throbber

`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`BIOCON BIOLOGICS INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No.: IPR2024-00201
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,888,601 B2
`Filed: April 29, 2019
`Issued: January 12, 2021
`Inventor: George D. Yancopoulos
`
`Title: USE OF A VEGF ANTAGONIST TO TREAT
`ANGIOGENIC EYE DISORDERS
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 & 42.54
`
`
`

`

`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 & 42.54, Petitioner Biocon Biologics Inc.
`
`(“Petitioner”) moves to seal Exhibit 1062, filed herewith. Exhibit 1062 is an excerpt
`
`of the Pretrial Memorandum submitted in the district court litigation captioned
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 22-cv-61
`
`(N.D.W. Va. May 26, 2023), which was designated as CONFIDENTIAL and filed
`
`under seal by Patent Owner in that matter. This exhibit was filed concurrently with
`
`Petitioner’s Petition in Inter Partes Review No. IPR2024-00201.
`
`The Board may seal documents for good cause. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.54(a);
`
`Garmin v. Cuozzo, IPR2012-00001, Paper 36, 8-9 (2013). “The rules aim to strike
`
`a balance between the public’s interest in maintaining a complete and
`
`understandable file history and the parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive
`
`information.” Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760
`
`(2012). The public’s interest in having access to confidential business information
`
`that is only indirectly related to patentability is “minimal.” Garmin v. Cuozzo,
`
`IPR2012-00001, Paper 36, 8-9 (2013) (granting a motion to seal an agreement
`
`relating to the “commercializ[ation]” of the patent-at-issue).
`
`The information that Petitioner seeks to seal has been designated as
`
`CONFIDENTIAL by Patent Owner in the district court litigation pending between
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner in the Northern District of West Virginia, Civil Action
`
`No. 22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM. Therefore, out of respect for Patent Owner’s
`
`1
`
`

`

`designation of the document as confidential, Petitioner seeks to maintain the same
`
`under seal in the pending inter partes review proceeding. It is Petitioner’s
`
`understanding good cause exists to seal portions of Exhibit 1062 as submitted.
`
`Thus, out of respect for Patent Owner’s confidential designation of Exhibit
`
`1062 in the district court litigation, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`grant its motion to seal Exhibit 1062 filed concurrently herewith.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Dated: November 20, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP
`
`/Paul J. Molino/
`Paul J. Molino
`Registration No. 45,350
`6 West Hubbard Street
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Telephone:
`(312) 222-6300
`Facsimile:
`(312) 843-6260
`paul@rmmslegal.com
`
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SEAL WAS served on November 20, 2023, via
`
`FedEx Priority Overnight on the Patent Owner at the correspondence address of
`
`record for U.S. Patent No. 10,888,601 B2 as evidenced in Patent Center:
`
`A&P - Regeneron (Prosecution)
`601 Massachusetts Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20001-3743
`
`/Paul J. Molino/
`Paul J. Molino (Reg. No. 45,350)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket