throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 534 Filed 03/30/21 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 11617
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC. and
`R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY
`
`Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
`Defendants,
`
`Case No. 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB
`
`
`
`v.
`
`ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC; PHILIP
`MORRIS USA INC.; and PHILIP MORRIS
`PRODUCTS S.A.
`
`Defendants and Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs.
`
`JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`Philip Morris Products, S.A.
`Exhibit 2014
`RJR v. PMP
`IPR2021-00826
`Ex. 2014-001
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 534 Filed 03/30/21 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 11618
`
`
`
`Pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Local Rule 7, Plaintiffs RAI Strategic
`
`Holdings, Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company (“Reynolds”) and Defendants Altria Client
`
`Services LLC, Philip Morris USA Inc., and Philip Morris Products S.A. (“PMP”) (“Counterclaim
`
`Plaintiffs”) (together, the “Parties”) hereby submit this Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order
`
`(Dkt. No. 99).
`
`The parties conferred on March 30, 2021 and agreed to jointly request a modification of
`
`the Scheduling Order, which provides for certain additional deadlines related to expert disclosures.
`
`Good cause exists to grant this motion. See FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be
`
`modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.”). The requested modifications to the
`
`Scheduling Order change certain deadlines that relate to necessary pre-trial disclosures and
`
`dispositive motions. The modified and additional deadlines will provide the parties with time to
`
`complete expert discovery, dispositive motions, and pre-trial filings before trial in this case.
`
`Accordingly, the prompt resolution of this case will not be affected. Additionally, the Parties agree
`
`that the requested additional deadlines are appropriate and consistent with the practice in this
`
`District.
`
`The Parties request that the Court treat the currently scheduled pretrial conference on April
`
`16, 2021 as a status conference to discuss pretrial preparations and scheduling.
`
`The Parties request that the Court set the additional Scheduling Order deadlines as follows:
`
`Description
`
`Current Deadline
`
`Proposed Modified
`Deadline
`
`• Last day for fact depositions1
`
`1 The Parties agree that the depositions of third-party Panasonic and Messr. Rinker, as well as party
`depositions of Swiss Counterclaim Plaintiff PMP, can be taken out of time, as necessary and with
`the Court’s permission. The parties currently have four PMP party depositions scheduled to occur
`
`April 12, 2021
`
`April 19, 2021
`
`1
`
`Ex. 2014-002
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 534 Filed 03/30/21 Page 3 of 6 PageID# 11619
`
`
`
`
`
`Description
`
`Current Deadline
`
`Proposed Modified
`Deadline
`
`• Experts identify citations to
`fact testimony to support
`already-disclosed opinions
`• Expert depositions
`
`• Party with the burden serves
`proposed uncontested facts
`• Party without the burden
`serves revised uncontested
`facts
`• Parties meet and confer on
`proposed uncontested facts
`• Deposition designations
`• Witness lists
`• Exhibit Lists
`• Statement of uncontested
`facts
`• Dispositive motions
`• Counter deposition
`designations
`• Objections to witness lists
`• Oppositions to dispositive
`motions
`• Objections to exhibits
`• Objections to deposition
`designations
`• Final pretrial conference
`
`N/A
`
`April 26, 2021
`
`By April 12, 2021
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`April 28 to May 12,
`2021
`May 14, 2021 (by 5:00
`PM ET)
`May 19, 2021 (by 5:00
`PM ET)
`
`May 20, 2021
`
`April 16, 2021
`
`May 21, 2021
`
`April 30, 2021
`
`June 4, 2021
`
`April 26 and 30, 2021
`
`June 25, 2021
`
`April 16, 2021
`
`TBD
`
`
`before April 19, 2021 and may not need to take any party depositions out of time. The parties also
`agree that Panasonic may produce documents responsive to Reynolds’s subpoena out of time.
`
`2
`
`Ex. 2014-003
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 534 Filed 03/30/21 Page 4 of 6 PageID# 11620
`
`
`
`For good cause shown, the Parties respectfully request that the Court modify the
`
`Scheduling Order to include the foregoing additional deadlines. A proposed order is submitted
`
`herewith. The Parties agree to waive oral argument on this motion.
`
`Dated: March 30, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`s/ David M. Maiorana
`David M. Maiorana (VA Bar No. 42334)
`Ryan B. McCrum
`JONES DAY
`901 Lakeside Avenue
`Cleveland, OH 44114
`Telephone: (216) 586-3939
`Facsimile: (216) 579-0212
`Email: dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`Email: rbmccrum@jonesday.com
`John J. Normile
`JONES DAY
`250 Vesey Street
`New York, NY 10281
`Tel: (212) 326-3939
`Fax: (212) 755-7306
`Email: jjnormile@jonesday.com
`
`Alexis A. Smith
`JONES DAY
`555 South Flower Street
`Fiftieth Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (213) 243-2653
`Facsimile: (213) 243-2539
`Email: asmith@jonesday.com
`
`Stephanie E. Parker
`JONES DAY
`1420 Peachtree Street, N.E.
`Suite 800
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: (404) 521-3939
`Facsimile: (404) 581-8330
`Email: separker@jonesday.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Maximilian A. Grant
`Maximilian A. Grant (VSB No. 91792)
`max.grant@lw.com
`Matthew J. Moore (pro hac vice)
`matthew.moore@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (202) 637-2200
`Facsimile: (202) 637-2201
`Clement J. Naples (pro hac vice)
`clement.naples@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`885 Third Avenue
`New York, NY 10022-4834
`Tel: (212) 906-1200; Fax: (212) 751-4864
`
`Gregory J. Sobolski (pro hac vice)
`greg.sobolski@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 391-0600
`Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
`
`Brenda L. Danek (pro hac vice)
`brenda.danek@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60611
`Tel: (312) 876-7700; Fax: (312) 993-9767
`
`Counsel for Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs
`Altria Client Services LLC, Philip Morris USA
`Inc., and Philip Morris Products S.A.
`
`3
`
`Ex. 2014-004
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 534 Filed 03/30/21 Page 5 of 6 PageID# 11621
`
`Anthony M. Insogna
`JONES DAY
`4655 Executive Drive
`Suite 1500
`San Diego, CA 92121
`Telephone: (858) 314-1200
`Facsimile: (844) 345-3178
`Email: aminsogna@jonesday.com
`
`William E. Devitt
`JONES DAY
`77 West Wacker
`Suite 3500
`Chicago, IL 60601
`Telephone: (312) 269-4240
`Facsimile: (312) 782-8585
`Email: wdevitt@jonesday.com
`
`Sanjiv P. Laud
`JONES DAY
`90 South Seventh Street
`Suite 4950
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 217-8800
`Facsimile: (844) 345-3178
`Email: slaud@jonesday.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiffs RAI Strategic
`Holdings, Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Vapor
`Company
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Ex. 2014-005
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 534 Filed 03/30/21 Page 6 of 6 PageID# 11622
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 30th day of March, 2021, a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing was served using the Court’s CM/ECF system, with electronic notification of such filing
`
`to all counsel of record.
`
`
`
`/s/ Maximilian A. Grant
`Maximilian A. Grant (VSB No. 91792)
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (202) 637-2200
`Facsimile: (202) 637-2201
`Email: max.grant@lw.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants and Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs Altria Client Services LLC and
`Philip Morris USA Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 2014-006
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket