throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 34
`Entered: April 4, 2023
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`VERVAIN, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01550
`Patent 10,950,300 B2
`_______________
`
`
`Before STACEY G. WHITE, JON M. JURGOVAN, and
`STEVEN M. AMUNDSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WHITE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial
`35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2021-01550
`Patent 10,950,300 B2
`
`
`I.
`INTRODUCTION
`With the Board’s authorization, Petitioner Micron Technology, Inc.
`and Patent Owner Vervain, LLC (collectively, “the Parties”) filed a Joint
`Motion to Terminate in the above-captioned proceeding involving U.S.
`Patent No. 10,950,300 B2 (“the ’300 patent”). Paper 31 (“Joint Motion”).
`Along with the Joint Motion, the Parties filed a copy of a Settlement
`Agreement (Ex. 1072, “Agreement”) and an Executed Settlement
`Agreement (Ex. 1073, “Executed Agreement”), as well as Joint Requests
`that the Agreement and Executed Agreement be treated as business
`confidential information and kept separate from the file of the patent
`involved in the above-captioned proceeding. Paper 32 (“Joint Request-
`Agreement”), 33 (“Joint Request-Executed Agreement”) (collectively “Joint
`Requests”).
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided
`the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.”
`35 U.S.C. § 317(a) also provides that if no petitioner remains in the inter
`partes review, the Office may terminate the review.
`In the Joint Motion, the Parties represent that they “have reached a
`settlement as to all the disputes in this proceeding and as to the ’300 patent
`between the parties.” Joint Motion 3. The Parties provided a copy of the
`Agreement and Executed Agreement. Exs. 1072, 1073. The Parties
`represent that “[n]o other such agreements, written or oral, exist between or
`among the Settling Parties.” Id.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2021-01550
`Patent 10,950,300 B2
`
`
`We instituted trial for the above-identified inter partes review
`proceeding (see Paper 11), but we have not yet decided the merits of the
`proceeding, and final written decision has not been entered. Under these
`circumstances, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate the
`proceeding.
`In the Joint Requests, the Parties request that the Agreement and
`Executed Agreement be treated as business confidential information and
`kept separate from the file of the patent involved in the above-captioned
`proceeding. Joint Request-Agreement 1, Joint Request-Executed Agreement
`1. After reviewing the Agreement and Executed Agreement, we determine
`that it is appropriate to treat these documents as business confidential
`information pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`This Order does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`III. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate is granted, and
`IPR2021-01550 is terminated; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Requests to treat the Agreement
`(Ex. 1072) and Executed Agreement (Ex. 1073) as business confidential
`information are granted, and the Agreement and Executed Agreement shall
`be kept separate from the file of U.S. Patent No. 10,950,300 B2, and made
`available only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or to any
`person on a showing of good cause, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2021-01550
`Patent 10,950,300 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jeremy Jason Lang
`Christopher Childers
`Parth Sagdeo
`Jared Bobrow
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`ptabdocketjjl2@orrick.com
`ptabdocketc4c8@orrick.com
`ptabdocketp2s7@orrick.com
`ptabdocketj3b3@orrick.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Alan Whitehurst
`James E. Quigley
`Christopher P. McNett
`McKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`awhitehurst@mckoolsmith.com
`jquigley@mckoolsmith.com
`cmcnett@mckoolsmith.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket