James A. Proctor Jr.
`1680 North Riverside Drive, Indialantic, FL 32903 - (321) 271-8411 - jproctor@ieee.org
`
`EDUCATION
`M.S. Electrical Engineering
`Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
`Graduated:
`September 1992
`Interests:
`Digital Signal Processing, Communications, Optics
`The University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
`B.S. Electrical Engineering
`Graduated:
`May 1991
`Minor Studies:
`Business
`Honors & Activities:
`PI ETA SIGMA Honor Society
`ALPHA LAMBDA DELTA Freshman Honor Society
`ETA KAPPA NU National Electrical Engineering Fraternity
`
`Skills & Achievements
`
`-
`
`-
`
`Successfully led Qualcomm / WiDeFi integration efforts resulting in a new product effort within
`Qualcomm related to the 3G/4G Market
`Co-founded WiDeFi and successfully raised >$14M of venture funding
`-
`- Generated intellectual property and product strategy leading to the acquisition of two companies
`(WiDeFi, and Tantivy Communications), contributing to > $100M of revenue
`Performed extensive customer and industry business development to provide support for innovative
`product definition, requirement definition, and customer support for business plan and forecasts
`(Qualcomm, WiDeFi, and Tantivy Communications)
`Led and coached many R&D teams to refine and de-risk innovative wireless concepts
`-
`Led cross functional product teams to deliver high volume ready prototypes
`-
`Ability to balance market, programmatic, and technical concerns and refine clear strategy and
`-
`actionable plans
`- Generated >325 issued US Patents Currently and >700 international patent publications
`Have spoken at numerous public events: industry, venture, and technical
`-
`Strong communication and technical skills
`-
`
`Work Experience
`Proctor Consulting, LLC
`December 2008 - Present
`Early stage market and technology strategy
`-
`o Interim CTO/Team Member, business development/validation
`o Roadmap / IP development
`o Advisory Board Member
`Technical / Market Consultant
`o Fastback Networks, Audigence, Peregrine Semiconductor
`Intellectual property portfolio analysis within the communications market space
`o Market / Product Applicability, Claims Chart Development and Analysis, Valuation
`o Expert Witness Consulting in Wireless Communications (WiFi, WoWiFi, 2G-GSM, 3G-
`C2K/WCDMA, 4G/LTE, VoLTE, 5G/NR, and associated networks)
`
`-
`
`-
`
`November 2011 – Present
`Proxicom Wireless. Co-Founder, Managing Director
`Proximity based mobile technology utilizing a centralized trusted third party
`-
`Development of foundational Intellectual Property (17+ US Patents)
`-
`Enabling technology applicable to a variety of proximity based applications including highly secure:
`-
`Mobile Payments, Electronic Coupons and Loyalty, Rating and Reviews, Social Commerce
`
`1
`
`Proctor CV
`
`PETITIONERS EXHIBIT 1027
`Page 1 of 15
`
`

`

`-
`
`-
`
` October 2007 - October 2009
`
`
`Qualcomm Inc., Principal Engineer (Consulting)
`Technical and Business development leadership of a consumer level 3G wireless repeater product
`-
`concept based upon WiDeFi’s technology during the integration
`Provided technical leadership in architecture development
`o Defined initial architecture approach for the wireless repeater concept based upon WiDeFi’s
`technology
`o Worked with technical team to refine approach and achieve “key proof points”
`Performed Business Development with International Wireless Operators
`o Worked closely with business development from ESG and QCT divisions
`o Developed bottoms up forecast with the top international wireless operators for consumer
`repeater products.
`o Refined product features to meet carrier’s requirements
`- Market Analysis to estimate Market Size and Competitive Landscape
`- Named inventor on 44+ Issued or pending patents for Qualcomm on wireless repeater concepts
`
`August 2005 - October 2007
`
`
`WiDeFi, Inc., EVP/CTO, and Co-Founder, Director
`- Focused on aligning WiDeFi’s technology and product roadmaps to customer and market drivers
`o Strategic and Technical Marketing, Product Definition
`o Market Analysis to estimate Market Size and Competitive Landscape
`o Collaborated with customers and internal team to define and pursue product/customer
`opportunities (Retail Wi-Fi, Mesh Repeater, VoiP over Wi-Fi Repeater, Cellular Repeaters, Wi-
`Max Repeaters, In-Building Distribution Systems)
`o Customer Development from initial contact, joint testing, first purchase order, to new product
`introduction
`o Contributed to and managed WiDeFi’s IP portfolio
`o Pursued fund raising from corporate and venture capital communities
`
`July 2002 - August 2005
`
`WiDeFi, Inc., President, CEO, and Co-Founder, Director
`Led WiDeFi from inception to the recruitment of an expansion-stage CEO.
`-
`Principal duties:
`-
`o Direct Fundraising of initial seed and Series A Venture Capital
`o General Management (Finance, Business Administration, Legal/Contracts and Organizational
`Development/Recruiting)
`o Coordination of Board of Directors and Investors
`o Sales (WiDeFi was Cash Flow positive prior to venture investment)
`
`
`
`
`
`April 1998 - June 2002
`
`
`
`
`
`Tantivy Communications
`Director of Strategic and Technical Marketing
`- Business Development/Technical Due Diligence
`- Represented Tantivy in a wide range of Wireless Broad Band Industry Conferences
`Intellectual Property Management and Strategy
`-
`o Represented Tantivy’s Patents and their value to External Companies
`o Performed Validity, Infringement, and Value Analysis of Tantivy Patents for non-Tantivy products
`Industry Standards Representation for 3G Technologies
`o TIA/3GPP2, Over 15 Technical Contributions/Papers
`o T1P1 (3GPP Member)
`- Project Management of an International Technology Transfer Team (S Korea)
`- Performed System Architecture and Analysis
`
`Spectrian, Advanced Development and Technical Marketing
`Interfaced with NORTEL/Qualcomm’s Product Management
`-
`- Performed Advanced Technology Development/Systems Analysis
`
`-
`
`1995 - April 1998
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Proctor CV
`
`PETITIONERS EXHIBIT 1027
`Page 2 of 15
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`September 1992 - 1995
`
`June 1991 - August 1992
`May 1990 - August 1990
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Harris Corp. GCSD,
`Senior Engineer Signal Processing Section, Modems Group
`
`Georgia Tech Research Institute, CSITL
`
`Harris Corp.. ISD, Electro-optics, Co-op
`- Acousto-optic signal processing
`
`
`
`
` Standards Development
`- Participated in architecting “Internet CDMA” (I-CDMA)
`Jointly led establishment of the Committee T1, working group T1P1.4 “WWINA” standardization
`-
`effort, which stands for “Wireless Wideband Internet Access”
`o T1 Approved this system as the T1.723-2002 standard
`- ATIS approved as ATIS0700723-2002 I-CDMA Spread Spectrum Systems Air Interface Standard
`- Participated in 3GPP2 Standards Developments (including 15+ technical contributions)
`
`Intellectual Property
`- More than 325 Issued U.S. Patents
`- More than 700 Issued or Pending International Patent Applications (WIPO)
`- Patents Cited at the USPTO more than 6000 times
`55+ Patents Assigned to Intel
`-
`45+ Patents Assigned to Qualcomm
`-
`16+ Patents designated as “Standards Essential” for UMTS (WCDMA)
`-
`6+ Patents designated as “Standards Essential” for LTE
`-
`
`
`
`Testifying Expert Experience
`
`SPH Am., LLC v. Acer, Inc., 09CV02535-CAB MDD, 2012 WL 1344515 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2012).
`Testifying Expert offering opinions on validity for the defense. The technology related to WCDMA
`modulation techniques. Resulted in settlement prior to trial.
`
`WI-LAN USA, INC. and WI-LAN INC. v. ELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and ERICSSON INC., Case No.
`l:12-23569-Civ (S.D. FL)
`Testifying expert offering opinions on infringement for the defense. The technology involved LTE
`“contention free” handover (CFRA), and Media Access Control (MAC) layer messaging for Quality of Service (QOS).
`Resulted in a summary judgement finding of non-infringement for the defense, and settlement after appeal.
`
`U.S. ETHERNET INNOVATIONS, LLC. V. STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.,
`Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-4181-MHS-JDL
`Testifying expert offering opinions on both validity and infringement for the defense. The technology related
`to Ethernet devices. Resulted in settlement prior to trial.
`
`UNWIRED PLANET. V. SQUARE, INC.,
`Case No. 3:13-CV-00579-RCJ-WGC, DISTRICT OF NEVADA,
`Case CBM2014-00156, Case IPR2014-01164, Case IPR2014-01165, UNITED STATES PATENT TRIAL AND
`APPEAL BOARD,
`Provided testimony related to claim construction, and validity for the defense. The technology was related to
`location based services (LBS). The case resulted in a finding by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of unpatentability
`of all asserted claims.
`
`PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC. V. T-MOBILE USA, INC., Case No. 12-CV-124
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Proctor CV
`
`PETITIONERS EXHIBIT 1027
`Page 3 of 15
`
`

`

`Testifying expert at trial, and deposition offering opinions on both validity and infringement for the defense.
`The technology was related to SIM/USIM/ISIM based authentication in UMTS, LTE, and IMS networks. The case
`resulted in a jury verdict of non-infringement.
`
`FASTVDO LLC. V. AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Services, Inc., and Apple Inc.,
`Case No. 3:16-cv-00385-H-WVG
`Engaged by Apple as the testifying expert offering opinions on infringement for the defense. The technology
`was related to Forward Error Correction (FEC) and voice codecs in GSM and WCDMA standards, including detailed
`FEC performance simulations. The case was concluded based upon an IPR outcome finding unpatentable subject
`matter by the PTAB.
`
`BLACKBERRY LIMITED V. BLU PRODUCTS, INC.,
`Case No.: 16-23535-CIV-MORENO
`Engaged by Blackberry as the testifying expert offering opinions on infringement for the plaintiff. The
`technology involved WCDMA and battery saving techniques in Radio Resource Control (RRC) states. The case was
`settled between the parties prior to trial.
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT LLC V. AT&T Inc., and Apple Inc.
`Case No.: 2:15-cv-00576-RWS-RSP
`Engaged by Apple as the testifying expert offering opinions on validity and benefits of the alleged inventions
`for the defense. The technology involved Media Access Control (MAC) messaging for LTE (Power Headroom
`Reporting) and LTE Advanced (CSI reporting for Carrier Aggregation). The case resulted in summary judgement for
`the defense.
`
`GENERAL ACCESS SOLUTIONS, LTD. v. Sprint Corporation et al.
`Civil Action No. 2:16-cv- 00465 (E.D. Tex.) and PTAB Proceedings (IPR2017-01885 (Patent 7,173,916 B2) IPR2017-
`01887 (Patent 6,891,810 B2) IPR2017-01889 (Patent 7,230,931 B2),
`
`Engaged by Sprint to provide expert testimony relating to claim construction, and validity for the defense
`before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) relating to an Inter Partes Review petition, providing multiple expert
`declarations, and deposition testimony. The technology related to Adaptive Modulation and Coding (AMC) in a
`wireless system; Adaptive Beamforming, Sectorization, and Multi-Input Multi-Output (MIMO). All trials were instituted
`by the PTAB Board, with a finding of all petitioned claims unpatentable for two of the three patents.
`
`TC TECHNOLOGY LLC. V., Sprint Corporation and Sprint Spectrum, L.P
`Case 1:16-cv-00153-RGA
`
`Engaged by Sprint to provide expert testimony relating to validity and infringement by the defense, in the
`district of Delaware. The technology related to OFDMA and SC-FDMA use in the LTE uplink, for multiplexing
`transmissions from different UEs utilizing mutually exclusive OFDM subcarriers. The matter was resolved.
`
`Mobility Workx, LLC v T-Mobile US, Inc.
`Civil Action No. 4:17-cv-00567-ALM
`Retained by the defendant, and provided declarations and deposition for claim construction, engaged for both
`invalidity and non-infringement analysis and testimony. This matter relates to LTE handover, and Mobile IP. The
`case was settled between the parties prior to trial.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Proctor CV
`
`PETITIONERS EXHIBIT 1027
`Page 4 of 15
`
`

`

`
`Mobility Workx, LLC v Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
`Case No. 4:17-cv-872-ALM
`Retained by the defendant, engaged for both invalidity and non-infringement analysis and testimony. This matter
`relates to LTE handover, and Mobile IP. The case further related to 3GPP compliance testing techniques. This
`matter was resolved during trial preparation.
`
`Uniloc USA, Inc., et al. v. Apple Inc.
`No. 18-cv-158 and 18-cv-161, engaged by Apple as a technical and testifying expert. This matter relates to Quality of
`Service aspect of 3G UMTS (WCDMA), and the request and allocation of uplink resources in LTE. The matter was
`stayed, pending result of PTAB IPR Trial.
`
`Wi-LAN v. LG,
`Case No. Case No.: 3:18-cv-01577-H-BGS
`Engaged by LG as a technical and testifying expert. The technology involved LTE “contention free” handover
`(CFRA), Media Access Control (MAC) layer messaging for bandwidth management and Quality of Service (QOS).
`This matter was resolved.
`
`Fractus, S.A. v. Sprint Communications Company, L.P. et al.,
`Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-00135 (E.D. Tex.), Engaged by Sprint and Verizon Wireless as a technical and testifying
`expert for invalidity. The technology involved design aspects of antenna element placement in multiband antenna
`arrays for use at cellular base stations. This matter was resolved.
`
`Wilson Electronics, LLC v.Cellphone-Mate,Inc. dba SureCall,
`Case No. 2:17-cv- 00305-DB (District of Utah)
`Retained by the Wilson Electronics, and engaged for both invalidity and non-infringement analysis and testimony in
`both district court and in ITU proceedings. This matter relates to cellular multi-band wireless signal boosters /
`repeaters. This matter was resolved.
`
`Sol IP, LLC v Joint Defense Group (AT&T, Ericsson, Nokia, Sprint, Verizon)
`Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-00526 (E.D. Tex.)
`Retained by each of the defendants, and engaged to provide testimony relating to infringement of the asserted claims
`for 8 of the asserted patents. The subject matter related to random access, paging, resource allocation, and carrier
`aggregation in LTE. The matter was resolved.
`
`Polaris PowerLED Technologies, LLC v. TCL Corporation, et al., C.D. California Civil Action No.: 8:20-cv-00127-JVS-
`DFM
BGL Ref. No.: 16725-7 and 16725-8
`Engaged by TCL and Hisense to provide expert testimony in district court and to provide a declaration as an expert in
`an Inter Party Review (IPR) proceeding before the U.S Patent Trial and Appeals Board. The subject matter related to
`power supply circuitry for use in backlight displays and U.S. Pat. No 11,011,752. The IPR was instituted, and the
`proceedings were terminated following settlement.
`
`SmartSky Networks v. Wireless Systems Solutions, LLC; DAG Wireless Solutions, et al., M.D. North Carolina (Case
`No. 1:20-cv-00834-NCT-LPA), and related arbitration proceedings
`Engaged by SmartSky to provide expert testimony related to a trade secret dispute in district court, and an arbitration
`proceeding. The technology related to air to ground internet service for aircraft using a proprietary LTE derived
`system including airborne radios and ground stations allowing for increased range and velocity beyond that which can
`be provided by standards based LTE systems. The system includes advanced UE and eNodeB architectures, and
`modified LTE protocols. I provided expert reports and declarations in both district court and arbitration. I further
`provided live testimony before an arbitration panel. The arbitration panel found in favor of SmartSky, achieving a
`successful injunction against WSS/DAG.
`
`
`Dali Wireless v. JMA Wireless, Civil Action 1:99-mc-09999
`Engaged by JMA Wireless to provide several declarations as an expert in an Inter Party Review (IPR) proceeding
`before the U.S Patent Trial and Appeals Board, and further testimony relating to the district course cases. The
`subject matter related to in-building wireless signal distribution systems utilizing digital network (CPRI / IP packetized)
`interfaces and as well as LTE eNodeB architectures. This matter was resolved pending expert discovery.
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Proctor CV
`
`PETITIONERS EXHIBIT 1027
`Page 5 of 15
`
`

`

`Dali Wireless v. Corning Optical Communications LLC, No. 3:20-cv-06469 (N.D. Cal.) and Dali Wireless, Inc. v.
`Corning Incorporated et al., No. 6:20-cv-00827 (W.D. Tex.)
`Engaged by Corning to provide several declarations as an expert in an Inter Party Review (IPR) proceeding before
`the U.S Patent Trial and Appeals Board and further testimony relating to the district course cases. The subject matter
`related to distributed antenna systems for in-building wireless signal distribution as well as intercell frequency reuse
`and interference management techniques. This matter was resolved pending expert discovery.
`
`Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:20-cv-00553-ADA (W.D. Texas), and Case No.
`2:21-cv-01055-DGE (W.D. Washington, Tacoma)
`Engaged by Amazon to provide testimony for district court matter in the Western District of Texas. The matter related
`to approaches for mobile devices to utilize Bluetooth to interface with smart speakers and servers, allowing for the
`request of content to be played by an output device (speaker) based upon specific requests, including in some cases
`voice requests. This matter was transferred to Western District of Washington, Tacoma Division and remains
`pending.
`
`WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. et al., 6:20-cv-
`00544 (W.D. Tex.)
`Engaged by Huawei to provide expert testimony in district court. The matter related to LTE protocols and signaling,
`Hybrid ARQ, and scheduling of retransmissions relative to new transmissions from a UE to an eNodeB. I provided a
`claim construction declaration, prior to the matter being resolved.
`
`Ericsson, Inc. IPR petition of 7,532,865, (TOT Power Control, S.L, Patent Owner)
`Engaged by Ericsson, Inc. to provide a declaration as an expert in an Inter Party Review (IPR) proceeding before the
`U.S Patent Trial and Appeals Board, relating to US. Pat. No. 7,532,865. The matter involved “outer loop” power
`control techniques in WCDMA systems or other mobile devices.
`
`Sierra Wireless et al, IPR petition of 7,215,653 (Sisvel, Patent Owner).
`Engaged by Sierra Wireless to provide a declaration as an expert in an Inter Party Review (IPR) proceeding before
`the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeals Board, relating to US. Pat. No. 7,215,653. This matter involved the control of
`uplink data rates and power control in a CDMA system called 1xEV-DO developed within the 3GPP2 standards, in
`which I personally participated. The IPR was instituted by the PTAB, and all claims were found unpatentable.
`
`KAIFI LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-281-JRG (E.D. Tex.)
`Engaged by T-Mobile to provide expert testimony for both (in)validity and (non)infringement for a district court matter
`in the Eastern District of Texas. The matter involved a mobile device’s roaming between an outdoor cellular / LTE
`networks and an indoor Wi-Fi network. It further included approaches for the LTE core network to perform the
`selection of transmission paths of VoLTE and VoWiFi signals involving the LTE core (EPC), including the ePDG, and
`IMS networks. This matter settled.
`
`KAIFI LLC v. Verizon Wireless. et al., Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-00280-JRG (E.D. Tex.)
`Engaged by Verizon to provide expert testimony relating to (in)validity for a district court matter in the Eastern District
`of Texas. The matter involved a mobile device’s roaming between an outdoor cellular / LTE networks and an indoor
`Wi-Fi network. It further included approaches for the LTE core network to perform the selection of transmission paths
`of VoLTE and VoWiFi signals involving the LTE core (EPC), including the ePDG, and IMS networks. This matter
`settled.
`
`NEO Wireless, LLC v. DELL Technologies Inc. and DELL Inc., Case No. 6:21-cv-024-ADA (W.D. Tex.)
`Engaged by Dell to provide expert testimony relating to claim construction, (in)validity and (non)infringement in the
`Western District of Texas, Waco Division. The matter involved LTE and 5G devices and standards aspects including
`signaling aspect associated with: OFDM/OFDMA, resource scheduling and frame structures, random access and
`ranging, transmit diversity and beamforming signaling. This matter was settled by the parties.
`
`American Patents v. Xerox., Case No. 6:21- cv-636-ADA, (W.D. Tex.)
`Engaged by Xerox to provide expert testimony relating to claim construction, (in)validity and (non)infringement in the
`Western District of Texas, Waco Division. The matter involved IEEE802.11 (WiFi) based systems relating to a
`number of patents, including Time and frequency synchronization in multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) systems, the
`assessment and management of interference in 802.11 systems. This matter was resolved.
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Proctor CV
`
`PETITIONERS EXHIBIT 1027
`Page 6 of 15
`
`

`

`TurboCode, v. Dell Technologies Inc. and Dell Inc., Case No. Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-359 (W.D. of Tex.)
`Engaged by Dell to provide expert testimony relating to claim construction, (in)validity and (non)infringement in the
`Western District of Texas, Waco Division. The matter involved 3G / WCDMA use and implementations of Turbo
`Coding in wireless transmission and reception. This matter was settled by the parties.
`
`XR Communications d/b/a Vivato Technologies v. Microsoft Corporation, Case No: 6:21-cv-695 (WDTX)
`Engaged by Microsoft to provide expert testimony relating to claim construction, (in)validity and (non)infringement in
`the Western District of Texas. The matter involved the use of transmit beamforming, channel estimation and diversity
`techniques in IEEE802.11n, 802.11AC, and 802.11AX systems (WiFi). This matter was settled by the parties.
`
`Finesse Wireless, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC; Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless; Nokia of America
`Corporation; Ericsson Inc., Case No. 2:21-CV-00063-JRG (E.D. TX).
`Engaged by Nokia to provide expert testimony relating to claim construction, (in)validity and (non)infringement in the
`Eastern District of Texas. The matter involved aspects of LTE and 5G infrastructure relating to the cancelation of
`radio frequency intermodulation distortion produced in a transmitter from the receiver of the same base station, and
`involving both passive intermodulation (PIM) and active intermodulation from Power amplifiers (PA).
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., Case No. 6:21-cv-00674-ADA (WDTX)
`Engaged by T-Mobile to provide expert testimony relating to claim construction, (in)validity and (non)infringement in
`the Western District of Texas. The matter involved approaches for roaming in a mobile network and the use of
`access codes to authorize access to voice over Wi-Fi (VoWiFi)/VoIP over the internet. The technology involved T-
`Mobile’s 4G network infrastructure involving access utilizing the ePDG, and IMS networks. The case further related
`to historical VoWiFi systems including T-Mobile’s HotSpot@Home, Unlicensed Mobile Access (UMA), 3GPP Generic
`Access (GAN), IMS/SIP, and voice call Continuity (VCC). The court found non-infringement during summary
`judgement.
`
`GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE v Ericsson and Nokia
`Case No. 2:21-CV-213-JRG, Case No. 2:21-CV-215-JRG (E.D. TX).
`Engaged by Nokia and Ericsson to provide expert testimony relating to claim construction, (in)validity and
`(non)infringement in the Eastern District of Texas. The matter involved aspects of LTE and 5G infrastructure relating
`to the channel state information (CSI/CQI) configuration and triggering for periodic and aperiodic, wideband and sub-
`band reports from LTE/NR UEs. This matter was settled prior to trail.
`
`Microsoft Corporation, IPR petition of ‘414, ‘763, ‘988, ‘890 (Lemco Corporation, Patent Owner).
`Engaged by Microsoft Corporation to provide several declarations as an expert in Inter Party Review (IPR)
`proceedings before the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeals Board, relating to US. Pat. Nos. 7,653,414, 7,548,763,
`7,855,988, and 9,191,980. These matters involved distributed cellular network infrastructure architectures. The
`patents relate to software implementations of cellular network infrastructure, including a distributed mobile
`architecture server and a distributed mobile architecture gateway. This matter remains pending.
`
`Ozmo v. Dell
`Case No: 6:22-cv-00642-ADA (WDTX)
`Engaged by Dell to testimony related to claim construction, (in)validity and (non)infringement relating to U.S Pat. Nos.
`8,599,814; 9,264,991; 10,873,906; 11,012,934; 11,122,504; and 11,252,659 and share common provisional
`applications. The subject matter of the patents relate to seamlessly integrating short-range wireless personal area
`networks (“WPANs”) into longer-range wireless local area networks. (“WLANs”).
`
`XR Communications d/b/a Vivato Technologies v. ASUSTek Computer Inc., Computer Inc.
`Case No: 6:21-cv-00622-ADA (WDTX)
`Engaged by ASUSTek to provide expert testimony relating to claim construction, (in)validity and (non)infringement in
`the Western District of Texas. The matter involved the use of transmit beamforming, channel estimation and diversity
`techniques in IEEE802.11n, 802.11ac, and 802.11ax systems (WiFi). This matter was settled.
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC v AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon.
`Case No: 2:2-cv-00474, 2:23-cv-00477, 2:23-cv-00478 (E.D. Tex.)
`Engaged by Joint Defense Group (including Nokia and Ericsson) to provide several declarations as an expert in Inter
`Party Review (IPR) proceedings before the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeals Board. Provided declarations for US Pat.
`Nos. 9,094,888, 8,554,196, 10,368,361, 8,891,347. I was further engaged to provide expert testimony relating to
`Interparty claim construction, (in)validity and (non)infringement in the Eastern District of Texas. The matter involved
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Proctor CV
`
`PETITIONERS EXHIBIT 1027
`Page 7 of 15
`
`

`

`various aspects of 3GPP LTE and 5G transmit beamforming, including: handoff, beam and frequency resource
`management, beam management and selection, adaptation based upon Channel State information (CSI). This
`matter remains pending.
`
`Samsung v. Cobblestone Wireless, LLC.
`Engaged by Samsung to provide several declarations as an expert in Inter Party Review (IPR) proceedings before
`the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeals Board. Provided declarations for US Pat. Nos. 9,094,888, 8,554,196, 10,368,361,
`8,891,347. The matter involved various aspects of 3GPP LTE and 5G transmit beamforming, including: handoff,
`beam and frequency resource management, beam management and selection, adaptation based upon Channel
`State information (CSI). This matter remains pending.
`
`Lenovo (United States) Inc. v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc.; ASUS Computer International.
`Case No.: 23-CV- 5892 (N.D. Cal.), ITC matter Inv. No. 337-TA-1382
`Engaged by AsusTek to provide opinions regarding claim construction, validity and infringement of U.S. Pat. Nos.
`7,792,066 and 10,952,203. The technology included Wake on Wireless Lan utilizing magic packets and the PS mode
`of 802.11 devices, and personal computer architecture and power states (APM,ACPI). The technology further
`included the use of triggered based uplink OFDMA resource allocation in WiFi 6 (802.11AX). This matter remains
`pending.
`
`Mobility Workx LLC v. AT&T Inc., et al.
`Case No. 4:23-cv-00594 (E.D. Tex.)
`Engaged by AT&T to provide opinions regarding claim construction, validity and infringement of U.S. Pat. Nos.
`7,697,508, 8,213,417, and 7,231,330. This matter relates to LTE / WiFi handover, and Mobile IP, and related test
`equipment. This matter remains pending.
`
`XR Communications d/b/a Vivato Technologies v. Joint Defense Group (AT&T Services Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC,
`AT&T Corporation, T-Mobile USA, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc., Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless,
`Nokia of America Corporation, and Ericsson, Inc.)
`Case No. 2:23-cv-202 (EDTex – Lead Case), Case No. 2:23-cv-203 (EDTex – Member Case)
`Case No. 2:23-cv-204 (EDTex, Member Case)
`Engaged by AT&T to provide opinions regarding claim construction, validity and infringement of U.S. Pat. Nos.
`10,715,235, 10,594,376, 7,177,369, 8,289,939, and 8,737,511. The matter involved the use of transmit
`beamforming, channel estimation and MIMO and diversity techniques in 3GPP 5G NR systems in 3GPP Releases
`15, 16 and 17 within the gNB infrastructure, and UEs. This matter remains pending.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Proctor CV
`
`PETITIONERS EXHIBIT 1027
`Page 8 of 15
`
`

`

`List of Issued U.S. Patents
`
`United States
`Pat. No.
`5,550,549
`5,687,196
`5,898,338
`5,929,704
`5,949,283
`5,960,047
`6,078,216
`6,100,843
`6,212,220
`6,222,832
`6,239,756
`6,301,291
`6,304,215
`6,362,790
`6,388,999
`6,396,456
`6,400,317
`6,404,386
`6,421,336
`6,448,938
`6,452,913
`6,456,835
`6,473,036
`6,515,635
`6,518,920
`6,542,481
`6,545,990
`6,545,994
`6,563,809
`6,600,456
`6,614,776
`6,678,260
`6,707,804
`6,785,323
`6,788,268
`6,792,290
`6,801,564
`6,804,223
`6,873,293
`6,888,504
`6,888,807
`6,894,653
`6,904,079
`6,911,879
`6,917,581
`
`Title
`Transponder system and method
`Range and bearing tracking system with multipath rejection
`Adaptive digital predistortion linearization and feed-forward correction of RF power amplifier
`Control of RF error extraction using auto-calibrating RF correlator
`Adaptive digital predistortion linearization and feed-forward correction of RF power amplifier
`System and method for transmitting information signals
`Aliased wide band performance monitor for adjusting predistortion and vector modulator control parameters of RF amplifier
`Adaptive antenna for use in same frequency networks
`Method and apparatus for creating non-interfering signals using non-orthogonal techniques
`Fast Acquisition of traffic channels for a highly variable data rate reverse link of a CDMA wireless communication system
`Antenna array with housing
`Pilot symbol assisted modulation and demodulation in wireless communication systems
`Method of use for an adaptive antenna in same frequency networks
`Antenna array structure stacked over printed wiring board with beamforming components
`Dynamic bandwidth allocation for multiple access communications using buffer urgency factor
`Stacked dipole antenna for use in wireless communications systems
`Method and apparatus for antenna control in a communications network
`Adaptive antenna for use in same frequency networks
`Variable rate orthogonally coded reverse link structure
`Method and apparatus for frequency selective beam forming
`Fast acquisition of traffic channels for a highly variable data rate reverse link of a CDMA wireless communication system
`Arbitration method for high power transmissions in a code division multiple access system
`Method and apparatus for adapting antenna array to reduce adaptation time while increasing array performance
`Adaptive antenna for use in wireless communication systems
`Adaptive antenna for use in same frequency networks
`Dynamic bandwidth allocation for multiple access communication using session queues
`Method and apparatus for a spectrally compliant cellular communication system
`Access probe acknowledgment including collision detection to avoid oversetting initial power level
`Subscriber-controlled registration technique in a CDMA system
`Adaptive antenna for use in wireless communication systems
`Forward error correction scheme for high rate data exchange in a wireless system
`System and method for maintaining wireless channels over a reverse link of a CDMA wireless communication system
`Fast acquisition of traffic channels for a highly variable data rate reverse link of a CDMA wireless communication system
`Variable rate coding for forward link
`Method and apparatus for frequency selective beam forming
`Method and apparatus for performing directional re-scan of an adaptive antenna
`Reverse link correlation filter in wireless communication systems
`Reverse link pilot integrated with block codes
`Adaptive receive and omnidirectional transmit antenna array
`Aperiodic array antenna
`Applying session services based on packet flows
`Low cost multiple pattern antenna for use with multiple receiver systems
`Access channel structure for wireless communication system
`Electronic phase shifter with enhanced phase shift performance
`Use of orthogonal or near orthogonal codes in reverse link
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Proctor CV
`
`PETITIONERS EXHIBIT 1027
`Page 9 of 15
`
`

`

`6,917,642
`6,925,070
`6,928,064
`6,933,887
`6,937,562
`6,940,842
`6,941,152
`6,954,448
`6,956,840
`6,973,140
`6,989,797
`6,992,54