throbber
United States Patent 19
`Mueller
`
`11)
`45)
`
`4,094,775
`June 13, 1978
`
`(54) DIALYSIS SYSTEM
`75 Inventor: William A. Mueller, Glendale, Calif.
`73) Assignee: California Institute of Technology,
`Pasadena, Calif.
`21 Appl. No.: 772,434
`22 Filed:
`Feb. 28, 1977
`51
`int. Cl’.............................................. B01D 13/00
`52 U.S. C. ................................... 210/22; 210/321 B
`58) Field of Search ........................ 210/22, 23, 321 B
`(56)
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`... 210/321
`9/1971 Haselden.
`3,608,729
`3,617,545 11/1971
`Dubois ............
`. 210/22
`3,669,880
`6/1972 Marantz et al. .
`210/22
`o
`3,703,959 11/1972 Raymond ............................. 210/321
`
`3,994,799 11/1976 Yao et al. ........................ 210/321 A
`Primary Examiner-Charles N. Hart
`Assistant Examiner-E. Rollins Cross
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Marvin E. Jacobs
`57
`ABSTRACT
`The improved hemodialysis system utilizes a second
`polymeric membrane having dialyzate in contact with
`one surface and a urea decomposition solution in
`contact with the other surface. The membrane selec
`tively passes urea from the dialyzate into the decompo
`sition solution, while preventing passage of positively
`charged metal ions from the dialyzate into the solution
`and ammonium ions from the solution into the dialy
`Zate.
`
`19 Claims, 4 Drawing Figures
`
`
`
`
`
`SPENT
`DALYZATE
`
`
`
`22
`
`PURIFED
`DALYZATE
`
`GCE - Exhibit 1022, Page 1
`GCE Gas Control Equipment Inc. v. VBOX, Inc.
`IPR2023-00326
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`June 13, 1978
`
`4,094,775
`
`8
`
`2
`
`+ UREASE
`
`
`
`NH
`4
`--
`HC0;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`-n.
`SPENT
`DALYZATE
`
`
`
`PURI FED
`DALYZATE
`
`ARTERIAL
`BLOOD
`
`A. 27- 4
`
`
`
`
`
`F-86
`TO VEN
`
`GCE - Exhibit 1022, Page 2
`GCE Gas Control Equipment Inc. v. VBOX, Inc.
`IPR2023-00326
`
`

`

`1.
`
`O
`
`15
`
`DALYSES SYSTEM
`ORIGIN OF THE INVENTION
`The invention described herein was made in the per
`formance of work under a NASA contract and is sub
`ject to the provisions of Section 305 of the National
`Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, Public Law 83-568
`(72 Stat. 435; 42 USC 2457).
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`1. Field of the Invention
`The present invention relates to a hemodialysis sys
`tem and, more particularly, to an improved system for
`selectively removing urea from dialyzate.
`2. Description of the Prior Art
`A sizable fraction of the estimated 50,000 people who
`die of kidney failure each year in the United States are
`free of other complications and might be restored to
`20
`useful life if their kidney function could be provided
`artificially. At present, artificial kidneys (using hemodi
`alysis) and clinical procedures have been developed to
`the point where long-term sustenance of life by periodic
`hemodialysis is practical in many cases.
`The limitations in using hemodialysis are the small
`number of patients who can be treated with a given
`kidney machine and the considerable expense of main
`taining and staffing a kidney-treatment center. Obvi
`ously, a desirable solution lies in the development of an
`30
`artificial kidney which is inexpensive, portable and ca
`pable of being operated outside the confines of a hospi
`tal with a minimum of medical attention. Attainment of
`this solution will require increased efficiency of mass
`transfer and further optimization in design of artificial
`35
`kidney systems.
`In recent years, considerable attention has been fo
`cused on methods of reducing the size of the artificial
`kidney. This requires miniaturization of the membrane
`containing dialyzer and a significant reduction in the
`volume of dialyzing fluid. It is generally conceded that
`the toxin primarily responsible for the uremic syndrome
`has not yet been identified. Even though urea is not
`considered particularly toxic, its removal is one of the
`chief objectives of dialysis as practiced today. The rea
`45
`son for the concentration on urea removal is that, in the
`absence of more specific knowledge, dialysis based on
`this principle is obviously beneficial. At least two expla
`nations suggest themselves: (a) Unidentified toxicants
`are removed along with the urea. (b) Urea produces
`toxic products.
`In order to increase the efficiency of hemodialysis, it
`is desirable to maintain the trans-membrane concentra
`tion gradient of waste metabolites as high as possible.
`Low waste concentrations in the dialyzing fluid have in
`55
`the past been maintained by two methods. The more
`widely used method is the continual dilution of the
`dialyzed substances in a large reservoir of fluid, usually
`100 to 300 liters. A second method of maintaining the
`gradient is to use the dialyzing fluid in a single-pass
`operation, where the waste-bearing effluent is dis
`carded. Even then, more than 100 liters of fluid are
`required. The current research trend in obtaining low
`concentrations of wastes is to remove them selectively
`from the dialyzing fluid. Such an approach would allow
`65
`the use of much smaller volumes of dialyzing fluid.
`Among all waste products, urea is by far the major
`waste metabolite which must be removed daily from the
`
`4,094,775
`2
`body fluid. Three major methods of urea removal from
`dialysate have been reported.
`The first procedure utilizes an activated carbon bed
`which removes urea by absorption. However, the dem
`onstrated capacity for urea is only 0.2-0.8 grams per 100
`grams of carbon. In another method urea is reduced by
`enzymatic hydrolysis either inside microcapsules or by
`the combination with other absorbents. However, enzy
`matic decomposition of urea produces large concentra
`tions of ammonium ion which is toxic. Therefore, it is
`essential to achieve rapidly removal of the ammonium
`ion or it can accumulate in the dialyzate and enter the
`blood. A commercial apparatus utilizes sodium zirco
`nium phosphate to remove the ammonia produced by
`enzymatic decomposition of urea in the presence of
`urease. Though this system does remove urea from
`dialyzate it also removes essential metal ions such as
`strontium and calcium which must be replaced. Fur
`thermore, large amounts of zirconium phosphate are
`required and the process is expensive since the spent
`zirconium phosphate absorbent is not regeneratable and
`must be discarded.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`The improved hemodialysis system in accordance
`with the invention obviates the need for an ammonia
`absorbent in the urea decomposition solution. The sys
`tem of the invention permits purification and recircula
`tion of dialyzate fluid in an efficient manner and sub
`stantially reduces the quantity of dialyzate needed for
`dialysis making it feasible to produce a portable, or
`wearable artificial kidney system. The degradation
`products produced by the dialyzate treating portion of
`the apparatus forms a soluble toxic component and a
`soluble nontoxic component. The toxic component is
`retained in the treating section of the apparatus while
`the nontoxic component may migrate or diffuse back
`into the dialyzate for safe elimination in the body of the
`patient. The system of the invention also prevents diffu
`sion of essential metal ions from dialyzate into the treat
`ing solution.
`Urea is continuously removed from dialyzate in ac
`cordance with the invention by passing the urea in
`contact with a polymeric membrane selectively perme
`able to urea. The urea passes through the membrane
`into a solution containing a urea decomposition agent
`such as the enzyme urease. The urea is decomposed into
`ammonium and bicarbonate ions. The membrane is
`selectively impermeable to ammonium ion but may pass
`the bicarbonate back into dialyzate and eventually
`through the primary membrane into the blood. How
`ever, bicarbonate is nontoxic and is readily decomposed
`and eliminated by exhalation as carbon dioxide. The
`membrane used in the dialyzate purification section is
`also selectively nonpermeable to essential positive cati
`ons such as strontium and calcium which remain in the
`dialyzate obviating the need to replenish these metals as
`is practiced in commercial systems. Preferred mem
`branes are positively charged membranes, suitably poly
`quaternary substituted cation exchange resins, since
`such membranes do not require gradient effects for
`providing the desired nonselectivity to passage of cati
`ons in either direction.
`The dialyzate treating apparatus of the invention has
`demonstrated the capability of removing almost half the
`urea content of test dialyzates in 20 hours while retain
`ing up to about 90% ammonium ions in the treating
`chamber. Operation is continuous and regeneration
`
`25
`
`50
`
`GCE - Exhibit 1022, Page 3
`GCE Gas Control Equipment Inc. v. VBOX, Inc.
`IPR2023-00326
`
`

`

`5
`
`15
`
`25
`
`4,094,775
`3
`4.
`simply involves replacing the low cost urease enzyme.
`of urea in the dialyzate. Usually the urea concentration
`The system substantially reduces the amount of dialy
`should be at least 25-300% the concentration of the
`urea in the dialyzate in order to provide adequate peri
`Zate required and a small size is indicated for use in
`ods before the need to recharge urease to the treating
`current clinical dialyzers in a typical thrice weekly
`dialysis regimen.
`chamber.
`The dialyzate treating unit of the invention can be
`These and many other features and attendant advan
`combined with many diverse types of hemodialysis
`tages of the invention will become apparent as the in
`units. In its simplest form shown in FIG. 2 the dialyzate
`vention becomes better understood by reference to the
`following detailed description when considered in con
`chamber 24 would have one wall formed by the pri
`junction with the accompanying drawings.
`mary membrane 26 and another wall portion formed of
`O
`the secondary treating membrane 28. Blood from an
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`artery enters the inlet 30 to continuous flow through
`chamber 32 and leaves through outlet 34. As the blood
`FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a spent dialyzate
`flows past primary membrane 26 such as a cellulose
`urea removal unit in accordance with the invention;
`ester, preferably a cupprammonium treated cellulose
`FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of an artificial kid
`ney hemodialysis unit incorporating the dialyzate treat
`acetate, urea diffuses through membrane 26 into the
`dialyzate chamber 24. The urea in turn will diffuse
`ing unit of the invention;
`through secondary positively charged membrane 28
`FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of a hollow fiber
`into the treating section 36 where it will be decomposed
`hemodialysis apparatus in accordance with the inven
`by urease into ammonium and bicarbonate ions. The
`tion; and
`20
`bicarbonate ions will build up in concentration and can
`FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of an artificial kid
`ney machine incorporating a single cationic membrane
`flow backwards through membrane 28 into the dialy
`and having the urease present in the dialyzate,
`zate and in turn through membrane 26 into the blood.
`The blood will leave through outlet 34 and will be
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`returned to a vein of the subject by intravenous injec
`EMBODIMIENTS
`tion.
`In the typical artificial kidney machine a very thin
`Referring now to FIG. 1 the dialyzate treating unit 10
`film of flowing blood is separated from the surrounding
`of the invention includes a container 12 divided into a
`dialyzate solution by an approximately 3 mill thick semi
`dialyzate chamber 14 and a urea decomposition cham
`ber 16 by a common membrane 18. Spent dialyzate
`permeable cellulose acetate membrane. This membrane
`30
`enters chamber 14 through inlet 20 and purified dialy
`allows substances in normal molecular solution and the
`solvent to pass through its pores but it prevents the
`zate leaves through outlet 22. The membrane 18 is per
`passage of very large molecules such as proteins and
`meable to the urea which diffuses into chamber 16
`which contains a solution of urease enzyme. The en
`cellular constituents of the blood. The membrane does
`zyme decomposes the urea into ammonium ion which is
`not permit the passage of bacteria and viruses so that
`35
`repelled by the membrane 18 and is retained in chamber
`sterilization of the apparatus located outside the mem
`brane is not required. Since the apparatus operates by
`14 and into bicarbonate which may permeate through
`the membrane 18 into the dialyzate. The purified dialy
`diffusion and osmosis the dialyzate liquid must contain
`physiological concentrations of all membrane-passing,
`zate may be recycled to the dialysis section of a hemodi
`alysis unit.
`dissolved normal constituents of the blood, electrolytes
`in particular, which are required to be maintained in the
`The membrane 18 is formed of a high molecular
`weight synthetic polymer having good tensile strength,
`blood. The dialyzate may also contain high concentra
`elongation and flexural strength. The membrane is se
`tions of substances which it is desired to introduce into
`lectively permeable to solvated urea molecules while
`the blood stream by diffusion such as drugs, dextrose,
`preventing passage of larger molecules and preventing
`etc. The dialyzate must be at the same temperature as
`45
`the blood this usually being effected by thermostatic
`passage of cationic ammonium or metallic ions in either
`control. Oxygen may be bubbled into the dialyzate so as
`direction. Preferred membrane materials are synthetic
`polymers containing cationic groups such as phospho
`to maintain the oxygen content of blood in a normal
`nium, sulfonium or quaternary nitrogen. A suitable
`condition. The kidney machine may also contain a
`pump and means to introduce anticoagulants such as
`membrane material is RAI P-4025 which is a polyethyl
`50
`ene containing 45% grafted vinylpyridine having an
`hirudin or heparin into the blood to prevent clotting of
`ion-exchange capacity of 5 meq/gm and a resistance of
`the blood on all surfaces of the apparatus that are in
`1 ohm-cm. The membrane may be utilized in various
`contact with blood.
`A principle requirement of a kidney machine is that
`thicknesses depending on the desired flow rate and
`mechanical properties required in the purification unit.
`the semipermeable membrane should have a large sur
`55
`face area to insure adequate osmotic interchange be
`The thickness may be from 1-15 mill, generally around
`tween the blood and the dialyzate. This usually requires
`2-10 mill in thickness. The surface area membrane is
`selected so as to give adequate removal of urea from the
`that the blood flow in a verythin film to provide maxi
`dialyzate. From experiments to date, it is estimated that
`mum contact with the membrane bathed by the dialy
`Zate liquid. Many configurations of kidney machines
`the surface required would be about 10 to 40 square
`have been devised and are all compatible with the dialy
`inches.
`The treating chamber 16 should contain concentra
`Zate treating section or unit of the invention. The blood
`dialyzate portion of the equipment may be in the form
`tions of low molecular weight ingredients equal to that
`contained in the dialyzate chamber 14. For example,
`of a rotary drum apparatus in which a blood-filled flat
`cellophane tube is wound in helical fashion around a
`buffer concentration should be equivalent as should
`rotating drum made of wire mesh, the drum being
`saline concentration to prevent diffusion from dialyzate
`bathed or submerged in dialyzate. A sandwich-type
`into the treating solution. The urease concentration
`apparatus has been devised and can more readily be
`should be sufficient to significantly decrease the amount
`
`65
`
`GCE - Exhibit 1022, Page 4
`GCE Gas Control Equipment Inc. v. VBOX, Inc.
`IPR2023-00326
`
`

`

`15
`
`35
`
`4,094,775
`5
`6
`utilized for ultrafiltration under pressure. In this form of
`can be replaced as needed. Should the hollow fibers of
`construction a flat cellophane bag is sandwiched be
`the blood cartridge 68 become damaged or worn out,
`tween grooved plates of plastic. The dialyzate liquid
`that unit can be replaced. Any of the cartridges can be
`flows through the grooves in the opposite direction to
`readily removed for sterilization.
`the flow of blood in the cellophane bag. However, this
`An example of practice follows.
`configuration provides dead flow spaces providing an
`Two cylindrical chambers of about 30 mls. capacity
`inherent danger of clotting unless large amounts of
`were separated by a positively charged membrane (RAI
`anticoagulants are used. Another configuration is a
`P-4025 membrane) having a surface area of about one
`twin-coil apparatus in which the semipermeable mem
`square inch. Synthetic test solutions were introduced on
`brane is in the form of a flat, wide cellophane tube
`each side of the membrane. The synthetic dialyzate
`10
`which is coiled in two tiers around the hollow core. The
`contained about 2 gm/liter of urea, 4.5 gm/liter of so
`coils are mounted inside a container through which the
`dium acetate trihydrate and 5.8 gm/liter of sodium
`rinsing liquid is passed. A very thin film of blood flows
`chloride. The urease chamber test solution contained
`through the coils which present a large area of contact
`about 1 gm/liter of urease, 4.5gm/liter sodium acetate
`with the surrounding liquid. This has the advantage that
`trihydrate and 5.8 gm/liter of sodium chloride.
`the modules can be supplied, sterilized and ready to use
`After six hours analysis showed that the quantity of
`inside the container and can be quickly and easily ex
`urea in dialyzate had dropped about 25% and that sig
`changed.
`nificant concentrations of ammonium were present in
`Hollow fibers also offer the advantage of high surface
`the urease chamber. After 20 hours, urea concentration
`area in a very compact volume. Hollow fibers may be
`had dropped 45% and about 90% of the ammonia was
`utilized for either or both of the membranes discussed
`present in the urease chamber, but the urease chamber
`herein. A more complete artificial kidney machine em
`now is found to contain no urea.
`ploying hollow fibers is illustrated in FIG. 3. In the
`The above experiment demonstrates that urea readily
`kidney machine 40 of FIG. 3 a cylindrical container 42
`diffuses through the membrane and is rapidly hydro
`houses the dialyzate chamber 44. The container 42 is
`lyzed to ammonium bicarbonate. The initial rate of
`25
`surrounded with a heating jacket 46 such as an electric
`removal of urea from dialyzate was about 0.1 gm/hr
`resistance heater powered by thermostatically con
`and about 0.05 gm/hr after 20 hours for the 4-5 mil
`trolled power unit 48. The cellulose acetate membrane
`thick film utilized. Higher diffusion rates can be ex
`is in the form of a plurality of fine filamentary hollow
`pected with thinner membranes. The positively charged
`fibers 50 having their inlet ends potted to a common
`membrane also demonstrated the ability to isolate the
`30
`toxic ammonium ion from the dialyzate and to retain the
`inlet header 52 and their outlet ends connected to a
`essential metal cations within the dialyzate. Preliminary
`common outlet header 54. Each of the headers 52 and
`54 can be threadingly and sealingly received into the
`estimates indicate that the dialyzate membrane need
`only require 24 in of surface area to be compatible with
`side walls 56, 58 of the container 42.
`the urea production of conventional hemodialysis units.
`The second membrane may also be in the form of a
`A cartridge or treating chamber could readily be
`plurality of hollow fiber tubes containing the urease
`solution and connected to the common inlet and outlet
`housed in a 1 ft. X 2 in. X 2 in. unit which is well within
`design constraints for continuous operation in portable
`headers as in the blood chamber described above. How
`or wearable artificial kidney apparatus for a typical
`ever, since there is no need to recirculate the urease
`thrice weekly dialysis regimen. Urease enzyme is not
`solution the dialyzate treating chamber can be in the
`expensive and can readily be recharged for the next
`form of a cartridge 60 in which the plurality of hollow
`dialysis treatment.
`fibers 62 have both ends connected to a base 62 which
`is threadingly received into a wall 58 of the container
`The urease solution could be pumped past the mem
`42. A further replaceable cartridge element 64 may be
`brane and removed from the chamber for continuous
`provided in the chamber containing an effective absor
`replenishment of urease and removal of ammonium
`45
`ions. Similarly the dialyzate could be continuously
`bent such as activated carbon to remove other impuri
`ties from the dialyzate.
`pumped in concurrent or countercurrent flow past both
`The kidney machine 40 of FIG. 3 is utilized by filling
`membranes to increase urea transfer rate from the blood
`the chamber 44 with dialyzate through inlet plug 66.
`into the dialyzate. Another configuration would be to
`encapsulate the urease within a positively charged poly
`The absorbent cartridge 64, dialyzate treating cartridge
`60 and blood cartridge 68 are inserted. The heater 48 is
`meric membrane and place the capsules in-line in the
`dialyzate flow path to absorb urea from the dialyzate
`turned on and a first catheter 70 is inserted into a vein of
`while retaining ammonium salts within the capsules.
`the subject and connected to blood outlet 72 and a sec
`ond catheter 74 is inserted into an artery of the subject
`The cationic polymer membrane can also be utilized
`and connected to the pump 76. The pump is then ener
`to form a single membrane, low dialyzate volume arti
`gized and as blood is drawn from the artery and
`ficial kidney machine. Referring now to FIG. 4, the
`through the hollow fiber tubes 50 of the blood car
`machine 70 includes a container 72 divided into a blood
`tridge, urea passes into the common body of dialyzate
`chamber 74 and a dialyzate chamber 76 by means of a
`44 and then through the walls of hollow fiber tubes 62
`cationic membrane 78. The membrane 78 repels and
`of the cartridge 60 where urea is decomposed and re
`prevents passage of NH4+ ions 80 and M ions 82.
`Therefore the dialyzate need not contain equilibrium
`tained therein. However, the positively charged walls
`of the hollow fibers 62 prevent the ammonium ions
`concentrations of the essential cations such as strontium
`from entering the dialyzate and prevent metal cations
`or calcium.
`from the dialyzate from entering the tubes 62. Other
`The blood chamber 74 contains an inlet 84 and an
`impurities are absorbed onto the granules 78 of acti
`outlet 86. As the blood flows past the membrane 78,
`essential large proteins, cellular constituents and cations
`vated carbon within the cartridge 64. As the urease
`containing cartridge 60 is exhausted a new cartridge is
`are retained in the blood, while urea 88 traverses the
`inserted. Similarly, the activated carbon cartridge 64
`membrane 78, enters the dialyzate chamber 76 and is
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`GCE - Exhibit 1022, Page 5
`GCE Gas Control Equipment Inc. v. VBOX, Inc.
`IPR2023-00326
`
`

`

`5
`
`O
`
`15
`
`20
`
`4,094,775
`8
`7
`10. A method of selectively removing urea from an
`decomposed into NH and HCO. The ammonium
`aqueous liquid containing urea and positive metal cati
`ion is retained in the dialyzate chamber. Substantially
`ons comprising the steps of:
`smaller amounts of dialyzate are required compared to
`placing the liquid in contact with a first surface of a
`dilution and continuous flowing dialyzate configura
`cationically charged polymeric membrane selec
`tions.
`tively permeable to urea and having low permea
`It is to be realized that only preferred embodiments of
`bility to cations;
`the invention have been described and that numerous
`placing an urea decomposition solution containing an
`Substitutions, modifications and alterations are permissi
`urea decomposition agent in contact with a second
`ble without departing from the spirit and scope of the
`surface of the membrane; and
`invention as defined in the following claims.
`selectively permeating urea from the liquid through
`What is claimed is:
`the membrane into the solution thereby decompos
`1. A system for selectively removing urea from an
`ing urea into ammonium cations and bicarbonate
`aqueous liquid containing urea and positive metal cati
`whereby the ammonium cations are retained in the
`ons comprising in combination:
`decomposition solution and the metal cations are
`a container divided into a first chamber and a second
`retained in the liquid.
`chamber by means of a continuous sheet of cationi
`11. A method according to claim 10 in which the
`cally charged polymeric membrane selectively
`membrane contains quaternary ammonium groups.
`permeable to urea and having low permeability to
`12. A method according to claim 11 in which the
`cations;
`membrane has an exchange capacity of from 1 to 20
`said first chamber including means for receiving said
`meg/gm.
`liquid; and
`13. A method according to claim 12 in which the
`said second chamber receiving a solution containing a
`membrane is a vinyl pyridine grafted polyethylene hav
`urea decomposition agent whereby said cations are
`ing a thickness from 1 to 15 mils.
`repelled by said membrane and retained in said
`14. A method according to claim 11 in which the
`25
`liquid and urea permeates through the membrane
`agent is urease.
`into the solution and is decomposed into bicarbon
`15. A method according to claim 14 in which the
`ate and ammonium, the ammonium being retained
`urease concentration of the decomposition solution is at
`in the solution in the second chamber.
`least 25% of the concentration of urea in the urea con
`2. A system according to claim 1 in which the mem
`taining liquid.
`30
`brane contains quaternary ammonium groups.
`16. A method according to claim 14 in which the urea
`3. A system according to claim 2 in which the mem
`containing liquid is dialyzate from a blood dialysis unit.
`brane is a vinyl pyridine grafted polyethylene.
`17. A method according to claim 14 in which the urea
`4. A system according to claim 1 in which the mem
`containing liquid is blood.
`brane has a thickness from 1 to 15 mils.
`18. An artificial kidney machine comprising in combi
`35
`5. A system according to claim 4 in which the mem
`nation:
`brane has an exchange capacity of 1 to 20 meq/gm.
`enclosure means having an inlet and an outlet, and
`6. A system according to claim 1 in which the first
`having a wall surface formed of a cationically
`chamber is a hollow body having said membrane as one
`charged membrane defining a channel for flowing
`wall thereof and having an inlet and outlet for flowing
`urea containing blood past one surface of the mem
`40
`said liquid past a first surface of the membrane.
`brane;
`7. A system according to claim 1 in which the urea
`urea removal means comprising walls defining a
`decomposition agent is urease.
`chamber, said chamber including a solution of ure
`8. A system according to claim 7 in which the urease
`ase having a concentration at least 25% by weight
`concentration of the solution is at least 25% by weight
`of the urea content of the blood; and
`45
`of the urea content of the liquid.
`means for supplying the urea permeate from the sec
`9. A system according to claim 7 in which the liquid
`ond surface of the membrane to the urease solution.
`is dialyzate containing urea and further including a
`19. A machine according to claim 18 in which the
`blood dialysis membrane selectively permeable to urea
`membrane forms a common wall portion of said channel
`having one surface in contact with said dialyzate and a
`and chamber.
`50
`second surface for contacting a flow of blood.
`
`2
`
`55
`
`65
`
`GCE - Exhibit 1022, Page 6
`GCE Gas Control Equipment Inc. v. VBOX, Inc.
`IPR2023-00326
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket