throbber
international
`journal of
`pharmaceutics
`
`volume 105 no. 3 (9 May 1994)
`completing volume 105
`
`\
`
`'
`
`'
`
`\:•
`
`i'
`
`
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1014.001
`
`

`

`© 1994, Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved
`
`ISSN 0378-5173/1994/$7.00
`No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transinitted in any form or by any means, electronic,
`mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written pyrmission of the Publisher, Elsevier Science B.V.,
`Copyright + Permissions Department P.O. Box 521, 1000 AM Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
`No responsibility is assumed by the Publisher for any injury aii.d/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
`negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material
`herein. Because of the rapid advances in the medical sciences, the Publisher recommends that independent verification of
`diagnoses and drug dosages should be made.
`Although all advertising material is expected to conform to ethical (medical) standards, inclusion in this publication does not
`constitute a guarantee or endorsement of the quality or value of such product or of the claims made of it by its manufacturer.
`Special regulations for authors. Upon accepta11ce of an article by the journal, the author(s) will be asked to transfer copyright of the
`article to the Publisher. This transfer will ensure the widest possible dissemination of information.
`Special regulations for readers in the U.SA. This journal has been registered with the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Consent is
`given for copying of articles for personal or internal use, or for the personal use of specific clients. This consent is given on the
`condition that the copier pays through the Center the per-copy fee stated in the code on the first page of each article for copying
`beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law. The appropriate fee should be forwarded with a copy of
`the first page of the article to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 27 Congress Street, Salem, MA 01970, U.S.A. If no code
`appears in an article the author has .not given broad consent to copy and permission to copy must be obtained directly from the
`author. The fee indicated on the first page of an article in this issue will apply retroactively to all articles published in this journal,
`regardless of the year of publication. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying such as for general distribution, resale,
`advertising and promotion purposes, or for creating new collective works. Special written permission must be obtained from the
`Publisher for such copying.
`
`Elsevier Science B.V.
`Fax ( +31-20)5803258. Tel. ( +31-20)5803422
`
`Postal Address:
`
`Courier Service Address:
`
`International Journal of Pharmaceutics
`Elsevier Science B.V.
`P.O. Box 1527
`1000 BM Amsterdam
`The Netherlands
`
`International Journal of Pharmaceutics
`Elsevier Science B.V.
`Molenwerf 1
`1014 AG Amsterdam
`The Netherlands
`
`This journal is in the ADONIS Service, whereby copies of individual articles can be printed out from CD-ROM on request. An
`explanatory leaflet can be obtained by writing to ADONIS B.V., P.O. Box 839, 1000 AV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
`
`Printed in the Netherlands
`
`This journal is printed on acid-free paper.
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1014.002
`
`

`

`ELSEVIER
`
`International Journal of Pharmaceutics 105 (1994) 209-217
`
`international
`journal of
`pharmaceutics
`
`Research Papers
`An integrated approach to the selection of optimal salt form
`for a new drug candidate
`
`Kenneth R. Morris, Michael G. Fakes, Ajit B. Thakur, Ann W. Newman, Ambarish K.
`Singh, John J. Venit, Ciro J. Spagnuolo, Abu T.M. Serajuddin *
`Pharmaceutical Development Division, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
`
`(Received 25 September 1992; Modified version received 13 October 1993; Accepted 20 October 1993)
`
`Abstract
`
`A general method was developed to select the optimal salt form for BMS-180431, a novel HMG-CoA reductase
`inhibitor and a candidate for oral dosage form development, in an expeditious manner at the onset of the drug
`development process. The physicochemical properties such as hygroscopicity, physical stability of crystal forms at
`different humidity conditions, aqueous solubility, and chemical stability of seven salts, e.g., sodium, potassium,
`calcium, zinc,. magnesium, arginine and lysine, were studied using a multi~tier approach. The progression of studies
`among different tiers was such that the least time-consuming experiments were conducted earlier, thus saving time
`and effort. A ·'go/no go' decision was made after each tier of testing the salts, thus avoiding generation of extensive
`data on all available salt forms. The hygroscopicities of all BMS-180431 salts were evaluated at tier 1 and four salts
`(sodium, potassium, calcium and zinc) were dropped from consideration due to excessive moisture uptake within the
`expected humidity range of pharmaceutical manufacturing plants (30-50% R.H. at ambient temperature). The
`remaining three salts were subjected to the tier 2 evaluation for any change in their crystal structures with respect to
`humidity and the determination of their aqueous solubilities in the gastrointestinal pH range. The magnesium salt
`was dropped from further consideration due to humidity-dependent changes in its crystal structure and low solubility
`in water (3.7 mg/ml at room temperature). Arginine and lysine salts, which were resistant to any change in their
`crystalline structui~s under extremes of humidity conditions (6 and 75% R.H.) and had high aqueous solubilities
`( > 200 mg/ ml), were elevated to tier 3 for the determination of their chemical stability. Based on solid state stability
`of these two salts under accelerated conditions (temperature, humidity, an.d presence of excipients), consideration of
`ease of synthesis, ease of analysis, potential impurities, etc., and input from the marketing group with respect to its
`preference of counter i.on species, the arginine salt was selected for further development. The number of tiers
`necessary to reach a decision on the optimal salt form of a compound may depend on the physicochemical properties
`studied and the number of salts available. This salt selection process can be completed within 4-6 weeks and be
`easily adopted in the drug development program.
`
`Key words: Salt selection; HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor; BMS-180431; Hygroscopicity; Arginine salt; Lysine salt
`
`* Corresponding author.
`
`(
`0378-5173/94/$07.00 © 1994 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved
`SSDI 0378-5173(93)E0327-M
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1014.003
`
`

`

`210
`
`1. Introduction
`
`KR. Morris et al./ International Journal of Pharmaceutics 105 (1994) 209-217
`,!
`
`Berge et al. (1977) reviewed various advan(cid:173)
`tages of using salt forms of drugs in pharmaceuti(cid:173)
`cal formulations, which include improved dissolu(cid:173)
`tion rate and bioavailability of poorly water-solu(cid:173)
`ble compounds. For some drugs, preparation of
`stable salts may not be feasible, and free acid or
`base forms may be preferred (Serajuddin et al.,
`1986). In selecting the optimum chemical form of
`a new drug candidate, one must, therefore, take
`into consideration all physicochemical properties
`which would influence its physical and chemical
`stability, processability under manufacturing con(cid:173)
`ditions, dissolution rate, and bioavailability. Such
`a selection of chemical form must be done at the
`initial stage of drug development. Changing the
`chemical form in the middle of a developmental
`program may require repeating most of the bio(cid:173)
`logical, toxicological, formulation, and stability
`tests performed. On the other hand, continuing
`the development of a nonoptimal chemical form
`may lead to increased developmental and produc(cid:173)
`tion costs and even product failure.
`Although the importance of using the optimal
`salt form of a compound in dosage form design is
`well-recognized (Berge et al., 1977; Hirsch et al.,
`1978), there is no generally accepted procedure
`of selecting such a form during the drug develop(cid:173)
`ment process. More often than not, the medicinal
`chemists select salt forms on a practical. basis,
`such as previous experience with the salt type,
`ease of synthesis, percent yield, etc. (Berge et al.,
`1977). It is, therefore, desirable that a procedure
`be developed for the selectfon of salt or other
`chemical form of a drug candidate expeditiously
`at the outset of the developmental program. We
`have developed an integrated approach which
`was successfully applied to the selectfon of the
`optimal salt forms of several compounds. Its ap(cid:173)
`plication in the selection of the salt form of
`BMS-180431, a new HMG-CoA reductase in(cid:173)
`hibitor which is a candidate for the development
`as a solid dosage form, is d~scribed in this paper.
`
`2. Development of salt selection strategy
`
`Gould (1986) described a salt selection process
`based on melting point, solubility, stability, wetta(cid:173)
`bility, etc., of various salt forms. However, in the
`absence of clear go/ no go decisions at any par(cid:173)
`ticular stage of the salt selection process, this
`approach would lead to the< generation of exten(cid:173)
`sive physicochemical data on, all salt forms syn(cid:173)
`thesized. Gould concluded that "the balance re(cid:173)
`quired in assessing the correct salt form to
`progress into drug development makes it a diffi(cid:173)
`cult semiempirical exercise." A more rational ap(cid:173)
`proach is, therefore, required to select the appro(cid:173)
`priate salt form expeditiously during drug devel(cid:173)
`opment. In the present method the physicochemi(cid:173)
`cal tests were conducted at different tiers and a
`go/ no go decision was made after each tier of
`testing the salts, thus avoiding generation of ex(cid:173)
`tensive data on each salt form synthesized. The
`studies were planned such that the least time(cid:173)
`consuming experiments which could still give a
`go/ no go decision were conducted at tier 1.
`Progressively more time-consuming and labor-in(cid:173)
`tensive experiments were conducted at tier 2, tier
`3, etc. In this way, many different salt forms
`could be screened with the minimum of experi(cid:173)
`mental effort.
`Based on the review of literature (Berge et al.,
`1977; Hirsch et el., 1978; Gould, 1986; Serajuddin
`et al., 1986) and our experience in product devel(cid:173)
`opment, we identified low hygroscopicity, in(cid:173)
`tegrity of crystal form at different storage condi(cid:173)
`tions, aqueous solubility, and chemical stability as
`primary criteria for the selection of BMS-180431
`salts, and set limits for the acceptability of these
`criteria. All salt forms of the compound which
`were found to be crystalline were tested at tier 1
`for their hygroscopicity. A high degree of mois(cid:173)
`ture sorption or desorption by the salts under
`expected ambient humidity conditions of pharma(cid:173)
`ceutical manufacturing plants may create han(cid:173)
`dling and manufacturing difficulties, such as
`change in potency of the drug substance, change
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1014.004
`
`

`

`K.R. Morris et al./ International Journal of Pharmaceutics 105 (1994) 209-217
`
`211
`
`in the true density, tariation in flow behavior, etc.
`There may be batch-to-batch variability in the
`potency of dosage forms if care is not taken to
`ensure that the bulk drug substance maintained
`its declared potency prior to batching. The change
`in moisture content may also affect the physical
`and chemical stability of salts. Therefore, at the
`end of tier 1, all salt forms with excessive mois(cid:173)
`ture sorption/ desorption behavior were dropped
`from further consideration.
`The salts which were considered to have ac(cid:173)
`ceptable hygroscopicity were then screened in
`tier 2 for changes in crystal structure under exc
`tremes of humidity conditions by using combina(cid:173)
`fions of powder X-ray diffraction and thermal
`analysis techniques. This would indicate any
`propensity for pseudopolymorphic and solution(cid:173)
`mediated polymorphic changes which might occur
`during manufacturing or accelerated stability test(cid:173)
`ing of the bulk material or the solid dosage form.
`At this stage, the salts were also screened for
`their aqueous solubilities to determine if there is
`any potential dissolution and bioavailability prob(cid:173)
`lems and whether the formulation of a solution
`dosage form, if required, is feasible. The go/ no
`go decision would depend on the consideration of
`both the physical stability of crystalline structure
`at different humidity conditions as well as the
`solubility. The criteria for the selection of salts at
`tier 2 may depend on the judgment of the drug
`development scientists in consideration of the
`type of dosage form and the expected dose of the
`compound. A salt with lower solubility which can
`· still provide good dissolution rate in the judgment
`of a formulation scientist could be selected over a
`salt which is highly soluble but prone to crys(cid:173)
`talline changes. On the other hand, if the solubil(cid:173)
`ity is not acceptable .in consideration of the disso(cid:173)
`lution rate or if a: solution with high drug concen(cid:173)
`tration· is required for oral or parenteral use,
`another salt with some propensity for changes in
`crystal properties under extremes of humidity may
`be considered.
`Finally, at tier 3, the selected salts )Vere sub(cid:173)
`jected to accelerated thermal stability and photo(cid:173)
`stability screening. Since the stability testing of
`salts required much time and effort, placing this
`at tier 3 limited the number of salts on which
`)
`
`such tests were conducted and avoided genera(cid:173)
`tion of unnecessary data with other salt forms.
`Compatibility screening with selected excipients
`may also be conducted at this stage.
`In the above scheme, the number of salt forms
`available and the physicochemical properties con(cid:173)
`sidered important for the bulk drug substance as
`well for the expected dosage forms will dictate
`how many tiers would be necessary to select a salt
`form. There may also be rare situations where all
`salts progressed from a lower tier to a higher one
`ai:'e unacceptable for development. For example,
`the solubility of all salts at tier 2 may be unac(cid:173)
`ceptable or chemical stability of all the salts at
`tier 3 may be poor. If this happens, additional salt
`forms or free acids/bases should be considered
`prior to reevaluating any salt that was dropped at
`an earlier tier. Also, the criteria of progression
`from a lower tier to the next higher one may
`depend on the physicochemical properties of the
`available salts. If, for example, all salts are found
`to be highly hygroscopic, it might be necessary to
`progress some of them to a higher tier, keeping in
`mind that, if selected, they might require special
`manufacturing and storage conditions.
`F
`
`OH
`
`"'""'• COOR
`OH
`
`. I
`
`·~
`
`F
`
`3. Experimental
`
`3.1. Mat~ripJs
`
`The following salts of BMS-180431 were used
`during salt selection: sodium, potassium, calcium,
`zinc, magnesium, arginine, and lysine. A few other
`salts were also prepared; however, they were
`found to be noncrystalline and, therefore, not
`considered for salt selection.
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1014.005
`
`

`

`212
`
`K.R. Morris et al./ International Journal of Pharmaceutics 105 (1994) 209-217
`
`Computer
`
`Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the moisture sorption-desorption
`apparatus.
`
`3.2. Moisture sorption studies
`
`The rate and extent of moisture sorption at
`different humidity conditions were determined by
`using a Cahn Digital Recording Balance fitted
`with a system to maintain and monitor specific
`relative humidity conditions. The system consists
`of a tubular glass chamber surrounding the pan
`of the balance, a flask for the humidity-control(cid:173)
`ling salt solution, a peristaltic pump to circulate
`the saturated air, and an in-line chilled mirror
`dew point meter for the determination of relative
`humidity within the system. Saturated aqueous
`solutions of MgCl 2 , Mg(N0 3) 2 and NaCl were
`used at room temperature to maintain 33, 52 and
`75% R.H. conditions, respectively. Anhydrous
`CaS04 (Drierite®, Hammond, OH) provided the
`6% relative humidity condition. Once assembled,
`a closed system is formed wherein the desired
`relative humidity condition can be readily at(cid:173)
`tained. The sample can be placed on the pan of
`the balance through the access port with practi(cid:173)
`cally no perturbation of the humidity inside the
`chamber. Once a sample ( ~ 10 mg) reaches equi(cid:173)
`librium at a particular relative humidity, the envi(cid:173)
`ronment surrounding the sample ma:y be changed
`to a different humidity condition by changing the
`flask containing the salt solution. The atmo-
`
`sphere within the glass chamber attains the new
`humidity condition within 5 min of such a change,
`and the sample then reaches equilibrium with
`this new atmospheric condition. Highly repro(cid:173)
`ducible moisture sorption data were obtained by
`this method. In a separate study, when multiple
`samples (15 mg each) from the same batch of a
`drug substance were equilibrated at different hu(cid:173)
`midity conditions, the final weights at each hu(cid:173)
`midity condition were within ± 0.02 mg. This
`indicated that for a 2% moisture uptake, the
`precision of the experiment would be ± 6.6%,
`while for a 10% moisture uptake it would be
`within ± 1.5%. 1 Also, when the equilibrium mois(cid:173)
`ture contents of a sample measured at different
`humidity conditions are compared, the influence
`of any artifacts such as the adsorption of mois(cid:173)
`ture to the sample pan is also minimal; for exam(cid:173)
`ple, in a moisture uptake run without any sample
`on the pan, the weight gain between 6 and 75%
`RH was < 0.01 mg. A schematic diagram of the
`moisture sorption/ desorption apparatus is given
`in Fig. 1.
`
`3.3. Determination of moisture content
`
`The moisture contents of samples exposed to
`different relative humidity conditions were deter(cid:173)
`mined primarily by thermal gravimetric analysis
`(TGA) using a DuPont 2000 Thermal Analyst
`system .. However, since the weight loss in the
`TGA represents both water and any other volatile
`material, initial moisture contents of all samples
`as well as moisture contents of specific samples
`after equilibration at different humidity condi(cid:173)
`tions were confirmed by coulometric titration us(cid:173)
`ing a Brinkman 684 Karl-Fischer Coulometer.
`The TGA was performed by weighing accurately
`about 10 mg of sample on an open sample pan
`and then heating the sample at a rate of l0°C per
`min. During the experiment, dry nitrogen was
`purged over the sample at a rate of 40 cm3 per
`min. For coulometric analysis, sample sizes were
`selected to yield 1-3 mg of water. The accuracy
`of the system was ensured by titrating 2 mg of
`water (10 µ,I of a 20% w /v solution of water in
`methanol) where the results varied between 97.5
`and 102 % of theoretical.
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1014.006
`
`

`

`KR. Morris et al./ International Journal of Pharmaceutics 105 (1994) 209-217
`
`213
`
`3.4. Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) anal(cid:173)
`ysis
`
`The energetics of the moisture-solid interac(cid:173)
`tion in samples, e.g.,. hydrate formation, was de(cid:173)
`termined by DSC analysis. A sample sealed in an
`aluminum pan with a pin hole was heated at a
`rate of 5 or 10°C per min from room temperature
`to about 200°C using a DuPont 2000 Thermal
`Analyst system.
`
`3.5. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis
`
`Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of the sam(cid:173)
`ples were collected using a Phillips APD 3720
`powder diffraction system with a vertical go(cid:173)
`niometer in the 8 /28 geometry. The X~ray gen(cid:173)
`erator (model XRG 3100) was operated at 45 kV
`with a copper radiation source. A scintillation
`detector was used to scan the range between 2
`and 32° 28. A sample was packed in a 1.5 cm X 1.0
`cm sample holder with a thickness of 2 mm and
`its initial powder pattern was determined. The
`sample holder was then stored overnight in a
`desiccator with a particular relative humidity, and
`the powder X-ray diffraction analysis was then
`repeated. The top/surface of the powder bed was
`fully exposed to the atmosphere, and, since the
`thickness of the powder bed was small, there was
`no barrier to the diffusion of moisture into the
`bed. By this procedure, it is also possible to
`determine the change in crystal structure when a
`sample equilibrated. at one relative humidity is
`reequilibrated at a different humidity condition.
`Since the samples were not disturbed after the
`initial packing, the parameters such as size and
`orientation of particles remained unchanged.
`
`3. 6. Determination of solubility
`
`The solubilities of various salts under simu(cid:173)
`lated gastric and intestinal pH conditions were
`determined by equilibrating excess of solid mate(cid:173)
`rial with 0.01 M HCl and water at room tempera(cid:173)
`ture using a Burrell® wrist action shaker. The
`solids were equilibrated 'with water for 24 h;
`however, since the preliminary studies showed
`that the compound is relatively unstable in· acidic
`
`media due to the formation of its lactone form
`( ~ 5% degradation at pH 2 in 6 h at room
`temperature) shaking with 0.01 M HCl was per(cid:173)
`formed for 2 h only. The pH values of the solu(cid:173)
`tions were recorded prior to their filtration
`through 0.45 µ,m pore size Millipore filters. The
`solutions were assayed for drug concentrations
`using high-pressure
`liquid chromatography
`(HPLC).
`
`3. 7. Determination of solid-state stability
`
`Accurately weighed samples of salts ( ~ 10 mg
`each) were stored at 40 and 50°C in closed 4 cm3
`glass vials and at 40°C/75% R.H. in open glass
`vials. For photostability studies, samples stored in
`closed clear glass vials were exposed to 900 foot(cid:173)
`candle fluorescent light; the vials stored under a
`similar condition with aluminum foil wrappers
`around them served as controls. The stability
`samples were assayed at different intervals by
`HPLC.
`
`3.8. Screening of drug-excipient compatibility
`
`Drug-excipient compatibility screening studies
`were performed on arginine and lysine salts of
`BMS-180431 using a procedure reported earlier
`(Serajuddin et al., 1991). Ternary or quaternary
`mixtures of the drug and excipients (drug: excipi(cid:173)
`ent, 1 : 7) were weighed into 4 cm3 glass vials,
`approx. 20% water was added to the contents of
`vials (70 µ,l water to 320 mg powder in a vial), the
`vials were sealed tightly, and stored at 50°C.
`Samples stored at room temperature without
`added water served as controls. Each drug-excipic
`ent mixture consisted of 40 mg of drug, 250 mg of
`a diluent (tricalcium phosphate, mannitol or mi(cid:173)
`crocrystalline cellulose), and 30 mg of a third
`component which was a disintegrant, binder or
`lubricant. Duplicate samples of each mixture were
`withdrawn, examined visually for any physical
`change, and analyzed chemically using HPLC.
`
`3.9. HPLC analysis
`
`The samples were dissolved in a 40 : 60 v /v
`mixture of acetonitrile and water, and analyzed
`by HPLC using a 4.6 mm x 250 mm reversed
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1014.007
`
`

`

`... --
`
`214
`
`KR. Morris et al./ International Journal of Pharmaceutics 105 (1994) 209-217
`
`CD
`
`20
`18
`~ 16 m-
`a; a 14
`a: a; 12
`l!!:i=
`.a~ 10
`.!!!C 8
`Oo
`::!E-
`
`6
`
`(a)
`
`33% RH
`
`52% RH
`
`Potassium
`Sodium
`
`Calcium
`75% RH
`
`- - - - -Z inc
`
`+-Change in RH
`
`4
`
`2 0
`
`2
`
`3
`Time, hours
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`I -
`
`18
`16
`CD
`~ 14
`~~ 12
`a: a; 10
`I!!:;=
`=~ 8
`.!!!C 6
`Oo
`::!E-
`4
`'#.
`
`2
`
`(b)
`
`33% RH
`
`52% RH
`
`75% RH
`
`Magnesium
`
`- - - - - -Lys ine
`
`i=:==:::::::;;:::::=--<--- Arginine
`t
`'Change In RH
`Change In RH
`2
`
`4
`
`0 0
`
`Table 1
`Moisture contents of various BMS-180431 salts initially and
`after equilibration at different humidity conditions
`% moisture relative to dry weight
`Salt
`Initial 33%R.H. 52% R.H.
`4.4
`4.4
`Sodium
`16.0
`Potassium
`9.5
`10.6
`17.1
`Calcium
`5.0
`10.4
`13.4
`4.1
`2.9
`Zinc
`6.5
`Magnesium 13.8
`13.5
`14.0
`Arginine
`2.8
`3.0
`3.2
`Lysine
`3.2
`3.6
`4.0
`
`75% R.H.
`ND
`ND
`16.1
`8.3
`14.9
`3.8
`6.0
`
`ND, not determined.
`
`R.H., as determined by recording weight gain or
`loss using a Cahn balance, are shown in Fig. 2.
`The initial moisture content varied from salt to
`salt. Also, when multiple lots of the same salt
`were received, the initial moisture content varied
`depending on the extent of drying of the samples
`(not shown in figure). As shown in Fig. 2, the
`moisture sorption rates were very rapid; the sam(cid:173)
`ples reached equilibrium in < 10 min when ex(cid:173)
`posed to 33, 52 or 75% R.H. Initial moisture
`contents as well as equilibrium moisture contents
`of various salts under these three different hu(cid:173)
`midity conditions are tabulated in Table 1.
`The energetics of the interaction of water with
`these salts were examined by DSC. The loss of
`moisture from the metal salts (sodium, potassium,
`
`5
`
`6
`
`3
`Time, hours
`Fig. 2. Moisture sorption by (a) potassium, sodium, calcium
`and zinc salts, and (b) magnesium, lysine and arginine salts of
`BMS-180431 at 33, 52 and 75% R.H. The initial moisture
`contents were determined separately by TGA. The % R.H.
`was changed to the next higher value after the sample reached
`equilibrium moisture content. at the lower % R.H. The typical
`changes in % R.H. are indicated by arrows.
`
`phase column (YMC-C18 column, S-5; YMC, Inc.,
`Morris Plains, NJ), a Waters autoinjector and an
`Applied Biosystems Spectroflow 783 detector.
`The mobile phase consisted of a · 40 : 15 : 45 v /v
`mixture of acetonitrile, methanol and a phospho(cid:173)
`ric acid solution (0.1 % H 3P0 4 in water), and had
`a final pH of 2.5. The flow rate of. the mobile
`phase was 1 ml/ min and the run time after each
`injection was 20 min. The sample volume was 20
`,ul, and the detection was by ultraviolet light
`absorbance at a wavelength of 296 nm.
`
`~-
`
`~ 0.3
`0 u:: - 0.1
`
`ra
`Q) :c
`
`4. Results and discussion
`
`4.1. Moisture sorption (tier I)
`
`Moisture sorption curves for various salts when
`exposed to 33% R.H., followed by 52 and 75%
`
`Temperature, °C
`
`Fig. 3. DSC scans of BMS-180431 calcium salt indicating its
`dehydration behavior. Scan A shows the sample as received
`for testing and scan B is for the sample equilibrated at 75%
`R.H.
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1014.008
`
`

`

`.. if.
`
`KR. Morris et al./ International Journal of Pharmaceutics 105 (1994) 209-217
`
`215
`
`calcium, zinc and magnesium) occurred in two
`stages, which 'i~ exemplified by the DSC scan of
`the calcium salt as shown in Fig. 3A and B where
`two dehydration endotherms at 59 and 97°C were
`observed. The ~ndotherm at 59°C disappeared
`when the calcium salt was equilibrated at 6%
`R.H., indicating a lower energy of salt-water asso(cid:173)
`ciation than the endotherm at 97°C which repre(cid:173)
`sents more tightly bound, possibly cation-associ(cid:173)
`ated, water. The presence of a dehydration en(cid:173)
`dotherm for a metal salt at a relatively low tem(cid:173)
`temperature
`perature (for example, 30-70°C
`range for the calcium salt in Fig. 3B) also sug(cid:173)
`gests the possibility that the loss of moisture may
`occur when heat is applied or developed during
`processing, e.g., -drying of bulk drug substance,
`compression of powders or granules in the tablet
`press, etc. In contrast, the DSC scans of the
`amino acid salts as received (Fig. 4) did not
`indicate the presence of any hydrate. The DSC
`scans remained essentially unchanged after the
`exposure of samples to humidity conditions be(cid:173)
`tween 33 and 75% R.H., indicating that there was
`also no hydrate formation during this humidity
`challenge test.
`Additionally, Table 1 shows that arginine and
`lysine salts have very low fluctuations in moisture
`content (0.4% or lower) within the range of 33-
`52% R.H, which is prevalent under most manu(cid:173)
`facturing conditions. Although the magnesium salt
`had high initial moisture content, it was relatively
`nonhygroscopic between 33 and 75% R.H. For
`
`0.5
`
`0.0
`
`-0.5
`
`-1.0
`
`-1.5
`
`-2.0
`
`.J2l
`3::
`"i
`0
`iI
`Ri
`Q)
`:I:
`
`r
`I
`/e'--.... v
`
`I _ _,,
`"
`
`2
`
`5
`-
`
`-
`
`25
`
`50
`
`75
`
`100 125 150 175. 206 225 250
`
`Temperature, °C
`Fig. 4. DSC scans of arginine (A) and lysine (B) salts of
`BMS-180431 as received for testing.
`
`75% RH
`
`0.0
`
`5.0
`
`10.0
`
`15.0
`
`Degrees, 28
`
`Fig. 5. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of BMS-180431
`magnesium salt as received for testing and after equilibration
`at 6 and 75% R.H.
`
`other salts, the fluctuation in moisture content
`between 33 and 52% R.H. was > 3%. Based on
`these considerations, arginine, lysine and magne(cid:173)
`sium salts were selected for the next stage (tier 2)
`of evaluation.
`
`4.2. Crystal structure and solubility (tier 2)
`
`Arginine, lysine, and magnesium salts selected
`because of their low hygroscopicity were further
`evaluated for any change in crystal structure un(cid:173)
`der expected extremes of humidity conditions
`during storage or accelerated stability testing. This
`is important because changes in crystal form in
`the bulk material may affect the physical (and/ or
`chemical) stability and performance of solid
`dosage forms and must be controlled. For exam(cid:173)
`ple, Yamaoka et al. (1982) observed cracking of
`tablets when the drug substances present changed
`from an anhydrate to a hydrate under high(cid:173)
`humidity conditions.
`The powder X-ray diffraction patterns of argi(cid:173)
`.. nine andJ.y:sine salts remained unchanged within
`the humidity range of 6-75% R.H. However, the
`magnesium salt showed changes in its powder
`XRD patterns which could be attributed to a
`change in the crystal form (Fig. 5). The sample
`stored at 6% R.H. loses intensity in the higher
`angle peaks as well as the major reflections at 11°
`28, and gains intensity in the peak at 11.5° 28.
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1014.009
`
`

`

`216
`
`KR. Morris et al./ International Journal of Pharmaceutics 105 (1994) 209-217
`
`The 75% R.H. pattern completely loses the 11.5°
`28 reflection while maintaining the 11° 2fJ peak.
`As mentioned earlier, solubilities of the salts
`of BMS-180431 were also studied at this stage.
`While the two amino acid salts were freely solu(cid:173)
`ble in water(> 200 mg/ml as free acid content),
`the magnesium salt was only slightly soluble (3.7
`mg/ml as free acid content). The pH values of
`the saturated solutions of these salts in water
`were between 6.8 and 7.6. All three salts, how(cid:173)
`ever, exhibited comparable solubilities under
`acidic pH conditions due to the conversion of
`BMS-180431 to the free acid (pKa = 4.4); the
`solubilities at pH 2.5-2.9 varied between 0.61 and
`0.67 mg/ml. These results indicate that these
`salts wou1d have adequate solubilities for their
`complete dissolution of the expected dose of 25
`mg under gastrointestinal pH conditions if formu(cid:173)
`lated as solid dosage forms. However, the limited
`solubility of the magnesium salt in water could
`present difficulties in the preparation of drug
`solutions for oral and parenteral use. Due to the
`change in crystal form and the limited solubility
`of magnesium salt, it was dropped from further
`consideration.
`
`4.3. Solid-state stability and drug-excipient compat(cid:173)
`ibility (tier 3)
`
`The solid-state stability evaluation of arginine
`and lysine salts for 4 weeks at a temperature as
`high as 50°C and at 40°C/75% R.H. did not show
`any significant degradation. Both salts, however,
`showed some susceptibility to light; the potencies
`of the arginine salt after exposure to 900 foot(cid:173)
`candle light for 1 and 2 weeks were 94.7 and
`87.9%, respectively, while those of the lysine salt
`stored under the same condition were 97.4 and
`95.0%, respectively. This difference in the light
`stability of arginine and lysine salts may not be of
`any practical significance because both salts would
`require protection from light.
`A short-term compatibility screen with some
`excipients commonly used in solid dosage forms,
`namely, tricalcium phosphate, mannitol, micro(cid:173)
`crystalline cellulose, croscarmelose sodium,
`cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone, and magnesium
`stearate, was conducted to further evaluate the
`
`arginine and lysine salts. Lactose was not selected
`as one of the excipients due to expected incom(cid:173)
`patibility of amino acid counter ions with lactose.
`The stabilities of the salts in the presence of
`various excipients were comparable; the loss in
`potency after

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket