throbber
Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

` Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`PREFACE
`
`This is the first of a two volume set detailing the properties, chemistry, analysis,
`environmental pollution, and biology of the herbicidal chlorinated phenoxyalkanoic
`acids and their compounds. It is strange that this is one of the first book of its kind
`for these compounds since they are the most widely used herbicides. Perhaps it is not
`too strange after all since Chemical Abstracts, Biological Abstracts, and Index Medicus
`list well over 50,000 entries, and the task of sifting and fusing this vast literature is
`(and was) gargantuan.
`This first volume details the physical and chemical properties and environmental
`impact of the herbicidal chlorinated phenoxyalkanoic acids and related compounds,
`including contaminants. This book does not claim to be exhaustive in its coverage of
`the literature. We have elected to concentrate on the decade 1967 to 1980 inclusive,
`citing other important references when we deemed it necessary. We have endeavored
`to give overviews where possible, spiced with the appropriate detail. We have also tried
`to cite many foreign language sources in the hope of making the information accessible
`to scientists in all countries, and have cited the Chemical Abstracts reference for East(cid:173)
`ern European, South American, and Asian sources.
`There is a general paucity of information on the physical properties and chemistry
`of the phenoxys, and we have tended to go into more detail on these aspects than on
`other better known facets such as pollution and analysis. However, we have also pre(cid:173)
`sented methods for analysis in the hope this first volume can be used as a methods
`manual as well as a handbook for physical and chemical properties, and for pollution
`control. With regard to phenoxy residues, it is obviously futile to tabulate all of these
`since the list is literally endless. When necessary, we have referenced the reader for the
`appropriate sources. We have included sections on the fundamental principles of such
`properties as vapor pressure, droplet impingement and retentivity, adsorption etc. to
`make this a complete reference book.
`We have also endeavored to suggest areas of profitable research potential.
`T he authors would like to thank Gail Gair for her excellent typing, as well as Mrs(cid:173)
`Lois Carpenter for her typing contributions.
`In addition., we would like to acknowledge the support of Dr. R. R. Suskind, Direc(cid:173)
`tor, Institute of Environmental Health, Kettering Laboratory, University of Cincin(cid:173)
`nati, Ohio.
`We wish to thank the Department of Biomedical Communications of the University
`of Cincinnati MedicaJ Center for their expert artwork.
`
`Shane S. Que Hee
`Ronald G. Sutherland
`January, 1981
`Cincinnati, Ohfo
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

`

`

`

`

`B.
`
`Amides .. ......... ... ... ... ........ . . . .. . . .. . . ......... 41
`4.
`IR Spectra ...... . ..... .. ..................... . .. . .. . .. . ... . . .41
`1.
`Free Acids . .............. . . . ......... . . . .. . ....... . . . .. 41
`2.
`Esters ..... ... .. . ............................. ... . .. ... 41
`3.
`Salts ... . . .. . .... . .......... ... .. . ...... . ...... . . . .. . .. 42
`4.
`Amides .. •............... .. ................ . ...... . .... 42
`C 13 and Proton NMR .. . ...... . ................ . . . ... . .. . ..... .42
`C .
`D. Mass Spectrometry ................................ . .......... .43
`Free Acids . . ..... . .............. . ...................... 43
`1.
`2 .
`Esters . . .......... .. ................................... 45
`3.
`Salts ................. . ........ .. ..... .. . . . . . . .. .... . .. 47
`a .
`Alkali Salts ... . .................... . ............ .47
`Amine Salts .... . ....... . .... • ....... ... .... . . . . . .47
`b.
`Amides ............ . . . ... .. ...... . . .... . . . ....... . ..... 47
`4.
`Fluorescence and Phosphorescence .................. . .......... .48
`1.
`Free Acids .... . .... . ................................... 48
`2.
`Esters ...... . . . .......... . ...... .. ..... . .. . ..... . ...... 49
`3.
`Salts ...................... . ........................... 50
`Miscellaneous ... . . .. . .. .. . .. ....... . . .. .... . . . .. . .... . ....... 50
`F.
`Appendixes . • .. . . .. ... . ........ . .. . .. . ............................. .. ... . 51
`References . . ...... . .............................. . .... . . . .... . ... .. . . ... 101
`
`E.
`
`III.
`
`Chapter 2
`Synt hesis ... . ................ . .. . .............. . ............... . .. . ..... 107
`I.
`Free Acids . ...... .. .. . ...... . ... . .. . .. .. . .. .... . . . ... . ...... ... ... 107
`II.
`Esters ... . ............ . .. . . . .......... . .. . ....... . ................ 112
`A.
`Esteri fication of Free Acids ................................... 112
`Production of Esters by Routes Other Than Direct Esterification .... 116
`B.
`Salts ... . ... . .. . . . .. . ... . .. .. .. . . .. . . . ........................... . 116
`A. Metal Salts and Organometallic Compounds ............... . . . .. . 116
`B.
`Amine Salts ...................... . ................ . ........ . 117
`IV. Amides ..... . .. . .................. .. ... . .. . ..... . .... . .... .. .. . .. 118
`V. Miscellaneous Compounds . . .. . . ..... . .. . .................. .. .... . .. 119
`Impurities in Reaction Products .................... . ................. 121
`VI.
`VII. Radiolabeled Materials ... .. . .. ......... . ................... .. ...... 123
`VIII. Industrial Manufacture and Uses ......... . .......................... . 124
`IX. Government Regulations .. . .. . .............. . .. • .... . .... . ....... .. 126
`Appendixes .. . ...... . .. . .. .. ......... . . .... . ...... . . . .... . ... .. ....... .. 128
`References ................ . ... . . . ............................ . .......... 140
`
`Chapter 3
`Chemistry ............. . ... . . . ... . ................................. . .... 149
`I.
`Reactions of the Free Acids ... . ....... . . .. ... .... ... .. . .. .. . . . . .. ... 149
`A.
`Introduction ....... . ............ . ........................... 149
`B.
`T hermodynamics ...... . .... .. .. ...... .... ... ... . .... . .. .. ... 149
`C.
`Typical Carboxylic Acid-Type Reactions ............... . ..... . .. 149
`Salt Formation .. . . .. .. . . . . . .. . .. . ....... .. . ... ........ 149
`1.
`Condensation Reactions with Unlike Molecules ............ 151
`2.
`3.
`Influence of Ring Substitution of Self-Condensation . .. ... . . 151
`4.
`Ether Link Cleavage ... . .............. . ......... , ... .. . 153
`5.
`Substitution at the Aromatic Ring .... . ... . .. . ......... .. . 155
`6.
`Side Chain Oxidation . . ............. . ...... . ....... . ... 156
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`4
`
`The Phenoxyalkanoic Herbicides
`
`II. NOMENCLATURE AND TRADE NAMES
`
`This section lists the more common phenoxyalkanoic acids and their commercial
`.formulations and manufacturers. The following acronyms will be used:
`
`Registralion of common names and nomenclature
`ANSI
`American National Standards Jnstitute
`BSI
`British Standards lnstitution
`IUPAC
`International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
`Weed Science Society of America
`WSSA
`
`CIBA-GEIGY
`
`DiamondS.
`
`DOW
`DuPont
`
`Fisons
`I.C.l.
`Kanesha
`
`Manufacturers and addresses
`Ansul
`The Ansul Company, 1 Stanton St.. Marinette, Wis. 54143
`Boots
`The Boots Pure Drug Company, Station Street, Nottingham, England
`Chipman, Division of Rhodia, lnc., 120 Jersey Avenue, New Brunswick, N. J.
`Chipman
`08903
`Research and Development Department, Agricultural Division, CIBA-GEIGY
`Corp., P.O. Box 1142.2, Greensboro, N.C. 27409
`Diamond Shamrock Corporation, Commercial Development Agriculcure.l Chemi(cid:173)
`cals Division, 1100 Superior Ave., Cleveland, Ohio 44114
`Tile Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich. 48640
`E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company, Biochemicals DepartmenL, Wilmington,
`Del. 19898
`Fisons Pest Control, Ltd., Harston, Cambridge, England
`LC.I. Plant Protection, Lid., Femhurst, Haslemere, Surrey, England
`Kanesha Company, Ltd., Room 333, Marunouchi Building, Maunouchi, Chiyoda-
`ku, Tokyo, Japan
`Mallinckrodt Chemical Works, 360 North 2nd St., St. Louis, Mo. 63160
`May and Baker, Lld., Room 10, Dagenham, Essex 7XS, England
`E . Merck, AG, 61 Darmstadt, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Germany
`Nor-Am Ag Products, l 1710 Lake Avenue, Woodstock, Ill. 60098
`Pepro, B.P. 139, 69 Lyon, R.P. • France
`Rhone-Poulenc, Boite Postale N753.08, Paris - Se• France
`
`Mallinckrodt
`M&B
`Merck
`Nor-Am
`Pepro
`Rhone-Poul-
`enc
`Stauffer
`
`Transvaal
`Union Carbide
`Uniroyal
`
`U.S. Borax
`Velsicol
`ViI1eland
`
`Stauffer Chemical Company, Agricultural Chemical Division, Westport, Conn.
`06880
`Transvaal Inc., P.O. Box 69, Marshall Road, Jacksonville, Ark. 72076
`Union Carbide AgricuJ tural Product Company, Jnc. South Charleston, W. Va.
`Uniroyal Chemical, Agriculcural Chemical Division, Amity Road, Bethany, Conn.
`06525
`U.S. Borax Research Corporation, 3075 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, Calif. 90010
`Velsicol Chemical Corporation, 341 East Ohio Street, Chicago, ru. 60611
`Vineland Chemical Company, West Wheat Road, Vineland, N.J. 08360
`
`The information presented here comes from the Herbicide Handbook of the Weed
`Science Society of America, 4th edition, 1979; Agricultural Chemicals: Book II -
`Herbicides, 1975-1976 Revision, by W. T. Thomson, and the Pesticide Manual, 2nd
`edition, British Crop Protection Council, Boreley, Worcester, England, 1971.
`
`Common name
`(BSl:WSSA)
`2,4-D
`(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy)
`acetic acid
`
`lUPAC name
`
`(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy)
`ethant>ic acid
`
`Ci-@--0-CH2-COOH
`
`Cl
`c, H. Cl,O~
`MW:221.0
`
`Origin; Amchem, 1942 (U.S.)
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

`

`

`6
`
`The Phenoxyalkanoic Herbicides
`
`Amine salts
`Amine4T
`Brush - Rhap A-4T
`Veon 245
`Weedar® 2,4,5-T
`Esters
`Brush - Rhap LV-OXY-4T
`Esteron® 245
`LO-VOL4T
`2,4,5-T Low Volatile Ester 6L
`Wcedone® 2,4,5-T
`
`Mixtures wilh other herbicides
`Dinoxol (2,4-D/2,4,5-T)
`Semparol 1167 (Atrazine/MCPP/2,4.5-T)
`Tordon 155 (picloram/ 2.4,5-T esters)
`
`Manufacturer
`Diamond S.
`Transvaal
`Dow
`Union Carbide
`
`Transvaal
`Dow
`Diamond S.
`Chipman
`Union Carbide
`
`Union Carbide
`CIBA-GEIGY
`Dow
`
`Other names
`Dacamine 4T, Envert-T, Phortox, Reddon, Tippon, Tribulon, Trinoxul, Veon
`
`Common name
`(BSI, WSSA)
`MCPA,MCP
`(2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxy)
`acetic acid
`
`IUPAC nam e
`
`(2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxy)
`ethanoic acid
`
`MW:200,6
`
`Origin: Plant Protection Ltd .• England, 1945
`
`Amine salts
`Dow MCP Amine Weed Killer
`'Rhomene
`
`Esters
`Chiptox
`Rhonox
`
`Sodium salt
`WeedarSodium MCPA
`
`Mixtures with other herbicides
`Aniten (fluorenol-n-butyl es1er/ MCPA)
`Banlene Plus (Dicamba/mecoprop/MCPA)
`Bencornox (Dicamba/MCPA)
`Brominal, Brominal Industrial, Brorninal M (Canada) (bromoxynil/MCPA)
`Brominal Plus (bromoxynil/MCPA)
`Bronate (bromoxynil/ MCPA)
`Buctril F (bromoxynil/MCP A)
`Cam bilene (Dicamba/TBA/ mecoprop/ M CPA)
`Fisons 18-15 (TBA/ MCPA)
`Legumex-DB (2.4-DB/ MC:PA)
`Ley-Cornox (Benazolin/ 2,4-0B/ MCPA)
`Lcy-Comox BN (benazolln/ MCPB/MCP A)
`Mondak (dicamba/ MCPA)
`New Legumex (MCPB/ MCPA)
`Rawl (dicamba/ mecoprop/MCPA)
`Tri-Cornox (benazolin/dicamba/ MCPA)
`Tri-Cornox Special (benazolin/ dicarnba/2,4-0P/ MCPA)
`
`Manufacturer
`Dow
`Chipman
`
`Chipman
`Chipman
`
`Union Carbide
`
`E. Merck A.G.
`Fisons
`Boots
`Union Carbide
`Union Carbide
`Chipman
`Chipman
`Fisons
`Fisons
`Fisons
`Boots
`Boots
`Vel.sicol
`Fisons
`Fisons
`Boots
`Boots
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`10
`
`The Phenoxyalkanoic Herbicides
`
`As sole active ingredient
`Ku ron® (low-volatile esters)
`Weedone® 2,4,5-TP (low-volatile esters)
`
`Other names
`2.4.5-TP, Fenormone, Oarlon, Kurosal, Propon
`
`Manufacturer
`Dow
`Union Carbide
`
`III. THE STRUCTURE OF HALOPHENOXY ALKANOIC ACID
`COMPOUNDS
`
`A. Free Acids
`Recent years have seen the active interest of at least one X-ray crystallographic group
`in the structure of various phenoxyacetic acids. 3H•.•• The bond lengths and angles as
`well as the dimensions of the crystallographic unit cells are presented in Tables I , 2.
`and 3, respectively. Noting that o-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (2-CPA) and 2,4,6-trich(cid:173)
`loropbenoxyacetic acid (2,4,6-T) are not auxins, the following conclusions can be
`made:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`The free acids all form dimers held together by van der Waals' interactions by
`H-bonds of approximately the same length, approximately 268' pm, apart from
`the 2-CP A (approximately 245 pm).
`There are few clear-cut differences in the bond lengths be.tween corresponding
`atoms of nonherbicidal and herbicidal members (see Table 1). The average length
`for the c.-c6 bond in herbicidal members is approximately 160.1 pm, compared
`with 136.0 pm with that for nonauxins. However, the latter figure includes the
`very_ low 130.2-pm value for 2-CPA, and the length for 2,4,5-T and 2,4,6-T is
`the same. The bond lengths of C6-H• do show variations in that the bond for
`Silvex (100 pm) and 2,5-0 (97 pm) are much shorter than for 2,4-D and 2,4,6-T.
`There is one clear-cut difference. The Cs-C• bond length does appear to be
`shorter for nonauxins (<150 pm) than for auxins {151 to 152 pm).
`The same nondiscriminating differences between herbicidal and nonherbicidaJ
`members can be discerned in the corresponding bond angles (see Table 2). The
`steric hindrance in 2,4,6-T is clearly evident, and the aromatic rings of 2,4,5-T
`and MCP A are much flatter than the others.
`Consideration of the crystallographic systems for each does reveal some differ(cid:173)
`ences (see Table 3). All but the 4-CPA acid fall into the triclinic system, Space
`Group Pl, while 2-CPA acid belongs to the monoclinic system. The angle be(cid:173)
`tween the normals to the planes of the benzene ring and the carboxy groups varies
`widely. The angles for 2,4,6-T and 2,4,5-T are much lower than tb.e rest. How(cid:173)
`ever, even though the dihedral angles of 2,4-D, 2,5-D, and Silvex are similar,
`that for 2,4,5-T is 4 to 15°; this means the 2,4,5-T dimer has all atoms, except
`a behavior similar to that
`the methylene group lying approximately in a plane -
`shown by most other substituted aromatic carboxylic acids. In addition, the ben(cid:173)
`zene rings of 2,4-D, 2,5 -D, and Sil vex do not lie on top of one another.
`5. The distance between the o- of the carboxyl group and the fractional positive
`charge induced on a specific ring C is 420, 429, 417, and 428 pm for 2,4-D, 2,4,5-
`T, 2,5-D, and 2,4,6-T, respectively, compared to 412 pm for IAA.
`For comparison with most other carboxylic acids:••
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`6.
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

`

`

`12
`
`The Phenoxyalkanoic Herbicides
`
`Table2
`BOND ANGLES IN DEGREES BETWEEN THE DESIGNATED ATOMS ABOVE
`TABLE l FOR PHENOXYALKANOIC ACIDS. THE DIHEDRAL L REFERS TO
`THE ANGLE BETWEEN THE NORMALS TO THE BENZENE RING AND THE
`CARBOXYL GROUP
`
`Angles
`
`2,4-D'"·"
`
`2,4,5-T"
`
`2,s-0• 1
`
`Silvex"
`
`2-CPA"
`
`2,4,6-T"
`
`Bo nd angles ( 0
`
`)
`
`c.-c,-c,
`c,-c,-c.
`c,-c.-c.
`c,-c.-c.
`c.-c.-c.
`c.-c,-c,
`C,-0 .. -H,.
`o,.-c.-o,,
`A-C,-C,
`A-C,-C,
`B-C,-C,
`B-c.-c.
`c-c.-c.
`c- c.-c.
`o-c.-c,
`o-c.-c.
`c,-c,-o,
`c.- c,-o,
`c,-o,-c.
`o,-c.- c,
`c.-c.-o,.
`c.-c.-o,,
`
`l 19. l
`122.2
`l 17.3
`122.7
`l 19.1
`1.19.6
`111 .5
`123. I
`118.9
`118.8
`117.6
`I 19.6
`
`l 16.2
`124.7
`118.8
`I 11.1
`123.2
`112.2
`
`119.8
`121.1
`l 19.5
`119.5
`121.9
`l l 8.1
`114.8
`124.4
`l 19.9
`119.l
`1J9.0
`121.6
`121.4
`116.6
`
`I 16.l
`124.0
`117.0
`106.7
`122.9
`112.7
`
`117.1
`121.9
`121.7
`117.0
`122.4
`119.9
`
`123.8
`I 17.l
`121.0
`
`118.8
`118.7
`
`l 17.8
`125. l
`J 18.9
`111.9
`124. l
`112.0
`
`118.8
`120.0
`119.8
`120.9
`ltO.O
`118.8
`llJ.9
`124.1
`119.5
`119. 7
`118. 7
`121.5
`120.9
`118.8
`
`119.7
`125.5
`I 18.3
`110.4
`123.9
`111. 9
`
`121.0
`122.6
`113.J
`126.2
`119.9
`116.7
`
`125.3
`122.2
`115.2
`
`116.9
`122.1
`115.5
`107.0
`121.4
`l 13.2
`
`115.9
`126.2
`139.4
`139.S
`136.J
`138.5
`
`136.5
`140.2
`137.8
`136.5
`137.8
`107.0
`115.9
`126.2
`
`In Silvex E
`
`c,o
`H,C.,.,.H
`
`a)~~
`
`c7
`
`a
`b
`Dihedral
`angle
`
`85.23
`
`4.15
`
`81-2
`
`105.0
`109.4
`77.8
`
`6.6
`
`32.03
`
`O·-H-0
`C-R
`R-C 0\
`"o-H--0~
`
`1c
`
`"
`
`Cl'
`
`122°
`
`R-C
`
`C=O
`
`146-154 pm
`
`112-+ 126 pm
`
`C-0
`
`126 ..... 13 7 pm
`
`0-H
`
`261-+ 264 pm
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`16
`
`The Phenoxyalkanofc Herbicides
`
`J. Sales
`The .mps for some amine salts of 2,4-D, of 2,4,5-T, and miscellaneous salts are
`presented in Appendixes 3, 4, and 6, respectively.
`
`a. Alkali and Metal Salts
`The sodium and potassium salts have high mps since they are ionic. The sodium salt
`of 2,4,5-T melts at 268°C with very little decomposition°1 and exists in at least two
`crystalline forms; it always recrystallizes from the melt into characteristic spberulites
`which are indefinitely stable at room temperature, but transform to the fibrous needles
`of the thermodynamically stable form when heated above 200°C. The potassium salt
`of 2,4,5-T, however, decomposes on heating above 300°C and is almost insoluble in
`molten 2,4,5-T, whereas lbe sodium salt is much more soluble. The potassium salt
`exhibits medium birefringence, but no similar studies have been reported for 2,4-D
`salts, even though the mp of the sodium salt is only 217°C. The 2,4-D potassium salt
`melts above 300°C The mp behavior may seem anomalous, since the mp order is
`usually Li> Na>K>Rb>Cs, but the phenoxy acid salts appear to act like typical fatty
`acid salts, where potassium salts have higher mps and water solubilities than the cor(cid:173)
`responding sodium salts. 73
`DTA of various (2,4,5-T)1 ·M·nH20 systems, where M = Cu, Zu,Cd, Co, Ni, and
`Mn and n = 2 or 4, and of (2,4,5-Th · Fe have been reported. 10 Most of these salts
`lost water of crystallization at "-'40°C, and the thermal stability of the anhydrous salts
`ranged from 20°C for Cd to 130°C for the Zn salt. All salts formed stable oxides at
`high temperatures, excepting CdO, which was unstable:
`
`b. Amine Salts
`The phenoxyalkanoic acids are weak acids and the alkylamines are weak bases; their
`salts are weakly ionic and so have low mps (see Appendixes 3 and 4, respectively).
`Generally, the salt is converted to its corresponding amide between 150 to 200°C, but
`the latter's formation can be detected well beneath the mp of the salt. 6~ The mp Litera(cid:173)
`ture is difficult to evaluate, since the temperature used in salt synthesis is often not
`given; also, there are many stoicbiometries that are possible other than 1: 1 as well as
`polymorphic forms.
`DSC of several 1: 1 amine salts of 2,4-D was investigated by Que Hee and Suther(cid:173)
`land. 65 The aH, values for the dimethyl, methyl, .n-butyl, n:-dodecyl, and n-tetradecyl
`salts were 11.20, 6.53, 15.0, 31.2, and 39.2 kcal/mo!, respectively. There is a linear
`relationship between llH1 and molecular weight obeying aH, = 0.1445 mol wt -27.4.
`At a heating rate of 10°C/ min and for a nitrogen furnace atmosphere, 72 the methylam(cid:173)
`ine salt sbowed endotbermal transitions at 103 to 117, 139 to 157, and 165 to 182°C,
`after which decomposition set in. The dimethylamine salt had one peak from 64 to
`74°C, a glass transition 134 to 136°C, and decomposed above 157°C. The a-butylam(cid:173)
`ioe salt had transitions from 98 to 111 and 162 to 195°C, with subsequent decomposi(cid:173)
`tion. The a-tetradecyl salt produced peaks between 57 to 64.5 and 163 to 202°C, with
`subsequent decomposition. The higher transitions correspond to the elimination of
`water in the formation of the corresponding amide, which is decomposed65 beyond
`200°c.
`
`4. Amides
`The melting points of various 2,4-D amides, 2,4-D amino acid amides, and miscel(cid:173)
`laneous amides are in Appendixes 3, 5, and 6, respectively. No OTA or DSC studies
`have been reported.
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

`

`

`18
`
`The Phenoxya/kanoic Herbicides
`
`) . Phillips'~
`high dilutions. Often mixed solvents were utilized (van Oberbeek et al. ' 5
`showed that the pK. of 2,4-D at I l'\,0.001 was 2.86 at 20°C, but was 4. IO in l: I
`ethanol/water (I 'v 0.005). The major criticism of the spectroscopic method of Phillips
`is that the molar absorptivity vs. wavelength curve has a very steep slope in the far
`UV rc::gioo, even though the:: pK value:: cited is the average of pK.s done at four wave(cid:173)
`lengths. However, the discrepancy between the value of Nelson and Faust77 and that
`of Phillips is not great. To check whether the solubility and pK. data are compatible,
`the maximum possible pK. value can be calculated from the solubility of 2,4-D (2.36
`>< 10-, Mat 25°C). 1• Since this represents the maximum (H•), the lowest pK. at 25°C
`should be around 2.63. The observed pK. is 2.73 (K. = 1.86 x 10-a), and this implies
`79o/o of the acid is dissociated, and 21 % is solvated without dissociation at saturation.
`It is also interesting that the degree of chlorination of the ring does not affect the
`pK. in a marked way, even though 4-CPA and 2-CPA have larger pK.s than 2,4-D, as
`does 2,4,5-T.1
`• Even the pK. of MCPA is not very different from that of 4-CPA, but
`MCPB, however, does have a much larger pK. than MCPA.
`Phillips' spectroscopic work is highly suggestive of the following relationships: '"
`
`I.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`The negative inductive effect of the phenoxy group (pK. 'v3 .12) I = 0.00 l re(cid:173)
`sponsible for the acid strengthenjng relative to acetic acid (pK. l'\,3. 74) is of the
`order of the iodo group and much greater than that of either the phenyl or hy(cid:173)
`droxyl groups.
`Chloro substitution in the phenyl ring generally enhances acid strength; the mag(cid:173)
`nitude depends on the number of chlorines, the distance of separation between
`the aromatic ring and the ionizing group, and solvent effects. In the phenoxy(cid:173)
`acetic acids, the effects of chloro substitution are swamped by solvent effects,
`e.g., pK. values in water vs. those in I :1 water to ethanol. The acid weakening
`effect of ethanol is due to the fact that open-chain H - bonded dimers are favored
`
`(B--H-0--H-O)
`I
`I
`R'
`R'
`
`in alcohol, whereas water allows other arrangements thus promoting greater dis(cid:173)
`sociation. Also, ethanol can be regarded as preferring to sol'vate the undissociated
`molecule rather than the dissociated form.
`The insertion of methylene groups between the phenoxy and ionizing group in(cid:173)
`creases the pK. as expected from inductive effects. Thus, /3-(2,4-DP) is 1.5 pK
`units weaker than the corresponding acetic or a,-substituted propionic acid. The
`insertion of another methylene group weakens it by a further 0.4 pK unit, so that
`the pK. is the same as that for butyric acid, i.e., the phenoxy group does not
`affect the ionization at all and its effect is almost eliminated by the insertion of
`two methylene groups.
`2,6-Disubstituted derivatives, usually inactive as auxins, are much weaker acids
`than their parent acids, and this is attributable to steric hindrance which prevents
`the phenoxy group from interacting with the carboxyl group. interestingly, al(cid:173)
`though 2,6-dichloro and 2,4,6-txichlorophenoxyacetic acids are not auxins, 2-flu(cid:173)
`oro-4,6-dichloro- and 2,4-dichloro(6-fluoro)-pbenoxyacetic acids are, and these
`also show greater acidity than their sterically hindered analogues.
`
`2. Esters
`These compounds are gener.ally immiscible. or insoluble in water, but gradual hydro(cid:173)
`lysis does occur (see Chapter 3).
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

`

`

`

`

`Volume J: Chemistry, Analysis, and Bnvironmental Pollution
`
`21
`
`aqueous pH below the pK. of of the free acid was necessary to extract the latter. Table
`5 shows the expenrnental conditions and p values obtained for some chlorophenoxy
`alkanoic acids atnd esters. These p values agree with those calculated from other liter(cid:173)
`ature sources (see Reference 95). It can be seen that the more polar the herbicide the
`smaller is its p •value and that different kinds of water make no significant difference
`to the observed! p values. However, suspended particulates do affect recovery, but
`more so at pH 7 to 8 than at pH 2 (see Section IV.F). Water should be filtered before
`any solventextr.action is attempted .
`The best solv,ents for extraction of the free acids are ethyl acetate and diethyl ether.
`Hexane is very poor. Diethyl ether and ethyl acetate are best for 2,4-D compounds,
`and benzene is ,optimal for 2,4,5-T. Benzene is a poor solvent for 2,4-D and MCPA.
`Thus, to separate a mixture of esters and free phenoxyacetic acids, one would use rr
`hexane to extract the esters, and then use ether or ethyl acetate to isolate the free acid.
`This procedure would not work for the propionjc or butyric acids, although pH ad(cid:173)
`justment would most likely solve this problem. A two-step procedure with 200 and 50
`ml of ethyl acetate was demonstrated to extract 99% of 2,4-D from 1 £ of aqueous
`solution adjusted before extraction to pH 2 with 0.2 Mphosphate buffer.
`Appendix l 1 compares the literature of the recovery (F.) of various herbicidal com~
`pounds from aqueous solution. Again, consistent recoveries of at least 99% are ob(cid:173)
`tained with diethyl ether, confirming p-value predictions, even if the pH was adjusted
`by HCl or H,SO. instead of phosphate buffer.
`
`E. Vapor Pressmes and Volatility
`1. Introduction
`A compound with a low vapor pressure (P) is often said to be ''nonvolatile".
`Pis a thermodynamic property, and no time scale can be inferred, but volatilization
`is a kinetic pro(~ess. Thus, although kinetic steady states are common. thermodynamic
`equilibrium is hardly ever attained. The atmosphere acts as an infinite reservoir, with
`the wind as a dlispersing agent. The amount of material volatilized is then a function
`of wind speed, ,contact volume, exposed surface area, temperature, type of compound,
`and variety of flow, as well as vapor pressure. There are several distinct available
`approaches which are used to predict volatilization rates.
`
`a. Ideal Gas Mc:tbod
`Since most phenoxy herbicides have a P < 10-2 mmHg, the vapors can be described
`as ideal gases olf volume, V, mass, m, and molecular weight, M, at a given temperature,
`T. Thus,
`
`M;
`mi
`,oi = 7 = Pi RT
`
`(7)
`
`where Q1 is the vapor density of component i, and p1 is its partial pressure; R is the gas
`constant in appiropriate units.
`When p, = P,, P, is the maximum mass of the compound per unit volume able to
`be contained in the vapor phase at a given temperature under ideal conditions.
`lf the air is s:ampled at Z 1/min and if the vapor .is sampled for t minute~, the mass
`of the compounid i that can be collected from a saturated atmosphere is
`
`z
`~m- = IP·Z = t p. M- -
`I RT
`I
`I
`I
`
`(8)
`
`where 2m, is the total mass collected.
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

`

`

`

`

`Schuylkill River water
`River water (filtered)
`Wissahickon Creek water (high organic load)
`
`0.925
`0.91 I
`0 .920
`
`0.007
`0.007
`
`13
`2
`
`0.996
`0.997
`0.998
`
`0.0005
`0.0010
`
`II
`3
`1
`
`Note: All values are the average of at least three determinations except those in parentheses, with a water:solvent ratio of
`10: I.
`
`• Amchem Products, Inc., analytical grade. All solids were recrystallized before use.
`• After Nelson and Faust."
`• All compounds are soluble at these concentrations.
`• All UV analyses on the water phase after solvent evaporation step.
`• Water:solvent ratio changed to 5: l.
`Water:solvent ratio changed to l: 1.
`
`Reprinted with permission from Suffet, l. H., J. Agric. Food Chem., 21,591, 1973. Copyright by the American Chemical
`Society.
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`-
`
`32
`
`The Phenoxyalkanoic Herbicides
`
`2 Mo
`pd
`ln - = ' - -
`pl' RTdr
`
`(53)
`
`where P • is the vapor pressure of the droplet, PP is the vapor pressure from a plane
`surface, r is the droplet radius, dis the surface tension, and dis the fluid density.
`
`2. Data for Chlorinated Phenoxyalkanoic Acid Herbicides
`a.Acids
`Very little work has been done on the volatility or vapor pressures of the free acids.
`mainly because they are hardJy ever used in spraying. However. it has been found that
`2,4-D has a p of 1.05 X 10· 2 mmHg at 25°C and boils at 160°C at 0.4 mmHg. 10
`'
`
`b. Esters
`It is instructive to compare the calcuJated values of P at 25°C for various esters
`calculated from the equations of Jensen and Schall'°0 and those of Flint et al., 101 who
`both utilized the same GC technique (see Chapter 1, Section TV. E.l.c) to find Ps of
`2.4-D esters at high temperatures, as well as the same internal reference (see Appendix
`12). It can be seen that the values for the 2-ethylhexyl, 2-octyl, and the 2-propyl esters
`of 2,4-D differ by more than an order of magnitude, witn Jensen and SchalJ's values
`being higher. Some of tne assumptions may be responsible for the contradictions (see
`Chapter I, Section E.1.c). Consjderation of the data of Jensen and Schal1100 leads to
`the conclusion that, as expected, the corresponding esters of 2,4,5-T have smaller Ps
`than those of 2,4-D, and branched isomers of the same acid have a higher vapor pres(cid:173)
`sure than the normal esters. The relevant calculated values are also compared with Ps
`found experimentally (see Appendix 13). The latter show that there are still many con(cid:173)
`tradictions. lt can be concluded, however, that the calculated values of Flint et al. ,oi
`are too low. The values for the 2,4-D n-butyl ester at 25°C range from 10-s to 4.0 x
`J0-<3 mm Hg, with the correct value probably between 3.90 x 10-• and 3.90 x 10-a mmHg.
`The P of the methyl ester of 2,4-D at 25°C varies from 3.3 x 10-• to 1.27 x 10·1 mmHg.
`The correct value is probably between 2 x 10-• to I. 3 x 10·2 mmHg. The values for the
`i-propyl ester also range from 4 x 10-s to 1.05 x 10-2 mmHg at 25°C, with the true
`value probably between 1.2 x 10-3 to 10· 2 mmHg.
`In general, the transpiration technique91 produces higher P values than the other
`methods, although the method used by Que Hee et al. 9
`6 and by Grover98
`99 does not,
`•
`4-9
`since the contact volume was always less than the nominal volume of air flowing over
`the surface deposit. Appendix 13 aJso presents the available fi.H. data. As expected the
`values for the liquid esters are lower than ~H, for solid 2,4-D (see Appendix 1). The
`various equations developed through Section E. l can then be utilized to find U values.
`Clearly, reliable P values have to be known before this is possible.
`The volatility of the esters has also been measured directly on a number of surfaces.
`Pyrex is less adsorptive than is the cuticle of a plant, so that volatilization from glass
`surfaces should be a good model system for the worst field conditions at comparable
`temperature, surface/mass ratios (Q) and flow rates. A major difficulty with many of
`these kinetic studies is that the crucial parameters were not often specified. Thus, Que
`Hee and Sutherland9" ·95 showed that only under the same conditions of Q., flow rate,
`and temperature did the volatilities of the 2,4-D esters follow the vapor pressures, i.e.,
`as chain length decreased so does volatility. Grover,96 using technical grade butyl esters
`of 2,4-D in a transpiration method, found that 238 ng/cm1/hr of butyl esters volatil(cid:173)
`ized at 14 £/hr at 30°C, whereas 447 ng/ cm2 /hr was the rate at 57.6 11hr. Que Hee
`and Sutherland found an evaporation rate of 4.45 t,tg/cm2/hr at 38°C for n-butyl ester
`at 56.4-Ubr flow rate and a Q" of 3.28 cm2 /g. If it is remembered that each 10°C rise
`
`Bayer EX1026 (Part 1 of 2)
`
`

`

`

`

`34
`
`The Phenoxyalkanoic Herbicides
`
`as well as the free acid, did not affect bean and tomato plants, and volatilities of many
`esters were reduced compared with the pure compounds when they were dissolved in
`diesel, corn, 1)r cottonseed oil. 111 The latter effect is explainable by consideration of
`Raoult's Law which predicts a partial pressure above a homogeneous solution of con(cid:173)
`stituents. Not only plants are affected by herbicides in the vapor phase. The germina(cid:173)
`tion of air-dried seeds was inhibited by "volatile" esters of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T (C, to
`C 3 esters inhibiting more than C, to C$ esters), when exposed to vapors for 30 to 60
`days. 118 lt was found that the vapor did not permeate the seed coats, bul entered during
`inhibition of water early in the germination process. Cotton plants were also sensitive,
`as well as bean and tomato. 120 The designation "high volatile" and "low volatile" was
`122 and Zimmerman et al,,." 6 ,u using the
`first formulalted by Baskin and Walker11
`• ·
`tomato stem o:urvature test. rt was shown that the C

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket