throbber
Attorney Docket No. 269290-462991
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________
`
`Northern Stamping, Co.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`Horizon Global Americas Inc.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`______________
`
`Case IPR2021-01411
`Patent 10,589,585
`
`______________
`
`Expert Declaration of Steven Becker in Support of
`Petitioner’s Opposition to Motion to Amend
`
`Mail Stop Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0001
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`I.
`II.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Page
`INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1
`THE PROPOSED SUBSTITUTE CLAIMS ARE UNPATENTABLE
`UNDER 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103, & 112 .......................................................... 2
`A.
`All Limitations Of The Proposed Substitute Claims Are
`Disclosed By Withers ............................................................................ 2
`1.
`[21.1] “said pair of tubular members having a first,
`second, third and fourth end” ...................................................... 2
`[21.2] “said mid rail is permanently attached to said pair
`of tubular members as a one piece assembly” ............................ 3
`[21.6] “a first mounting flange attached to said first end,
`a second mounting flange attached to said second end, a
`third mounting flange attached to said third end, and a
`fourth mounting flange attached to said fourth end” .................. 5
`[21.7] “each of said mounting flanges extend along a
`same axis as said tubular member to which said mounting
`flange is attached” ....................................................................... 5
`[21.8] “a mounting aperture on each of said mounting
`flanges” ....................................................................................... 6
`[21.9] “said mounting flanges and mounting apertures
`configured to attach directly to a frame of a vehicle” ................ 7
`All Limitations Of The Proposed Substitute Claims Are Taught
`By Withers ’317 In View Of Fandrich ................................................ 8
`1.
`[21] “A hitch mounting system comprising” .............................. 8
`2.
`[21.1] “a pair of tubular members each having a cross-
`sectional shape a substantial portion of which is defined
`by an enclosed peripheral wall with a generally hollow
`section, said pair of tubular members having a first,
`second, third and fourth end” ...................................................... 9
`
`B.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`- i -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0002
`
`

`

`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`[21.2] “a mid rail attached to each of and between said
`pair of tubular members spacing said pair of tubular
`members apart, said mid rail is permanently attached to
`said pair of tubular members as a one piece assembly” ........... 13
`[21.3] “said mid rail having a socket capable of accepting
`a gooseneck hitch ball” ............................................................. 14
`[21.4] “a pair of receiving members attached with each of
`said pair of tubular members” ................................................... 15
`[21.5] “said receiving members configured to engage a
`leg of a fifth wheel hitch” ......................................................... 16
`[21.6] “a first mounting flange attached to said first end,
`a second mounting flange attached to said second end, a
`third mounting flange attached to said third end, and a
`fourth mounting flange attached to said fourth end” ................ 17
`[21.7] “each of said mounting flanges extend along a
`same axis as said tubular member to which said mounting
`flange is attached” ..................................................................... 18
`[21.8] “a mounting aperture on each of said mounting
`flanges” ..................................................................................... 19
`[21.9] “said mounting flanges and mounting apertures
`configured to attach directly to a frame of a vehicle” .............. 20
`[22] “The hitch mounting system of claim 21, wherein at
`least a pair of the receiving members are configured to
`accept a safety chain tie down.” ................................................ 21
`
`- ii -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0003
`
`

`

`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
` Page(s)
`
`STATUTES
`35 U.S.C. § 102 .......................................................................................................... 2
`35 U.S.C. § 103 .......................................................................................................... 2
`
`- iii -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0004
`
`

`

`TABLE OF EXHIBITS
`Publication
`Date (unless
`otherwise
`noted)
`Dec. 4, 2017
`(filing date)
`
`Type of
`Prior Art
`(Pre-AIA
`35 U.S.C.)
`
`N/A
`
`Nov. 22, 2002 § 102(b)
`Jun. 23, 2009
`(filing date)
`Jan. 14, 1936
`Jul. 31, 2008
`(filing date)
`Oct. 30, 2009
`(filing date)
`
`§ 102(e)
`
`§ 102(b)
`
`§ 102(e)
`
`N/A
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`Description
`
`1001
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1014
`
`1022
`
`2006
`
`USPN 10,589,585 to Stanifer et al. (the
`’585 Patent) (Patent under Inter Partes
`Review)
`USPN 6,467,791 to Fandrich et al.
`(Fandrich)
`USPN 7,793,968 to Withers (Withers)
`
`USPN 2,027,990 to Lubbers (Lubbers)
`USPN 7,828,317 to Withers (Withers
`’317)
`U.S. Application No. 12/609,062 (’062
`Application)
`
`- iv -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0005
`
`

`

`I, Steven Becker, make the present Declaration in support of Petitioner’s
`
`Opposition to Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend. To that end, I hereby declare as
`
`follows:
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`1.
`My background qualifications and Curriculum Vitae were previously
`
`set forth in my Declaration in Support of the Petition for Inter Partes Review
`
`(“First Declaration”). See Ex. 1007 at ¶¶ 1–11; Ex. 1008.
`
`2.
`
`In reaching my opinions in this declaration, I carefully reviewed
`
`Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend (“MTA”; Paper 21), as well as U.S. Patent No.
`
`10,589,585 (“’585 Patent”; Ex. 1001), U.S. Patent No. 7,793,968 to Withers
`
`(“Withers”; Ex. 1012), U.S. Patent No. 7,828,317 to Withers (“Withers ’317”; Ex.
`
`1022), U.S. Patent No. 6,467,791 to Fandrich (“Fandrich”; Ex. 1011), U.S. Patent
`
`No. 2,027,990 to Lubbers (“Lubbers”; Ex. 1014), and U.S. Application No.
`
`12/609,062 (“’062 Application”; Ex. 2006).
`
`3.
`
`My understanding of a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of
`
`the alleged invention (“POSA”) of the ’585 Patent was set forth in my First
`
`Declaration. See Ex. 1007 at ¶¶ 14–19. My testimony and opinions in this
`
`Declaration are given from the perspective of a POSA at the time of the alleged
`
`invention of the ’585 Patent unless otherwise specifically indicated. This is true
`
`even if my statements are in the present tense.
`
`- 1 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0006
`
`

`

`4.
`
`The legal assumptions set forth in my First Declaration are
`
`incorporated herein and apply equally to this Declaration. See Ex. 1007 at ¶¶ 20–
`
`26.
`
`5.
`
`Several of the figures in this Declaration are annotated and/or colored.
`
`While I did not personally create these figures, I worked with counsel for
`
`Petitioner to ensure the annotations and/or colors are accurate.
`
`II.
`
`THE PROPOSED SUBSTITUTE CLAIMS ARE UNPATENTABLE
`UNDER 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103, & 112
`A.
`All Limitations Of The Proposed Substitute Claims Are Disclosed
`By Withers
`I have already demonstrated how Withers anticipates original
`
`6.
`
`Challenged Claims 16, 17 and 19. See Ex. 1007, ¶¶ 152–170. Below, I show how
`
`Withers also teaches the limitations added to proposed substitute claim 21 over
`
`original claim 16, such that Withers also anticipates proposed substitute claim 21.
`
`1.
`
` [21.1] “said pair of tubular members having a first, second,
`third and fourth end”
`As shown in the annotated Figure 1 of Withers below, it is my
`
`7.
`
`understanding that the front and rear transverse bar portions 28, 30 (red) include
`
`“four tubular ends 20A-D.” Ex. 1012, 3:2–4, Fig. 1.
`
`- 2 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0007
`
`

`

`Second end
`
`Fourth end
`
`First end
`
`Third end
`
`2.
`
`[21.2] “said mid rail is permanently attached to said pair of
`tubular members as a one piece assembly”
`My understanding of the term “assembly” is a collection of parts so
`
`8.
`
`assembled. Accordingly, the phrase “one piece assembly” is unclear to me, as an
`
`assembly necessarily requires a collection of pieces and thus not one piece.
`
`9.
`
`This limitation recites the mid rail being “permanently attached” to
`
`the pair of tubular members, and Patent Owner refers to the disclosure of
`
`“welding” in the specification of the ’062 Application as alleged support for this
`
`phrase. See MTA at 5; Ex. 2006 at 10 (¶ 26).
`
`10. However, it is my understanding that “permanently attached” is not
`
`limited to only welding, and, in some circumstances, a nut and bolt configuration
`
`can constitute permanent attachment. For example, Fandrich notes
`
`that
`
`conventional “mounting systems are typically bolted to the under frame of the
`
`vehicle through the use of essentially permanent fastener systems such as bolt and
`
`nut combinations….”). Ex. 1011, 1:17–22 (emphasis added).
`
`- 3 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0008
`
`

`

`11.
`
`Indeed, the specification of the ’062 Application states: “The mid rail
`
`or adapter plate 40 may be attached to the rails by any appropriate means, such as
`
`with fasteners, welding or the like.” Ex. 2006 at 10 (¶ 26). It is unclear to me
`
`whether
`
`the attachments other
`
`than welding also constitute “permanent
`
`attachment,” and the specification of the ’062 Application does not provide clarity
`
`on this point.
`
`12.
`
`Ignoring the lack of clarity with the phrase “one piece assembly,” it is
`
`my understanding that Withers discloses a central bridging portion 32 (green) that
`
`is a single component and is attached to the front and rear transverse bar portions
`
`28, 30 (red). Ex. 1012, 3:9–11, Fig. 1 (annotated version below).
`
`13.
`
`Ignoring the lack of clarity with the phrase “permanently attached,” it
`
`is my understanding is that the central bridging portion 32 is permanently attached
`
`(via, e.g., welding) to the front and rear transverse bar portions 28, 30.
`
`14.
`
`For example, Withers discloses the “H-shaped body portion 12 may
`
`be fabricated from several tubular members or may also be fabricated as a two-
`
`piece stamped assembly.”
`
` Ex. 1012, 2:63–65 (emphasis added).
`
` My
`
`understanding is that a “two-piece stamped assembly” means the H-shaped body is
`
`formed from two near-identical layered stamped pieces, with the central bridging
`
`portion 32 being permanently attached to the front and rear transverse bar portions
`
`28, 30.
`
`- 4 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0009
`
`

`

`3.
`
`[21.6] “a first mounting flange attached to said first end, a
`second mounting flange attached to said second end, a third
`mounting flange attached to said third end, and a fourth
`mounting flange attached to said fourth end”
`15. Withers discloses “[f]our end inserts 18A-D are shown inserted into
`
`four tubular ends 20A-D,” with the end inserts 18A–D shown in pink below. Ex.
`
`1012, 3:2–4, Fig. 1. It is my opinion that the end inserts 18A–D constitute
`
`mounting flanges as claimed because they “connect the support structure assembly
`
`10 to a vehicle frame” (see id., 3:3–5), i.e., allow for the mounting of the assembly
`
`10, and that each respective end insert is attached to a corresponding end of the
`
`tubular members as shown in annotated Figure 1 below.
`Second end
`insert
`
`Fourth end
`insert
`
`First end
`insert
`
`4.
`
`Third end
`insert
`[21.7] “each of said mounting flanges extend along a same axis
`as said tubular member to which said mounting flange is
`attached”
`I have reviewed the figures and specification of the ’585 Patent, and
`
`16.
`
`the term “axis” is not recited in either. Accordingly, it is unclear to me which
`
`“axis” this claim limitation is referring to. For example, all three-dimensional
`
`- 5 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0010
`
`

`

`objects, by definition, extend along three axes, but require a reference axis or angle
`
`to define their orientation.
`
`17. However, relying upon the annotated figure provided by Patent Owner
`
`in its MTA that includes axis reference arrows, I am able to demonstrate how
`
`Withers discloses this limitation. Specifically, using a similar annotation as Patent
`
`Owner, it is clear that the end inserts 18A–D extend along a same axis (green) as
`
`the front and rear transverse bar portions 28, 30.
`
`5.
`[21.8] “a mounting aperture on each of said mounting flanges”
`18. My understanding of the term “aperture” is a hole or absence of
`
`material. Accordingly, it is impossible for an “aperture” to be “on” anything
`
`unless the aperture does not go all the way through, which is specifically called a
`
`blind aperture. A blind aperture would require the aperture to be threaded or use an
`
`expanding fastener and cause the flange to be positioned under an aperture on the
`
`vehicle frame rail for fastening. Thus, this claim limitation is unclear to me.
`
`- 6 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0011
`
`

`

`19. As best I can understand, Withers discloses an aperture that passes
`
`through its end inserts. Specifically, Withers, using the end insert 18D as an
`
`example, discloses “[t]he end insert 18D is assembled to the frame rail 42 by a
`
`fastener 56.” Ex. 1012, 4:18–22, Fig. 9 (annotated version below). The fastener
`
`56 necessarily must pass through an aperture in the end insert 18D.
`
`6.
`
`flanges and mounting apertures
`[21.9] “said mounting
`configured to attach directly to a frame of a vehicle”
`20. Referring to annotated Figure 5 below, Withers discloses the end
`
`inserts 18A–D and the apertures that receive the fasteners 56 are configured to
`
`attach directly to the frame 42 of the vehicle. Ex. 1012, Fig. 5, 3:18–19 (“As
`
`shown in FIG. 3, the support structure assembly 10 is attached to the truck bed
`
`frame rails 42.”).
`
`- 7 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0012
`
`

`

`B.
`
`All Limitations Of The Proposed Substitute Claims Are Taught
`By Withers ’317 In View Of Fandrich
`1.
`[21] “A hitch mounting system comprising”
`21. Withers
`’317 discloses
`“[a]n
`integrated
`
`support
`
`structure
`
`apparatus…for attaching either a fifth wheel trailer hitch or a gooseneck trailer
`
`hitch to a truck bed.” Ex. 1022, Abstract, Fig. 1 (reproduced below). Thus, it is my
`
`understanding that Withers ’317 discloses a hitch mounting system.
`
`- 8 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0013
`
`

`

`2.
`
`[21.1] “a pair of tubular members each having a cross-
`sectional shape a substantial portion of which is defined by an
`enclosed peripheral wall with a generally hollow section, said
`pair of tubular members having a first, second, third and fourth
`end”
`22. Withers ’317 discloses an “H-shaped body portion 12 includ[ing] a
`
`front transverse bar portion 28 and a rear transverse bar portion 30.” Ex. 1022,
`
`3:13–16. Withers ’317 does not explicitly disclose that the front and rear
`
`transverse bar portions 28, 30 are tubular members having a cross-sectional shape a
`
`substantial portion of which is defined by an enclosed peripheral wall with a
`
`generally hollow section, but Fandrich teaches the use of tubular cross members
`
`having a cross-sectional shape a substantial portion of which is defined by an
`
`enclosed peripheral wall with a generally hollow section in an underbed hitch
`
`mount.
`
`- 9 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0014
`
`

`

`23.
`
`Specifically, Fandrich teaches an assembly 112 acting as “as a rigid
`
`support structure providing a secure foundation for vehicle hitch components.” Ex.
`
`1011, 4:6–8. The assembly 112 includes “generally hollow tube[s] 110, rectangular
`
`in cross-section, and extending generally perpendicularly between [vehicle] frames
`
`106.” Id., 3:64–66. “Tubes 110 typically include a hollow interior 116 disposed
`
`between upper wall 114 and a lower wall 118.” Id., 4:19–20. As further shown in
`
`annotated Figure 2 below, tubes 110 (red) constitute a pair of tubular members
`
`having cross-sectional shapes substantial portions of which are defined by enclosed
`
`peripheral walls with generally hollow sections:
`
`Id., Fig. 2.
`
`24.
`
`It would be obvious to a POSA as of October 30, 2008 to modify
`
`Withers ’317 with tubular cross members, such as those taught by Fandrich to
`
`- 10 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0015
`
`

`

`arrive at the claimed invention. For example, in addition to tubular cross members
`
`being one of a finite number of predictable shapes for a cross member in an
`
`underbed hitch mounting system, Fandrich explicitly teaches that its tubular
`
`members are “designed to withstand substantial tensile and compressive strength.”
`
`Ex. 1011, 3:67–4:2. Thus, the advantages of tubular structures for cross members
`
`in underbed hitch mount systems were well-known in the art. Accordingly, a
`
`POSA would be motivated to modify the shape of the cross-members of Withers
`
`’317 to be tubular based upon, at least, express teachings in the art (e.g., Fandrich)
`
`concerning the desirability of such a structure. Additionally, a POSA would know
`
`that tubular cross members could be an alternative to solid cross members, for
`
`example, because they could exhibit sufficient strength compared to solid cross
`
`members.
`
`25. Moreover, tubular members have been used as cross members in a
`
`hitch mounting system for years, and a POSA would understand that such a
`
`structure would be readily available at the time of the ’585 Patent. As just one
`
`example, Lubbers (filed November 24, 1933) discloses a mounting structure for a
`
`fifth-wheel hitch that attaches to a frame 2 of a towing vehicle by way of tubular
`
`cross members referred to as “boxes 25.” See Ex. 1014, 2:17–40, Fig. 2.
`
`26. Additional rationales for modifying Withers ’317 with the tubular
`
`cross members of Fandrich include that such a modification would reflect simple
`
`- 11 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0016
`
`

`

`substitution of one known element (i.e., any “non-tubular” cross members of
`
`Withers ’317) for another (i.e., the tubular cross members of Fandrich) to obtain
`
`predictable results.
`
`27.
`
`In addition, such a modification would have been “obvious to try,”
`
`particularly in view of Lubbers disclosing tubular cross members in a hitch
`
`mounting system as far back as the 1930’s (see Ex. 1014, 2:17–40, Fig. 2), and
`
`Works and Lindenman teaching the use of tubular cross members specifically in
`
`the context of underbed hitch mounts for gooseneck and fifth-wheel hitches. See
`
`Ex. 1009, 4:60–62; Ex. 1010, 3:47–56.
`
`28.
`
`Finally, a POSA would have understood that known work in one field
`
`of endeavor (i.e., hitch mounting systems) would prompt variations of it for use in
`
`the same field based on design incentives (i.e., ability of the mount to “withstand
`
`substantial tensile and compressive loading” as taught by Fandrich (Ex. 1011,
`
`3:67–4:3)) or other market forces because the variations are predictable to a POSA.
`
`For example, other market forces may include reducing material and shipping costs
`
`achieved by the weight reduction of having a hollow, tubular structure with less
`
`material than a solid structure.
`
`29.
`
`Thus, Withers ’317, as modified by Fandrich, would include tubular
`
`transverse bar portions including a first, second, third, and fourth end, as shown in
`
`the annotated version of Figure 1 of Withers ’317 below:
`
`- 12 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0017
`
`

`

`Second end
`
`Fourth end
`
`First end
`
`Third end
`
`Ex. 1022, Fig. 1.
`
`3.
`
`[21.2] “a mid rail attached to each of and between said pair of
`tubular members spacing said pair of tubular members apart,
`said mid rail is permanently attached to said pair of tubular
`members as a one piece assembly”
`Ignoring the lack of clarity with the phrase “one piece assembly,” it is
`
`30.
`
`my understanding that Withers ’317 discloses a central bridging portion 32 that is a
`
`single component and is attached to the front and rear transverse bar portions 28,
`
`30. Ex. 1022, 3:14–16, Fig. 1 (annotated version below).
`
`- 13 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0018
`
`

`

`31. Additionally, Withers ’317 discloses “[t]he H-shaped body portion 12
`
`may be fabricated in one piece.” Id., 2:65–66, Fig. 1. Accordingly, ignoring the
`
`lack of clarity with the phrase “permanently attached,” my understanding is that
`
`the central bridging portion 32 is permanently attached to the front and rear
`
`transverse bar portions 28, 30 as a one piece assembly, because the entire H-shaped
`
`body portion 12 is one piece.
`
`4.
`
`[21.3] “said mid rail having a socket capable of accepting a
`gooseneck hitch ball”
`32. Withers ’317 discloses a “gooseneck ball receiver 16” in the central
`
`bridging portion 32 that is configured to receive a “quick connect receiver ball 44.”
`
`Ex. 1022, 3:26–28, Fig. 8 (annotated version below).
`
`- 14 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0019
`
`

`

`Gooseneck
`hitch ball
`
`Socket
`
`33.
`
`Thus, in my opinion, Withers ’317 in view of Fandrich teaches a mid
`
`rail (i.e., the central bridging portion 32) having a socket (i.e., the gooseneck ball
`
`receiver 16) capable of accepting a gooseneck hitch ball (i.e., the quick connect
`
`receiver ball 44).
`
`5.
`
`[21.4] “a pair of receiving members attached with each of said
`pair of tubular members”
`34. Withers ’317 discloses “[f]our fifth wheel pucks 18 [that] are shown
`
`attached to the top surface of the body portion 12.” Ex. 1022, 3:3–5, Fig. 1
`
`(annotated version below showing pucks 18 in blue). Thus, it is my understanding
`
`that Withers ’317 teaches a pair of receiving members (i.e., pucks 18) attached
`
`- 15 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0020
`
`

`

`with each of said pair of tubular members (i.e., the front and rear transverse bar
`
`portions 28, 30 of Withers ’317 as modified by Fandrich to be tubular).
`
`6.
`
`[21.5] “said receiving members configured to engage a leg of a
`fifth wheel hitch”
`35. Withers ’317 discloses a “fifth wheel receiver pedestal 46 [that]
`
`includes quarter turn locking pins that lock the pedestal 46 to the fifth wheel pucks
`
`18.” Ex. 1022, 3:36–41, Fig. 7 (below).
`
`- 16 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0021
`
`

`

`36.
`
`Thus, in my opinion, Withers ’317 in view of Fandrich teaches
`
`receiving members (i.e., pucks 18) configured to engage a leg of a fifth wheel hitch
`
`(i.e., fifth wheel receiver pedestal 46).
`
`7.
`
`[21.6] “a first mounting flange attached to said first end, a
`second mounting flange attached to said second end, a third
`mounting flange attached to said third end, and a fourth
`mounting flange attached to said fourth end”
`37. Referring to the annotated version of Figure 1 below, I understand
`
`Withers ’317 to include flanges (pink) attached to each end of the front and rear
`
`transverse bar portions 28, 30. Ex. 1022, Fig. 1; see also supra at ¶ 12.
`
`- 17 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0022
`
`

`

`8.
`
`[21.7] “each of said mounting flanges extend along a same axis
`as said tubular member to which said mounting flange is
`attached”
`38. As set forth above, it is unclear what the claimed “axis” is referring to.
`
`However, relying upon the annotated figure provided by Patent Owner in its MTA,
`
`I am able to demonstrate how Withers ’317/Fandrich teaches this limitation.
`
`39.
`
`Specifically, using a similar annotation as Patent Owner, it is clear
`
`that at least a portion of the flanges of Withers ’317 extend along a same axis
`
`(green) as the front and rear transverse bar portions 28, 30.
`
`- 18 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0023
`
`

`

`40.
`
`Thus, in my opinion, Withers ’317 in view of Fandrich teaches each
`
`of the mounting flanges (pink) extend along a same axis (green) as said tubular
`
`member (i.e., the front and rear transverse bar portions 28, 30 of Withers ’317 as
`
`modified by Fandrich to be tubular) to which said mounting flange is attached.
`
`9.
`[21.8] “a mounting aperture on each of said mounting flanges”
`41. Referring to the annotated version of Figure 8 below, Withers ’317
`
`shows a variety of “fasteners 26” in the flanges (pink). Ex. 1022, 3:10–11, Fig. 8.
`
`Specifically, the fasteners 26 inherently must pass through an aperture in the
`
`flanges, and the fasteners 26 disposed in the apertures that correspond to the
`
`claimed mounting apertures are shown in orange below.
`
`- 19 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0024
`
`

`

`10.
`
`flanges and mounting apertures
`[21.9] “said mounting
`configured to attach directly to a frame of a vehicle”
`42. Withers ’317 discloses “[r]eferring to FIG. 8, the support structure
`
`assembly 10 is shown secured to the truck bed frame rails 42.” Ex. 1022, 3:60–61.
`
`As shown in the annotated version of figure 8 below, the fasteners 26 shown in
`
`orange directly attach the flanges (pink) to the truck bed frame rails 42 (red).
`
`- 20 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0025
`
`

`

`43.
`
`Thus, it is my opinion that Withers ’317 in view of Fandrich teaches
`
`the mounting flanges (pink) and mounting apertures (apertures receiving orange
`
`fasteners 26) configured to attach directly to a frame (red truck bed frame rails 42)
`
`of a vehicle.
`
`11.
`
`[22] “The hitch mounting system of claim 21, wherein at least a
`pair of the receiving members are configured to accept a safety
`chain tie down.”
`44. Withers ’317 discloses “[t]he fifth wheel pucks 18 may be used to
`
`secure the safety chains of the trailer to the bed of the truck when the trailer is
`
`assembled to the gooseneck quick connect receiver ball 44.” Ex. 1022, 3:28–31.
`
`45.
`
`Thus, it is my opinion that Withers ’317 in view of Fandrich teaches
`
`wherein at least a pair of the receiving members (pucks 18) are configured to
`
`accept a safety chain tie down (“safety chains of the trailer”).
`
`- 21 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0026
`
`

`

`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on August _16_, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`By:___________________________
`
`Steven Becker
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 22 -
`
`NSI - Exhibit 1028 - 0027
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket