throbber
Case: 4:24-cv-00118-BYP Doc #: 13 Filed: 03/26/24 1 of 3. PageID #: 71
`
`PEARSON, J.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
`EASTERN DIVISION
`
`CASE NO. 4:24CV0118
`
`JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON
`
`ORDER
`[Resolving ECF No. 10]
`
`)))))))))
`
`ALTRONIC LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`MOTORTECH GMBH, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Pending is Defendant MOTORtech Gmbh’s (“MOTORtech”) Motion to Stay Pursuant to
`
`28 U.S.C. § 1659(a) (ECF No. 10), filed on February 26, 2024. Counsel for Plaintiff Altronic
`
`LLC has informed MOTORtech that Plaintiff does not oppose a stay of all proceedings in the
`
`above-entitled action alleging patent infringement. See ECF No. 10 at PageID #: 66-67, ¶ 7. For
`
`good cause shown, the motion is granted.
`
`On January 10, 2024, Plaintiff filed a complaint with the United States International
`
`Trade Commission (“ITC”) under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1337,
`
`against MOTORtech and its affiliate MotorTech Americas, LLC, alleging they have infringed
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,401,603 (“the Asserted Patent”). See 89 Fed. Reg. 11314-01, 2024 WL
`
`582276 (Feb. 14, 2024).
`
`Nine days later, Plaintiff filed the Complaint (ECF No. 1) in the case at bar. As with its
`
`ITC complaint, Plaintiff alleges that MOTORtech has infringed the Asserted Patent. See ECF
`
`No. 1 at PageID #: 1, ¶ 2. The Complaint also names as Defendants Jane or John Does,
`
`Exhibit 1019
`MOTORTECH v. Altronic - IPR2025-00398
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`Case: 4:24-cv-00118-BYP Doc #: 13 Filed: 03/26/24 2 of 3. PageID #: 72
`
`(4:24CV0118)
`
`unidentified entities that Plaintiff “may add” after obtaining discovery. ECF No. 1 at PageID #:
`
`2, ¶ 5.1 The Complaint’s claim of infringement of the Asserted Patent is the only count
`
`pleaded. See ECF No. 1 at PageID #: 6-9, ¶¶ 31-37.
`
`On February 8, 2024, the ITC instituted Investigation No. 337-TA-1390 (the “1390
`
`Investigation”) based on Plaintiff’s complaint. The ITC’s Notice of Institution names
`
`MOTORtech as a Respondent in the 1390 Investigation.
`
`Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a), a stay of all proceedings in the case at bar is required.
`
`That statute provides that a party in a civil action that is also a party to a proceeding before the
`
`ITC under section 337 may request a mandatory stay of the civil action within “30 days after the
`
`party is named as a respondent” in the ITC proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a). Upon such a
`
`request, the district court must stay proceedings in the civil action “with respect to any claim that
`
`involves the same issues involved” in the ITC investigation until the ITC’s determination in the
`
`investigation “becomes final.” Id.
`
`Accordingly Defendant MOTORtech Gmbh’s Motion to Stay (ECF No. 10) is granted.
`
`All proceedings in the case at bar are stayed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a) pending a final
`
`determination by the ITC as to the Asserted Patent, including as to any appeals. Within 14 days
`
`of when the ITC’s determination in the 1390 Investigation becomes final, the parties shall file a
`
`1 The Court exercises its inherent authority to stay the proceedings as to these
`unidentified parties. See DSM Desotech, Inc. v. Momentive Specialty Chemicals, Inc.,
`No. 2:15-cv-70, 2017 WL 11634919, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 6, 2017) (staying civil action
`under § 1659(a) and, as to party not named as a respondent in parallel ITC investigation,
`under the court’s inherent authority) (citing Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55
`(1936)).
`
`2
`
`Exhibit 1019
`MOTORTECH v. Altronic - IPR2025-00398
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`Case: 4:24-cv-00118-BYP Doc #: 13 Filed: 03/26/24 3 of 3. PageID #: 73
`
`(4:24CV0118)
`
`Joint Status Report informing the Court of the result and the effect of the proceedings upon the
`
`claims in the present case. The case is administratively closed, subject to reopening upon written
`
`motion. No claims or defenses, including lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, are
`
`waived as a result of the stay. A written motion to reopen, preferably joint, shall set forth a
`
`proposed schedule for the case going forward.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
` March 26, 2024
`Date
`
` /s/ Benita Y. Pearson
`Benita Y. Pearson
`United States District Judge
`
`3
`
`Exhibit 1019
`MOTORTECH v. Altronic - IPR2025-00398
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket