`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 34
`Entered: February 1, 2023
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`CODE200, UAB; TESO LT, UAB; METACLUSTER LT, UAB;
`OXYSALES, UAB; and CORETECH LT, UAB,
`Petitioners,
`v.
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2021-01492 (Patent 10,257,319)
` IPR2021-01493 (Patent 10,484,510)1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, SHEILA F. McSHANE, and
`RUSSELL E. CASS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`PER CURIAM.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conditionally Granting Patent Owner’s Motions for
`Admission Pro Hac Vice of Robert M. Harkins
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The parties are not authorized to use this caption.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 (Patent 10,257,319)
`IPR2021-01493 (Patent 10,484,510)
`On December 30, 2022, Patent Owner filed motions for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Robert M. Harkins in each of the above-identified
`proceedings. Paper 30 (collectively “Motions”). 2 Each Motion in each case
`is supported by a corresponding Declaration of Mr. Harkins. Ex. 2020
`(collectively “Declarations”). Patent Owner indicates, in each Motion, that
`“Patent Owner conferred with Petitioners prior to filing this Motion and
`Petitioners do not oppose this Motion.” Paper 30, 5.
`Upon review of the record before us, we determine that all
`requirements for admission pro hac vice have been met and there is good
`cause to admit Mr. Harkins pro hac vice.
`We note that a Power of Attorney in accordance with 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.10(b) has not been submitted for Mr. Harkins. In view thereof, the
`Motions for admission of Mr. Harkins are conditionally granted, and will be
`effective after Patent Owner files the aforementioned Power of Attorney for
`Mr. Harkins in each proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hearby:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission
`of Robert M. Harkins are conditionally granted, provided that within ten
`(10) business days of the date of this order, Patent Owner must submit a
`Power of Attorney for Mr. Harkins in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b)
`in each of these proceedings;
`
`
`2 For expediency, we refer to Paper and Exhibit numbers filed in IPR2021-
`01492. Similar Papers and Exhibits were filed in IPR2021-01493.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 (Patent 10,257,319)
`IPR2021-01493 (Patent 10,484,510)
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner must file updated
`mandatory notices identifying Mr. Harkins as back-up counsel in accordance
`with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3) in each of these proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Harkins will be authorized to act
`only as back-up counsel in the above-identified proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Harkins shall comply with the
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide3 (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)),
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials as set forth in Part 42 of Title
`37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Harkins shall be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 (Patent 10,257,319)
`IPR2021-01493 (Patent 10,484,510)
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`George “Jorde” Scott
`John Heuton
`CHARHON CALLAHAN ROBSON & GARZA, PLLC
`jscott@ccrglaw.com
`theuton@ccrglaw.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Thomas Dunham
`Elizabeth O’Brien
`CHERIAN LLP
`tomd@ruyakcherian.com
`elizabetho@ruyakcherian.com
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
