throbber
From: Robinson, Erick <erobinson@spencerfane.com>
`Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 2:05 AM
`To: Arjomand, Mehran <MArjomand@mofo.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: patdunn64@gmail.com; Dunn, Patrick <pdunn@spencerfane.com>;
`mbrockhaus@dunlapcodding.com; Allee, J. Lori <JAllee@spencerfane.com>;
`dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com; Yap, Alex S. <AYap@mofo.com>; Blumenkopf, Bryan
`<BBlumen@mofo.com>; Sony-Quantum-IPR <Sony-Quantum-IPR@mofo.com>; Tuttle, Kevin
`<ktuttle@spencerfane.com>; Rafatijo, Homayoon <hrafatijo@spencerfane.com>; Quantumimaging
`<quantumimaging@spencerfane.com>; robinson.erick <robinson.erick@gmail.com>
`Subject: Re: IPR2023-00954: Patent Owner's Request for Permission to File Rebuttal Evidence with Sur-
`Reply
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Honorable Board:
`
`Petitioner did not contact or otherwise meet and confer before sending the email below. Rather than
`argue via email as Petitioner does below, Patent Owner merely stands on its request to file the sur-reply
`it intended to. If Petitioner wishes to strike some portion, then it can attempt to do so at a later time.
`However, Petitioner delayed providing any clear response to whether it opposed PO filing the correct
`brief. This is the only issue before the Board at this time.
`
`Thank you for your consideration.
`
`Sincerely,
`Erick Robinson
`
`Erick Robinson Partner
`Co-Chair, Intellectual Property
`Spencer Fane LLP
`Mobile:713.498.6047
`[Sent via mobile: please excuse typos]
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Arjomand, Mehran <MArjomand@mofo.com>
`Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 12:55:49 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: patdunn64@gmail.com <patdunn64@gmail.com>; Dunn, Patrick <pdunn@spencerfane.com>;
`mbrockhaus@dunlapcodding.com <mbrockhaus@dunlapcodding.com>; Allee, J. Lori
`<JAllee@spencerfane.com>; dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com <dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com>; Yap, Alex
`S. <AYap@mofo.com>; Blumenkopf, Bryan <BBlumen@mofo.com>; Sony-Quantum-IPR <Sony-
`Quantum-IPR@mofo.com>; Tuttle, Kevin <ktuttle@spencerfane.com>; Rafatijo, Homayoon
`<hrafatijo@spencerfane.com>; Quantumimaging <quantumimaging@spencerfane.com>; robinson.erick
`<robinson.erick@gmail.com>; Robinson, Erick <erobinson@spencerfane.com>
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: IPR2023-00954: Patent Owner's Request for Permission to File Rebuttal
`Evidence with Sur-Reply
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3005
`Page 1
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`[Warning] This E-mail came from an External sender. Please do not open links or
`attachments unless you are sure it is trusted.
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`
`Patent Owner’s email below does not properly characterize Petitioner’s position. Petitioner does not
`oppose Patent Owner’s request to expunge Ex. 2015 and all references to Ex. 2015 in its sur-reply. It
`also does not oppose Patent Owner filing a corrected sur-reply removing the improper content. But
`Patent Owner has insisted on replacing the expunged content in the sur-reply with a lengthy footnote
`making reference to Ex. 2015. In addition, after Petitioner notified Patent Owner on July 9 of additional
`improper content on pages 9 and 10, Patent Owner offered to remove the content but once again
`added a footnote making reference to the removed content. Expunging content only to reference it in
`footnotes is not expungement. And adding new content after July 8 is not proper. Petitioner is mindful
`of the Board’s resources and has repeatedly requested that Patent Owner simply expunge the improper
`content and re-file the sur-reply, without the addition of any new content, such as the footnotes. That
`would be consistent with the rules relating to sur-replies and the Board’s order on July 8. If authorized,
`Petitioner will submit a redline showing the content that Patent Owner seeks to add in its corrected sur-
`reply.
`
`
`Respectfully,
`
`
`Mehran Arjomand
`
`
`MEHRAN ARJOMAND
`Partner | Morrison & Foerster LLP
`707 Wilshire Boulevard | Los Angeles, CA 90017-3543
`P: +1 (213) 892-5630
`mofo.com | LinkedIn | Twitter
`
`
`
`
`From: Robinson, Erick <erobinson@spencerfane.com>
`Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 8:13 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: patdunn64@gmail.com; Dunn, Patrick <pdunn@spencerfane.com>;
`mbrockhaus@dunlapcodding.com; Allee, J. Lori <JAllee@spencerfane.com>;
`dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com; Yap, Alex S. <AYap@mofo.com>; Arjomand, Mehran
`<MArjomand@mofo.com>; Blumenkopf, Bryan <BBlumen@mofo.com>; Sony-Quantum-IPR <Sony-
`Quantum-IPR@mofo.com>; Tuttle, Kevin <ktuttle@spencerfane.com>; Rafatijo, Homayoon
`<hrafatijo@spencerfane.com>; Quantumimaging <quantumimaging@spencerfane.com>; Robinson,
`Erick <erobinson@spencerfane.com>; robinson.erick <robinson.erick@gmail.com>
`Subject: Re: IPR2023-00954: Patent Owner's Request for Permission to File Rebuttal Evidence with Sur-
`Reply
`
`
`
`External Email
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3005
`Page 2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`Dear Honorable Board:
`
`
`Patent Owner has met and conferred with Petitioner, and Petitioner opposes Patent Owner’s
`request that its Sur-Reply (Paper 35) in the IPR2023-00954 matter and Ex-2015 be expunged due
`to a filing error related to the impact of Hurricane Beryl on PO’s counsel. If allowed, PO will
`provide the corrected Sur-Reply and exhibit list that it initially intended to file on July 8. The
`corrected Sur-Reply includes two footnotes explaining what was eliminated for appellate
`purposes.
`
`
`This is the version of the Sur-Reply that was intended to be filed on July 8 and would have been
`filed had the hurricane not severely disrupted operations on the due date of the sur-reply. PO
`represents to the Board that the version it intends to file is the same version PO’s counsel was
`referring to in my July 8 email to the Board. If a conference call with the Board is needed, the
`parties can provide their availability. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
`
`
`Sincerely,
`Erick Robinson
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Quantum Imaging LLC
`
`
`Erick Robinson Partner
`Co-Chair, Intellectual Property
`Spencer Fane LLP
`Mobile:713.498.6047
`[Sent via mobile: please excuse typos]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 10:41 AM
`To: Robinson, Erick <erobinson@spencerfane.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: patdunn64@gmail.com <patdunn64@gmail.com>; Dunn, Patrick
`<pdunn@spencerfane.com>; mbrockhaus@dunlapcodding.com
`<mbrockhaus@dunlapcodding.com>; Allee, J. Lori <JAllee@spencerfane.com>;
`dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com <dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com>; ayap@mofo.com
`<ayap@mofo.com>; marjomand@mofo.com <marjomand@mofo.com>; bblumen@mofo.com
`<bblumen@mofo.com>; Sony-Quantum-IPR@mofo.com <Sony-Quantum-IPR@mofo.com>;
`Tuttle, Kevin <ktuttle@spencerfane.com>; Rafatijo, Homayoon <hrafatijo@spencerfane.com>;
`robinson.erick <robinson.erick@gmail.com>; Quantumimaging
`<quantumimaging@spencerfane.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2023-00954: Patent Owner's Request for Permission to File Rebuttal Evidence
`with Sur-Reply
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3005
`Page 3
`
`

`

`
`
`Counsel,
`
`
`Patent Owner’s counsel should confirm that it met and conferred with Petitioner’s counsel and
`that Petitioner does not object to Patent Owner’s request.
`
`
`Regards,
`
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`
`
`From: Robinson, Erick <erobinson@spencerfane.com>
`Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 9:31 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: patdunn64@gmail.com; Dunn, Patrick <pdunn@spencerfane.com>;
`mbrockhaus@dunlapcodding.com; Allee, J. Lori <JAllee@spencerfane.com>;
`dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com; ayap@mofo.com; marjomand@mofo.com;
`bblumen@mofo.com; Sony-Quantum-IPR@mofo.com; Tuttle, Kevin
`<ktuttle@spencerfane.com>; Rafatijo, Homayoon <hrafatijo@spencerfane.com>; robinson.erick
`<robinson.erick@gmail.com>; Quantumimaging <quantumimaging@spencerfane.com>
`Subject: Re: IPR2023-00954: Patent Owner's Request for Permission to File Rebuttal Evidence
`with Sur-Reply
`
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE
`before responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`
`Upon further comment from my non-hurricane-ravaged colleagues, PO respectfully requests the
`entire sur-reply (Paper 35) to be expunged. If allowed, we will provide a corrected sur-reply and
`exhibit list immediately to eliminate any reference to Ex. 2015.
`
`
`Apologies for the confusion and thank you for your consideration.
`
`
`Best regards,
`Erick Robinson
`
`
`Get Outlook for iOS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3005
`Page 4
`
`

`

`From: Robinson, Erick <erobinson@spencerfane.com>
`Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 8:21:59 PM
`To: Trials@uspto.gov <Trials@uspto.gov>
`Cc: patdunn64@gmail.com <patdunn64@gmail.com>; Dunn, Patrick
`<pdunn@spencerfane.com>; mbrockhaus@dunlapcodding.com
`<mbrockhaus@dunlapcodding.com>; Allee, J. Lori <JAllee@spencerfane.com>;
`dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com <dsorocco@dunlapcodding.com>; ayap@mofo.com
`<ayap@mofo.com>; marjomand@mofo.com <marjomand@mofo.com>; bblumen@mofo.com
`<bblumen@mofo.com>; Sony-Quantum-IPR@mofo.com <Sony-Quantum-IPR@mofo.com>;
`Tuttle, Kevin <ktuttle@spencerfane.com>; Rafatijo, Homayoon <hrafatijo@spencerfane.com>;
`robinson.erick <robinson.erick@gmail.com>; Quantumimaging
`<quantumimaging@spencerfane.com>
`Subject: Re: IPR2023-00954: Patent Owner's Request for Permission to File Rebuttal Evidence
`with Sur-Reply
`
`
`Dear Honorable Board:
`
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that Ex. 2015 from PO’s sur-reply (Paper 35) re IPR2023-
`00954 be expunged. Petitioner’s counsel are copied on this email.
`
`
`Primary counsel for PO as well as supporting staff are based in Houston, which today took a
`direct hit from Hurricane Beryl. We have been without power or Internet all day in the office
`and at our homes. In the chaos, we mistakenly filed an old version of our Sur-Reply from before
`this morning's ruling from the Board. Out of an abundance of caution based on this morning’s
`ruling, we request Ex. 2015 be expunged. If the Board approves, we will immediately file an
`updated exhibit list without Ex. 2015. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Please
`contact me if you have any questions. Thank you again.
`
`
`Sincerely,
`Erick Robinson
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Quantum Imaging LLC
`Partner and Co-Chair of IP
`Spencer Fane LLP
`713-498-6047
`
`
`============================================================================
`
`
`This message may be confidential and privileged. Use or disclosure by anyone other than an intended
`addressee is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please delete it and advise the sender by
`reply email. Learn about Morrison & Foerster LLP's Privacy Policy.
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3005
`Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket