throbber
Paper: 120
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Date: January 24, 2023
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOVARTIS PHARMA AG, NOVARTIS TECHOLOGY LLC,
`NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`IPR2021-00816
`Patent 9,220,631 B2
`______________
`
`Before ERICA A. FRANKLIN, ROBERT L. KINDER, and
`JAMIE T. WISZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Joint Motion to Seal the Final Written Decision;
`Preserving the Record Pending Appeal; and Extending the Deadline for
`Filing a Motion to Expunge Sealed Documents
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14, 42.54, 42.56
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`Patent 9,220,631 B2
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`As noted in our Order, Paper 115, on October 25, 2022, the Final
`Written Decision (“Decision,” Paper 113) in this proceeding was entered
`into the record as available to “Board and Parties Only” to provide the
`parties with an opportunity to meet and confer and jointly submit a proposed
`redacted version of the Decision for the public. The Decision refers to
`exhibits and information that we have previously sealed pursuant to the
`Second Modified Default Protective Order (Paper 103) entered on July 8,
`2022. The confidential materials were protected pursuant to our orders
`granting motions to seal filed by Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis Technology
`LLC, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (collectively, “Novartis”)
`and a motion to seal filed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`(“Regeneron”). See Papers 22, 103, 105 (orders granting motions to seal).
`In accordance with our instruction, the parties have filed a joint
`motion to seal the Final Written Decision, Paper 117 (“Mot.”), along with a
`proposed redacted version of the Final Written Decision, Exhibit 1257. For
`the reasons explained below, we grant the joint motion.
`II. DISCUSSION
`“There is a strong public policy for making all information filed in a
`quasi-judicial administrative proceeding open to the public, especially in an
`inter partes review which determines the patentability of claims in an issued
`patent and therefore affects the rights of the public.” Garmin Int’l v. Cuozzo
`Speed Techs., LLC, IPR2012-00001, Paper 34, 1–2 (PTAB Mar. 14, 2013).
`A motion to seal may be granted for good cause. 37 C.F.R. § 42.54. The
`moving party or parties must show that there is good cause for the relief
`requested, including why the information is appropriate to be filed under
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`Patent 9,220,631 B2
`seal. 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.20, 42.54; see also Argentum Pharms. LLC v. Alcon
`Research, Ltd., IPR2017-01053, Paper 27 at 3–4 (PTAB Jan. 19, 2018)
`(informative) (discussing factors the Board may consider when deciding
`whether to grant a motion to seal documents asserted to contain confidential
`information).
`In the motion, the parties assert that good cause exists for sealing
`portions of the Final Written Decision because those portions refer to
`confidential research and development information, along with confidential
`commercial and financial information, submitted previously by the parties in
`this proceeding. Mot. 2–5. As noted above, those referenced materials were
`previously sealed.
`Accordingly, based on our consideration of the motion and proposed
`redactions to the Final Written Decision, we determine that the parties have
`shown good cause to seal the confidential version of the Final Written
`Decision.
`The parties are advised that any papers or exhibits that are currently
`sealed in this case ordinarily would become public 45 days after final
`judgment. See Patent Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice
`Guide, 1 21–22. Based on the circumstances involved here, including the
`timing of the joint motion, we preserve the entire record of this proceeding,
`including all confidential papers and exhibits as sealed documents, pending
`appeal.
`
`
`1 Patent Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide
`(November 2019), available at
`https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/tpgnov.pdf.
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`Patent 9,220,631 B2
`Further, we extend the deadline for filing a motion to expunge
`documents under 37 C.F.R. § 42.56 to ten business days after final
`disposition of an appeal.
`
`
`III. ORDER
`In accordance with the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the joint motion to seal the confidential version of the
`Final Written Decision, Paper 113, is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the jointly filed redacted version of the
`Final Written Decision, Exhibit 1257, shall be entered by the Board as
`available to the public;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the record in this proceeding shall be
`preserved, including all confidential pleadings and exhibits as sealed
`documents, until ten business days after final disposition of an appeal; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the time for filing a motion to expunge
`documents under 37 C.F.R. § 42.56 is extended to ten business days after
`final disposition of an appeal.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`Patent 9,220,631 B2
`For PETITIONER:
`Elizabeth Weiswasser
`Anish Desai
`Christopher Pepe
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`elizabeth.weiswasser@weil.com
`anish.desai@weil.com
`christopher.pepe@weil.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Elizabeth Holland
`William James
`Nicholas Mitrokostas
`Allen & Overy LLP
`elizabeth.holland@allenovery.com
`william.james@allenovery.com
`nicholas.mitrokostas@allenovery.com
`
`Duncan Greenhalgh
`Linnea Cipriano
`Joshua Weinger
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`lcipriano@goodwinlaw.com
`jweinger@goodwinprocter.com
`dgreenhalgh@goodwinlaw.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket