`
`Proxense’s Proposed Constructions
`
`Patent Claims
`
`Apple’s Proposed Terms, Phrases or Clauses
`
`Proxense’s Proposed Construction
`
`Adopt the Court’s prior construction in Proxense v.
`Samsung:
`
`No construction needed; plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Adopt the Court’s prior construction in Proxense v.
`Samsung:
`
`A signal or notification enabling or announcing access
`
`No construction needed; plain and ordinary meaning
`beyond any terms that the Court previously construed
`in Proxense v. Samsung.
`
`’730 claims 1, 8
`
`’954 patent, claim
`1
`
`’730 claims 1, 8
`
`’954 claim 1
`
`’905 claim 1
`
`’730 claim 8
`
`“persistently storing biometric data of the user and a
`plurality of codes and other data values comprising a
`device ID code uniquely identifying the integrated
`device and a secret decryption value … to a storage
`element”
`/
`“stores biometric data of a user and a plurality of codes
`and other data values comprising a device ID code
`uniquely identifying the integrated device and a secret
`decryption value … to the memory”
`“access message”
`
`“a verification unit, in communication with the memory,
`receives scan data from a biometric scan for comparison
`against the biometric data, and if the scan data matches
`the biometric data, wirelessly sends one or more codes
`from the plurality of codes and the other data values for
`authentication by an agent that is a third- party trusted
`authority possessing a list of device ID codes uniquely
`identifying legitimate integrated devices”
`
`1
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012, Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`’730 claims 1, 8
`
`’954 claim 1
`
`’905 claim 1
`
`’989 claim 1
`
`’730 claims 1, 8
`
`’954 claim 1
`
`’042 patent claims
`1, 6
`
`’188 patent claims
`1, 3, 4, 7
`’042 patent claim
`1
`’188 patent claim
`1
`’042 patent claims
`1, 6
`
`’188 patent claim
`1
`
`“device ID code”
`/
`“ID code”
`/
`“identification (ID) code”
`
`Adopt the Court’s prior construction in Proxense v.
`Samsung:
`
`A unique code identifying a device
`
`“tamper proof format”
`
`Adopt the Court’s prior construction in Proxense v.
`Samsung:
`
`“hybrid device”
`
`“A hybrid device comprising”
`
`No construction needed; plain and ordinary meaning
`Adopt the Court’s prior construction in Proxense v.
`Samsung:
`
`A device comprising an integrated personal digital key
`(PDK) and an integrated receiver-decoder circuit.
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No construction necessary
`beyond adopting the Court’s prior construction of
`“hybrid device” in Proxense v. Samsung.
`
`“personal digital key (PDK)”
`
`Adopt the Court’s prior construction in Proxense v.
`Samsung:
`
`An operably connected collection of elements
`including an antenna and a transceiver for
`communicating with a RDC and a controller and
`memory for storing information particular to a user
`
`2
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012, Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`’042 patent claims
`1, 6
`
`’188 patent claims
`1, 3
`
`“receiver-decoder circuit (RDC)”
`
`Adopt the Court’s prior construction in Proxense v.
`Samsung:
`
`A component or collection of components, capable of
`wirelessly receiving data in an encrypted format and
`decoding the encrypted data for processing
`
`3
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012, Page 3 of 3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
