throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 24
`Entered: August 31, 2022
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`NETNUT LTD,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2021-01492 (Patent 10,257,319)
` IPR2021-01493 (Patent 10,484,510)1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, SHEILA F. McSHANE, and
`RUSSELL E. CASS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`PER CURIAM.
`
`
`ORDER
`STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`1 The parties are not authorized to use this caption.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2021-01492 (Patent 10,257,319)
`IPR2021-01493 (Patent 10,484,510)
`I. BACKGROUND
`NetNut Ltd.’s petitions in these proceedings for inter partes review of
`U.S. Patent No. 10,257,319 B2 (“the ’319 patent”) and U.S. Patent No,
`10,484,510 B2 (“the ’510 patent”) were granted on March 21, 2022. Paper
`12.2
`
`On July 25, 2022, this panel entered decisions denying institution of
`inter partes review of the ’319 and ’510 patents, respectively, in IPR2021-
`00861 and IPR2022-00862. See IPR2022-00861, Paper 17; IPR2022-00862,
`Paper 17. Those decisions also denied the requested joinder with,
`respectively, IPR2021-01492 and IPR2021-01493. Id.
`On August 23, 2022, the Director of the United States Patent and
`Trademark Office, sua sponte, vacated the panel decisions denying
`institution in IPR2022-00861 and IPR2022-00862 and remanded those cases
`to the panel “to consider the Patent Owner’s remaining arguments, including
`those for discretionary denial under Fintiv[3] and against the merits of the
`Petitioner’s patentability challenges.” Code200, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd.,
`IPR2022-00861, -00862, Paper 18 (PTAB Aug. 23, 2022) (precedential).
`II. DISCUSSION
`The Director’s August 23, 2022 decision in Code200 calls upon the
`panel “to consider the Patent Owner’s remaining arguments [in IPR2022-
`00861 and IPR2022-00862], including those for discretionary denial under
`Fintiv and against the merits of the Petitioner’s patentability challenges.”
`
`
`2 Citations refer to paper numbers in IPR2021-01492. Similar papers were
`filed in IPR2021-01493.
`3 Apple Inc. v. Fintiv, Inc., IPR2020-00019, Paper 11 (PTAB March 20,
`2020) (precedential).
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2021-01492 (Patent 10,257,319)
`IPR2021-01493 (Patent 10,484,510)
`Code200, Paper 18 at 7. To allow time for consideration of whether to
`institute inter partes review in IPR2022-00861 and IPR2022-00862 and the
`possible joinder of those proceedings with these cases,4 the panel has
`determined that there is good cause to vacate the current Scheduling Orders
`in IPR2021-01492 and IPR2021-01493, including any prior modifications to
`the Due Dates, and to stay these proceedings. This will allow the panel time
`to consider Director’s directives on remand and to evaluate whether to
`proceed with inter partes review in IPR2021-00862 and IPR2021-00863, as
`well as to consider whether to join those cases to these proceedings. We
`note that if there is institution and joinder of IPR2022-00861 and IPR2022-
`00862 to IPR2021-01492 and IPR2021-01493, respectively, the schedules
`for the joined cases will be reconsidered and revised Scheduling Orders will
`be issued.
`
`III. ORDER
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`
`ORDERED that the Scheduling Orders in IPR2021-01492 and
`
`IPR2021-01493 (including any subsequent orders modifying the Due Dates
`in those Scheduling Orders) are hereby vacated;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that all proceedings in IPR2021-01492 and
`IPR2021-01493 are stayed until further notice; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the stays in Reexamination Control Nos.
`90/14,875 and 90/14,876 shall remain in effect and no further filings in those
`reexaminations are permitted.
`
`
`4 Joinder was denied in IPR2022-00861 and IPR2022-00862 due to the
`denial of institution of trial in those cases. See, e.g., IPR2022-00861, Paper
`17, 17 (citing 35 U.S.C. § 315(c)).
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2021-01492 (Patent 10,257,319)
`IPR2021-01493 (Patent 10,484,510)
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Ronald Abramson
`Mord Lewis
`Ari Jaffess
`LISTON ABRAMSON LLP
`ron.abramson@listonabramson.com
`michael.lewis@listonabramson.com
`ari.jaffess@listonabramson.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Thomas Dunham
`Elizabeth O’Brien
`RUYAKCHERIAN LLP
`tomd@ruyakcherian.com
`elizabetho@ruyakcherican.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket