`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`—————
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`—————
`
`SLAYBACK PHARMA LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`EYE THERAPIES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`—————
`
`Case No.: IPR2022-00142
`
`U.S. Patent No.: 8,293,742
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF ROBERT FREDERICKSON III IN
`SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1044, Page 1 of 4
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`I, Robert Frederickson III, am more than twenty-one years of age,
`
`am competent to present this declaration, and have personal knowledge of the
`
`facts set forth herein.
`
`
`
`2.
`
`This declaration is given in support of Petitioner's Motion for Pro
`
`Hac Vice Admission.
`
`
`
`
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`I am a partner with the law firm of Goodwin Procter LLP.
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney. I have been litigating patent
`
`cases for nearly 15 years. I have been practicing law since 2007 and have
`
`extensive experience litigating patent infringement cases in many different courts
`
`across the United States.
`
`5. My experience in patent litigation matters includes patent jury trials,
`
`including opening statements, closing arguments, presentation of non-expert and
`
`expert-testimony, arguing Markman hearings, patent summary judgment
`
`proceedings, and other patent-related hearings and pleadings concerning, inter
`
`alia, patent validity and infringement issues. I have also represented clients’
`
`appeals before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit resulting from cases I
`
`tried and in other cases.
`
`
`
`6.
`
`I have an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in
`
`this proceeding. I have reviewed the Petition and accompanying exhibits filed in
`
`this proceeding and all other papers associated with this proceeding. As part of
`
`this proceeding, I have studied the ‘742 patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1044, Page 2 of 4
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of
`
`
`
`Massachusetts.
`
`
`
`8.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`
`
`9.
`
`Two initial applications seeking my admission pro hac vice filed in
`
`IPR2019-00328 and IPR2019-00329 were denied without prejudice due to
`
`procedural defects in the accompany declarations. I was admitted pro hac vice in
`
`those matters upon submitting corrected declarations. Otherwise, no application
`
`of mine for admission to practice before any court or administrative body has
`
`ever been denied.
`
`
`
`10. No sanctions or contempt citations have been imposed against me by
`
`any court or administrative body.
`
`
`
`11.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37
`
`C.F.R.
`
`
`
`12.
`
`I understand that I will be subject to the USPTO Code of
`
`Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.101 et seq. and disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §11.19(a).
`
`13.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice in any other proceedings
`
`before the Office in the last three years.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1044, Page 3 of 4
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Executed on August 5, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /Robert Frederickson III/
` Robert Frederickson III
`
`
`
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`
`
`
`Slayback Exhibit 1044, Page 4 of 4
`Slayback v. Eye Therapies - IPR2022-00142
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
