throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 12
`Date: May 25, 2022
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`CODE200, UAB; TESO LT, UAB; METACLUSTER LT, UAB;
`OXYSALES, UAB; and CORETECH LT, UAB,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2022-00861 (Patent 10,257,319)
` IPR2022-00862 (Patent 10,484,510)1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, SHEILA F. McSHANE, and
`RUSSELL E. CASS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The parties are not authorized to use this caption.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00861 (Patent 10,257,319)
`IPR2022-00862 (Patent 10,484,510)
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`On May 24, 2022, counsel for petitioner Code200 UAB et al.,2
`counsel for patent owner Bright Data Ltd., and the panel conducted a
`telephone conference call to discuss the pending motions for joinder with
`IPR2021-01492 (for IPR2022-00861) and IPR2021-01493 (for IPR2022-
`00862). The conference was requested by counsel for Code200. Also on the
`call were counsel for NetNut Ltd., the petitioner in IPR2022-01492 and
`IPR2022-01493, and counsel for Major Data, UAB, the petitioner in
`IPR2022-00915 and IPR2022-00916.3
`After hearing from the parties, the Board panel expressed a desire to
`decide the joinder motions as soon as is reasonably possible and sought the
`parties’ cooperation in adjusting the schedule in these cases to achieve that
`goal. After discussing various alternatives, the parties reached agreement
`with the panel on a schedule for filing Bright Data’s preliminary responses
`to the petitions in these cases to coincide with Code200’s filing of its replies
`to Bright Data’s oppositions to Code200’s joinder motions. This agreement
`is reflected in the order that follows.
`In addition, Bright Data reached agreement with the Board panel on
`an extension of time to file its patent owner responses in IPR2021-01492
`and IPR2021-01493. A separate order will reset the due dates for those
`filings.
`
`
`2 Code200, UAB; Teso LT, UAB; Metacluster LT, UAB; Oxysales, UAB;
`and coretech lt, UAB.
`3 Major Data also has moved for joinder with IPR2021-01492 and IPR2021-
`01493.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00861 (Patent 10,257,319)
`IPR2022-00862 (Patent 10,484,510)
`ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Code200’s replies to Bright Data’s oppositions to
`Code200’s joinder motions in IPR2022-00861 and IPR2022-00862 are due
`by June 20, 2022, and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Bright Data’s patent owner preliminary
`responses in IPR2022-00861and IPR2022-00862 are also due by June 20,
`2022.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00861 (Patent 10,257,319)
`IPR2022-00862 (Patent 10,484,510)
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`George Scott
`John Heuton
`CHARHON CALLAHAN ROBSON & GARZA, PLLC
`jscott@ccrglaw.com
`jheuton@ccrglaw.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Elizabeth A. O’Brien
`RUYAKCHERIAN LLP
`tom@dunham.cc
`elizabetho@ruyakcherian.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket