throbber
DIGITAL DESIGN
`PRINCIPLES AND ACTICES
`JOHN E WAKERLY
`
`PRENTICE HALL SERIES IN COMPUTER ENGINEERING
`EDWARDJ. McCLUSKEY, SERIES EDITOR
`
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Ex. 1034, Page 1 of 5
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC
`IPR2021-01376
`
`

`

`Digital Design
`Principles and Practices
`
`Goqu oaeitoaa
`alee
`vsneTyib 9va)
`heloct obgM TodgotulsglunaM
`
`boistogioanltstzyodobA io hsnobat saiiqi
`OTO
`JOHN F. WAKERLY
`tormabsisl
`Stanford University
`
`o
`
`aA
`
`lonotzividA
`9100s noni
`S2OTOveast ws ahiDboowalgog
`
`cam oodaldhlozugo
`bovoen2idg itA
`areitdvgdimoitgotheninoizaisq tuodi
`
`-8EB5L5-EL-D M821
`UIsnoortaiollataoi
`oal obansllekdeooitoo
`
`PRENTICE HALL, Englewood Cliffs, NewJersey07632
`
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Ex. 1034, Page 2 of 5
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC
`IPR2021-01376
`
`

`

`L1brary of Congress Cata log ing-1n-Publicat
`
`ion Data
`
`waker ly, John F.
`pr inc iples and pract ices / John F. Waker ly
`Digital design
`(Prent ice Hall ser1es in computer engineer ing)
`Cn.
`--
`p.
`Includes bibliographical references.
`ISBN 0-13-212838-1
`1. Dig1tal
`integrated
`circu1ts--Des ign and construct
`I. Title.
`II. Series.
`des 1gn.
`1990
`TK7874.H335
`621.39'5--dc20
`
`ion.
`
`2.
`
`Logic
`
`c9oilos9 bns2slcioniha
`
`89-26498
`CIP
`
`Editorial/production supervision: Kathleen Schiaparelli
`Cover design: Peggy Kenselaar
`Cover painting: Casey Burley
`Manufacturing buyer: Margaret Rizzi
`
`PostScript is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
`Macintosh is a trademark of Apple Computer, Inc.
`TRI-STATE is a trademark of National Semiconductor Corporation.
`PAL is a trademark of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
`ABEL is a trademark of Data I/O Corporation
`
`© 1990 by Prentice-Hall, Inc.
`A Division ofSimon &Schuster
`Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632
`
`All rightsreserved. No part of this book may
`be reproduced, in any form or by any means,
`without permission in writing from the publisher.
`
`Printed in the United States of America
`10
`9
`8
`76
`5
`4
`3
`2
`1
`
`ISBN -13-212838-1
`
`Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited, London
`Prentice-Hall of Australia Pty. Limited, Sydney
`Prentice -HallCanadaInc., Toronto
`Prentice-Hall Hispanoamericana, S.A., Mexico
`Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi
`AH8OTA3A9
`Prentice-Hall ofJapan, Inc., Tokyo
`Simon & Schuster Asia Pte. Ltd., Singapore
`Editora Prentice -Hall do Brasil, Ltda, Rio de Janiero
`
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Ex. 1034, Page 3 of 5
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC
`IPR2021-01376
`
`

`

`524
`
`SEQUENTIAL LOGIC DESIGN PRACTICES
`
`CH. 6
`
`ure
`
`forms binary multiplication using the shift-and-add algorithm, or binarydivision
`using the shift-and-subtract algorithm. To perform an n-bit operation, theseal.
`gorithms require an initialization step, n computation steps, and possible cleanup
`steps. The main machine for such an algorithm contains states for initialization,
`generic
`computation, and cleanup steps, and a modulo-n
`counter can be used
`as a submachine to control
`the number of generic
`computation steps executed.
`In Section 6.9.2, we'll show the design of a monolithic state machine for8-bit
`shift-and-add multiplication, while the design of a corresponding decomposed
`machine for n-bit multiplication is left as an exercise (6.59).
`
`synchronous design
`methodology
`fully synchronous
`circuit
`
`6.9 SYNCHRONOUS DESIGN METHODOLOGY
`The basic rule of synchronous design mnethodology is that all of a circuit's flip-
`flops should be clocked by the same clock, and that preset and clear inputs
`should not be used, except for system initialization.
`In such fully synchronous
`circuits,
`races and hazards are not a problem,
`for
`two reasons. First,
`the only
`fundamental-mode circuits that might be subject
`to races or essential hazardsare
`predesigned elements (e.g., discrete flip-flops or ASIC cells), guaranteed bythe
`manufacturer to work properly. Second, even though the combinational circuits
`that drive flip-flop control
`inputs may contain static or dynamic or function
`hazards, these hazards have no effect since the control
`inputs are sampled only
`after the hazard-induced glitches have had a chance to settle out.
`The designer of a synchronous system or subsystem must perform justthree
`well-defined tasks to ensure reliable system operation:
`(1) Minimize and determine the amount of clock skew in the system, asdis-
`cussed in Section 6.9.3.
`(2) Ensure that flip-flops have positive setup- and hold-time margins, including
`an allowance for clock skew, as described in Section 6.1.4.
`Identify asynchronous inputs, synchronize them with the clock, andensure
`that
`the synchronizers have an adequately
`low probability
`of
`failure, as
`described in Sections 6.9.5 and 6.10.
`Before discussing some of these timing-related issues, we'll
`model
`for synchronous system structure and an example.
`
`look at a general
`
`(3)
`
`6.9.1 Synchronous System Structure
`The sequential-circuit design examples that we've given so far in this chapter
`are mostly state machines with a small number of states.
`If a sequential circuit
`has more than a few flip-flops,
`then it's not desirable (and often not possible)
`
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Ex. 1034, Page 4 of 5
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC
`IPR2021-01376
`
`

`

`SEC. 6.9
`
`Figure 6-82
`Synchronoussystem structure.
`
`CLOCK
`
`SYNCHRONOUS DESIGN METHODOLOGY
`
`525
`
`COMMAND
`JI
`
`CONTROL
`UNIT
`(state machine)
`
`DATA IN
`
`CONTROL
`
`INPUT
`
`CONTROL
`
`DATA UNIT
`
`CONTROL
`
`CONDITIONS
`
`OUTPUT
`JL
`DATA OUT
`
`state machine, because the number of
`
`totreat the circuit as a single, monolithic
`stateswould be too large to handle.
`Fortunately, most digital systems or subsystems can be partitioned into two
`ormoreparts. Whether
`the system processes numbers, digitized voice signals, or
`astreamof spark-plug pulses, a certain part of the system, which we'll call
`the
`dataunit, can be viewed as storing,
`routing,
`combining, and generally processing
`"data."Another part, which we'll call
`the control unit, can be viewed as starting
`andstopping actions in the data unit,
`testing conditions, and deciding what
`to do
`nextaccording to circumstances.
`In general, only the control unit
`is treated as a
`state machine.
`Figure 6-82 is a general block diagram of a system with a control unit and
`adataunit. We have also included
`explicit
`blocks for
`input and output, but we
`Couldhave just as easily absorbed these functions into the data unit
`itself. The
`Controlunit is a state machine whose inputs include command inputs that
`indicate
`howthe machine is to function, and condition inputs provided by the data unit.
`Ihecommand inputs may be supplied by another subsystem or by a user to set
`egeneraloperating mode of the control machine (RUN/HALT, NORMAL/TURBO,
`ec), while the condition inputs allow the control unit
`to change its behavior as
`Cquiredby circumstances in the data unit (ZERO DETECT, MEMORY FULL, etc.).
`A key characteristic of the structure in Figure 6-82 is that the control unit
`d thedata unit both use the same common clock. Figure 6-83 illustrates the
`Uperationsof both units during a typical clock cycle:
`(1 Shortly after the beginning of the clock period, the control-unit state and
`the data-unit
`register outputs are valid.
`
`data unit
`control unit
`
`command input
`condition input
`
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Ex. 1034, Page 5 of 5
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC
`IPR2021-01376
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket