` FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION 6:21-cv-00740-ADA
`
`
`
`
`TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`SZ DJI TECHNOLOGY CO, LTD.,
`DJI EUROPE B.V., AND DJI
`TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURES OF PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`Under the Court’s Order Governing Proceeding – Patent Case (“OGP”), Plaintiff Textron
`
`Innovations Inc. (“Textron”) provides its Preliminary Infringement Contentions to Defendants SZ
`
`DJI Technology Co., Ltd., DJI Europe B.V., and DJI Technology Inc. (“DJI” or “Defendants”).
`
`Textron makes this disclosure based on the information presently available to it. Discovery
`
`in this case has not yet begun, and Textron reserves the right to amend or supplement these
`
`disclosures as permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by the local rules of the Western
`
`District of Texas, and by order of the Court, including the Court’s OGP.
`
`I.
`
`Identification of Asserted Claims and Accused Products
`
`Based on the information currently and reasonably available to Textron, in view of
`
`Textron’s present understanding of the proper construction of each of the claims listed below
`
`(collectively, the “Asserted Claims”) and based on Textron’s present understanding of the function
`
`and operation of the DJI instrumentalities listed below (collectively, the “Accused Products”), DJI
`
`has infringed and continues to infringe at least the following Asserted Claims in violation of 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271(a) by making, using, offering to sell, or selling within the United States, or by
`
`1
`
`Page 1 of 7
`
`DJI Exhibit 1010
`
`
`
`importing into the United States, at least the following Accused Products. Additionally, on
`
`information and belief, DJI has developed and tested Accused Products in this District. As noted
`
`below, Textron provides its preliminary contentions regarding DJI’s infringement of each of the
`
`Asserted Claims by the Accused Products in the attached charts.
`
` Exhibit A: Claims 1-11 of U.S. Patent No. 8,014,909 (“’909 Patent”).
`
` Exhibit B: Claims 1, 4-6, 9-11, and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 8,108,085 (“’085
`
`Patent”).
`
` Exhibit C: Claims 1-2, 4, 6-7, 9-10, 12, and 14-18 of U.S. Patent No. 8,078,395
`
`(“’395 Patent”).
`
` Exhibit D: Claims 1-2, 6-7, and 12-13 of U.S. Patent No. 9,162,752 (“’752
`
`Patent”).
`
` Exhibit E: Claims 1-2, 4-8, 10-13, 15-17, and 22-25 of U.S. Patent No. 10,243,647
`
`(“’647 Patent”).
`
`Although discovery has not yet begun, Exhibits A–E contain charts identifying examples
`
`of where each element of each Asserted Claim is found in the Accused Products. Based on the
`
`information currently and reasonably available to Textron and based on Textron’s present
`
`understanding of the function and operation of the Accused Products, each element of the Asserted
`
`Claims is present in the Accused Products literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. Textron
`
`reserves all rights to respond more fully regarding the doctrine of equivalents if and after DJI
`
`provides discovery (including, to the extent DJI contends that it does not literally infringe any
`
`Asserted Claim, the basis for such contention) and/or after the Court provides its Claim
`
`Construction Order. Textron further reserves the right to revise, amend, and/or supplement the
`
`attached claim charts to the full extent contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`
`
`Court’s Local Rules, or as allowed by the Court, including after DJI provides discovery or any
`
`other pertinent information and after the Court provides its Claim Construction Order.
`
`II.
`
`Identification of Priority Dates
`
`Based on the information currently and reasonably available to Textron, each of the
`
`Asserted Claims is entitled to the preliminary priority dates identified below:
`
` The application from which the '909 Patent issued was filed on March 25, 2004.
`
`Based on Textron's current investigation, Asserted Claims of the '909 Patent are
`
`entitled to a priority date no later than March 25, 2004.
`
` The application from which the '085 Patent issued was filed on May 18, 2011 and
`
`claims priority back to a PCT application filed on March 25, 2004. Based on
`
`Textron's current investigation, Asserted Claims of the '085 Patent are entitled to a
`
`priority date no later than March 25, 2004.
`
` The application from which the '395 Patent issued was filed on November 15, 2005.
`
`Based on Textron's current investigation, Asserted Claims of the '395 Patent are
`
`entitled to a priority date no later than November 15, 2005.
`
` The application from which the '752 Patent issued was filed on July 15, 2011.
`
`Textron conceived of the invention as early as July 21, 2000. Based on Textron's
`
`current investigation, Asserted Claims of the '752 Patent are entitled to a priority
`
`date no later than July 15, 2011.
`
` The application from which the '647 Patent issued was filed on May 30, 2017.
`
`Based on Textron's current investigation, Asserted Claims of the '647 Patent are
`
`entitled to a priority date no later than May 30, 2017.
`
`Additionally, contemporaneously with these Preliminary Infringement Contentions,
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`
`
`Textron is producing copies of the file histories for each of the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`Textron’s investigation is ongoing. In the event that any of the Asserted Claims is found
`
`to not be entitled to the claimed priority date, such Asserted Claim(s) are entitled to claim priority
`
`to at least the date of the next-filed priority application, and are entitled to a priority date of no
`
`later than the date of filing of the application from which the Asserted Claims issued. Textron
`
`identifies the above priority dates for patents that claim priority to an earlier application expressly
`
`without waiver to asserting earlier invention dates. Textron reserves the right to assert invention
`
`dates earlier than the aforementioned priority dates based on the earlier conception and/or
`
`reduction to practice of the Asserted Claims.
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`
`
`Dated: November 1, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Kevin J. Meek
`Kevin J. Meek
`Texas Bar No. 13899600
`Valerie Barker
`Texas Bar No. 24087141
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`98 San Jacinto Blvd, Suite 1500
`Austin, TX 78701
`Telephone: (512) 322-2587
`Facsimile: (512) 322-3687
`kevin.meek@bakerbotts.com
`valerie.barker@bakerbotts.com
`
`Harrison Rich (pro hac vice)
`Texas Bar No. 24083730
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 900
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone: (214) 953-6896
`Facsimile: (214) 661-4896
`harrison.rich@bakerbotts.com
`
`Arya Moshiri (pro hac vice)
`California Bar No. 324231
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`101 California Street, Suite 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 291-6223
`Facsimile: (415) 291-6323
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`
`Mark D. Siegmund
`State Bar No. 24117055
`Steckler Wayne Cochran Cherry, PLLC
`8416 Old McGregor Road
`Waco, Texas 76712
`Telephone: (254) 651-3690
`Facsimile: (254) 651-3689
`mark@swclaw.com
`jenn@swclaw.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC.
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that the foregoing is being served on all counsel of record who consent to
`
`electronic service on this the 1st day of November 2021.
`
`By: /s/ Kevin J. Meek
`Kevin J. Meek
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`John Palmer
`State Bar No. 15430600
`John A. “Andy” Powell
`State Bar No. 24029775
`USPTO Reg. No. 71,533
`Jacqueline P. Altman
`State Bar No. 24087010
`NAMAN HOWELL SMITH & LEE, PLLC
`400 Austin Ave., Suite 800
`Waco, Texas 76701
`Telephone: (254) 755-4100
`Facsimile: (254) 754-6331
`palmer@namanhowell.com
`powell@namanhowell.com
`jaltman@namanhowell.com
`
`Benjamin Schlesinger (pro hac vice to be filed)
`Robert High (pro hac vice to be filed)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`271 17th Street, NW, Suite 1400
`Atlanta, Georgia 30363
`Telephone: (404) 653-6400
`Facsimile: (404) 653-6444
`benjamin.schlesinger@finnegan.com
`robert.high@finnegan.com
`
`J. Michael Jakes (pro hac vice to be filed)
`Qingyu Yin (pro hac vice to be filed)
`Joshua Goldberg (pro hac vice to be filed)
`Sydney Kestle (pro hac vice to be filed)
`
`6
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`Telephone: (202) 408-4000
`Facsimile: (202) 408-4400
`mike.jakes@finnegan.com
`qingyu.yin@finnegan.com
`joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com
`sydney.kestle@finnegan.com
`
`Jacob Schroeder (pro hac vice to be filed)
`Jinwoo Kim (pro hac vice to be filed)
`Yanyi Liu (pro hac vice to be filed)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Stanford Research Park
`3300 Hillview Avenue, 2nd Floor
`Palo Alto, California 94304
`Telephone: (650) 849-6600
`Facsimile: (650) 849-6666
`jacob.schroeder@finnegan.com
`jinwoo.kim@finnegan.com
`yanyi.liu@finnegan.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants SZ DJI Technology Co., LTD.,
`DJI Europe B.V., and DJI Technology, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 7
`
`