`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`NESPRESSO USA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`K-FEE SYSTEM GMBH,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`IPR2024-00257 (U.S. Patent No. 11,548,722)
`IPR2024-00299 (U.S. Patent No. 11,554,910)
`IPR2024-00304 (U.S. Patent No. 11,465,830)
`
`
`NOTICE OF SECOND JOINT STIPULATION
`EXTENDING DUE DATES 1 AND 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Scheduling Order (Paper 10), the Parties hereby provide notice
`
`to the Board that they have agreed to extend Due Dates 1 and 2 as indicated on the
`
`attached Due Date Appendix.
`
`
`
`Date: September 16, 2024
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Douglas Carsten/
`Douglas Carsten, Lead Counsel
`Registration No. 43,534
`Attorneys/Agents for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/B. Clayton McCraw/
`B. Clayton McCraw
`Registration No. 68,258
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1221 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10020-1001
`Telephone: (212) 506-2649
`CMcCraw@mayerbrown.com
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`1
`
`
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`
` October 1, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 1 .................................................................. September 17, 2024
`Patent Owner’s response to the petition
`Patent Owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`
` December 24, 2024
`DUE DATE 2 ................................................................... December 10, 2024
`Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend (due date unchanged per Scheduling
`Order at 8)
`
` January 31, 2025
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 3 ....................................................................... January 21, 2025
`Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply
`Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend (or Patent Owner’s revised
`motion to amend) (due date unchanged per Scheduling Order at 8)
`
`
`DUE DATE 4 ..................................................................... February 11, 2025
`Request for oral argument (may not be extended by stipulation)
`
`
`DUE DATE 5 ........................................................................... March 4, 2025
`Petitioner’s sur-reply to reply to opposition to motion to amend
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`
`DUE DATE 6 ......................................................................... March 11, 2025
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`Request for prehearing conference
`
`
`DUE DATE 7 ......................................................................... March 18, 2025
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`
`DUE DATE 8 ......................................................................... March 20, 2025
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, that on September 16, 2024, a
`
`complete copy of the foregoing document was served upon the following by
`
`ELECTRONIC MAIL:
`
`B. Clayton McCraw (Lead counsel)
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1221 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10020-1001
`Telephone: (212) 506-2649
`CMcCraw@mayerbrown.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Amanda S. Bonner (Back-up Counsel)
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`71 South Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone: (312) 701-8645
`asbonner@mayerbrown.com
`
`/Douglas Carsten/
`Douglas Carsten
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
