allowing
`the conclusion that
`this enzyme probably reflects a 5'-nucleo-
`tidase similar to that described by Fridland et al. (15). Compar
`ative substrate activities of several relevant compounds with the
`two enzymes,
`in the presence of both ATP (4 HIM)and IMP (4
`HIM) is tabulated in Table 4. It
`is of interest
`to note that 3-
`deazaguanosine
`appears to be more efficiently phosphorylated
`by SG-A (presumably nicotinamide
`ribonucleoside kinase) than
`by SG-C (presumably 5'-nucleotidase), while the reverse seems
`to be true for tiazofurin phosphorylation.
`This is consistent
`with the observation that nicotinamide
`ribonucleoside
`reverses
`the toxicity produced by 3-deazaguanosine more effectively than
`that resulting from exposure to tiazofurin.
`In other experiments
`(not shown) phosphorylation
`of tiazofurin by SG-A was clearly
`inhibited by the presence of nicotinamide
`riboside while the
`reaction catalyzed by SG-C was essentially unaffected. SG-C
`required both IMP and ATP (or dATP)
`for activity while SG-
`A required ATP alone and was unaffected by the addition of
`IMP. All of these properties
`taken together support our conclu
`sion that one of the activities (SG-A) represents
`the nicotina
`mide ribonucleoside kinase that we have previously associated
`with 3-deazaguanosine
`phosphorylation,
`and that
`the SG-C
`enzyme is a cytoplasmic 5'-nucleotidase
`such as that described
`by Fridland et al. (15).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`TIAZOFURIN PHOSPHORYLATION
`a loss of
`requiring formation of tiazofurin 5'-monophosphate,
`the ability to phosphorylate
`the compound would not result
`in
`resistance. The latter possibility seems improbable since tiazo
`furin is a C-nucleoside and thus cannot enter
`into those reac
`tions whereby nicotinamide
`is initially metabolized to NAD,
`whether via a phosphoribosyltransferase
`to form the 5'-mono-
`phosphate or to NAD directly by an exchange reaction. These
`routes have been suggested by Nelson et al. (25) as possibilities
`in the metabolism of a related agent, 2-amino-l,3,4-thiadiazole.
`Cytoplasmic 5'-nucleotidase
`has recently been implicated in
`the phosphorylation
`of inosine (26), acyclovir
`(27),
`tiazofurin
`(15) and 2',3'-dideoxyinosine
`(28) through an exchange reac
`tion mediated by an enzyme-phosphate
`intermediate. The phos
`phorylation reaction with these nucleosides
`is characterized by
`a requirement
`for IMP as phosphate
`donor,
`stimulation
`by
`ATP, and inhibition by high concentrations
`of inosine. Phos
`phorylation of tiazofurin by the partially purified enzyme (SG-
`A) from CHO cells demonstrates
`a clear requirement
`for ATP
`in the absence of added IMP. Nicotinamide
`riboside is by far
`the best substrate for this enzyme. The SG-C activity, on the
`other hand,
`requires both IMP and ATP, although minimal
`reaction can be detected with IMP alone. Inosine is clearly the
`best substrate
`for SG-C. From these observations we have
`concluded that SG-A represents a nicotinamide
`ribonucleoside
`kinase while SG-C is probably a 5'-nucleotidase
`such as that
`described by Fridland et al. ( 15).
`kinase in cellular
`The role of nicotinamide
`ribonucleoside
`metabolism remains unclear. Although this reaction has been
`observed to occur
`(29, 30),
`it is not well documented and its
`importance in NAD synthesis and cycling is uncertain. We have
`presented evidence elsewhere (16) for the activation by this
`enzyme, of another unusual nucleoside, 3-deazaguanosine.
`In
`view of the possible role of this phosphorylating
`activity in drug
`metabolism and action, additional work directed toward a fun
`damental understanding of its occurrence,
`its substrate specific
`ity, and its significance in NAD metabolism seems warranted.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`of tiazofurin is assumed to be a key
`The phosphorylation
`reaction in the metabolism of this agent
`to its active form.
`While adenosine
`kinase,
`in partially purified form, has the
`capability of phosphorylating
`tiazofurin,
`it is not clear whether
`it does so to a significant extent
`in intact CHO cells; adenosine
`kinase deficient cells demonstrate
`little or no resistance to the
`drug. This
`is in contrast
`to the structurally
`related agents
`ribavirin and pyrazofurin which are readily phosphorylated
`by
`adenosine kinase in whole cells and are inactive toward adeno
`sine kinase deficient
`cells.
`In this communication we have
`demonstrated
`the existence of an enzyme in CHO cells, other
`than adenosine kinase or 5'-nucleotidase,
`that can phosphoryl-
`1. Srivastava, P. D., Pickering, M. U., Allen, L. B., Streeter, D. G., Campbell,
`M. T., Witkowski, J. T., Sidwell, R. W., and Robins, R. K. Synthesis and
`ate tiazofurin. We have physically separated the three phospho
`antiviral activity of certain thiazole C-nucleosides. J. Med. Chem., 20: 256-
`rylating activities and have demonstrated
`conditions
`for the
`262, 1977.
`2. Robins. R. K., Srivastava, P. C, Narayanan, V. L., Plowman, J., and Paull,
`selective measurement of each. Moreover, we present evidence
`K. D. 2-/3-D-Ribofuranosylthiazole-4-carboxamide,
`a novel potential antitu-
`that
`the new phosphorylating
`activity is relevant
`to the utiliza
`mor agent for lung tumors and métastases.J. Med. Chem., 25: 107-108,
`tion of the drug in growing cells, and tentatively identify it as a
`1982.
`3. Streeter, D. G., and Miller, J. P. The in vitro inhibition of purine nucleotide
`nicotinamide
`ribonucleoside kinase,
`the same enzyme to which
`biosynthesis by 2-$-D-ribofuranosylthiazole-4-carboxamide.
`Biochem. Bio-
`we have attributed the phosphorylation
`of 3-deazaguanosine
`in
`phys. Res. Commun., 103: 1409-1412, 1981.
`hypoxanthine-guanine
`phosphoribosyltransferase
`deficient
`Inhibition of inosinate
`4. Kuttan, R., Robins, R. K., and Saunders, P. P.
`dehydrogenase by metabolites of 2-fi-D-ribofuranosylthiazole-4-carboxamide.
`CHO cells (16).
`Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 107: 862-868, 1982.
`involved in
`factors
`have investigated
`Several
`laboratories
`5. Cooney, D. A., Jayaram, H. N., Gebeyehu, G., Betts, C. R., Kelley, J. A.,
`Marquez, J. E., and Johns, D. G. The conversion of 2-/3-D-ribofuranosylthia-
`resistance to tiazofurin, both natural and acquired (6, 9, 11, 12,
`zole-4-carboxamide
`to an analog of NAD with potent
`IMP dehydrogenase-
`24), and have reported
`several conditions
`resulting
`in this
`inhibitory properties. Biochem. Pharmacol., 31: 2133-2136. 1982.
`phenotypic property,
`the most common of which is an inability
`6. Jayaram, H. N., Cooney, D. A., Glazer, R. I., Dion, R. L., and Johns, D. G.
`Mechanism of resistance to the oncolytic C-nucleoside 2-ii-D-ribofuranosyl-
`to form TAD. None, however, have reported a deficiency of
`thiazole-4-carboxamide
`(NSC 286193). Biochem. Pharmacol.,
`31: 2557-
`phosphorylation
`as a mechanism of resistance
`to this agent.
`2560, 1982.
`7. Jayaram, H. N., Dion, R. L., Glazer, R. I., Johns, D. G., Robins, R. K.,
`There are several possible explanations
`for this: a) if there are
`Srivastava, P. C., and Cooney, D. A. Initial studies on the mechanism of
`three enzymes catalyzing the reaction (i.e., adenosine kinase,
`action of a new oncolytic thiazole nucleoside, 2-/3-D-ribofuranosylthiazole-4-
`5'-nucleotidase,
`and nicotinamide
`ribonucleoside
`kinase)
`the
`carboxamide (NSC 286193). Biochem. Pharmacol., 31: 2371-2380,
`1982.
`8. Jayaram, H. N., Smith, A. L., Glazer, R. I., Johns, D. G., and Cooney, D.
`probability of losing all of them through mutation would be
`A. Studies on the mechanism of action of 2-(J-D-ribofuranosylthiazole-4-
`very low; b)
`if the enzyme responsible
`for phosphorylating
`carboxamide (NSC 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket