throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 37
`
`
` Entered: November 13, 2023
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`––––––––––––––––––
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`––––––––––––––––––
`BLUEBIRD BIO, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`SLOAN KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH,
`Patent Owner.
`––––––––––––––––––
`IPR2023-00070 (Patent 7,541,179 B2)
` IPR2023-00074 (Patent 8,058,061 B2)1
`––––––––––––––––––
`
`
`Before SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN, JAMES A. WORTH, and
`CYNTHIA M. HARDMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SNEDDEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order addresses an issue common to both of the above-referenced
`proceedings. The parties are not permitted to use this caption unless
`authorized by the Board.
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00070 (Patent 7,541,179 B2)
`IPR2023-00074 (Patent 8,058,061 B2)
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission of Mary Jean Kim
`and declarations in support thereof in the above-identified cases are not in
`condition for grant. The declarations (Ex. 2085) filed to support the Motions
`for admission pro hac vice in the subject cases do not comply with the
`requirements set forth in Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC,
`Case IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (“Unified Patents”).
`See Paper 3, 2 (directing parties to file motions for admission pro hac vice in
`accordance with the Unified Patents order). Specifically, the declarations do
`not list other USPTO proceedings for which Mary Jean Kim has applied for
`admission pro hac vice in the last three years. See Unified Patents, Paper 7,
`at 3. Patent Owner must correct these deficiencies by filing corrected
`declarations (as an exhibit in each of the cases) within 10 business days, or
`the Motions will be dismissed.2
`Additionally, Powers of Attorney in accordance with 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.10(b) have not been submitted for Mary Jean Kim. Patent Owner must
`correct these deficiencies by filing a Power of Attorney for Mary Jean Kim
`in each of the cases within 10 business days.
`
`It is
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`2 Patent Owner is advised to file corrected declarations only and not
`corrected motions for pro hac vice admission, as that would require Patent
`Owner to pay another fee for filing such motions.
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00070 (Patent 7,541,179 B2)
`IPR2023-00074 (Patent 8,058,061 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Naveen Modi
`Eric Dittmann
`Daniel Zeilberger
`Krystina L. Ho
`Max. H. Yusem
`PAUL HASTINGS
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`ericdittmann@paulhastings.com
`danielzeilberger@paulhastings.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Michael Glynn
`Joe Chen
`Howard Suh
`James H. McConnell
`Wanda French-Brown
`FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
`mglynn@foxrothschild.com
`joechen@foxrothschild.com
`hsuh@foxrothschild.com
`jmcconnell@foxrothschild.com
`wfrench-brown@foxrothschild.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket