`From: Rodkey, Kevin <Kevin.Rodkey@finnegan.com>
`Sent: Friday, January 13, 2023 8:27 AM
`To: Richard Cowell <rcowell@fabricantllp.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Yang, Christina Ji-Hye <Christina.Yang@finnegan.com>; Arner, Erika <erika.arner@finnegan.com>;
`Cooley, Daniel <Daniel.Cooley@finnegan.com>; High, Robert <Robert.High@finnegan.com>; PTAB
`<PTAB@fabricantllp.com>; Peter Lambrianakos <plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com>; Fred Fabricant
`<ffabricant@fabricantllp.com>; Vincent Rubino <vrubino@fabricantllp.com>; Rodkey, Kevin
`<Kevin.Rodkey@finnegan.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2022-00623, -00649
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`
`Petitioner opposes and respectfully requests the Board deny Patent Owner’s request.
`
`
`The dispute hinges on whether Patent Owner can use an opposed extension of time to cure its failure to
`timely notice and take a deposition within the mandated cross-examination period under Rule 37 CFR
`§ 42.53(d), which expired December 29, 2022. Patent Owner has not noticed a deposition or contacted
`Petitioner regarding availability of Petitioner’s expert. Without providing a reason, Patent Owner’s
`counsel sought an extension for the first time on January 6, 2023. The parties reached an impasse when
`Patent Owner revealed that it would not forgo a deposition, notwithstanding the deadline having
`already passed.
`
`
`Petitioner is available for a teleconference on the dates and times provided by Patent Owner’s counsel.
`
`
`Sincerely,
`Kevin Rodkey
`Reg. No. 65,506
`Back-up counsel for Petitioner
`
`Kevin Rodkey
`Attorney at Law
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`+1.404.653.6484 | kevin.rodkey@finnegan.com | www.finnegan.com
`
`From: Richard Cowell <rcowell@fabricantllp.com>
`Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 7:26 PM
`To: 'Trials' <trials@uspto.gov>
`Cc: Yang, Christina Ji-Hye <Christina.Yang@finnegan.com>; Arner, Erika <erika.arner@finnegan.com>;
`Cooley, Daniel <Daniel.Cooley@finnegan.com>; High, Robert <Robert.High@finnegan.com>; PTAB
`<PTAB@fabricantllp.com>; Peter Lambrianakos <plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com>; Fred Fabricant
`<ffabricant@fabricantllp.com>; Vincent Rubino <vrubino@fabricantllp.com>
`Subject: IPR2022-00623, -00649
`
`EXTERNAL Email:
`
`
`

`

`Honorable Board:
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner in the above-referenced actions respectfully requests a conference call with
`the Board. A dispute has arisen regarding the due date for Patent Owner’s Response and the deposition
`of Petitioner’s expert. Patent Owner proposed a 4-week extension of Due Date 1, with a commensurate
`extension of Due Date 2. Petitioner stated that it would only accept a 3-week extension, and only if
`Patent Owner agreed not to depose Petitioner’s expert.
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner and Petitioner are available for a teleconference on Tuesday January 17 from
`1-3 p.m. ET and Wednesday, January 18 from 9 a.m.–3 p.m. ET.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Richard M. Cowell
`Reg. No. 79,143
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`Richard Cowell
`Counsel
`
`Fabricant LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue
`Suite 206 South
`Rye, NY 10580
`
`
`
`T: 646-797-4294
`F: 212-257-5796
`rcowell@fabricantllp.com
`fabricantllp.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This e-mail message is intended only f or indiv idual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain inf ormation that is priv ileged, conf idential,
`proprietary , or otherwise exempt f rom disclosure under applicable law. If y ou believ e y ou hav e receiv ed this message in error, please adv ise
`the sender by return e-mai
`
`