throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper No. 21
`Date: February 20, 2024
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`XILINX, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED,
`Patent Owner.
`______________________________
`
`IPR2023-00513 (Patent 7,532,523 B2)
`IPR2023-00516 (Patent 6,157,589)1
`______________________________
`
`
`
`Before JEAN R. HOMERE, BARBARA A. PARVIS, and
`NORMAN H. BEAMER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement after Institution of Trial and
`Granting Request to File Settlement Agreement
`as Business Confidential Information
`35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. §42.74
`
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are the same in each of the above
`captioned proceedings. We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to
`cover all the proceedings. The parties, however, are not authorized to use
`this style heading in subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00513 (Patent 7,532,523 B2)
`IPR2023-00516 (Patent 6,157,589)
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`On February 8, 2024, with the Board’s authorization, Petitioner and
`Patent Owner (collectively, “the Parties”) filed a Joint Motion to Terminate
`Proceeding. Paper 18 (“Joint Motion”).2 Along with the Joint Motion, the
`Parties filed a copy of a Highly Confidential Patent License, Tolling Stand-
`Still and Settlement Agreement. Ex. 1016 (“Settlement Agreement”). The
`Parties jointly request to file the Settlement Agreement as business
`confidential information and keep it separate from the file of U.S. Patent No.
`7,532,523 B2 (“the ’523 patent”). Paper 20 (“Joint Request”).
`DISCUSSION
`I.
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided
`the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.”
`35 U.S.C. § 317(a) also provides that if no petitioner remains in the inter
`partes review, the Office may terminate the review.
`In the Joint Motion, the Parties represent that the Settlement
`Agreement resolves their disputes involving the ’523 patent. Joint Motion 1.
`The Parties also represent that they have filed a true and correct copy of the
`Settlement Agreement (id.) and that “[t]here are no other collateral
`agreements or understandings, oral or written, between the Parties made in
`connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of this proceeding.”
`Id. The Parties further “represent that their entire agreement in connection
`
`
`2 For purposes of expediency, we cite to papers and an exhibit filed in
`IPR2023-00513, unless otherwise noted. The Parties filed similar papers
`and exhibit in IPR2023-00516.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00513 (Patent 7,532,523 B2)
`IPR2023-00516 (Patent 6,157,589)
`
`with the termination of this proceeding is embodied in the [Settlement]
`Agreement.” Id.
`We instituted trial for IPR2023-00513 on September 14, 2023. See
`Paper 12. We have not yet decided the merits of the proceeding, and a final
`written decision has not been entered. Notwithstanding that the proceeding
`has moved beyond the preliminary stage, the Parties have shown adequately
`that termination of the proceeding is appropriate. Under these
`circumstances, we determine that good cause exists to terminate the
`proceeding with respect to the Parties.
`The Parties jointly request that the Settlement Agreement be treated as
`business confidential information and kept separate from the file of the ’523
`patent. Joint Request 1. We have reviewed the Settlement Agreement,
`which contains confidential business information regarding the settlement
`terms, and we determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement
`Agreement as business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) and keep it separate from the files of the
`’523 patent and this proceeding. Accordingly, we grant this aspect of the
`Parties’ Joint Request.
`The Parties also “that they be notified of [a] third party request and be
`given the opportunity to respond” if the “third party submits a written
`request to the Board for a copy of the settlement agreement along with a
`purported showing of good cause.” Joint Req. 2. However, neither the
`statute nor the regulation provides for any such notification, and the Parties
`have not provided any reason or special circumstance that would justify
`issuing an order that purports to impose an additional requirement.
`Accordingly, we deny that portion of the Parties’ Joint Request.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00513 (Patent 7,532,523 B2)
`IPR2023-00516 (Patent 6,157,589)
`
`
`II. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motions to Terminate are granted, and
`IPR2023-00513 and IPR2023-00516 are terminated with respect to
`Petitioner and Patent Owner; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties’ joint requests to treat the
`Settlement Agreement as business confidential information are granted, and
`the Settlement Agreement shall be kept separate from the files of U.S. Patent
`Nos. 7,532,523 B2 and 6,157,589, and made available only to Federal
`Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of
`good cause, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00513 (Patent 7,532,523 B2)
`IPR2023-00516 (Patent 6,157,589)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Brian Oaks
`Aashish Kapadia
`Tessa Kroll
`Thomas Damario
`boaks@mwe.com
`akapadia@mwe.com
`tkroll@mwe.com
`tdamario@mwe.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`David DeZern
`Brent Bumgardner
`david@nelbum.com
`brent@nelbum.com
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket