throbber
Trials
`Argenti, Matthew; Trials
`Mudd, Jason (SHB); Schafer, Mark D. (SHB); Friesen, Kyle E. (SHB); Rosato, Michael; Mills, Jad
`RE: IPR2023-01186, -01187, -01188 (CSC ServiceWorks, Inc. v. PayRange, Inc.)
`Friday, December 8, 2023 11:01:10 AM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Counsel,
`
`From the Board –
`
`Patent Owner’s deadline for filing its Sur-Replies is extended to Tuesday, December 12, 2023.
`Patent Owner must file its Sur-Replies and any supporting evidence designated confidential by
`Petitioner as “Board Only” or “Board and Parties Only.” As the confidential information belongs to
`Petitioner, Petitioner must file a Motion to Seal no later than Friday, December 15, 2023 if it wishes
`the information to remain under seal.
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`From: Argenti, Matthew <margenti@wsgr.com>
`Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 11:06 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Mudd, Jason (SHB) <jmudd@shb.com>; Schafer, Mark D. (SHB) <MSCHAFER@shb.com>; Friesen,
`Kyle E. (SHB) <KFRIESEN@shb.com>; Rosato, Michael <mrosato@wsgr.com>; Mills, Jad
`<jmills@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2023-01186, -01187, -01188 (CSC ServiceWorks, Inc. v. PayRange, Inc.)
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Board,
`
`Patent Owner PayRange writes with a request for urgent relief. PayRange’s sur-reply regarding CSC’s
`RPI issues is due tomorrow, Friday, December 7, 2023. This afternoon, Petitioner produced a trove
`of confidential documents that they did not file with their reply. These new documents reflect a pre-
`existing relationship (including indemnification obligations) between the Petitioner here and the
`prior petitioners who challenged PayRange’s patents. The last-minute production of these
`documents (which Petitioner requests be filed only under seal) necessitates a brief one week
`extension in PayRange’s deadline for filing the sur-reply.
`
`PayRange has requested CSC’s position on this extension and has not received a response.
`
`Exhibit 3003
`
`

`

`Regards,
`
`Matthew A. Argenti
`Counsel for Patent Owner PayRange Inc.
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`650 Page Mill Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Direct: (650) 354-4154
`Fax: (650) 493-6811
`
`
`From: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 5:57 AM
`To: Mudd, Jason (SHB) <jmudd@shb.com>; Schafer, Mark D. (SHB) <MSCHAFER@shb.com>; Friesen,
`Kyle E. (SHB) <KFRIESEN@shb.com>; Argenti, Matthew <margenti@wsgr.com>; Rosato, Michael
`<mrosato@wsgr.com>; Mills, Jad <jmills@wsgr.com>
`Cc: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Subject: RE: IPR2023-01186, -01187, -01188 (CSC ServiceWorks, Inc. v. PayRange, Inc.)
`
`EXT - trials@uspto.gov
`
`
`Counsel,
`
`Petitioner’s request is granted. In each proceeding, Petitioner is authorized to file a 7-page reply to the
`Patent Owner Preliminary Response in each IPR, to address Patent Owner’s argument that the Petition
`does not identify all real-parties-in-interest. Additionally, the parties should indicate whether or not the
`proceeding is barred under 35 U.S.C. § 315. See SharkNinja Operating LLC v. iRobot Corp., IPR2020-
`00734, Paper 11 (PTAB Oct. 6, 2020) (precedential). The reply is due no later than December 1, 2023.
`Patent Owner is authorized to file a 7-page sur-reply in each IPR no later than December 8, 2023.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`(571)272-7822
`
`
`
`From: Mudd, Jason (SHB) <jmudd@shb.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 10:17 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Schafer, Mark D. (SHB) <MSCHAFER@shb.com>; Friesen, Kyle E. (SHB) <KFRIESEN@shb.com>;
`Argenti, Matthew <margenti@wsgr.com>; Rosato, Michael <mrosato@wsgr.com>; Mills, Jad
`<jmills@wsgr.com>
`Subject: IPR2023-01186, -01187, -01188 (CSC ServiceWorks, Inc. v. PayRange, Inc.)
`
`
`

`

`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Board:
`
`We write on behalf of Petitioner, CSC ServiceWorks, Inc., in connection with the above-referenced
`IPRs to respectfully request leave to file a reply brief to the Patent Owner Preliminary Responses in
`each of the above IPRs, limited to the topic of addressing Patent Owner’s argument that the
`petitions did not identify all real-parties-in-interest. Petitioner respectfully requests 7 pages for each
`reply brief. Petitioner also requests that Patent Owner be allowed to file a sur-reply in each of the
`IPRs also limited to 7 pages. Petitioner submits that good cause for the replies exists because it was
`not foreseeable that Patent Owner would make some of the representations it did about Petitioner’s
`relationship with KioSoft/TechTrex with respect to the RPI issue and because Petitioner needs to
`provide Petitioner’s side to create a fulsome record.
`
`Petitioner has conferred with Patent Owner regarding this request, and Patent Owner opposes this
`request. However, should the Board grant Petitioner’s request, Patent Owner agrees that it should
`be given an equal number of pages to respond in a sur-reply.
`
`Should the panel wish to conduct a conference call with the parties to discuss this request, the
`parties can provide their availabilities at the panel’s request.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Jason R. Mudd
`Senior Counsel
`Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
`
`816-559-2437 | jmudd@shb.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message including attachments, if any, is intended for the
`person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
`Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
`recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
`Thank you.
`
`This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for
`the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any
`attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
`contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and
`
`

`

`any attachments thereto.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket