`571-272-7822
`
` Paper: 50
`
` Entered: May 25, 2023
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`THE DATA COMPANY TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2022-00135
`Patent 10,257,319 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, SHEILA F. McSHANE, and
`RUSSELL E. CASS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`CASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`NOTICE
`Determining All Challenged Claims Unpatentable
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00135
`Patent 10,257,319 B2
`
`
`Today, we issued a non-public version of a Final Written Decision
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 318(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.73. Paper 49. For the reasons
`
`discussed in the Final Written Decision (a public version of which will issue
`
`in due course), we concluded that Petitioner has shown by a preponderance
`
`of the evidence that challenged claims 1–29 (the “challenged claims”) of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,257,319 B2 are unpatentable.
`
`The following table summarizes the determinations in this proceeding.
`
`Claim(s)
`
`35
`U.S.C.
`§
`
`Reference(s)/
`Basis
`
`Plamondon
`
`1, 12–14,
`21–27
`28, 29
`
`15–17
`
`102
`
`103
`
`103
`
`17, 18
`
`103
`
`2
`
`103
`
`2–5, 19, 20 103
`6–11
`103
`Overall
`Outcome
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim(s)
`Shown
`Unpatentable
`1, 12–14, 21–
`27
`28, 29
`15–17
`
`17, 18
`
`2
`
`Claim(s) Not
`Shown
`Unpatentable
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plamondon
`Plamondon, RFC
`2616
`Plamondon, RFC
`1122
`Plamondon, IEEE
`802.11-2007
`Plamondon, Price 2–5, 19, 20
`Plamondon, Kozat 6–11
`1–29
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00135
`Patent 10,257,319 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`
`
`Michael Rader
`Adam Wichman
`Gregory Nieberg
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`MRader-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`AWichman-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`GNieberg-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Elizabeth A. O’Brien
`RUYAKCHERIAN LLP
`tom@dunham.cc
`elizabetho@ruyakcherian.com
`
`3
`
`