`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 12
`Date: May 25, 2022
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`CODE200, UAB; TESO LT, UAB; METACLUSTER LT, UAB;
`OXYSALES, UAB; and CORETECH LT, UAB,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2022-00861 (Patent 10,257,319)
` IPR2022-00862 (Patent 10,484,510)1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, SHEILA F. McSHANE, and
`RUSSELL E. CASS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The parties are not authorized to use this caption.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00861 (Patent 10,257,319)
`IPR2022-00862 (Patent 10,484,510)
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`On May 24, 2022, counsel for petitioner Code200 UAB et al.,2
`counsel for patent owner Bright Data Ltd., and the panel conducted a
`telephone conference call to discuss the pending motions for joinder with
`IPR2021-01492 (for IPR2022-00861) and IPR2021-01493 (for IPR2022-
`00862). The conference was requested by counsel for Code200. Also on the
`call were counsel for NetNut Ltd., the petitioner in IPR2022-01492 and
`IPR2022-01493, and counsel for Major Data, UAB, the petitioner in
`IPR2022-00915 and IPR2022-00916.3
`After hearing from the parties, the Board panel expressed a desire to
`decide the joinder motions as soon as is reasonably possible and sought the
`parties’ cooperation in adjusting the schedule in these cases to achieve that
`goal. After discussing various alternatives, the parties reached agreement
`with the panel on a schedule for filing Bright Data’s preliminary responses
`to the petitions in these cases to coincide with Code200’s filing of its replies
`to Bright Data’s oppositions to Code200’s joinder motions. This agreement
`is reflected in the order that follows.
`In addition, Bright Data reached agreement with the Board panel on
`an extension of time to file its patent owner responses in IPR2021-01492
`and IPR2021-01493. A separate order will reset the due dates for those
`filings.
`
`
`2 Code200, UAB; Teso LT, UAB; Metacluster LT, UAB; Oxysales, UAB;
`and coretech lt, UAB.
`3 Major Data also has moved for joinder with IPR2021-01492 and IPR2021-
`01493.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00861 (Patent 10,257,319)
`IPR2022-00862 (Patent 10,484,510)
`ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Code200’s replies to Bright Data’s oppositions to
`Code200’s joinder motions in IPR2022-00861 and IPR2022-00862 are due
`by June 20, 2022, and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Bright Data’s patent owner preliminary
`responses in IPR2022-00861and IPR2022-00862 are also due by June 20,
`2022.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00861 (Patent 10,257,319)
`IPR2022-00862 (Patent 10,484,510)
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`George Scott
`John Heuton
`CHARHON CALLAHAN ROBSON & GARZA, PLLC
`jscott@ccrglaw.com
`jheuton@ccrglaw.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Elizabeth A. O’Brien
`RUYAKCHERIAN LLP
`tom@dunham.cc
`elizabetho@ruyakcherian.com
`
`4
`
`