throbber
BILL LIN
`Curriculum Vitae
`Tel: 858.531.2441
`Email: billmbox@gmail.com
`
`
`
`
`EDUCATION
`
`
`• Ph.D, Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
`University of California, Berkeley, May 1991
`• Masters of Science, Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
`University of California, Berkeley, May 1988
`• Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
`University of California, Berkeley, May 1985
`
`
`PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
`
`1/1997 – present
`
`University of California, San Diego
`Department Chair, Electrical and Computer Engineering
`Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering
`
`IMEC, Leuven, Belgium
`Group Head, Systems Control and Communications Group
`
`
`2/1992 – 12/1996
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AREAS OF EXPERTISE
`
`
`• All aspects of computer networks and computer architecture problems, including the
`design of data networks, high-performance switches and routers, high-performance
`packet monitoring and measurements, wireless communications and mobile computing,
`multimedia and graphics systems, many-core processors, and systems-on-chip designs.
`Source code analysis for communications and computing applications.
`
`
`PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
`
`
`• Served or serving as Editor on 3 ACM or IEEE journals, as General Chair on 4 ACM or
`IEEE conferences, on the Organizing or Steering Committees for 5 ACM or IEEE
`conferences, and on the Technical Program Committees of 45 ACM or IEEE
`conferences.
`
`
`SELECTED PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
`
`
`• General Chair, ACM/IEEE Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications
`Systems (ANCS), 2010
`• Chair of Steering Committee, ACM/IEEE Symposium on Architectures for Networking and
`Communications Systems (ANCS), 2010-present (Chair since 2012)
`• Guest Editor, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management (TNSM), 2012-2013
`• General Co-Chair, ACM SIGMETRICS, 2015
`• General Chair, ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Quality-of-Service (IWQoS), 2011
`•
`Steering Committee, ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Quality-of-Service (IWQoS),
`2011-present
`• Associate Editor, ACM Transactions on Design Automation and Electronics Systems
`(TODAES), 2010-2015
`• Editorial Board, International Journal of Embedded Systems, 2003-present
`• General Chair, ACM/IEEE Symposium on Networks-on-Chips (NOCS), 2009
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 7
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1003
`
`

`

`PUBLICATIONS
`
`
`• Published over 200 journal articles and conference papers in top-tier venues and publications.
`
`
`
`PATENTS
`
`
`•
`
`• Mitigating Low-Rate Denial-of-Service Attacks in Packet-Switched Networks. United States
`Patent 8,443,444. Issued in May 14, 2013.
`Systems and Methods for Proactive Surge Protection. United States Patent 7,860,004. Issued in
`December 28, 2010.
`• Method and Apparatus for Scan Block Caching. United States Patent 7,672,005. Issued in March
`2, 2010.
`• Design Environment and a Design Method for Hardware/Software Co-Design. United States
`Patent 5,870,588. Issued in February 9, 1999.
`System and Method for Generating a Hazard-Free Asynchronous Circuit. United States Patent
`5,748,487. Issued in May 5, 1998.
`
`
`•
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`

`EXPERT WITNESS HISTORY (BILL LIN)
`
` I
`
` have served as an expert witness in 34 engagements (most engagements involved multiple patents in suit
`and multiple matters), of which I wrote expert reports or declarations in 22 engagements, analyzed source
`code in 14 engagements, was deposed 22 times, and testified at trial 4 times. The specific engagements and
`services provided are as follows:
`
`
`1. Vizio, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics USA Inc., Civil Action No. 09-cv-1481-
`BEL
`• Expert witness on behalf of Vizio, Inc.
`• Law firm: Jones Day.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert report, analyzed source code.
`• Technologies: Digital TV.
`
`2. Vizio Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics USA Inc., In the Matter of CERTAIN
`FLAT PANEL DIGITAL TELEVISIONS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF, U.S.
`International Trade Commission Inv. No. 337-TA-733
`• Expert witness on behalf of Vizio, Inc.
`• Law firm: Jones Day.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert report, analyzed source code.
`• Technologies: Digital TV.
`
`3. Vizio Inc. v. Coby Electronics Corp., Curtis International Ltd., E&S International Enterprises,
`Inc., MStar Semiconductor, Inc., ON Corp US, Inc., Renesas Electronics Corporation, Japan,
`Renesas Electronics America, Inc., Sceptre, Inc., and Westinghouse Digital, LLC, In the Matter of
`CERTAIN DIGITAL TELEVISIONS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF, U.S. International
`Trade Commission Inv. No. 337-TA-789
`• Expert witness on behalf of Vizio, Inc.
`• Law firm: Jones Day.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert reports, was deposed, analyzed source code.
`• Technologies: Digital TV.
`
`4. Linex Technologies Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Apple Inc., Aruba Networks, Inc., Meru
`Networks, and Ruckus Wireless, In the Matter of CERTAIN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
`DEVICES AND SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND PRODUCTS
`CONTAINING SAME, U.S. International Trade Commission Inv. No. 337-TA-775
`• Expert witness on behalf of Hewlett-Packard Company, Apple Inc., Aruba Networks,
`Inc., Meru Networks, and Ruckus Wireless
`• Law firms: Covington & Burling, K&L Gates, Morrison & Foerster, Lewis Roca &
`Rothgerber.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert reports, was deposed, analyzed source code.
`• Technologies: WiFi networks.
`
`
`5. MOSAID Technologies, Inc. v. Dell, Inc., Qualcomm Atheros, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:11-cv-
`00179-TJW
`• Expert witness on behalf of Qualcomm Atheros, Inc.
`• Law Firm: McDermott Will & Emory.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert analysis.
`• Technologies: WiFi networks.
`
`6. Hitachi Consumer Electronics Co. Ltd., et al. v. Top Victory Electronics (Taiwan) Co. Ltd., et al.,
`Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-260-JRG.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Vizio, Inc.
`• Law Firm: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert reports, analyzed source code.
`• Technologies: Digital TV.
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`7. United States International Trade Commission (USITC) Investigation Number: 337-TA-853 and
`Technology Properties Limited, LLC v. Kyocera Corporation and Kyocera Communciations, Inc.
`in the Northern District of California, Case No. 3:12-cv-03860-JSC
`• Expert witness on behalf of Kyocera Corporation and Kyocera Communciations.
`• Law firm: Morrison & Foerster.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert analysis.
`• Technologies: Cell phones, microprocessors.
`
`8. Netgear, Inc. v. Ruckus Wireless, Inc., Case No. 1:10-cv-00999-SLR / D. Del.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Ruckus Wireless, Inc.
`• Law firms: Lewis Roca & Rothgerber, Orrick.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert report, analyzed source code, was deposed, and
`testified at trial.
`• Technologies: WiFi networks.
`
`9. Sonics, Inc. v. Arteris, Inc., Case No. 11 CV-05311 SBA, and Arteris S.A.S. v. Sonics, Inc., Case
`No. C 12-00434 (WHA)
`• Expert witness on behalf of Arteris, Inc. and Arteris S.A.S.
`• Law firm: DLA Piper.
`•
`Services provided: Retained as an expert.
`• Technologies: Systems-on-Chips (SoCs).
`
`10. Linex Technologies Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Apple Inc., Aruba Networks, Inc., Meru
`Networks, and Ruckus Wireless, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, C 13-00159
`CW
`
`• Expert witness on behalf of Hewlett-Packard Company, Apple Inc., Aruba Networks,
`Inc., Meru Networks, and Ruckus Wireless
`• Law firms: Covington & Burling, Milbank, K&L Gates, Morrison & Foerster, Lewis
`Roca & Rothgerber.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert reports, analyzed source code.
`• Technologies: WiFi networks.
`
`11. Frontier Communications Corp. v. Google, C.A. No. 10-545 (D. Del)
`• Expert witness on behalf of Frontier Communications Corp.
`• Law firm: Steese, Evans & Frankel
`•
`Services provided: Provided source code analysis.
`• Technologies: Voice over IP.
`
`12. U.S. Ethernet Innovations LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al., Case No. 10-cv-3724 (N.D. Cal.)
`• Expert witness on behalf of Qualcomm Atheros, Inc., Sigma Designs, Inc., and AT&T
`Services, Inc.
`• Law firms: Reed Smith LLP, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, and Vinson &
`Elkins LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert reports, was deposed, analyzed source code.
`• Technologies: Intelligent network interfaces, data center networks.
`
`13. Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patents.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Netgear, Inc. and Belkin International, Inc.
`• Law firm: Reed Smith LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided declaration for IPR petition.
`• Technologies: Wireless networks.
`
`14. Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patents.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Arista Networks.
`• Law firm: Fish & Richardson.
`•
`Services provided: Provided declarations for IPR petitions, deposed 3 times.
`• Technologies: Network routers, data center networks.
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`

`

`
`15. Invalidity Expert Witness.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Intel Corp.
`• Law firm: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert analysis.
`• Technologies: WiFi networks, bluetooth networks.
`
`16. Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Case No. 2:14-CV-690-
`JRG-RSP (E. D. Texas).
`• Expert witness on behalf of HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
`• Law firm: Sidley Austin LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Retained as an expert.
`• Technologies: Memory architectures.
`
`17. System Architecture Information Technology dba SAI Technology, Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Qualcomm Inc.
`• Law firm: McDermott Will & Emory.
`•
`Services provided: Retained as an expert, provided reports, analyzed source code, was
`deposed, and testified at trial.
`• Technologies: WiFi networks.
`
`18. Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patents.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Sandvine Corp.
`• Law firm: Erise IP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided declarations.
`• Technologies: Network monitoring and measurements.
`
`19. Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patents.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Intel Corp., Cavium Inc., and Dell Inc.
`• Law firms: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Duane Morris LLP, Alston & Bird LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided declarations for IPR petitions, deposed 3 times.
`• Technologies: Intelligent network interfaces, data center networks, memory
`management.
`
`20. Expert Witness.
`• Law firm: Covington & Burling.
`•
`Services provided: Retained as an expert.
`• Technologies: WiFi networks.
`
`21. Qualcomm Inc. v. Apple Inc., Inv. No. 337-TA-1065 (ITC)
`• Expert witness on behalf of Apple Inc. and Intel Corp.
`• Law firm: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert reports/declarations, analyzed source code, was
`deposed.
`• Technologies: Mobile systems, application and modem processors, inter-processor
`communications, embedded software, processor and bus power management, memory
`management.
`
`22. Qualcomm Inc. v. Apple Inc., Civ. Action No. 3:17-cv-01375-JAH-MDD (S.D. Cal.)
`• Expert witness on behalf of Apple Inc. and Intel Corp.
`• Law firm: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert reports/declarations, analyzed source code, deposed
`2 times, and testified at trial.
`• Technologies: Mobile systems, application and modem processors, inter-processor
`communications, embedded software, processor and bus power management, memory
`management.
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`

`

`23. Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patents.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Panasonics Avionics Corp.
`• Law firm: Haynes and Boone LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided declarations for IPR petitions.
`• Technologies: Network security.
`
`24. Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patents.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Intel Corp.
`• Law firm: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided declarations for IPR petitions, deposed 4 times.
`• Technologies: Mobile systems, application and modem processors, inter-processor
`communications, embedded software, power management, memory management.
`
`25. Expert Witness.
`• Law firm: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Retained as an expert.
`• Technologies: Inter-processor communications and security.
`
`26. Bell Northern Research LLC v. Coolpad Technologies, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 3:18-cv-
`01783-CAB-BLM (S.D. Cal.)
`• Expert witness on behalf of Coolpad Technologies, Inc. and Yulong Computer
`Communications
`• Law firm: Perkins Coie LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert reports, analyzed source code, deposed.
`• Technologies: Processors, wireless communications, power management.
`
`27. Inter Partes Review and Ex Partes Review of U.S. Patents.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Google LLC.
`• Law firm: Paul Hastings LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided declarations for IPR and Ex Partes Review petitions.
`• Technologies: Computer networks, wireless communications.
`
`28. In the Matter of CERTAIN ROUTERS, ACCESS POINTS, CONTROLLERS, NETWORK
`MANAGEMENT DEVICES, OTHER NETWORKING PRODUCTS, AND HARDWARE
`AND SOFTWARE COMPONENTS THEREOF, U.S. International Trade Commission Inv.
`No. 337-TA-1227.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Netgear, and CommScope
`• Law firm: Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert reports, analyzed source code, deposed, and testified
`at trial.
`• Technologies: WiFi networks.
`
`29. Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patents.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Intel Corp.
`• Law firm: Desmarais LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided declarations for IPR petitions.
`• Technologies: Computer systems.
`
`30. PACT XPP Schweiz AG v. Intel Corp. 1:19-cv-1006-RGA (D. Del.).
`• Expert witness on behalf of Intel Corporation
`• Law firm: Kirkland & Ellis.
`•
`Services provided: Provided expert report, deposed.
`• Technologies: Multiprocessors, reconfigurable processors, power management.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`

`

`31. Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patents.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Intel Corp.
`• Law firm: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided declarations for IPR petitions, deposed 1 time.
`• Technologies: Mobile systems, application and modem processors, embedded software,
`memory management.
`
`32. Ex Partes Review of U.S. Patents.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Rapid7, Inc., and CrowdStrike Holdings
`• Law firm: Erise IP.
`•
`Services provided: Provided declarations for Ex Partes Review petitions.
`• Technologies: Computer networks and network security.
`
`33. Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patents.
`• Expert witness on behalf of Google LLC.
`• Law firm: Paul Hastings LLP.
`•
`Services provided: Retained as expert.
`• Technologies: Telephony and teleconferecing.
`
`34. Expert Witness.
`• Law firm: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
`•
`Services provided: Retained as expert.
`• Technologies: Processors and chip design.
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket