throbber
0013-7227/08/$15.00/0
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`Endocrinology 149(9):4413– 4420
`Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society
`doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0325
`
`The Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and
`Estradiol in the Regulation of Endometrial Angiogenesis
`and Cell Proliferation in the Marmoset
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/149/9/4413/2455652 by guest on 29 June 2022
`
`Hamish M. Fraser, Helen Wilson, Audrey Silvestri, Keith D. Morris, and Stanley J. Wiegand
`Medical Research Council Human Reproductive Sciences Unit (H.M.F., H.W., A.S., K.D.M.), University of Edinburgh Centre
`for Reproductive Biology, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom; and Regeneron
`Pharmaceuticals (S.J.W.), Tarrytown, New York 10591
`
`The present studies explore the roles of vascular endothelial
`growth factor (VEGF) and estradiol on angiogenesis and stro-
`mal and epithelial cell proliferation in the marmoset endo-
`metrium during the proliferative phase of the ovulatory cycle.
`At the start of the proliferative phase, marmosets were 1)
`treated with vehicle, 2) treated with a VEGF inhibitor (VEGF
`Trap, aflibercept), 3) ovariectomized, 4) ovariectomized and
`given replacement estradiol, or 5) treated with VEGF Trap
`and given replacement estradiol. The uterus was examined
`10 d later in the late proliferative phase. Changes in endothe-
`lial and epithelial cell proliferation were quantified using a
`volumetric density method after immunohistochemistry for
`bromodeoxyuridine to localize proliferating cells, CD31 to vi-
`sualize endothelial cells, and dual staining to distinguish en-
`dothelial cell proliferation. Endothelial proliferation was el-
`
`evated in late proliferative controls but virtually absent after
`VEGF Trap. Ovariectomy had a similar inhibitory effect,
`whereas angiogenesis was restored by estrogen replacement.
`Estradiol replacement in VEGF Trap-treated marmosets re-
`sulted in only a small increase in endothelial cell proliferation
`that remained significantly below control values. VEGF Trap
`treatment and ovariectomy also markedly reduced stromal cell
`proliferation but resulted in increased stromal cell density as-
`sociated with a reduction in overall endometrial volume. Estro-
`gen replacement in both ovariectomized and VEGF Trap-
`treated animals restored stromal proliferation rates and cell
`density. These results show that endometrial angiogenesis and
`stromal proliferation during the proliferative phase are driven
`by estradiol and that the effect of estrogen on angiogenesis is
`mediated largely by VEGF. (Endocrinology 149: 4413–4420, 2008)
`
`PHYSIOLOGICAL ANGIOGENESIS, the formation of
`
`new blood vessels from preexisting capillaries, is rare
`in the adult but takes place on a regular cycle in the ovaries
`and uterus. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a
`potent stimulator of endothelial cell proliferation and per-
`meability (1). The availability of potent specific antagonists
`of VEGF such as VEGF Trap (2), allows for the physiological
`role of VEGF to be investigated by in vivo inhibition. In a
`series of experiments, we have described the role of VEGF in
`the ovary using the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus), a
`commonly used primate in reproductive research, as a
`model. Treatment during the 10-d follicular phase resulted in
`a marked suppression of follicular angiogenesis and follic-
`ular development so that ovulation was prevented (3). When
`administered during the luteal phase, VEGF Trap also mark-
`edly suppressed luteal angiogenesis and function (4). These
`studies established that VEGF is essential for normal follic-
`ular and luteal angiogenesis and development.
`VEGF and its receptors are expressed in the primate uterus
`and are likely to be involved in the regulation of uterine
`angiogenesis and permeability (5, 6). However, the role of
`VEGF in the primate uterus has yet to be studied by direct
`experimentation in vivo. Such studies carried out in the ovari-
`
`First Published Online May 22, 2008
`Abbreviations: BrdU, Bromodeoxyuridine; VEGF, vascular endothe-
`lial growth factor.
`Endocrinology is published monthly by The Endocrine Society (http://
`www.endo-society.org), the foremost professional society serving the
`endocrine community.
`
`ectomized, estrogen-treated mouse reported that inhibition
`of VEGF prevented endothelial cell proliferation in one study
`(7) or had no effect on angiogenesis but inhibited edema and
`epithelial cell proliferation in another (8). In the immature
`rat, VEGF immunoneutralization was also shown to block
`estrogen-induced edema (9) and, in the adult, to prevent
`implantation (10). The purpose of the present investigation
`was to examine the changes in the marmoset endometrium
`after treatment with VEGF Trap with respect to endothelial,
`stromal, and epithelial cell proliferation. Because normal en-
`dometrial function is dependent upon estradiol, and because
`this steroid has been implicated in the regulation of VEGF (5,
`6, 11), we also examined the effects of ovariectomy and
`estradiol replacement on endometrial angiogenesis. In ad-
`dition, because VEGF Trap treatment suppresses plasma es-
`tradiol by virtue of its inhibitory effects on follicular devel-
`opment, effects of estradiol replacement were also compared
`in this group.
`
`Materials and Methods
`Animals and treatment
`
`Experiments were carried out in accordance with the Animals (Sci-
`entific Procedures) Act, 1986, and approved by the Local Ethical Review
`Process Committee. In common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), the ovu-
`latory cycle comprises an 8-d follicular phase followed by a 20-d luteal
`phase, such that follicular recruitment ordinarily takes place during the
`mid to late luteal phase of the preceding cycle. To synchronize follicular
`recruitment, selection and ovulation during treatment cycles, marmosets
`(2– 4 yr old), housed as described previously (12), were injected with 1
`␮g prostaglandin F2␣ analog (cloprostenol, Planate; Coopers Animal
`
`4413
`
`Celltrion Exhibit - 1036
`Celltrion, Inc. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`

`

`4414 Endocrinology, September 2008, 149(9):4413– 4420
`
`Fraser et al. (cid:127) Endometrial Angiogenesis
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/149/9/4413/2455652 by guest on 29 June 2022
`
`the ovary (4). For detection of proliferating endothelial cells, dual stain-
`ing was obtained by immunohistochemistry with CD31 and BrdU. For
`CD31 detection, the protocol was followed as described above, but
`visualization was performed with fast red (Sigma, Poole, UK). Sections
`were then washed with Tris-buffered saline before the second primary
`antibody, sheep antibody to BrdU (Fitzgerald, Concord, MA) was
`added, diluted 1:5000 in normal rabbit serum, and incubated overnight
`at 4 C. After postincubation washes with Tris-buffered saline, a biotin-
`ylated rabbit antisheep secondary antibody (Vector, Peterborough, UK)
`was added, followed by ABC-AP (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). After
`incubation with the ABC-AP complex, slides were transferred to ni-
`troblue tetrazolium buffer before staining with nitroblue tetrazolium for
`15 min. The reaction was stopped in water, and the slides were air dried
`and then cleared in xylene and mounted in Pertex.
`
`Volume fraction measurements
`
`Five anatomic zones were evaluated: the luminal epithelium, glands
`of the functionalis, the stroma in the functionalis, the glands of the
`basalis, and the stroma in the basalis. Endothelial cells were identified
`using CD31 and proliferating endothelial cells by dual staining with
`CD31 and BrdU. Optimal delineation of the endothelial cells was ob-
`tained in the absence of counterstain. The glands of the functionalis and
`basalis were delineated by their location and shape (20). Volume fraction
`measurements were performed on sections dual stained with BrdU/
`CD31 as described previously (20), in three non-overlapping regions,
`perpendicular to the luminal epithelium extending to the myometrium:
`the first at the top of the uterus and the second and third on the right
`and left-hand side of the cross-section, respectively. In each region,
`successive non-overlapping fields of view were analyzed, totaling 20 –30
`fields per specimen. A test grid,- comprising 864 points was superim-
`posed on each field, and the number of test points falling on glands
`(including lumen), proliferating (BrdU-labeled) glandular epithelium,
`uterine lumen, stroma, proliferating stromal cells, luminal epithelium,
`proliferating luminal epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and proliferating
`endothelial cells (identified by colocalizing BrdU and CD31 immuno-
`staining) were counted. The volume fraction occupied by each compo-
`nent was then calculated by expressing the number of points hitting that
`component as a percentage of the total number of test points applied. In
`this way, for example, the volume fraction of proliferating (BrdU-la-
`beled) endothelial cells could be expressed as a percentage of the total
`endothelial cell (CD31-labeled) volume fraction.
`To assess the effects of the treatment on the area of the endometrial
`and myometrial compartments, and to determine stromal cell density,
`a stereological unit consisting of an Axio Imager A1 microscope (Carl
`Zeiss, Go¨ttingen, Germany) equipped with a video camera (KY-F550;
`JVC, Yokohama, Japan) and connected to a PC with a computer-assisted
`stereology system (Image-Pro Plus 6.2 Software; Media Cybernetics,
`Buckinghamshire, UK) was employed. The system was set up to outline
`and measure the area of the endometrium and myometrium in a cross-
`section of the uterus in which the lumen was maximal (i.e. approximately
`the center of the uterus). The endometrial and myometrial areas were
`outlined (see Fig. 3) and the area calculated using the computer-assisted
`stereology system. To assess changes in stromal density, the functionalis
`layer was examined on hematoxylin- and eosin-stained sections, and the
`slides were analyzed at a ⫻630 oil immersion objective. The microscope
`had a motorized stage controlled by the computer for selection of count-
`ing frames within an area of interest, in this case the stroma of the
`functionalis layer where 50 counting frames (45 ⫻ 45 ␮m) were ran-
`domly selected. Cell nuclei were counted within each frame, and the
`stromal density for each animal was taken as the mean of the 50 counts.
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`For volumetric analysis, results were log transformed and analyzed
`by ANOVA multiple comparison followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test.
`Differences were considered to be significant at P ⬍ 0.05.
`
`Results
`
`Hormonal changes
`Because all treatments were initiated during the secretory
`phase, plasma progesterone concentrations were elevated at
`
`Health Ltd., Crewe, UK) per animal im on d 13–15 of the luteal phase
`to induce luteolysis. The day of prostaglandin injection was designated
`follicular d 0. This method of synchronizing follicular recruitment is
`followed by follicle selection on cycle d 5 and ovulation on d 9 –11
`(13–15).
`To block VEGF, we employed the VEGF Trap (aflibercept) (Regen-
`eron Pharmaceuticals), a recombinant chimeric protein comprising por-
`tions of the extracellular domains of the human VEGF receptors 1 and
`2 expressed in sequence with the Fc portion of human Ig (2). VEGF Trap
`binds all isoforms of VEGF-A as well as placenta-derived growth factor.
`VEGF Trap was at a concentration of 24.3 mg/ml in buffer. In previous
`studies, we have shown that VEGF Trap (25 mg/kg) given sc every other
`day on d 0 –10 of the cycle or the same dose given once on d 0 are equally
`efficacious in suppressing follicular angiogenesis (3, 15). In the current
`study, we used an intermediate schedule of 25 mg/kg sc on d 0, 3, and
`7 beginning at the time of prostaglandin F2␣ analog administration.
`Animals were killed at 10 d, such that the treatment period covered the
`duration of the normal proliferative phase. Control animals were stud-
`ied at the late proliferative phase (d 10) of the normal cycle (n ⫽ 6 per
`group) after treatment with vehicle alone or a control protein, 25 mg/kg
`recombinant human Fc.
`To determine the effects of total withdrawal of ovarian steroids,
`marmosets were ovariectomized (n ⫽ 4) after sedation with ketamine
`hydrochloride (Parke-Davis Veterinary, Pontypool, Gwent, UK), anes-
`thesia by Saffan (Alphaxalone/Alpadalone; Schering-Plough Animal
`Health, Welwyn Garden City, UK) and maintenance of analgesia by
`buprenorphine (Alstoe Animal Health, Melton Mowbray, UK) im as
`described previously (16). Ovariectomy was carried out between d 13
`and 15 of the secretory phase, and uteri collected 10 d later, the same
`schedule as for the VEGF Trap treatment.
`To determine the effects of estrogen replacement, marmosets were
`treated with VEGF Trap (n ⫽ 6 per group) or ovariectomized as above
`(n ⫽ 4 per group), except that estradiol benzoate was administered in
`increasing doses to mimic the rising concentrations of plasma estradiol
`observed during the proliferative phase in intact marmosets (14) based
`on a modification of a method described previously (17). Estradiol
`benzoate was supplied in a solution of 5 mg/ml in arachis oil (Intervet
`UK Ltd., Milton Keynes, UK). This was diluted to obtain a solution of
`50 ␮g/ml in arachis oil and was administered sc once daily in doses
`increasing from 5 to 20 ␮g as follows: d 0 – 4, 100 ␮l; d 5, 150 ␮l; d 6 and
`7, 200 ␮l; d 8, 300 ␮l; and d 9, 400 ␮l.
`To obtain further information on changes in cell proliferation at other
`stages of the cycle, tissue was collected on d 10 –16 of the secretory phase
`(no treatment, represents d 0 in the main study) and at the mid prolif-
`erative phase (d 5) (n ⫽ 6 per group).
`Blood samples were collected three times per week for 6 – 8 wk pre-
`treatment and during the study period for progesterone assay as de-
`scribed previously. All animals were injected iv with 20 mg bromode-
`oxyuridine (BrdU; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Essex, UK) in saline
`1 h before being sedated using 200 ␮l ketamine hydrochloride (Parke-
`Davis Veterinary) and 200 ␮l Saffan. After perfusion with 4% neutral
`buffered formalin, the uterus was removed immediately, weighed, and
`kept in 4% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h. The tissues were trans-
`ferred into 70% ethanol, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin accord-
`ing to standard procedures. Serial sections were cut so that the endo-
`metrial area nearest the center of the uterus was selected for study.
`Plasma progesterone throughout the study and plasma estradiol on
`terminal blood samples were measured using assays described previ-
`ously (4, 18). Levels of unbound VEGF Trap were measured by ELISA
`as described previously (19) with plasma being diluted 1:10,000.
`
`Hematoxylin and eosin staining
`
`The uteri were embedded so that longitudinal sections could be cut.
`Uteri were serially sectioned (5 ␮m) at least to the middle of the tissue
`where the lumen was clearly visible and tissue sections placed onto BDH
`SuperFrost Plus slides (Menzel-Glazer, Menzel GmbH & Co., Braun-
`schweig, Germany). Representative sections were stained with hema-
`toxylin and eosin.
`
`Immunohistochemistry
`
`Methods for immunohistochemical detection of endothelial cells by
`CD31 and proliferating cells by BrdU were as described previously for
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/149/9/4413/2455652 by guest on 29 June 2022
`
`Fraser et al. (cid:127) Endometrial Angiogenesis
`
`Endocrinology, September 2008, 149(9):4413– 4420 4415
`
`FIG. 1. Functionalis area of endome-
`trium, dual stained for CD31 (red) and
`BrdU (dark-stained nuclei) of the endo-
`thelium (green arrows), stroma/perivas-
`cular cells (blue arrows) and epithelial
`cells within glands (G), (outlined to dis-
`tinguish them from stroma) during the
`mid-proliferative (MP) (A), late prolif-
`erative (LP) (B) and mid-late secretory
`(M-LS) (C) phases of the ovulatory cy-
`cle. Volume fraction of proliferating
`cells is shown for endothelial cells (D),
`stromal/perivasular cells (E), and ep-
`ithelial cells of glands (F). Values are
`means ⫾ SEM; n ⫽ 6 per group. Sig-
`nificant differences between stages
`are denoted by different letters. Scale
`bar, 50 ␮m.
`
`d 0. All marmosets responded to treatment with prostaglan-
`din analog or ovariectomy, with a rapid fall in plasma pro-
`gesterone levels to follicular-phase values, which were main-
`tained for the remainder of the treatment period (data not
`shown). Stage of cycle in control animals was also confirmed
`by ovarian histology as described previously (3). At the end
`of the experimental period, estradiol levels (means ⫾ sem)
`were 1965 ⫾ 466 pmol/liter in late proliferative controls and
`were significantly reduced (P ⬍ 0.01) by VEGF Trap (230 ⫾
`24 pmol/liter) and ovariectomy (89 ⫾ 28 pmol/liter). Estra-
`diol benzoate treatment restored plasma estradiol to the nor-
`mal range; 1964 ⫾ 354 pmol/liter in the ovariectomized
`group and 2009 ⫾ 279 pmol/liter in the VEGF Trap-treated
`group by the end of the treatment period. All VEGF Trap-
`treated marmosets exhibited plasma concentrations of free
`VEGF Trap (not already bound to VEGF) between 100 and
`200 mg/liter at 1 d after treatment, and levels remained
`above 10 mg/liter through d 10. The detection limit of the
`assay was 0.5 mg/liter, and it has been estimated that
`effective pharmacological blockade of VEGF in the ovary
`is maintained until free VEGF Trap levels fall to less than
`1–2 mg/liter (21). Thus, levels of unbound VEGF Trap in
`all treated marmosets remained within the anticipated
`pharmacologically effective range for the duration of the
`study.
`
`Volume fraction measurements
`BrdU-positive staining was observed in the nuclei of the
`epithelial cells of the glands, the CD31-positive endothelial
`cells within the stroma, and CD31-negative stromal cells
`located adjacent to blood vessels or dispersed within the
`stroma (Figs. 1, A–C, and 2A). For the purposes of analysis,
`the latter two groups were combined, and classified as being
`stromal.
`To obtain an overview of changes during the normal cycle,
`data from the mid-proliferative, late proliferative, and mid-
`late secretory phase were compared. Angiogenesis was
`rarely observed in mid-proliferative phase specimens (Fig.
`1A) but was common in the late-proliferative phase, espe-
`cially in the functionalis next to the luminal epithelium (Fig.
`1B). Angiogenesis continued to be observed in most speci-
`mens during the mid to late secretory phase (Fig. 1C). Quan-
`titative analysis confirmed that endothelial cell proliferation
`was lowest during the mid-proliferative phase and rose
`markedly by the late proliferative phase in both the func-
`tionalis (P ⬍ 0.001) and basalis zones (P ⬍ 0.05) (Fig. 1D).
`Endothelial cell proliferation in the functionalis zone re-
`mained significantly higher (P ⬍ 0.05) during the secretory
`phase than in mid-proliferative phase endometrium (Fig.
`1D). Stromal cell proliferation was also extremely low in the
`mid-proliferative phase and rose significantly in both func-
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/149/9/4413/2455652 by guest on 29 June 2022
`
`4416 Endocrinology, September 2008, 149(9):4413– 4420
`
`Fraser et al. (cid:127) Endometrial Angiogenesis
`
`FIG. 2. Functionalis area of endome-
`trium, dual stained for CD31 (red) and
`BrdU (dark-stained nuclei) in control
`late proliferative (LP) (A) phase, after
`VEGF Trap (Trap) treatment (B), after
`ovariectomy (ovex) (C), after ovariec-
`tomy with estrogen (Ovex ⫹ E) replace-
`ment (D), and after VEGF Trap with
`estrogen replacement (Trap ⫹ E) (E).
`Note proliferating endothelial
`cells
`(green arrows), proliferating perivascu-
`lar cell (blue arrow), and proliferating
`epithelial cells in glands (G). Histogram
`(F) shows mean volume fraction of pro-
`liferating endothelial cells as a percent-
`age of total endothelial cells within the
`functionalis and basalis layers. Values
`are means ⫾ SEM. Significant differ-
`ences between groups are denoted by
`different letters. Scale bar, 50 ␮m.
`
`tionalis (P ⬍ 0.001) and basalis (P ⬍ 0.05) layers by the late
`proliferative phase (Fig. 1E). In the glands of the functionalis
`in the mid-proliferative phase, the cell proliferation index
`was highly variable and not significantly different from the
`peak levels seen in the late proliferative phase (Fig. 1F). In the
`basalis glands, cell proliferation was significantly greater in
`the late proliferative compared with mid-proliferative phase
`(P ⬍ 0.01) (Fig. F). In the secretory phase, cell proliferation
`was significantly reduced in the glands of both the functio-
`nalis and basalis (P ⬍ 0.001) (Fig. 1, C and F).
`In the main study, abundant dual staining of proliferating
`endothelial cells was evident in late proliferative controls
`(Fig. 2A). In marked contrast, endothelial cell proliferation
`was virtually absent in the uteri of animals treated with
`VEGF Trap (Fig. 2B) or ovariectomized (Fig. 2C). Abundant
`endothelial cell proliferation was evident in the functionalis
`of ovariectomized marmosets that received estrogen (Fig.
`2D), but estrogen replacement appeared to produce only a
`small increase in endothelial cell proliferation in VEGF Trap-
`treated animals (Fig. 2E). Quantitative analysis revealed that
`when treatment groups were compared with late prolifera-
`tive phase controls, endothelial cell proliferation was signif-
`icantly lower in VEGF Trap-treated and ovariectomized an-
`imals, being virtually absent both in the functionalis (P ⬍
`0.001) and basalis zones (P ⬍ 0.05) (Fig. 2F). After estrogen
`
`replacement, angiogenesis was fully restored in the functio-
`nalis in the ovariectomized animals (Fig. 2F). In contrast,
`endothelial cell proliferation was reduced in estrogen-
`treated animals given VEGF Trap compared with controls
`(P ⬍ 0.05), although this value was higher than in animals
`given Trap alone (P ⬍ 0.01) (Fig. 2F). In the basalis zone,
`estrogen replacement produced small increases in endothe-
`lial proliferation in both ovariectomized and VEGF Trap-
`treated groups (Fig. 2F). Despite the near total inhibition of
`endothelial cell proliferation after VEGF Trap or ovariec-
`tomy, vascular density within the stroma was not decreased
`(see Fig. 2, B and C). The likely cause of this paradox was the
`coincident reduction in stromal volume produced by these
`treatments. The mean fraction volume of endothelial cells as
`a percentage of total stromal cells showed no significant
`difference among groups.
`
`Histology
`The gross appearance of the uterus was altered in VEGF
`Trap-treated and ovariectomized animals, being reduced in
`size relative to controls. Area measurements confirmed that
`both the endometrium (P ⬍ 0.01) and the myometrium (P ⬍
`0.05) were significantly smaller in the ovariectomized ani-
`mals than late proliferative controls (Fig. 3, B and C). Al-
`
`

`

`Fraser et al. (cid:127) Endometrial Angiogenesis
`
`Endocrinology, September 2008, 149(9):4413– 4420 4417
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/149/9/4413/2455652 by guest on 29 June 2022
`
`ciated with decreased cell size and increased cell density.
`Representative sections from the functionalis zone are shown
`in Fig. 4. In the uteri of late proliferative controls, stromal
`cells were large and contained abundant cytoplasm, and the
`glandular epithelium exhibited the round or oval appearance
`characteristic of estrogen stimulation (Fig. 4A). After VEGF
`Trap treatment or ovariectomy, the epithelial cells appeared
`more densely packed, and cytoplasmic volume appeared
`reduced relative to controls (Fig. 4, B andC). These changes
`were even more marked in the stroma of both treatment
`groups (Fig. 4, B and C). These observed decreases in cell size,
`and consequent increases in packing density, were reversed
`by estrogen replacement (Fig. 4, D and E).
`BrdU labeling showed that proliferation the epithelium of
`the functionalis glands was high in controls but was also
`taking place after ovariectomy or VEGF Trap treatment and
`also were unaffected by estrogen replacement (Fig. 4, F–J).
`Quantification revealed no significant differences among
`groups in the epithelial cell proliferation index in the func-
`tionalis (Fig. 4K). In the basalis glands, epithelial cell prolif-
`eration was significantly reduced in the VEGF Trap-treated
`group compared with the controls, and proliferation was
`restored by estrogen replacement.
`Stromal cell proliferation was significantly lower (P ⬍ 0.001)
`in VEGF Trap-treated and ovariectomized animals in both the
`functionalis and basalis zones and was restored by estrogen in
`both groups (Fig. 4, F–J, M, and N). Despite the clear inhibition
`of stromal cell proliferation, the number of stromal cells per unit
`area was increased in both VEGF Trap and ovariectomized
`animals relative to controls (P ⬍ 0.001). Treatment of both VEGF
`Trap and ovariectomized groups with estrogen resulted in sig-
`nificant reductions in stromal density (P ⬍ 0.01) compared with
`VEGF Trap and ovariectomy alone (Fig. 4O).
`With respect to the luminal epithelial cells, intense prolifer-
`ation was observed at the late proliferative phase and was
`significantly reduced (P ⬍ 0.05) in the ovariectomized group.
`Proliferation rates were not significantly different from the con-
`trol for any other treatment group (data not shown), and there
`were no significant changes in the volume fraction of epithelial
`cells among the different groups (data not shown).
`
`Discussion
`This study provides the first description of the effects of
`VEGF inhibition on the primate uterus and shows that treat-
`ment of marmosets with a potent inhibitor of VEGF over the
`course of the proliferative phase results in a near complete
`inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation. In addition, stromal
`cell proliferation was also markedly suppressed, whereas the
`stroma itself became condensed. Thus, inhibition of VEGF in
`the intact marmoset results in an inhibition of endometrial
`angiogenesis. However, pharmacological inhibition of VEGF
`in intact animals also inhibits ovarian follicular angiogenesis,
`leading to reductions in plasma concentrations of estradiol
`(3, 19). Estrogen is known to stimulate the synthesis of VEGF
`in the endometrium and may similarly influence the expres-
`sion of numerous other factors associated with angiogenesis
`and maintenance of vascular function in primates (6) and
`rodents (22). Indeed, ovariectomy also inhibited angiogen-
`esis and produced other morphological changes in the uterus
`
`FIG. 3. A, Marmoset uterus showing a typical outline used to calcu-
`late myometrial (M) and endometrial (E) areas. The areas of both the
`endometrium (B) and myometrium (C) were significantly reduced by
`ovariectomy and fully restored by estrogen replacement. Significant
`differences between groups are denoted by different letters.
`
`though both endometrial and myometrial areas were also
`reduced in VEGF Trap-treated animals, these intermediate
`values were not statistically different from those of ovariec-
`tomized animals or controls. Estrogen replacement restored
`both endometrial and myometrial areas to normal in both
`groups (Fig. 3, B and C).
`Further analysis of hematoxylin- and eosin-stained sec-
`tions revealed that reductions in uterine volume evident in
`ovariectomized and VEGF Trap-treated animals were asso-
`
`

`

`4418 Endocrinology, September 2008, 149(9):4413– 4420
`
`Fraser et al. (cid:127) Endometrial Angiogenesis
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/149/9/4413/2455652 by guest on 29 June 2022
`
`FIG. 4. Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained
`sections of functionalis of control late
`proliferative phase (LP)
`(A), after
`VEGF Trap (Trap) treatment (B), after
`ovariectomy (Ovex) (C), after ovariec-
`tomy with estrogen replacement (Ovex
`⫹ E) (D), after VEGF Trap with estro-
`gen replacement (Trap ⫹ E), and in cor-
`responding BrdU-stained sections (F–
`J). Note that VEGF Trap treatment and
`ovariectomy reduce epithelial cell size
`in the glands and increase cell density of
`the stroma; effects reversed by estrogen
`replacement. In all groups, epithelial
`cell proliferation (dark-stained nuclei)
`is present in glands. Note that stromal
`proliferation in the control
`(dark-
`stained nuclei, yellow arrows) is lost af-
`ter VEGF Trap treatment or ovariec-
`tomy but
`is restored by estrogen
`replacement. Quantification of cell pro-
`liferation (K–O) shows that VEGF Trap
`decreased glandular proliferation in the
`basalis glands, and this was reversed by
`estrogen replacement. Stromal prolifer-
`ation was suppressed in both the func-
`tionalis and basalis glands after VEGF
`Trap or ovariectomy, and this effect was
`reversed by estrogen replacement.
`Quantitative analysis also confirmed
`that cell density in the stroma (O) was
`increased by VEGF Trap treatment or
`ovariectomy, and this effect was re-
`versed by estrogen replacement. Values
`are means ⫾ SEM. Significant differ-
`ences between groups are denoted by
`different letters. Scale bar, 50 ␮m.
`
`that resembled those seen after VEGF inhibition. Therefore,
`we also assessed the effects of estrogen replacement on these
`parameters in animals that were treated with VEGF Trap
`or ovariectomized. All morphological and proliferative
`changes in the uterus that resulted from ovariectomy were
`substantially normalized by estrogen replacement. Estro-
`gen replacement also fully restored stromal proliferation
`and stromal cell density largely to control levels. However,
`in animals treated with VEGF Trap, estrogen replacement
`had only a minor stimulatory effect on endothelial cell
`proliferation, demonstrating that VEGF plays a major and
`indispensable role in the final pathway that regulates an-
`giogenesis in the primate endometrium.
`Evidence from earlier studies using a variety of experi-
`mental models have suggested that exposure to estradiol
`during the proliferative phase drives VEGF production and
`
`angiogenesis in the uterus (6, 23, 24). Our quantitative studies
`in the marmoset confirm that there is indeed a significant
`increase in endothelial cell proliferation between the mid-
`proliferative (d 5) and late proliferative phases (d 10) and that
`this increase in angiogenesis is dependent upon estrogen and
`mediated by VEGF. However, there is little direct evidence
`indicating that there is a cyclic peak in uterine angiogenesis
`during the late proliferative phase in humans; rather, the
`endometrium in women has been reported to exhibit a rel-
`atively stable rate of endothelial cell proliferation (25). How-
`ever, it has been acknowledged that this negative finding
`might be attributable to technical difficulties inherent in hu-
`man studies such as individual variability in hormonal cycles
`or variability inherent in the use of small biopsies (26 –29). To
`establish a more precise relationship between steroid expo-
`sure and changes in endometrial angiogenesis, Nayak and
`
`

`

`Fraser et al. (cid:127) Endometrial Angiogenesis
`
`Endocrinology, September 2008, 149(9):4413– 4420 4419
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/149/9/4413/2455652 by guest on 29 June 2022
`
`sels supply a substantially reduced volume of tissue and
`hence appear more densely packed, as in the case for the
`stromal cells themselves (7). Thus, although the vascular
`density in the uterus was not reduced, the total endothelial
`mass is likely to be decreased.
`Apart from inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation, it is
`likely that the pharmacological blockade of local VEGF re-
`sults in additional changes in the structure and function of
`the uterine vasculature. Taking effects on the marmoset
`ovary as an example, VEGF inhibition induces an increase in
`the expression of the tight junctional protein claudin 5 (34),
`an up-regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1␣ (35), a de-
`crease in expression of mRNA for VEGF receptors (4), and an
`acute increase in endothelial cell death in the recently formed
`blood vessels in the corpus luteum (21). VEGF inhibition has
`also been shown to suppress the estrogen-induced increase
`in uterine permeability in rodents (7–11). These findings,
`together with the fact that VEGF inhibition has been shown
`to reduce vascular permeability in diverse vascular beds
`across species, strongly suggest that VEGF also plays a piv-
`otal role in modulating vascular function and permeability
`in the primate uterus, including regulation of tight junctions
`(24). Indeed, decreases in the permeability of uterine vessels
`may have contributed to the overall decrease in uterine vol-
`ume and increase in stromal cell density observed in ovari-
`ectomized and VEGF Trap-treated marmosets.
`Glandular epithelial cell proliferation in the basalis zone
`and luminal epithelial cell proliferation were partially in-
`hibited by ovariectomy or treatment with VEGF Trap com-
`pared with the late proliferative phase controls. This is to be
`expected because estrogen is the established stimulator of
`this process (29). However, the apparent absence of effects of
`VEGF Trap treatment or ovariectomy

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket