throbber
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`CA, INC. and AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES
`INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED,
`
`v.
`
`NETFLIX, INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`NO. 2:21–CV–80–JRG–RSP
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ PATENT RULE 3–1 AND 3–2 DISCLOSURES TO NETFLIX
`
`In accordance with P.R. 3–1 and 3–2, Plaintiffs CA, Inc. and Avago Technologies
`
`International Sales Pte. Limited make the following disclosures to Defendant Netflix, Inc. These
`
`disclosures are based on information currently available to Plaintiffs.
`
`I.
`
`P.R. 3–1 DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`A.
`
`Each claim of each patent-in-suit that is allegedly infringed by each opposing
`party.
`
`Netflix infringes at least the following claims under 35 U.S.C. § 271:
`
`Patent
`U.S. Patent No. 7,103,794 (“the ’794 Patent”)
`U.S. Patent No. 8,656,419 (“the ’419 Patent”)
`U.S. Patent No. 8,646,014 (“the ’014 Patent”)
`U.S. Patent No. 9,402,098 (“the ’098 Patent”)
`U.S. Patent No. 10,911,938 (“the ’938 Patent”)
`
`Asserted Claims
`1, 3–9, 11–17
`1, 3–20
`1, 3–6, 10, 11
`1, 2, 7
`1–30
`
`B.
`
`Separately for each asserted claim, each accused apparatus, product, device,
`process, method, act, or other instrumentality (“Accused Instrumentality”)
`of each opposing party of which the party is aware.
`
`The table below identifies the Accused Instrumentalities of which Plaintiffs are currently
`
`aware, that infringe one or more of the Asserted Claims.
`
`– 1 –
`
`Netflix, Inc. - Ex. 1020, Page 000001
`IPR2022-00322 (Netflix, Inc. v. CA, Inc.)
`
`

`

`Accused Instrumentalities
`Claims
`All asserted claims As described in more detail in Exhibit A, Netflix’s
`Content Delivery Network (“CDN”), also known as
`“Open Connect,” infringes the ’794 Patent through its
`implementation of the caching techniques described and
`claimed in the ’794 Patent.
`
`All asserted claims As described in more detail in Exhibit B, Netflix’s
`distributed computing and microservices platforms,
`including those implemented using Netflix’s Titus
`container-management platform, infringe the ’419 Patent
`through their use of multiple nodes according to the
`systems and methods described and claimed in the ’419
`Patent.
`
`All asserted claims As described in more detail in Exhibit C, Netflix’s CDN,
`also known as “Open Connect,” infringes the ’014 Patent
`through its implementation of the video-information
`transmission and processing techniques described and
`claimed in the ’014 Patent.
`
`All asserted claims As described in more detail in Exhibit D, Netflix’s CDN,
`also known as “Open Connect,” infringes the ’098 Patent
`through its implementation of the video-information
`transmission and processing techniques described and
`claimed in the ’098 Patent.
`
`All asserted claims As described in more detail in Exhibit E, Netflix’s video-
`streaming system and services, including the CDN and
`Netflix’s back-end processing functionality that supports
`the video-streaming system, infringe the ’938 Patent
`through their implementation of various aspects of
`content Netflix provides to its subscribers via the Netflix
`user interface on the subscribers’ equipment.
`
`
`Patent
`’794
`
`’419
`
`’014
`
`’098
`
`’938
`
`
`
`
`
`C.
`
`A chart identifying specifically where each element of each asserted claim is
`found within each Accused Instrumentality, including for each element that
`such party contends is governed by 35 U.S.C. § 112(6), the identity of the
`structure(s), act(s), or material(s) in the Accused Instrumentality that
`performs the claimed function.
`
`The exhibits referenced in the table below provide charts that identify specifically where
`
`each element of each asserted claim is found within the Accused Instrumentalities.
`
`– 2 –
`
`Netflix, Inc. - Ex. 1020, Page 000002
`
`

`

`Patent
`
`Exhibit A
`Exhibit B
`Exhibit C
`Exhibit D
`Exhibit E
`
`Exhibits
`
`D. Whether each element of each asserted claim is claimed to be literally present
`or present under the doctrine of equivalents in the Accused Instrumentality.
`
`At this time, Plaintiffs contend that each element of each asserted claim is literally present
`
`’794
`’419
`’014
`’098
`’938
`
`
`
`
`
`in the Accused Instrumentalities as set forth in Exhibits A–E. To the extent any element of an
`
`Asserted Claim is not found to be literally present as discovery proceeds, Plaintiffs reserve the
`
`right to seek leave to amend these infringement contentions in accordance with the Court’s rules
`
`and procedures.
`
`E.
`
`For any patent that claims priority to an earlier application, the priority date
`to which each asserted claim allegedly is entitled.
`
`
`
`The following patents claim priority to earlier applications and are entitled to a priority
`
`date as set forth below.
`
`’014
`’098
`’938
`
`F.
`
`Patent
`
`Priority
`March 26, 2004 (all asserted claims)
`March 26, 2004 (all asserted claims)
`June 12, 2007 (all asserted claims)
`
`If a party claiming patent infringement wishes to preserve the right to rely,
`for any purpose, on the assertion that its own apparatus, product, device,
`process, method, act, or other instrumentality practices the claimed
`invention, the party must identify, separately for each asserted claim, each
`such apparatus, product, device, process, method, act, or other
`instrumentality that incorporates or reflects that particular claim.
`
`At the current time, Plaintiffs are not asserting that any of their own apparatuses, products,
`
`
`
`
`
`devices, processes, methods, or other instrumentalities practices any of the claimed inventions.
`
`– 3 –
`
`Netflix, Inc. - Ex. 1020, Page 000003
`
`

`

`II.
`
`P.R. 3–2 DOCUMENT PRODUCTION ACCOMPANYING DISCLOSURE
`
`A.
`
`Documents (e.g., contracts, purchase orders, invoices, advertisements,
`marketing materials, offer letters, beta site testing agreements, and third
`party or joint development agreements) sufficient to evidence each discussion
`with, disclosure to, or other manner of providing to a third party, or sale of
`or offer to sell, the claimed invention prior to the date of application for the
`patent in suit. A party’s production of a document as required herein shall
`not constitute an admission that such document evidences or is prior art
`under 35 U.S.C. § 102.
`
`After a reasonable investigation, Plaintiffs are unaware of any such documents.
`
`B.
`
`All documents evidencing the conception, reduction to practice, design, and
`development of each claimed invention, which were created on or before the
`date of application for the patent in suit or the priority date identified
`pursuant to P. R. 3-1(e), whichever is earlier.
`
`After a reasonable search, Plaintiffs were unable to locate any such documents.
`
`C.
`
`A copy of the file history for each patent-in-suit.
`
`Copies of
`
`the file histories for each of
`
`the patents-in-suit are provided at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CA_AVA0000000100000001 through CA_AVA0000000100003569.
`
`
`
`– 4 –
`
`Netflix, Inc. - Ex. 1020, Page 000004
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
`Bruce S. Sostek, Attorney-in-Charge
` State Bar No. 18855700
` bruce.sostek@tklaw.com
`Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
` State Bar No. 24003214
` richard.wynne@tklaw.com
`Adrienne E. Dominguez
` State Bar No. 00793630
` adrienne.dominguez@tklaw.com
`Austin Teng
` State Bar No. 24093247
` austin.teng@tklaw.com
`
`THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
`One Arts Plaza
`1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`214.969.1700
`214.969.1751 (fax)
`
`
`Samuel F. Baxter
` State Bar No. 01938000
` sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
` State Bar No. 24012906
` jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 East Houston Street, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`903.923.9000
`903.923.9099 (fax)
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS CA, INC. and
`AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES
`PTE. LIMITED
`
`– 5 –
`
`Netflix, Inc. - Ex. 1020, Page 000005
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that the foregoing was served via electronic mail on July 1, 2021, on all
`
`counsel of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
`Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
`
`
`
`– 6 –
`
`Netflix, Inc. - Ex. 1020, Page 000006
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket