throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 21
`Date: November 23, 2022
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VOCALIFE LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`IPR2022-00005
`Patent RE48,371 E
`________________
`
`
`
`Before MONICA S. ULLAGADDI, AMBER L. HAGY, and
`JASON M. REPKO, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HAGY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial
`35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72, 42.74
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00005
`Patent RE48,371 E
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`Google LLC (“Petitioner”) filed a petition requesting inter partes
`review of claims 22–41 of U.S. Patent No. RE48,371 E (Ex. 1001, “the ’371
`patent”). Paper 1 (“Pet.”). Vocalife LLC (“Patent Owner”) filed a
`Preliminary Response. Paper 6 (“Prelim. Resp.”). With our authorization
`(Paper 7), Petitioner filed a Reply. Paper 8 (“Prelim. Reply”). We also
`authorized Patent Owner to file a Sur-Reply of equal length, but no sur-reply
`was filed. Paper 7, 5. We granted institution on April 15, 2022. Paper 10.
`Through email, the Parties requested and the Board authorized “(1) a
`motion to terminate the proceeding, as a Paper, (2) a true copy of the written
`settlement agreement and any collateral agreement (including any licensing
`agreement) made in connection with the termination, as an Exhibit, and (3) a
`request to treat the written settlement agreement as business confidential
`under 37 CFR 42.74(c), as part of or as a separate Paper from the motion to
`terminate.” Ex. 3002. The Parties filed a Joint Motion to Terminate
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 on November 18, 2022. Paper 19 (“Motion”),
`and what they refer to as a true copy of “a confidential agreement with a
`third party that resolves all pending disputes between the Parties, including
`all disputes relating to this proceeding and the related district court action”
`(Ex. 2006) and “a true copy of the written release agreement” between the
`parties (Ex. 2007). Motion 1. The Parties also filed a Joint Motion to Treat
`the Agreements as Business Confidential and to Keep Separate Pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74. Paper 20.
`II. DISCUSSION
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “An inter partes review instituted under
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00005
`Patent RE48,371 E
`request of the petitioner and patent owner, unless the Office has decided the
`merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” We
`entered Decision to Institute on April 15, 2022 (Paper 10), but we have not
`yet held an oral hearing or entered a Final Written Decision on the merits.
`“The Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing of
`a settlement agreement, unless the Board has already decided the merits of
`the proceeding.” See Consolidated Trial Practice Guide, 86 (Nov. 2019).1
`Because the Parties state the settlement agreement that they filed “resolves
`all pending disputes between the Parties relating to this proceeding” (Motion
`1) and we have not decided the merits, we determine that it is appropriate to
`terminate the proceeding without entering a Final Written Decision on the
`patentability of the challenged claims.
`The Parties also filed a joint motion that the agreements (Exs. 2006,
`2007) be treated as business confidential information and be kept separate
`from the file of the patent involved in this inter partes proceeding. Paper 20.
`After reviewing the agreements, we find that they contain confidential
`business information regarding the terms of settlement. We determine that
`good cause exists to treat the agreements as business confidential
`information pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`
`
`
`1 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00005
`Patent RE48,371 E
`
`
`III. ORDER
`
`It is
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate trial is GRANTED,
`and this trial is hereby terminated; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint request to treat the agreements
`as business confidential information is GRANTED, and the agreements
`(Exs. 2006, 2007) shall be treated as business confidential information
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), kept separate from the file of U.S. Patent
`RE48,371 E, and remain designated as “Board and Parties Only.”
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00005
`Patent RE48,371 E
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Erika Arner
`Daniel Tucker
`Mingji Jin
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`erika.arner@finnegan.com
`daniel.tucker@finnegan.com
`mingji.jin@finnegan.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`Peter Lambrianakos
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`FABRICANT LLP
`vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`plambrianako@fabricantllp.com
`eiturralde@fabricantllp.com
`
`Jialin Zhong
`ZHONG LAW, LLC
`zhong@zhong-law.com
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket