throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
` Paper 9
`Date Entered: March 14, 2024
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., INC.
`Petitioner
`v.
`
`ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2024-00366
`Patent 8,760,454 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JAMES P. CALVE, BRIAN J. McNAMARA, and
`KEVIN W. CHERRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`McNAMARA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion For Joinder
`37 C.F.R. § 42.122(b)
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2024-00366
`Patent 8,760,454 B2
`
` TCL Industries Holing Co., Ltd. (TCL) filed a petition challenging
`claims 1–11 of U.S. Patent No. 8,760,454 B2. Paper 1. With its Petition
`TCL filed a Motion For Joinder (Paper 3, “Motion” or “Mot.”) to join this
`proceeding with Realtek Semiconductor Corp v. ATI Technologies ULC
`IPR2023-00922 (“the Realtek IPR”).
`TCL’s Motion For Joinder states that its Petition relies on the identical
`arguments and grounds and the same expert opinions and testimony as those
`asserted by the petitioner (Realtek) in the petition filed in the Realtek IPR.
`Mot. 3–4. In the Realtek IPR, we entered a Decision to Institute a trial
`(Paper 10) on December 1, 2023 (Paper 10). On December 5, 2023, we
`entered a Scheduling Order (Paper 11) in the Realtek IPR.
`In its Motion For Joinder TCL agrees that, unless the petitioner in the
`Realtek IPR ceases its participation, TCL will assume an “understudy” role
`that will not impact the schedule, create any additional burdens, or affect the
`cost of the proceeding for either of the Realtek IPR parties. Id. at 4–5.
`ATI Technologies, Inc (Patent Owner) states that, in view of TCL’s
`agreement to assume an understudy role, it does not oppose the joinder.
`Paper 7. In a separate Decision on Institution, we instituted a trail in this
`proceeding.
`In consideration of the above it is:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Joinder is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that IPR2024-00366 is hereby instituted and
`joined with IPR2023-00922;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the grounds on which IPR2023-00922
`was instituted are unchanged and no other grounds are included in the joined
`proceeding;
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2024-00366
`Patent 8,760,454 B2
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Order entered in
`IPR2023-00922 remains unchanged and shall govern the schedule of the
`joined proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that, throughout the joined proceeding,
`Realtek and TCL will file all papers jointly in the joined proceeding as
`consolidated filings, and will identify each such paper as “Consolidated,”
`except that papers filed on behalf of a single party need not be marked
`Consolidated;
`FURTHER ORDERED that, unless Realtek ceases to participate in
`the IPR, TCL may not conduct discovery separately from discovery
`conducted by Realtek or rely on any separate expert opinion;
`FURTHER ORDERD that in the event of an irreconcilable divergence
`in interest between Realtek and TCL or other special circumstances
`requiring TCL to file a separate substantive paper or take any action
`independent of Realtek, TCL shall contact the Board for authorization before
`filing such a paper or taking such action;
`FURTHER ORDERED that IPR2024-00366 is terminated under 37
`C.F.R. § 42.72 and all further filings in the joined proceedings are to be
`made in IPR2023-00922;
`FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Decision will be entered
`into the record of IPR2023-00922; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the case caption in IPR2023-00922 shall
`be changed to reflect joinder with this proceeding in accordance with the
`attached example.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2024-00366
`Patent 8,760,454 B2
`FOR PETITIONER IPR2024-00366:
`
`John Schnurer
`Yun (Louise) Lu
`Kevin J. Patari
`Kyle R. Canavera
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`PerkinsServiceTCL-AMDIPRs@perkinscoie.com
`
`FOR PETITIONER IPR2023-00922:
`
`Jeffrey Johnson
`Christopher J. Higgins
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
`3J6PTABDocket@orrick.com;
`OCHPTABDocket@orrick.com
`Realtek-AMD_OHS@orrick.com
`
`Steve Baik
`WHITE HAT LEGAL
`sbaik@whitehat.legal
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`William A. Meunier
`Michael T. Renaud
`Adam S. Rizk
`Reza Dokhanchy
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,
`GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`WAMeunier@mintz.com
`MTRenaud@mintz.com
`ARizk@mintz.com
`RDokhanchy@mintz.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2024-00366
`Patent 8,760,454 B2
`Example Case Caption for Joined Proceeding
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`REALTECK SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. and
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2023-00922
`Patent 8,760,454 B21
`____________
`
`
`1 Joinder with IPR2024-00366
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket