`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
` Paper 17
`Entered: September 28, 2022
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
` MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR
`PRODUCTS, INC., and MICRON TECHNOLOGY TEXAS LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`
` NETLIST, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2022-00236 (Patent 9,824,035 B2)
`IPR2022-00418 (Patent 8,301,833 B1)
` IPR2022-00744 (Patent 10,489,314 B2)
` IPR2022-00745 (Patent 10,489,314 B2)1
`
`
`Before GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, JON M. JURGOVAN,
`DANIEL J. GALLIGAN, SHEILA F. MCSHANE, NABEEL U. KHAN,
`and KARA L. SZPONDOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.2
`
`KHAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Michael R. Rueckheim
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 The parties are not authorized to use a multi-case caption.
`2 This is not an expanded panel. Each of the six listed judges is part of
`three-judge panels assigned to the listed proceedings.
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00236 (Patent 9,824,035 B2)
`IPR2022-00418 (Patent 8,301,833 B1)
`IPR2022-00744 (Patent 10,489,314 B2)
`IPR2022-00745 (Patent 10,489,314 B2)
`
`
`Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., and
`Micron Technology Texas LLC (“Petitioner”) filed a motion for pro hac
`vice admission of Michael R. Rueckheim in each of the above-listed
`proceedings (“Motions”). Paper 19. 3 Petitioner also filed supporting
`declarations from Mr. Rueckheim. Ex. 1021. Petitioner states that the
`Motions are unopposed. Paper 19, 1.
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to
`the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. In its notice
`authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires a
`statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board to recognize
`counsel pro hac vice, and an affidavit or declaration of the individual
`seeking to appear in this proceeding. See Paper 5, 2 (citing Unified Patents,
`Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013)
`(Paper 7) (representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission”)).
`We have reviewed the submissions and determine that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and that there is good
`cause to admit Mr. Rueckheim pro hac vice.
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that the Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Michael
`R. Rueckheim are granted and Mr. Rueckheim is authorized to represent
`Petitioner only as back-up counsel in the above- listed proceedings;
`
`
`3 All citations are to IPR2022-00236 with the understanding that the other
`proceedings include papers having substantially the same content.
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00236 (Patent 9,824,035 B2)
`IPR2022-00418 (Patent 8,301,833 B1)
`IPR2022-00744 (Patent 10,489,314 B2)
`IPR2022-00745 (Patent 10,489,314 B2)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that a registered practitioner will continue to
`represent Petitioner as lead counsel in the above-listed proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Rueckheim shall comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, as updated by the Consolidated Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)) and the
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code
`of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Rueckheim is subject to the
`USPTO’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq. and to the USPTO’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`§ 11.19(a).
`
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00236 (Patent 9,824,035 B2)
`IPR2022-00418 (Patent 8,301,833 B1)
`IPR2022-00744 (Patent 10,489,314 B2)
`IPR2022-00745 (Patent 10,489,314 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Juan C. Yaquian
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`JYaquian@winston.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Rex Hwang
`Ryan Hargrave
`Michael Ricketts
`SKIERMONT DERBY LLP
`rhwang@skiermontderby.com
`rhargrave@skiermontderby.com
`mricketts@skiermontderby.com
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
