throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________________
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOVARTIS PHARMA AG,
`NOVARTIS TECHNOLOGY LLC,
`NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`______________________
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00816
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`______________________
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO
`ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY PATENT OWNER
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b), Petitioner Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
`
`hereby objects as follows to the admissibility of evidence filed by Patent Owners
`
`Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis Technology LLC, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
`
`Corporation, in conjunction with the Patent Owner Preliminary Response, filed on
`
`July 29, 2021, and Patent Owner Sur-Reply, filed on August 27, 2021.
`
`Evidence
`Exhibit 2001
`
`Objections
`FRE 105: To the extent that any portion of this exhibit
`
`may be deemed admissible, such admissibility should be
`
`for a limited purpose.
`
`FRE 602: As to at least paragraphs 37-41, 43-44, 46, 48-51,
`
`56-58, 68, 71-75, 79-80, 86-89, 92, 94-95, 99, 101, 106-117,
`
`120-121, 125-132, 134, 136, 138-140, 142-145, 148, 152,
`
`154-164, 166-170, 173-174, 176-179, 184-185, 189-192,
`
`195, 198, 202, 210, the exhibit includes assertions for which
`
`evidence has not been introduced sufficient to show that the
`
`witness has personal knowledge of the matter asserted.
`
`FRE 701/702 and/or 37 C.F.R. § 42.65: As to at least
`
`paragraphs 10-11, 28-60, 63-211, the exhibit declarant is not
`
`qualified to opine on what a person of ordinary skill in the
`
`art would understand, to opine on patent claim limitations,
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Evidence
`
`Objections
`to perform claim construction, and/or to perform legal
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`analysis of invalidity. The opinion testimony offered in this
`
`exhibit is not based on scientific, technical, or other
`
`specialized knowledge, and is also not based on personal
`
`knowledge. The opinion testimony includes unsubstantiated
`
`leaps and advances inaccurate, unqualified and unsupported
`
`generalizations. The opinion testimony fails to properly
`
`disclose the underlying facts or data on which the opinion is
`
`based. The opinion testimony includes testimony on United
`
`States patent law and/or patent examination practice.
`
`FRE 705 and /or 37 C.F.R. § 42.65: As to at least
`
`paragraphs 39-41, 43-44, 46, 48-51, 56-58, 68, 71-75, 79-
`
`80, 86-89, 92, 94-95, 99, 101, 106-117, 120-121, 125-132,
`
`134, 136, 138-140, 142-145, 148, 152, 154-164, 166-170,
`
`173-174, 176-179, 184-185, 189-192, 195, 198, 202, 210,
`
`the exhibit includes expert testimony that does not disclose
`
`the underlying facts or data.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Evidence
`
`Objections
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`therein.
`
`Exhibit 2002
`
`FRE 602: As to at least paragraphs 8-15, 18, the exhibit
`
`includes assertions for which evidence has not been
`
`introduced sufficient to show that the witness has personal
`
`knowledge of the matter asserted.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`Exhibit 2003
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`Exhibit 2004
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Evidence
`
`Objections
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2005
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`Exhibit 2007
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`Exhibit 2011
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 602: The exhibit includes assertions for which
`
`evidence has not been introduced sufficient to show that the
`
`witness has personal knowledge of the matter asserted.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2015
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2016
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2017
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2019
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2020
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2023
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2024
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2025
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2026
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2027
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2028
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2029
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2030
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2031
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2033
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2034
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2035
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2036
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`
`
`17
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2041
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2042
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`18
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2044
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`
`
`19
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2045
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`Exhibit 2046
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`Exhibit 2047
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`20
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2048
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2049
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`21
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2050
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`Exhibit 2051
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`22
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2052
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`Exhibit 2053
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`Exhibit 2054
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`23
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2055
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`
`
`24
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2056
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2057
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`25
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2058
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`Exhibit 2059
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`Exhibit 2060
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`
`
`26
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2061
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`Exhibit 2062
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`Exhibit 2063
`
`FRE 105: To the extent that any portion of this exhibit may
`
`be deemed admissible, such admissibility should be for a
`
`limited purpose.
`
`
`
`27
`
`

`

`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2064
`
`FRE 105: To the extent that any portion of this exhibit may
`
`be deemed admissible, such admissibility should be for a
`
`limited purpose.
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`
`
`28
`
`

`

`Evidence
`
`Objections
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2065
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`
`
`29
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2066
`
`FRE 105: To the extent that any portion of this exhibit may
`
`be deemed admissible, such admissibility should be for a
`
`limited purpose.
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`
`
`30
`
`

`

`Evidence
`Exhibit 2067
`
`Objections
`FRE 105: To the extent that any portion of this exhibit may
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`be deemed admissible, such admissibility should be for a
`
`limited purpose.
`
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 802: The entirety of the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay
`
`if offered to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted
`
`therein.
`
`FRE 901: Petitioner has not produced evidence sufficient to
`
`support a finding that the exhibit is what Petitioner claims it
`
`is.
`
`Exhibit 2068
`
`FRE 105: To the extent that any portion of this exhibit may
`
`be deemed admissible, such admissibility should be for a
`
`limited purpose.
`
`
`
`31
`
`

`

`Evidence
`
`Objections
`FRE 402: The exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`
`IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`which trial was instituted.
`
`FRE 403: The exhibit

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket