throbber
·1· ·UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`·2· · · · · · ·_________________
`
`·3· ·BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`·4· · · · · · ·_________________
`
`·5· ·BLUEBIRD BIO, INC.
`
`·6· · · · · Petitioner
`
`·7· ·vs.
`
`·8· ·SLOAN KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH,
`
`·9· · · · · Patent Owner
`
`10· · · · · · ·_________________
`
`11· · · · · · ·Patent No. 8,058,061
`
`12· · · · · · ·_________________
`
`13
`
`14· · · · · · · · · · · July 10, 2023
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17· · · · · Video-Recorded Deposition of
`
`18· · · · · · · ·Jörg Bungert, Ph.D.
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22· ·Stenographically Reported By:
`
`23· ·Mark Richman, RPR, CSR, CCR, CM
`
`24· ·Job No. J9814137
`
`25
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 1 of 254
`
`

`

`·1
`
`·2
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · · · ·JULY 10, 2023
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · · · ·9:41 A.M. EST
`
`·5
`
`·6
`
`·7· · · · · · Video-Recorded Deposition of
`
`·8· ·JÖRG BUNGERT, PH.D., at the offices of Paul
`
`·9· ·Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, New
`
`10· ·York, before Mark Richman, Certified
`
`11· ·Shorthand Reporter, Certified Court
`
`12· ·Reporter, Registered Professional Reporter,
`
`13· ·and a Notary Public within and for the State
`
`14· ·of New York.
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 2 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· ·A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`·2· ·PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`
`·3· ·Attorneys for Bluebird Bio
`
`·4· · · · · 200 Park Avenue
`
`·5· · · · · New York, New York 10166
`
`·6
`
`·7· ·BY:· MAX YUSEM, ESQ.
`
`·8· · · · KRYSTINA HO, ESQ.
`
`·9
`
`10· ·FOX ROTHSCHILD
`
`11· ·Attorneys for San Rocco Therapeutics as
`
`12· ·Representative for MSK
`
`13· · · · · 101 Park Avenue, 17th floor
`
`14· · · · · New York, NY 10178
`
`15
`
`16· ·BY:· · MICHAEL GLYNN, ESQ.
`
`17· · · · · JOE CHEN, ESQ.
`
`18· · · · · HOWARD SUH, ESQ.
`
`19
`
`20· ·ALSO PRESENT:
`
`21· ·SILVIO FACCHIN, Videographer
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 3 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· · · · THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· This is the
`
`·3· ·media labeled number 1 of the video
`
`·4· ·recorded deposition of Dr. Jörg
`
`·5· ·Bungert in the matter of Bluebird Bio
`
`·6· ·v. Sloan Kettering Institute for
`
`·7· ·Cancer Research.
`
`·8· · · · We are now going on the record.
`
`·9· ·The time is 9:41 a.m.
`
`10· · · · Counsel please state their
`
`11· ·appearances for the record.
`
`12· · · · MR. YUSEM:· Yes.· Max Yusem for
`
`13· ·Paul Hastings and Bluebird.
`
`14· · · · MS. HO:· Krystina Ho for Paul
`
`15· ·Hastings and Bluebird.
`
`16· · · · DR. GLYNN:· Michael Glynn from
`
`17· ·Fox Rothschild, joined by my
`
`18· ·colleagues, Joe Chen and Howard Suh,
`
`19· ·also from Fox Rothschild representing
`
`20· ·San Rocco Therapeutics.
`
`21· · · · THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· Will the court
`
`22· ·reporter please swear in the witness.
`
`23· · · · //
`
`24· · · · //
`
`25· · · ·//
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 4 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· · · · · ·JÖRG BUNGERT, PH.D., called as a
`
`·3· · ·witness, having been first duly sworn
`
`·4· · ·by the Notary Public (Mark Richman),
`
`·5· · ·was examined and testified as
`
`·6· · ·follows:
`
`·7· · · · · EXAMINATION BY DR. GLYNN:
`
`·8· · Q.· · Good morning.
`
`·9· · A.· · Good morning.
`
`10· · · · · Perhaps before we begin, in
`
`11· ·preparation of this meeting, I noticed
`
`12· ·that there were some minor errors in the
`
`13· ·declaration and they don't affect my
`
`14· ·conclusions but I would like to hand
`
`15· ·them to you.
`
`16· · · · · MR. YUSEM:· We've got copies too.
`
`17· · · · · MS. HO:· Yes, pass them out?
`
`18· · · · · DR. GLYNN:· Yes, let's distribute
`
`19· · ·copies as well.
`
`20· · Q.· · These are corrected versions of
`
`21· ·figures?
`
`22· · A.· · Yes, of the visualizations of the
`
`23· ·analysis of the restriction fragments.
`
`24· · Q.· · And what is different about these
`
`25· ·figures with respect to the figures in
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 5 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·your declaration?
`
`·3· · A.· · Yes.· Let me go to the... so one
`
`·4· ·change is with regard to HS2.· So if you
`
`·5· ·go to page 47 of the declaration or 55
`
`·6· ·of a 100, you notice that --
`
`·7· · Q.· · I'm sorry, what page?· I'm sorry,
`
`·8· ·what page?
`
`·9· · A.· · Page 47.
`
`10· · Q.· · 47.
`
`11· · A.· · Or 55 out of 100, declaration
`
`12· ·179.
`
`13· · Q.· · I went too far, sorry.
`
`14· · A.· · It's the one before.
`
`15· · Q.· · Got it.
`
`16· · A.· · So that's the first one.· And you
`
`17· ·noticed in here that we change the
`
`18· ·position of the HS2 site so we
`
`19· ·erroneously used the ones at 493 and we
`
`20· ·corrected that to use the ones at 765
`
`21· ·and we didn't consider any of these
`
`22· ·fragments or I didn't consider any of
`
`23· ·these fragments for the analysis. I
`
`24· ·mean for the final selection of
`
`25· ·fragments that we used.
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 6 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· · Q.· · I'm not following you.
`
`·3· · A.· · So in this, in this figure you
`
`·4· ·see below in the original version we
`
`·5· ·list six fragments and they were ordered
`
`·6· ·according to the length.· And the first
`
`·7· ·two fragments of HS2, AvaI, HS2i, you
`
`·8· ·see these two fragments?
`
`·9· · Q.· · Mm-hmm.
`
`10· · A.· · And so in the revised version we
`
`11· ·changed using the HS2 that is a closer
`
`12· ·to the core.· We meant, I meant to use
`
`13· ·the restriction enzyme that is closer to
`
`14· ·the core.
`
`15· · Q.· · Okay.· Okay, I understand.· So in
`
`16· ·the original figure it's using the HS2
`
`17· ·site at 493?
`
`18· · A.· · That's correct.
`
`19· · Q.· · And you changed this to use the
`
`20· ·XhoII site at 653?
`
`21· · A.· · That's correct.
`
`22· · Q.· · All right.· Is that the only
`
`23· ·difference?
`
`24· · A.· · This is the only difference in
`
`25· ·this figure here.
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 7 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· · Q.· · Okay.
`
`·3· · A.· · And then in the next figure, I
`
`·4· ·made the mistake to include one
`
`·5· ·additional fragment which in this
`
`·6· ·original figure is the NdeI sub 1
`
`·7· ·fragment and we -- I should not have
`
`·8· ·included that one because it is too
`
`·9· ·large for the fragments that we
`
`10· ·considered for this analysis based on
`
`11· ·the May article.
`
`12· · Q.· · So you're excluding from this
`
`13· ·figure the NdeI?
`
`14· · A.· · NdeI.
`
`15· · Q.· · Okay.· Any other changes?
`
`16· · A.· · No.
`
`17· · Q.· · Okay.· When did you -- when did
`
`18· ·you notice these errors in the
`
`19· ·declaration?
`
`20· · A.· · Just in preparation for this
`
`21· ·deposition before I met with the
`
`22· ·counsel.
`
`23· · Q.· · Have you been deposed before?
`
`24· · A.· · Excuse me?
`
`25· · Q.· · Have you been deposed before?
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 8 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· · A.· · No.· This is the first time.
`
`·3· · Q.· · This is the first time?· Okay.
`
`·4· ·So you understand that you are under
`
`·5· ·oath.
`
`·6· · A.· · Mm-hmm.
`
`·7· · Q.· · To give truthful and complete
`
`·8· ·testimony?
`
`·9· · A.· · Mm-hmm.
`
`10· · Q.· · All right.· I'll be asking you
`
`11· ·questions today.· You are required to
`
`12· ·give answers.· And if any of the
`
`13· ·questions that I ask you are unclear to
`
`14· ·you, please let me know and I'll do my
`
`15· ·best to rephrase in a way that's clear
`
`16· ·to you.
`
`17· · · · · We will be taking breaks from
`
`18· ·time to time.· If you find that you need
`
`19· ·a break, please let me know and we'll
`
`20· ·take a break either when that question
`
`21· ·and answer is complete or depending when
`
`22· ·that line of questioning is complete and
`
`23· ·we'll take a break as soon as
`
`24· ·practicable.
`
`25· · · · · Is that all right?
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 9 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· · A.· · That's all right.
`
`·3· · Q.· · Okay.· Other things, just keep in
`
`·4· ·mind the talking over which we covered.
`
`·5· ·That can, that complicates things for
`
`·6· ·the record.
`
`·7· · · · · Answers should be verbal, right.
`
`·8· ·Nods and things like that also aren't
`
`·9· ·conducive for the deposition atmosphere,
`
`10· ·so.
`
`11· · · · · All right.· I think with that in
`
`12· ·mind we will start.
`
`13· · · · · How did you identify those, the
`
`14· ·mistakes that we just covered?· You just
`
`15· ·happened to notice them as you were
`
`16· ·going through?
`
`17· · A.· · Well, I just went over and it
`
`18· ·just didn't make sense to me that we
`
`19· ·would use fragments where we used the
`
`20· ·further upstream HS2 sites so I went
`
`21· ·back in the restriction map that I did
`
`22· ·and then I noticed that we should have
`
`23· ·used these in the corrected version.
`
`24· · Q.· · Oh, is that because if you used
`
`25· ·the upstream one then you had another
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 10 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·XhoII site cutting in the middle and
`
`·3· ·that wouldn't make sense?
`
`·4· · A.· · No, not because of that.· Because
`
`·5· ·we were looking for fragments that had
`
`·6· ·the size that were outlined in the May
`
`·7· ·article in Figure 1 according to the
`
`·8· ·size.· And so if we would have used the
`
`·9· ·other one, it wouldn't be in that range.
`
`10· · Q.· · Okay.· All right.· As we go
`
`11· ·through your discussion today, you
`
`12· ·understand that the time frame that
`
`13· ·we're talking about with respect to the
`
`14· ·knowledge of a person of ordinary skill
`
`15· ·in the art or what's in the art is the
`
`16· ·2001 time frame?
`
`17· · A.· · And earlier.
`
`18· · Q.· · And earlier, yes.
`
`19· · A.· · Mm-hmm.
`
`20· · Q.· · Up to and including, you know,
`
`21· ·mid 2001, right?
`
`22· · A.· · Mm-hmm.
`
`23· · Q.· · Okay.· In, in that time frame, up
`
`24· ·and including 2001 or mid 2001, what
`
`25· ·methods would a person of ordinary skill
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 11 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·in the art use to clone or subclone
`
`·3· ·segments of DNA?
`
`·4· · A.· · I would say the preferential
`
`·5· ·method would be to use restriction
`
`·6· ·enzymes.
`
`·7· · Q.· · Okay.· Are there other methods?
`
`·8· · A.· · There are other methods.
`
`·9· · Q.· · Okay.· And what are they?
`
`10· · A.· · You could use PCR, other methods.
`
`11· · Q.· · Okay.· Have you used PCR to clone
`
`12· ·fragments?
`
`13· · A.· · I've used PCR.
`
`14· · Q.· · Okay.· And a person of ordinary
`
`15· ·skill in the art would have known that
`
`16· ·PCR is a way of cloning these fragments,
`
`17· ·right?
`
`18· · A.· · With respect to this particular
`
`19· ·situation, a POSA, or a person of
`
`20· ·ordinary skill in the arts, would have
`
`21· ·looked at this publication, would have
`
`22· ·looked at previous publications and
`
`23· ·would have assumed that in this
`
`24· ·particular situation restriction enzymes
`
`25· ·were used.
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 12 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· · Q.· · Based on what?
`
`·3· · A.· · Based on previous publications
`
`·4· ·that generated LCR fragments, and I cite
`
`·5· ·the Ellis paper, I cite the Bouhasirra
`
`·6· ·paper, based on another publication from
`
`·7· ·the Sadelain group in 1990 where they
`
`·8· ·use restriction enzymes to clone
`
`·9· ·together these fragments for the
`
`10· ·Lentiviral factor.
`
`11· · · · · So based on that, I think a POSA
`
`12· ·would assume that this was done with
`
`13· ·restriction enzymes.
`
`14· · Q.· · When you've cloned fragments from
`
`15· ·the LCR you used PCR, right?
`
`16· · A.· · We used it in a very different
`
`17· ·context.· We used, we make constructs --
`
`18· ·we used it in a different context.· We
`
`19· ·generated PCR fragments and cloned
`
`20· ·together fragments that we used for a
`
`21· ·recombination in yeast so the context is
`
`22· ·very different.
`
`23· · · · · We didn't care about the ends of
`
`24· ·these fragments because during the
`
`25· ·recombination process they wouldn't be
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 13 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·incorporated into the, into the final
`
`·3· ·product.
`
`·4· · Q.· · If you're cloning with
`
`·5· ·restriction sites, are there particular
`
`·6· ·qualities that a person of ordinary
`
`·7· ·skill in the art would look like -- look
`
`·8· ·for when that person is evaluating which
`
`·9· ·restriction enzymes to, to use or which
`
`10· ·sites to use?
`
`11· · A.· · I'm not sure about the question.
`
`12· ·Can you repeat or rephrase?
`
`13· · Q.· · Sure.· In -- when you're cloning
`
`14· ·or subcloning a segment of DNA, there is
`
`15· ·often a variety of restriction enzyme
`
`16· ·sites or restriction sites to choose
`
`17· ·from, and a person of ordinary skill in
`
`18· ·the art is going to make a decision
`
`19· ·about which enzymes or sites they want
`
`20· ·to use and maybe which ones they don't
`
`21· ·use in the first instance, right?
`
`22· · A.· · Mm-hmm.
`
`23· · Q.· · All right.· So are there
`
`24· ·qualities that a person of ordinary
`
`25· ·skill in the art would look for in the
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 14 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·restriction enzymes or restriction
`
`·3· ·enzyme sites that would be preferable?
`
`·4· · A.· · Yes.· And I outlined this in a
`
`·5· ·declaration.· That preferably you would
`
`·6· ·not use enzymes that cut too often.
`
`·7· ·Preferably you would not use enzymes
`
`·8· ·that cut outside the recognition site
`
`·9· ·because that makes the fragment harder
`
`10· ·to define.· So these are criteria I
`
`11· ·think that you would, that you would use
`
`12· ·in general.
`
`13· · Q.· · Are there other criteria?
`
`14· · A.· · Well, with respect to the claim
`
`15· ·here in the May article, you would look
`
`16· ·for restriction enzymes that match the
`
`17· ·fragments that are outlined in the May
`
`18· ·article.
`
`19· · Q.· · Okay.· But right now we're
`
`20· ·talking generally.
`
`21· · A.· · Okay.
`
`22· · Q.· · For restriction enzymes.
`
`23· · · · · Are there other, are there other
`
`24· ·characteristics that you would look for,
`
`25· ·perhaps sticky ends versus blunt ends?
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 15 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· · A.· · I mean that is just the
`
`·3· ·technology, a technological question
`
`·4· ·about how to put these fragments
`
`·5· ·together.
`
`·6· · Q.· · Sure.
`
`·7· · A.· · Sometimes you use sticky and
`
`·8· ·sometimes you use blunt ends.
`
`·9· · Q.· · Right, blunt-end cloning being a
`
`10· ·bit more inefficient?
`
`11· · A.· · In terms of what?
`
`12· · Q.· · In terms of ligating, ligating
`
`13· ·efficiency.
`
`14· · A.· · I think by that time conditions
`
`15· ·for sticky end ligation and blunt end
`
`16· ·ligation were both out, so doable.
`
`17· · Q.· · Certainly both were doable?
`
`18· · A.· · Yes.
`
`19· · Q.· · Would you have a preference for
`
`20· ·an enzyme that cut once versus having to
`
`21· ·use a different enzyme on both sides of
`
`22· ·the fragment?
`
`23· · A.· · Do you mean that would I prefer
`
`24· ·using an enzyme that cuts once and then
`
`25· ·use another enzyme to release the
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 16 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·fragment or use an enzyme that cuts
`
`·3· ·twice and release as fragment?
`
`·4· · Q.· · Yes, the second one.· Would you
`
`·5· ·prefer if the enzyme cut twice, once on
`
`·6· ·each side of the fragment so that you
`
`·7· ·only have to use one restriction site --
`
`·8· ·or one restriction enzyme, excuse me?
`
`·9· · A.· · That depends on the situation and
`
`10· ·the context.
`
`11· · Q.· · So there's no preference one way
`
`12· ·or the other?
`
`13· · A.· · It depends on the context.
`
`14· · Q.· · And we were talking about cloning
`
`15· ·here.· What do you understand me to mean
`
`16· ·by that?· I want to make sure we're
`
`17· ·using the same language.
`
`18· · A.· · Sure.· By cloning I mean that you
`
`19· ·create a DNA construct that contains
`
`20· ·multiple DNA elements and that you use
`
`21· ·for further experiments.
`
`22· · Q.· · Okay.· So you're isolating DNA
`
`23· ·from one source and putting it into
`
`24· ·another source, and assembling it into
`
`25· ·another source?
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 17 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· · A.· · That's correct.
`
`·3· · Q.· · Right.· And that's true of course
`
`·4· ·whether it's, that the source that
`
`·5· ·you're assembling it into is for
`
`·6· ·homologous recombination, right, to
`
`·7· ·incorporate something into, you know,
`
`·8· ·into yet another source, right, using --
`
`·9· ·or for expression studies and the like,
`
`10· ·kind of like what we're talking about
`
`11· ·here?
`
`12· · A.· · What --
`
`13· · · · · MR. YUSEM:· I'll object to the
`
`14· · ·form of the question.
`
`15· · A.· · Yes.· So it always depends on the
`
`16· ·context.· So the way you put things
`
`17· ·together for recombination may be
`
`18· ·totally different than the way you put
`
`19· ·things together for generating an
`
`20· ·expression construct.
`
`21· · Q.· · If you're assembling an LCR that
`
`22· ·you're then going to use in expression
`
`23· ·construct and that expression construct
`
`24· ·is going to be expressed from a vector,
`
`25· ·maybe a lentiviral vector versus that
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 18 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·construct being used for homologous
`
`·3· ·recombination and integrated into a
`
`·4· ·target DNA, why would a person of
`
`·5· ·ordinary skill in the art when
`
`·6· ·assembling the LCR consider different
`
`·7· ·methods for the assembly?
`
`·8· · A.· · Because for that assembly the
`
`·9· ·ends of the restriction fragments would
`
`10· ·matter versus for the homologous
`
`11· ·recombination, because the homologous
`
`12· ·recombination does not incorporate the
`
`13· ·restriction enzymes that you add during
`
`14· ·the PCR.
`
`15· · Q.· · Maybe my question wasn't clear.
`
`16· ·If you're using homologous recombination
`
`17· ·to incorporate the LCR and whatever gene
`
`18· ·is being expressed from it into a
`
`19· ·target, that LCR is going to contain,
`
`20· ·you know, all the -- you know, the
`
`21· ·fragments that you put into it, whatever
`
`22· ·method that you use, right?
`
`23· · · · · And the same goes for an
`
`24· ·expression construct that's not used for
`
`25· ·homologous recombination but maybe a
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 19 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·lentiviral expression reconstruct,
`
`·3· ·right?
`
`·4· · · · · That LCR when you assemble it is
`
`·5· ·still the LCR, is going to contain the
`
`·6· ·elements that you put together along
`
`·7· ·with the remnant of the assembly, right?
`
`·8· · A.· · I don't agree with that and the
`
`·9· ·reason I don't agree with that is we
`
`10· ·didn't use PCR to assemble fragments of
`
`11· ·the LCR, to generate an LCR that we use
`
`12· ·for expression construct.· We use PCR to
`
`13· ·generate constructs that we use to
`
`14· ·remove elements from the LCR or to
`
`15· ·replace elements from the LCR.
`
`16· · · · · It was an analytical method.· We
`
`17· ·did not, for us it was not important
`
`18· ·where the ends of the restriction sites
`
`19· ·were.
`
`20· · · · · And I want to also clarify that
`
`21· ·if we talk about PCR versus restriction
`
`22· ·fragments that in the May article there
`
`23· ·is no mention of PCR.· There's reference
`
`24· ·to other articles before and all of
`
`25· ·these articles use restriction enzymes
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 20 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·to generate fragments for the LCR.
`
`·3· · Q.· · Nonetheless, you would agree
`
`·4· ·that, generally speaking, when a person
`
`·5· ·of ordinary skill in the art is looking
`
`·6· ·to assemble or clone segments of DNA,
`
`·7· ·they would consider both the use of
`
`·8· ·restriction endonucleases and PCR?
`
`·9· · A.· · I would say a POSA by looking at
`
`10· ·the May article would have concluded
`
`11· ·that restriction enzymes were used based
`
`12· ·on the article, based on previous
`
`13· ·publications and would not have
`
`14· ·considered PCR.
`
`15· · Q.· · That wasn't my question.· My
`
`16· ·question was, a person of ordinary skill
`
`17· ·in the art at the relevant time frame,
`
`18· ·2001 and before, would understand that
`
`19· ·when cloning or subcloning segments of
`
`20· ·DNA, that, that one could use
`
`21· ·restriction enzymes and one could also
`
`22· ·use PCR, correct?
`
`23· · A.· · That depends on the context.· So
`
`24· ·in this particular context here a POSA
`
`25· ·would have assumed that restriction
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 21 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·fragments were used.
`
`·3· · Q.· · It's not your testimony, is it,
`
`·4· ·that in this context a person of
`
`·5· ·ordinary skill in the art would be
`
`·6· ·unable to use PCR to assemble the LCR,
`
`·7· ·correct?
`
`·8· · A.· · That is not correct.
`
`·9· · Q.· · It's your testimony that a person
`
`10· ·of ordinary skill in the art would not
`
`11· ·be able to use PCR to assemble an LCR?
`
`12· · A.· · I don't think I mentioned PCR at
`
`13· ·all in my declaration.
`
`14· · Q.· · That's true, you did not.· And
`
`15· ·you didn't mention PCR because the
`
`16· ·claims themselves cite restriction
`
`17· ·fragments, right?
`
`18· · · · · MR. YUSEM:· Object to form.
`
`19· · A.· · I didn't mention the PCR because
`
`20· ·there was no reason for me to assume
`
`21· ·that a POSA would have thought that
`
`22· ·these fragments were generated by PCR.
`
`23· ·I was a POSA at that time.· I worked in
`
`24· ·this area.· I would not have assumed
`
`25· ·that they would use PCR to generate an
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 22 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·LCR fragment.
`
`·3· · Q.· · A person of ordinary skill in the
`
`·4· ·art could use PCR when doing that,
`
`·5· ·right?· It's within their capability?
`
`·6· · A.· · A POSA would be able to use PCR
`
`·7· ·but a POSA that would have looked at the
`
`·8· ·May article would have assumed, based on
`
`·9· ·the information given in this paper and
`
`10· ·the information that was cited by this
`
`11· ·paper, other papers that used cloning to
`
`12· ·generate an LCR fragment that expresses
`
`13· ·ß-globin in all these previous
`
`14· ·publications restriction enzymes were
`
`15· ·used, as far as I know.
`
`16· · Q.· · All right.· But you answered a
`
`17· ·different question so I just want to, I
`
`18· ·just want to ask you the question again
`
`19· ·and get the answer to the question.
`
`20· · · · · A person of ordinary skill in the
`
`21· ·art in the time frame of mid 2001 and
`
`22· ·before could use PCR to assemble the
`
`23· ·LCR, correct?
`
`24· · A.· · But a POSA looking --
`
`25· · Q.· · Please, please answer -- please
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 23 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·answer that question.· We'll get to
`
`·3· ·talking about the article later, I
`
`·4· ·promise.· But please answer the question
`
`·5· ·that I'm asking you.
`
`·6· · A.· · Yes, and I would say a POSA --
`
`·7· ·what a POSA in attempting to generate an
`
`·8· ·LCR fragment would have preferred using
`
`·9· ·restriction enzymes given all the
`
`10· ·information at that time.
`
`11· · Q.· · Okay.
`
`12· · A.· · A POSA would not have considered
`
`13· ·using PCR, putting these elements
`
`14· ·together to drive ß-globin expression.
`
`15· · Q.· · But that is not the question I
`
`16· ·asked.· A person of ordinary skill in
`
`17· ·the art had the knowledge, the ability
`
`18· ·to use PCR in this context, right?
`
`19· · A.· · A person of ordinary skill in the
`
`20· ·art would have looked in this paper
`
`21· ·knowing that PCR exists.· A POSA would
`
`22· ·know that PCR exists.· But in this
`
`23· ·particular situation, given the
`
`24· ·information provided in this paper and
`
`25· ·given previous publications, would have
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 24 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·assumed that these fragments were
`
`·3· ·generated by restriction enzyme
`
`·4· ·digestion.
`
`·5· · Q.· · Dr. --
`
`·6· · A.· · And another reason for that,
`
`·7· ·another reason for that --
`
`·8· · Q.· · -- that is answering a different
`
`·9· ·question.· Please --
`
`10· · · · · MR. YUSEM:· Sorry, Dr. Bungert,
`
`11· · ·were you done with your answer?
`
`12· · · · · THE WITNESS:· Excuse me?
`
`13· · · · · MR. YUSEM:· Were you done with
`
`14· · ·your answer?
`
`15· · · · · THE WITNESS:· I would just add
`
`16· · ·one, one more thing.
`
`17· · Q.· · Please do.
`
`18· · A.· · And that is if you look at the
`
`19· ·information given in the May article,
`
`20· ·you notice that they not only provide
`
`21· ·the position of the core hypersensitive
`
`22· ·sites, they also provide the position of
`
`23· ·the fragments that were used, correct?
`
`24· · Q.· · I'm not here to answer questions,
`
`25· ·I'm sorry.
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 25 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· · A.· · Okay, yes.· So you can see that
`
`·3· ·they not only provide the position of
`
`·4· ·the hypersensitive sites, but also the
`
`·5· ·position of these fragments.· And the
`
`·6· ·way these fragments are positioned, for
`
`·7· ·example, the idea was using larger
`
`·8· ·fragments, the idea was having the core
`
`·9· ·and the franking sequences, you notice
`
`10· ·that some of these were very close to
`
`11· ·the course.· That would be another
`
`12· ·reason for a POSA to assume that they
`
`13· ·were not generated by PCR, in my
`
`14· ·opinion.
`
`15· · Q.· · Couldn't you just make PCR
`
`16· ·primers in those positions?
`
`17· · A.· · But to me it wouldn't make sense.
`
`18· ·To me it would not have made sense.
`
`19· · Q.· · Okay.· To you --
`
`20· · A.· · If I would have generated an LCR
`
`21· ·with the core and flanking sequences, I
`
`22· ·would not have chosen a PCR fragment
`
`23· ·that originates at the hypersensitive
`
`24· ·site.
`
`25· · Q.· · Okay.· A person of ordinary skill
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 26 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·in the art was aware that of the
`
`·3· ·techniques that could be used to clone
`
`·4· ·or subclone fragments, PCR was one of
`
`·5· ·them, right?
`
`·6· · A.· · I think a POSA would have
`
`·7· ·excluded using PCR.· He would be aware
`
`·8· ·of it, but he would have excluded using
`
`·9· ·PCR to generate an LCR fragment that
`
`10· ·drives high ß-globin expression.
`
`11· · Q.· · Let's forget about LCRs for a
`
`12· ·second and just talk about cloning
`
`13· ·generally.· Can we do that?
`
`14· · A.· · Yes.
`
`15· · Q.· · Okay.· In the time frame of mid
`
`16· ·2001 and before, a person of ordinary
`
`17· ·skill in the art was aware that in
`
`18· ·addition to the use of restriction
`
`19· ·endonucleases PCR was an option for
`
`20· ·cloning and subcloning DNA fragments,
`
`21· ·right?
`
`22· · A.· · I would still maintain that even
`
`23· ·if someone would not work on the LCR but
`
`24· ·in another topic, the preferentially
`
`25· ·technique to assemble regulatory
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 27 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·elements into an LCR like configuration
`
`·3· ·would be restriction enzyme digestion.
`
`·4· · Q.· · Not the question I asked.· But
`
`·5· ·I'll try one more time.
`
`·6· · · · · It's true, isn't it, that a
`
`·7· ·person of ordinary skill in the art in
`
`·8· ·this time frame, mid 2001, would be
`
`·9· ·aware that one could use restriction
`
`10· ·endonucleases to subclone or clone
`
`11· ·fragments of DNA and one could use PCR
`
`12· ·to subclone or clone fragments of DNA,
`
`13· ·right?
`
`14· · A.· · A POSA would know about the
`
`15· ·different technologies available and
`
`16· ·when assembling the regulatory element
`
`17· ·like the LCR would have used restriction
`
`18· ·enzymes.
`
`19· · Q.· · Let's talk about --
`
`20· · A.· · That's my opinion.
`
`21· · Q.· · Okay.· Let's talk about
`
`22· ·restriction enzymes and how techniques
`
`23· ·for using those to assemble multiple
`
`24· ·pieces like in the LCR.· Maybe you
`
`25· ·could, maybe you can explain that.· So
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 28 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·if you're looking to clone multiple
`
`·3· ·fragments of DNA using restriction
`
`·4· ·endonucleases, how would you do it, just
`
`·5· ·generally?· Please, I'm not talking
`
`·6· ·about looking at the May article right
`
`·7· ·now.· If you want to clone multiple
`
`·8· ·fragments together, what are the
`
`·9· ·techniques you would use?
`
`10· · A.· · First, I would look at the
`
`11· ·database.· I would look for restriction
`
`12· ·map.· I would look for where these
`
`13· ·restriction enzymes are relative to the
`
`14· ·elements that I would like to subclone.
`
`15· ·And then I would design a strategy to
`
`16· ·use particular restriction fragments to
`
`17· ·clone these together.
`
`18· · Q.· · Okay.· And how would you develop
`
`19· ·that strategy?· What would that entail?
`
`20· · A.· · Well, I would look at restriction
`
`21· ·enzymes that encompass the regulatory
`
`22· ·element and any other additional
`
`23· ·elements I would like to include.· Then
`
`24· ·I would isolate these fragments and
`
`25· ·would ligate them together in expression
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 29 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·vector or whatever context.
`
`·3· · Q.· · Would you have any particular
`
`·4· ·strategy when it comes to selecting the
`
`·5· ·restriction enzymes?
`
`·6· · A.· · I would use restriction enzymes
`
`·7· ·that do not cut too often preferably.
`
`·8· ·That is not always possible.· I would
`
`·9· ·prefer enzymes that would not ---that
`
`10· ·cut outside the recognition sequence. I
`
`11· ·would prefer using enzymes that have
`
`12· ·been used before in cloning techniques.
`
`13· ·I would use enzymes that are available
`
`14· ·at that time, whatever.
`
`15· · · · · So all these things I would take
`
`16· ·into consideration.
`
`17· · Q.· · And you'd consider, for example,
`
`18· ·whether the enzymes that you're using
`
`19· ·had compatible sticky ends?
`
`20· · A.· · Yes, sometimes I would consider
`
`21· ·this.· I would maybe prefer enzymes that
`
`22· ·don't have sticky ends but sometimes
`
`23· ·that is not possible.
`
`24· · Q.· · So you would just look for blunt
`
`25· ·ended?
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 30 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· · A.· · I would look for both.
`
`·3· · Q.· · Okay, both?
`
`·4· · A.· · Mm-hmm.
`
`·5· · Q.· · Okay.· And if some are blunt and
`
`·6· ·some are sticky, then what do you do?
`
`·7· · A.· · If it's at the same position, I
`
`·8· ·would use the sticky end.· If it's, if
`
`·9· ·it's at a different position and I need
`
`10· ·to include other elements that the
`
`11· ·blunt-end restriction enzyme includes, I
`
`12· ·would use the blunt end.
`
`13· · Q.· · Okay.· And when you're putting
`
`14· ·the fragments together, if you need to
`
`15· ·assemble these fragments and some have
`
`16· ·sticky ends that aren't compatible or
`
`17· ·some have, one has a blunt end and one
`
`18· ·has a sticky end, what's the strategy
`
`19· ·then?
`
`20· · A.· · Then you make the other one
`
`21· ·blunt.
`
`22· · Q.· · All right.· So you just blunt
`
`23· ·both?
`
`24· · A.· · Mm-hmm.
`
`25· · Q.· · Okay.· And you're okay with
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 31 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·losing whatever sequence you're
`
`·3· ·blunting, right?
`
`·4· · A.· · It depends.· It depends on the
`
`·5· ·context.
`
`·6· · Q.· · Okay.· But one option is, one
`
`·7· ·option is to generate blunt ends and do
`
`·8· ·blunt-end cloning?
`
`·9· · A.· · If there is no other possibility,
`
`10· ·then that's what you do in a particular
`
`11· ·context.
`
`12· · Q.· · Okay.· In the situations where
`
`13· ·you would use PCR to clone, because you
`
`14· ·said you have, right, you used PCR to
`
`15· ·clone and subclone fragments, what are
`
`16· ·the advantages of using PCR in those
`
`17· ·situations over restriction
`
`18· ·endonucleases?
`
`19· · A.· · So if you can either restriction
`
`20· ·enzymes or PCR, I would use restriction
`
`21· ·enzymes.
`
`22· · Q.· · Okay.· But that's not what I
`
`23· ·asked.
`
`24· · A.· · The advantage of restriction
`
`25· ·enzymes is that you don't introduce
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 32 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· ·mutations.· If you use PCR there's a
`
`·3· ·possibility that you introduce
`
`·4· ·mutations.· Nucleotide changes.
`
`·5· · Q.· · I understand.· I understand.
`
`·6· ·Because, because the -- during, during
`
`·7· ·the PCR itself?
`
`·8· · A.· · Yes.
`
`·9· · Q.· · Okay.· In these situations where
`
`10· ·you did use PCR, are you aware of any
`
`11· ·advantages to using PCR or is there just
`
`12· ·disadvantages like that mutations?
`
`13· · A.· · So ideally you use restriction
`
`14· ·enzymes to preserve the nucleotide
`
`15· ·sequences.· I understand we talked about
`
`16· ·blunt end where you have maybe small
`
`17· ·changes but with PCR you will maybe
`
`18· ·disturb that more.· So having that's
`
`19· ·another advantage of restriction
`
`20· ·enzymes.
`
`21· · · · · Another advantage, as I said, is
`
`22· ·you avoid generating mutations by PCR
`
`23· ·and, yeah, so in this particular
`
`24· ·situation the POSA would prefer using
`
`25· ·restriction enzymes.
`
`SKI Exhibit 2055
`Page 33 of 254
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·J. BUNGERT - 7.10.23
`
`·2· · Q.· · When using PCR, are you aware of
`
`·3· ·any strategies that a person of ordinary
`
`·4· ·skill in the art in the relevant time
`
`·5· ·frame would use in order to address the
`
`·6· ·possibility of mutations arising during
`
`·7· ·the PCR?
`
`·8· · A.· · Technology --
`
`·9· · Q.· · Sure.
`
`10· · A.· · -- it is --· yes, I mean you
`
`11· ·could sequence.
`
`12· · Q.· · Sure, you could sequence.
`
`13· · A.· · But if you use restriction
`
`14· ·enzymes you don't have to really
`
`15· ·sequence because if you clone it out you
`
`16· ·don't introduce any mutations or
`
`17· ·nucleotide changes.
`
`18· · Q.· · Are you using --
`
`19· · A.· · So that is an additional step you
`
`20· ·w

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket