throbber
To:
`Subject:
`
` Trials
` RE: Request for Conference Call re Joinder in Apple v. Proxense IPR2025-00075 with IPR2024-
`00783
`
`From: James Zak <jzak@hechtpartners.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:03 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>; Belnap, Paul H. <PHBelnap@duanemorris.com>; David Hecht <dhecht@hechtpartners.com>;
`Proxense <proxense@hechtpartners.com>; Woo, Philip <PWWoo@duanemorris.com>; Squire, Monté T.
`<MTSquire@duanemorris.com>; Bartow, D. Stuart <DSBartow@duanemorris.com>; Bell, Cory <Cory.Bell@finnegan.com>;
`Pamm Moreno Vegas <pmorenovega@hechtpartners.com>; Selina Kyle <admin@hechtpartners.com>; Arner, Erika
`<erika.arner@finnegan.com>; Specht, Kara <Kara.Specht@finnegan.com>; Aguilar, Safiya <Safiya.Aguilar@finnegan.com>;
`Google-Proxense-IPRs <Google-Proxense-IPRs@finnegan.com>; Chang, Shawn <Shawn.Chang@finnegan.com>
`Subject: Re: Request for Conference Call re Joinder in Apple v. Proxense IPR2025-00075 with IPR2024-00783
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before responding, clicking on links, or
`opening attachments.
`
`Honorable Board,
`
`Patent Owner does not oppose Petitioner’s Motion for Joinder. Accordingly, should the Board grant Petitioner’s
`Motion, Patent Owner does not believe filing a Patent Owner Preliminary Response would benefit the Board.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`James A. Zak, Esq.
`Counsel for Proxense
`
`Hecht Partners LLP
`
`125 Park Ave. 25th Floor
`New York, NY 10017
`E: jzak@hechtpartners.com
`P: (651) 357-8517
`
`From: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 9:31 AM
`To: Belnap, Paul H. <PHBelnap@duanemorris.com>; David Hecht <dhecht@hechtpartners.com>; James Zak
`<jzak@hechtpartners.com>; Proxense <proxense@hechtpartners.com>; Woo, Philip <PWWoo@duanemorris.com>; Squire,
`Monté T. <MTSquire@duanemorris.com>; Bartow, D. Stuart <DSBartow@duanemorris.com>; Bell, Cory
`<Cory.Bell@finnegan.com>; Pamm Moreno Vegas <pmorenovega@hechtpartners.com>; Selina Kyle
`<admin@hechtpartners.com>; Arner, Erika <erika.arner@finnegan.com>; Specht, Kara <Kara.Specht@finnegan.com>; Aguilar,
`Safiya <Safiya.Aguilar@finnegan.com>; Google-Proxense-IPRs <Google-Proxense-IPRs@finnegan.com>; Chang, Shawn
`<Shawn.Chang@finnegan.com>
`Cc: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Subject: RE: Request for Conference Call re Joinder in Apple v. Proxense IPR2025-00075 with IPR2024-00783
`
`Counsel,
`
`Ex. 3001
`IPR2025-00075
`
`file:///S/...ference%20Call%20re%20Joinder%20in%20Apple%20v.%20Proxense%20IPR2025-00075%20with%20IPR2024-00783%20.htm[1/6/2025 10:50:18 AM]
`
`

`

`The above-identified case now been paneled. The parties shall indicate by responsive email whether there are any
`matters they would like to discuss with the Board at this time. If not, in lieu of convening a conference call, the panel
`asks Patent Owner to indicate via return email whether it waives the filing of a Preliminary Response.
`
`Regards,
`
`Tina Lee
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`
`From: Belnap, Paul H. <PHBelnap@duanemorris.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 1:48 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: dhecht@hechtpartners.com; jzak@hechtpartners.com; proxense@hechtpartners.com; Woo, Philip
`<PWWoo@duanemorris.com>; Squire, Monté T. <MTSquire@duanemorris.com>; Bartow, D. Stuart
`<DSBartow@duanemorris.com>; Pamm Moreno Vegas <pmorenovega@hechtpartners.com>; Selina Kyle
`<admin@hechtpartners.com>; Arner, Erika <erika.arner@finnegan.com>; Specht, Kara <Kara.Specht@finnegan.com>; Bell, Cory
`<Cory.Bell@finnegan.com>; Aguilar, Safiya <Safiya.Aguilar@finnegan.com>; Google-Proxense-IPRs <Google-Proxense-
`IPRs@finnegan.com>; Chang, Shawn <Shawn.Chang@finnegan.com>
`Subject: Request for Conference Call re Joinder in Apple v. Proxense IPR2025-00075 with IPR2024-00783
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before responding, clicking on links, or
`opening attachments.
`
`To the Honorable Members of the Board,
`
`Apple has filed IPR2025-00075 seeking to join Google, LLC v. Proxense, LLC, IPR2024-00783.
`
`Pursuant to Section II(J) of the Trial Practice Guide, Google, Apple, and Proxense (Patent Owner) are reaching out to arrange a
`conference call with the panel of the Google-filed proceedings “to timely manage the proceedings.”
`
`All parties are available anytime on Friday, November 15th.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
` www.duanemorris.com
` Paul H. Belnap
`Associate
`Duane Morris LLP
`901 New York Avenue N.W., Suite
`
`700 East
`Washington, DC 20001-4795
` E-MAIL | BIO | VCARD
`
`
`
`P: +1 202 776 7879
`F: +1 202 478 2897
`
`
`Counsel for Apple
`
`For more information about Duane Morris, please visit http://www.DuaneMorris.com
`
`Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have
`received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.
`
`file:///S/...ference%20Call%20re%20Joinder%20in%20Apple%20v.%20Proxense%20IPR2025-00075%20with%20IPR2024-00783%20.htm[1/6/2025 10:50:18 AM]
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket