IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`C.A. No. 6:24-cv-188-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`))))))))))
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TESLA, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF
`PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`Pursuant to the Joint Notice Regarding Preliminary Contentions (Dkt. 19) and P.R. 3-1 and
`
`3-2, Plaintiff Intellectual Ventures II LLC ( “Plaintiff” or “IV”), hereby provides its Initial
`
`Infringement Contentions to Defendant Tesla, Inc. (hereinafter, “Defendant” or “Tesla”) for U.S.
`
`Patent Nos. 7,336,805 (“the ’805 Patent”), 9,706,500 (“the ’500 Patent”), 10,292,138 (“the ’138
`
`Patent”), 10,952,153 (“the ’153 Patent”), 8,898,395 (“the ’395 Patent”), 10,136,416 (“the ’416
`
`Patent”), 7,916,180 (“the ’180 Patent”), 9,232,158 (“the ’158 Patent”), and 7,181,743 (“the ’743
`
`Patent”), 6,894,639 (“the ’639 Patent”), 11,206,670 (“the ’670 Patent”), 11,664,889 (“the ’889
`
`Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents” or “Patents-in-Suit”).
`
`IV makes this disclosure based on the information presently available to it. Discovery in this
`
`case has not started, and IV reserves its right to amend or supplement these disclosures as permitted
`
`by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by the local rules of the Western District of Texas, and by
`
`order of the Court, including the Scheduling Conference Order.
`
`For each Asserted Patent, Plaintiff identifies the following Accused Instrumentalities of
`
`which it is currently aware. The identification of Accused Instrumentalities is based on Plaintiff’s
`
`research and analysis to date, without the benefit of discovery from the Defendant. Plaintiff
`
`reserves the right to add, delete, substitute or otherwise amend this list of Accused
`
`
`Ex.1014 / Page 1 of 9Ex.1014 / Page 1 of 9
`
`TESLA, INC.TESLA, INC.
`
`

`

`Instrumentalities based on discovery or other circumstances, in a manner consistent with the
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, local rules, and standing order.
`
`The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, the following:
`
` The ’805 Patent. The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, Tesla automotive
`vehicles that are equipped with Autopilot technology, and all past, current and future Tesla
`products that operate in the same or substantially similar manner as the specifically identified
`products and components, and all past, current and future Tesla products that have the same or
`substantially similar features as the specifically identified products and components. Exhibit
`1.
`
` The ’500 Patent. The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, Tesla automotive
`vehicles that are equipped with Connectivity features, and all past, current and future Tesla
`products that operate in the same or substantially similar manner as the specifically identified
`products and components, and all past, current, and future Tesla products that have the same
`or substantially similar features as the specifically identified products and components. Exhibit
`2.
`
` The ’138 Patent. The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, Tesla automotive
`vehicles that are equipped with Connectivity features and all past, current and future Tesla
`products that operate in the same or substantially similar manner as the specifically identified
`products and components, and all past, current and future Tesla products that have the same or
`substantially similar features as the specifically identified products and components. Exhibit
`3.
`
` The ’153 Patent. The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, Tesla automotive
`vehicles that are equipped with Connectivity features, and all past, current, and future Tesla
`products that operate in the same or substantially similar manner as the specifically identified
`products and components, and all past, current and future Tesla products that have the same or
`substantially similar features as the specifically identified products and components. Exhibit
`4.
`
` The ’395 Patent. The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, Tesla automotive
`vehicles that are equipped with a computer system that includes memory management features,
`and all past, current and future Tesla products that operate in the same or substantially similar
`manner as the specifically identified products and components, and all past, current and future
`Tesla products that have the same or substantially similar features as the specifically identified
`products and components. Exhibit 5.
`
` The ’416 Patent. The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, Tesla automotive
`vehicles that are equipped with Connectivity features, and all past, current and future Tesla
`products that operate in the same or substantially similar manner as the specifically identified
`products and components, and all past, current and future Tesla products that have the same or
`substantially similar features as the specifically identified products and components. Exhibit
`6.
`
`2
`
`
`Ex.1014 / Page 2 of 9Ex.1014 / Page 2 of 9
`
`TESLA, INC.TESLA, INC.
`
`

`

` The ’180 Patent. The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, Tesla automotive
`vehicles that are equipped with Autopilot technology, and all past, current and future Tesla
`products that operate in the same or substantially similar manner as the specifically identified
`products and components, and all past, current, and future Tesla products that have the same
`or substantially similar features as the specifically identified products and components. Exhibit
`7.
`
` The ’158 Patent. The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, Tesla automotive
`vehicles that are equipped with Autopilot technology, and all past, current and future Tesla
`products that operate in the same or substantially similar manner as the specifically identified
`products and components, and all past, current and future Tesla products that have the same or
`substantially similar features as the specifically identified products and components. Exhibit
`8.
`
` The ’743 Patent. The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, Tesla
`infrastructure for supporting Tesla automotive vehicles, and all past, current and future Tesla
`products that operate in the same or substantially similar manner as the specifically identified
`products and components, and all past, current and future Tesla products that have the same or
`substantially similar features as the specifically identified products and components. Exhibit
`9.
`
` The ’639 Patent. The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, Tesla automotive
`vehicles that are equipped with Autopilot technology, and all past, current and future Tesla
`products that operate in the same or substantially similar manner as the specifically identified
`products and components, and all past, current, and future Tesla products that have the same
`or substantially similar features as the specifically identified products and components. Exhibit
`10.
`
` The ’670 Patent. The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, Tesla automotive
`vehicles that are equipped with Connectivity features, and all past, current and future Tesla
`products that operate in the same or substantially similar manner as the specifically identified
`products and components, and all past, current, and future Tesla products that have the same
`or substantially similar features as the specifically identified products and components. Exhibit
`11.
`
` The ’889 Patent. The Accused Instrumentalities include, without limitation, Tesla automotive
`vehicles that are equipped with Connectivity features, and all past, current and future Tesla
`products that operate in the same or substantially similar manner as the specifically identified
`products and components, and all past, current and future Tesla products that have the same or
`substantially similar features as the specifically identified products and components. Exhibit
`12.
`
` All past, current and future Tesla products and services that operate in the same or substantially
`
`similar manner as the specifically identified products and services above and described in
`
`3
`
`
`Ex.1014 / Page 3 of 9Ex.1014 / Page 3 of 9
`
`TESLA, INC.TESLA, INC.
`
`

`

`Exhibits 1-12 (claim charts identifying specifically where each element of each asserted claim
`
`is found within each Accused Instrumentality).
`
` All past, current and future Tesla products and services that have the same or substantially
`
`similar features as the specifically identified products and services above and described in
`
`Exhibits 1-12, (claim charts identifying specifically where each element of each asserted claim
`
`is found within each Accused Instrumentality).
`
`Plaintiff’s infringement contentions apply to the Accused Instrumentalities as well as all
`
`other past, current and future hardware and software products and services developed, made, used,
`
`offered for sale, sold, imported, and provided by Tesla that contain or make use of the Patented
`
`Technology.1 This identification of Accused Instrumentalities is based upon Plaintiff’s diligent
`
`investigation to date, and without the benefit of any discovery from the Defendant and without the
`
`benefit of the Court’s claim construction. Plaintiff expressly reserves the right to add, delete,
`
`substitute or otherwise amend this list of Accused Instrumentalities based on discovery, the Court’s
`
`claim construction, or other circumstances, in a manner consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure and the Court’s rule, including the local Patent Rules.
`
`These preliminary infringement contentions are based upon publicly-available information
`
`and Plaintiff’s diligent investigation to date, and without the benefit of any substantial discovery
`
`from the Defendant and without the benefit of the Court’s claim construction. Plaintiff anticipates
`
`that discovery may provide additional evidence of Defendant’s infringement, may lead to the
`
`discovery of additional instances of infringement, and may also enable identification of additional
`
`claims that are infringed by Defendant.
`
`1 “Patented Technology” means all technologies described in the claims of the Patents-in-Suit.
`4
`
`
`Ex.1014 / Page 4 of 9Ex.1014 / Page 4 of 9
`
`TESLA, INC.TESLA, INC.
`
`

`

`Based upon currently available information, IV asserts that Tesla has infringed and/or
`
`continues to infringe the patents and claims identified in the attached claim charts (the “Asserted
`
`Claims” of the Patents-in-Suit). Infringement claim charts evidencing the correspondence between
`
`(i) the elements of the Asserted Claims, and (ii) the corresponding items of the accused products
`
`are attached hereto. Further, Exhibits 1-12, which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference,
`
`are exemplary infringement claim charts identifying specifically where each limitation of each
`
`Asserted Claim is found within each Accused Instrumentality or practiced by each Accused
`
`Instrumentality.
`
`Plaintiff asserts that Defendant has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the
`
`Asserted Claims literally through the Accused Instrumentalities by making, using, offering for sale,
`
`selling, and/or importing into the United States the Accused Instrumentalities. To the extent that
`
`Defendant alleges that one or more limitations of the Asserted Claims are not literally found in the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities, Plaintiff alleges that such limitations are found in or practiced by the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities under the doctrine of equivalents. Any differences alleged to exist
`
`between any of the Asserted Claims and any of the Accused Instrumentalities are insubstantial and
`
`that each Accused Instrumentality also meets each limitation under the doctrine of equivalents as
`
`the identified features of the Accused Instrumentality performs substantially the same function in
`
`substantially the same way to achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding claim
`
`limitation. IV reserves the right to assert infringement solely under the doctrine of equivalents with
`
`respect to any particular claim element(s), if warranted by discovery, further analysis, and/or claim
`
`constructions in this case.
`
`These assertions are based upon Plaintiff’s diligent investigation to date, and without the
`
`benefit of any substantial discovery from the Defendant and without the benefit of the Court’s
`
`claim construction. Plaintiff reserves the right to add, delete, substitute or otherwise amend these
`5
`
`
`Ex.1014 / Page 5 of 9Ex.1014 / Page 5 of 9
`
`TESLA, INC.TESLA, INC.
`
`

`

`infringement allegations based on discovery, the Court’s claim construction, or other
`
`circumstances, in a manner consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court’s
`
`rules, including the local Patent Rules.
`
`Plaintiff further asserts that Defendant has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly
`
`infringe by actively inducing infringement of one or more of the claims of the Asserted Patents
`
`through the Accused Instrumentalities. Plaintiff further asserts that Defendant has indirectly
`
`infringed and continues to indirectly infringe by contributory infringement by (at least) providing
`
`replacement parts to Tesla vehicles and repair facilities by least making components that suitable
`
`for direct infringement that do not have any substantial non-infringing use.
`
`Plaintiff also asserts that these third-parties directly infringe at least one or more of the
`
`claims of the Asserted Patents through the manufacture, use, sale, offer to sell, or importation of
`
`the Accused Instrumentalities.
`
`For example, Defendant has actively induced infringement by encouraging the use of the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities in ways that infringe each Asserted Claim. Defendant knew or should
`
`have known that such encouragement would induce infringement. Defendant has taken active steps
`
`with the specific intent to encourage and cause others to use each Accused Instrumentality in ways
`
`that infringes each Asserted Claim. Such active steps by Defendant with specific intent to induce
`
`infringement have included, among other things, advertising, promoting, marketing, making
`
`available for use, offering to sell, and/or selling the Accused Instrumentalities to others;
`
`encouraging and influencing others to import, offer to sell, and/or sell the Accused
`
`Instrumentalities; directing and instructing others to use the Accused Instrumentalities in
`
`infringing ways, including providing and promoting the described hardware and/or software
`
`components and features that when used in their normal and customary ways as intended and
`
`design infringe; and by providing the Accused Instrumentalities to others. Tesla has performed the
`6
`
`
`Ex.1014 / Page 6 of 9Ex.1014 / Page 6 of 9
`
`TESLA, INC.TESLA, INC.
`
`

`

`aforementioned active steps with the knowledge of the Asserted Patents through receipt of a letter
`
`dated April 11, 2024 and received by Defendant on the same date, and also as of the date when the
`
`complaint in this case was filed. Tesla has known or should have known that the acts it has induced
`
`constitute infringement because, for instance, it has been aware that end users and resellers will
`
`purchase the Accused Instrumentalities and use them, resulting in direct infringement.
`
`IV further reserves the right to supplement or revise its infringement contentions and/or
`
`charts. Such supplement may be based upon, for example, further discovery. Further, IV reserves
`
`the right to supplement or revise its infringement contentions and/or chart, including identification
`
`of additional asserted claims, based on, for example, new versions or variations of one or more of
`
`the accused products that are later discovered.
`
`Each of the Asserted Claims of the ’805 Patent is entitled to a priority date of no later than
`
`June 16, 2004. Each of the Asserted Claims of the ’500 Patent is entitled to a priority date of no
`
`later than August 12, 2004. Each of the Asserted Claims of the ’138 Patent is entitled to a priority
`
`date of no later than May 8, 2006. Each of the Asserted Claims of the ’153 Patent is entitled to a
`
`priority date of no later than Aug. 12, 2004. Each of the Asserted Claims of the ’395 Patent is
`
`entitled to a priority date of no later than Apr. 7, 2005. Each of the Asserted Claims of the ’416
`
`Patent is entitled to a priority date of no later than September 27, 2007. Each of the Asserted Claims
`
`of the ’180 Patent is entitled to a priority date of no later than August 25, 2005. Each of the Asserted
`
`Claims of the ’158 Patent is entitled to a priority date of no later than August 25, 2005. Each of
`
`the Asserted Claims of the ’743 Patent is entitled to a priority date of no later than May 24, 2001.
`
`Each of the Asserted Claims of the ’639 Patent is entitled to a priority date of no later than
`
`December 18, 1991. Each of the Asserted Claims of the ’670 Patent is entitled to a priority date of
`
`no later than January 20, 2012. Each of the Asserted Claims of the ’889 Patent is entitled to a
`
`priority date of no later than December 27, 2006. The subject matter described by the Asserted
`7
`
`
`Ex.1014 / Page 7 of 9Ex.1014 / Page 7 of 9
`
`TESLA, INC.TESLA, INC.
`
`

`

`Claims, however, may have been conceived and reduced to practice prior to these dates. Plaintiff’s
`
`research and analysis is ongoing and Plaintiff reserves the right to assert that the claims are entitled
`
`to a priority date that is earlier than the above dates.
`
`Dated: August 1, 2024
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Jonathan K. Waldrop
`Jonathan K. Waldrop (CA Bar No. 297903)
`(Admitted in this District)
`jwaldrop@kasowitz.com
`Darcy L. Jones (CA Bar No. 309474)
`(Admitted in this District)
`djones@kasowitz.com
`Marcus A. Barber (CA Bar No. 307361)
`(Admitted in this District)
`mbarber@kasowitz.com
`John W. Downing (CA Bar No. 252850)
`(Admitted in this District)
`jdowning@kasowitz.com
`Heather S. Kim (CA Bar No. 277686)
`(Admitted in this District)
`hkim@kasowitz.com
`ThucMinh Nguyen (CA Bar No. 304382)
`(Admitted in this District)
`tnguyen@kasowitz.com
`KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES LLP
`333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, California 94065
`Telephone: (650) 453-5170
`Facsimile: (650) 453-5171
`
`Mark D. Siegmund (TX Bar No. 24117055)
`msiegmund@cjsjlaw.com
`CHERRY JOHNSON SIEGMUND
`JAMES PLLC
`The Roosevelt Tower
`400 Austin Avenue, 9th Floor
`Waco, Texas 76701
`Telephone: (254) 732-2242
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC
`
`8
`
`
`Ex.1014 / Page 8 of 9Ex.1014 / Page 8 of 9
`
`TESLA, INC.TESLA, INC.
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or
`
`delivered electronically, via email, to all counsel of record, on this 1st day of August 2024.
`
`/s/ Jonathan K. Waldrop
`Jonathan K. Waldrop
`
`
`
`
`Ex.1014 / Page 9 of 9Ex.1014 / Page 9 of 9
`
`TESLA, INC.TESLA, INC.
`
`