throbber
Bioconjugate Chem. 2003, 14, 3-17
`
`3
`
`REVIEWS
`
`Synthesis of Target-Specific Radiolabeled Peptides for Diagnostic
`Imaging
`
`Jakub Fichna and Anna Janecka*
`
`Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Medical University of Lodz, Lindleya 6, 90-131 Lodz, Poland.
`Received April 23, 2002
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Radiopharmaceuticals are drugs containing atoms of
`some radioactive elements. They are designed for diag-
`nostic or therapeutic purposes, to deliver small doses of
`ionizing radiation to the disease sites in the body.
`Radiopharmaceuticals, unlike classical chemotherapeu-
`tics, act against malignant cells with high specificity.
`Radiopharmaceuticals are mostly small organic mol-
`ecules, such as peptides or peptidomimetics, but they can
`also be macromolecules, for example antibodies.
`Biodistribution of radiopharmaceuticals can be deter-
`mined either by their chemical and physical properties
`or by their biological interactions. Radiopharmaceuticals,
`which act through receptor binding, are called target-
`specific. Ideally, these radiopharmaceuticals are designed
`to locate with high specificity at cancerous tumors, even
`if their location in the body is unknown, while producing
`minimal radiation damage to normal tissues (1-6). In
`the past decade significant progress has been made in
`the development of peptide-based target-specific radiop-
`harmaceuticals, which have become an important class
`of imaging agents for the detection of various diseases,
`such as tumors, thrombosis, and inflammation.
`Many excellent reviews have been published discussing
`different aspects of radionuclide chemistry and therapy
`(7-9) and the use of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnosis
`and treatment of different pathological conditions (10-
`19). Most popular technetium radiopharmaceuticals (20-
`28), as well as those incorporating other radionuclides
`(29, 30), have been reviewed. Antibodies (24, 25), peptides
`(23, 30-35), and steroids (36) as targeting molecules have
`been described.
`In this review, which is limited to the use of small
`peptides as targeting molecules, we attempt to sum-
`marize, from the chemical point of view, the development
`of labeling methods, in particular the application of
`different bifunctional chelating agents. We also give a
`short description of radionuclides used with these agents.
`Radiopharmaceuticals based on small peptides, which are
`in clinical use or under investigation in preclinical and
`clinical trials, are also mentioned.
`
`LABELING METHODS
`Direct Labeling. Direct labeling methods (Table 1)
`are mostly based on the binding of a radionuclide to thiol
`groups in the targeting molecule, that seems relatively
`
`* Address for correspondence: Dr. Anna Janecka, Depart-
`ment of Medicinal Chemistry, Medical University of Lodz,
`Lindleya 6, 90-131 Lodz, Poland. Tel/fax:
`(4842) 6784277.
`E-mail: ajanecka@csk.am.lodz.pl.
`
`easy to perform (37, 38). However, such a labeling process
`is difficult to control, for its detailed chemistry is un-
`known and may lead to unplanned changes in the
`structure, stability, and pharmacokinetic properties of
`the labeled molecule. Furthermore, very little is known
`about the number of donor atoms in the labeled molecule
`and the geometry of radionuclide coordination. The
`stability in vivo of a synthesized complex also remains
`uncertain.
`The direct labeling approach is rather unsuitable for
`small peptides, which either do not possess disulfide
`linkage or are unable to maintain their activity after
`reduction. For example Thakur (39) has reported the
`alteration of the receptor binding properties of the
`radiolabeled somatostatin analogues, when the disulfide
`bridge was reduced to free thiol groups and subsequently
`radiolabeled with 99mTc. However, direct labeling has
`been successfully applied for labeling of the platelet
`receptor-binding peptide with 99mTc (40, 41) and for high
`molecular weight proteins such as antibodies and their
`fragments (42, 43).
`Chelate Methods. In chelate methods (Table 1) a
`radionuclide is bound to the targeting molecule in-
`directly, through a bifunctional chelating agent (BFCA)
`(Figure 1).
`In general, a radiopharmaceutical containing a BFCA
`consists of the following parts: a targeting molecule,
`BFCA, radionuclide, and a linker (22). The targeting
`molecule is a carrier of a radionuclide to the receptor site
`in vivo. A radionuclide serves as a radiation source. A
`BFCA, covalently attached to the targeting molecule,
`functions as the coordinator of the radionuclide. A linker,
`not always necessary, is a spacer residue, which sepa-
`rates a targeting molecule from a chelating agent.
`Functional groups, naturally present in the peptide or
`introduced synthetically, are responsible for covalent
`attachment of BFCA. Naturally occurring functional
`groups include terminal, as well as side-chain amino and
`carboxy groups, thiol groups from cysteine, and p-
`hydroxyphenyl from tyrosine. BFCA must contain a
`conjugation group, which is used for attachment of the
`peptide.
`Several types of conjugation groups, active esters,
`isothiocyanates, maleimides, hydrazides, and R-haloam-
`ides are used to form BFCA-peptide linkages (Figure 2).
`Active esters can be used to form an amide bond
`between a carboxy group of a BFCA and an amino group
`in a peptide ligand. Since they are at a low level of
`activation, side-reactions during coupling are generally
`less of a problem than with most amide bond forming
`procedures. Commonly used are p-nitrophenyl, pen-
`
`© 2003 American Chemical Society
`10.1021/bc025542f CCC: $25.00
`Published on Web 12/19/2002
`
`Downloaded via GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV on December 4, 2024 at 02:26:58 (UTC).
`
`See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1018, p. 3
`
`

`

`4 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 14, No. 1, 2003
`
`Fichna and Janecka
`
`Table 1. General Overview of Applied Labeling Methods
`labeling method
`main principle
`targeting molecule
`high molecular
`direct labeling
`radionuclide
`weight molecules
`binds directly to
`active groups
`present in the
`targeting molecule
`
`advantages
`easy to perform
`
`disadvantages
`unknown chemistry
`
`ref
`(32, 35,
`37, 38)
`
`unknown geometry of
`a radionuclide-targeting
`molecule complex
`possible damage to
`targeting molecule
`during labeling process
`
`chelate methods
`prelabeling
`
`postlabeling
`
`labeling of BFCA
`followed by
`conjugation with
`the targeting
`molecule
`
`conjugation of
`BFCA to targeting
`molecule, followed
`by labeling
`of conjugate
`
`small peptides
`
`relatively easy to control,
`well-defined chemistry
`
`time-consuming
`
`(26, 32)
`
`targeting molecule functional
`groups remain unlabeled
`
`small peptides
`
`most popular method
`
`complicated purification
`of obtained
`radiopharmaceutical
`possible damage to targeting
`molecule during labeling
`process
`
`(35, 44)
`
`well-defined chemistry
`possible use of classical
`solid-phase or solution
`methods of the peptide
`synthesis
`
`Figure 1. Schematic structure of a radiopharmaceutical. BFCA
`can complex a metal and also contains a functional group which
`forms a covalent linkage to a biological molecule, such as
`peptide.
`
`tafluorophenyl, N-hydroxysuccinimide, and sulfo-N-hy-
`droxysuccinimide active esters. The N-hydroxysuccinim-
`ide esters are very reactive with high selectivity toward
`aliphatic amines (22, 45). The choice of an active ester
`to be used for BFCA-peptide bond formation is partly
`dictated by sheer reactivity, but the ease of coproduct
`removal is also an important consideration. Thus, for
`water-insoluble BFCA-peptide conjugates, a succinimide
`ester coupling is especially convenient because both
`N-hydroxysuccinimide and sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide
`are very water-soluble (46, 47) and easy to remove. But
`for water-soluble BFCA-peptide conjugates p-nitrophe-
`nyl or pentafluorophenyl esters, which are ether-soluble,
`may be a better choice (48).
`Isothiocyanates, like active esters, react with amino
`groups of a peptide forming thiourea bonds. Since they
`react best in the higher pH, they cannot be used with
`peptides susceptible to alkaline conditions.
`The third class are maleimides, which react with thiols
`and form thioether bonds. The optimum pH for the
`reaction is near 7. At higher pH maleimides may hydro-
`lyze to form nonreactive maleanic acids (49, 50).
`Hydrazides are conjugation groups which react with
`the aldehyde group of a peptide to form a hydrazone-
`
`Figure 2. Reaction schemes for BFCA-peptide conjugation.
`peptide conjugate. They are suitable for peptides contain-
`ing 2-amino alcohol structure like in serine, threonine,
`and hydroxylysine, which can be very rapidly oxidized
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1018, p. 4
`
`

`

`Reviews
`by periodate at pH ) 7 to generate an aldehyde. The use
`of a low molar ratio of periodate to peptide minimizes
`the potential for side-reactions during the oxidation. The
`formed hydrazones are stable at pH 6-8 for at least 12
`h at 22 °C (51).
`R-Haloamides are suitable for conjugation with pep-
`tides containing a free SH group. Chloroacetyl- or bro-
`moacetylamides are used (52, 53).
`The bifunctional approach is often associated with the
`term ‘pharmacokinetic modifier’ (PKM). Liu and Edwards
`(22) define PKM as a linker between a targeting molecule
`and a BFCA. PKM is a spacer residue, separating the
`radionuclide from the binding site of the molecule to
`minimize the risk of its undesired modification. The use
`of a linker helps to choose a BFCA and a radionuclide
`more independently. The most popular linkers are long
`poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) or hydrocarbon chains to
`increase the lipophilicity and polyamino acid sequences,
`such as polyglycine, to increase the hydrophilicity, as well
`as esters and disulfides capable of rapid metabolism.
`The distinction between chelate methods can be made
`depending on the sequence of the steps used for the
`synthesis of a radiolabeled peptide.
`Prelabeling Method. The pre-labeling method (pre-
`formed chelate approach) is based on the labeling of a
`BFCA with its subsequent activation and conjugation,
`through covalent bonds, to a peptide. In this approach
`the chemistry of a process is well defined and easily
`controlled. As the labeling and conjugation steps are
`separated, it can be ensured that the radionuclide is
`attached directly to a chelate moiety and the peptide
`amino groups remain unlabeled (22). However, the prela-
`beling of a BFCA may impair the conjugation process and
`complicate purification of a radiopharmaceutical. The
`method is time-consuming, so not appropriate for use
`with short-lived isotopes, generally associated with imag-
`ing. As such the prelabeling method is rarely used for
`synthesis of radiolabeled peptides.
`Postlabeling Method. The postlabeling method (indirect
`labeling approach), the most popular approach in the
`synthesis of radiopharmaceuticals, requires the synthesis
`of a BFCA-peptide conjugate and is followed by its
`labeling. In this method BFCA may be attached to N- or
`C-terminus, as well as to a side chain of a peptide or it
`can be even incorporated into a peptide backbone. The
`postlabeling method is characterized by a well-defined
`chemistry and relative simplicity. For convenient, high
`yield synthesis of radiopharmaceuticals, applied BFCA
`should be compatible with the solid-phase or solution
`methods of peptide synthesis. However, harsh conditions
`required for effective labeling of conjugates may some-
`times cause changes in the amino acid sequence or
`peptide backbone conformation and even begin the
`decomposition of the whole radiopharmaceutical (35).
`
`BIFUNCTIONAL CHELATING AGENTS
`BFCAs are used to connect a radionuclide and a
`targeting molecule to form a radiopharmaceutical. An
`ideal BFCA should coordinate the radionuclide with a
`high yield, to form a relatively stable complex. The agent
`must comply with the nature and oxidation state of a
`radionuclide and should prevent any accidental changes
`in its redox potential.
`It is important to carefully choose a proper BFCA, as
`the conjugation with targeting molecule requires specific
`conditions: pH, temperature, reaction time. The stere-
`ochemistry of a BFCA is important when synthesizing
`radiopharmaceuticals targeting specific receptors.
`
`Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 14, No. 1, 2003 5
`
`Figure 3. Structure of DTPA and its analogues:
`(b) cDTPA; (c) mDTPA.
`
`(a) DTPA;
`
`DTPA. DTPA (NR-diethylenetriaminopentaacetic acid)
`belongs to the group of polyaminocarboxy chelates (Fig-
`ure 3a). It is a strong chelating group, mostly linked with
`111In, a trivalent radionuclide. It can be attached to larger
`proteins, e.g., albumins and antibodies (49, 50, 54), as
`well as to small peptides, like somatostatin analogues
`(55, 56). The conjugation of DTPA with macromolecules
`has been successfully performed by the use of isobutyl
`chloroformate as a coupling reagent (57). For small
`peptides, however, DTPA derivatives such as DTPA
`bicyclic anhydride (cDTPA) and monoreactive DTPA
`derivative, 3,6-bis(carboxymethyl)-9-(((2-maleimidoethyl)-
`carbamoyl)methyl)-3,6,9-triazaundecanedioic acid (mDT-
`PA), have been applied (Figure 3b and 3c).
`Hnatowich et al. (54) have developed a simple method
`of covalent coupling of cDTPA to peptides at their amino
`groups. The efficiency of this method is relatively high
`and it has several advantages. The coupling reaction runs
`in an aqueous solution and is a simple, one-step process.
`The side product of the reaction, a double substituted
`DTPA derivative, and unreacted material can be both
`easily separated from the main product by gel chroma-
`tography. The conjugated peptide maintains its affinity
`toward specific receptors. The sample, purified before the
`addition of a radionuclide, can be stored and labeled only
`when required. For peptides containing lysine the con-
`jugation occurs especially at its (cid:15)-amino group, as more
`basic than N-terminal amino group. The method is
`therefore inappropriate for somatostatin analogues, as
`the lysine residue is situated within the active site of the
`molecule and the conjugation may result in the loss of
`receptor binding activity. For that reason a modified
`method, proposed by Bakker et al. (55) for DTPA-
`octreotide, is used to conjugate the somatostatin analogue
`with cDTPA. In this approach lysine residue within the
`active site of the peptide is protected with tert-butyloxy-
`carbonyl group (Boc), before the reaction with cDTPA and
`deprotected after the conjugation (Figure 4). This method
`enables a selective reaction of the N-terminal amino
`group with BFCA, whereas the lysine residue within the
`bioactive site remains unsubstituted.
`A monoreactive DTPA derivative, mDTPA, with four
`carboxy groups protected as tert-butyl esters, was intro-
`duced by Arano et al. (57) (Figure 5). Since mDTPA
`possesses only one free carboxy group, the formation of
`undesired intermolecular linkages with peptides is pre-
`vented. High solubility of mDTPA in various solvents
`makes this BFCA appropriate for both liquid- and solid-
`phase peptide synthesis.
`A great obstacle in the efficient radiolabeling of DTPA
`conjugates is the presence of trace metals in the prepara-
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1018, p. 5
`
`

`

`6 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 14, No. 1, 2003
`
`Fichna and Janecka
`
`very stable complexes with a variety of trivalent radio-
`nuclides, such as 66,67,68Ga,86,90Y, 111In, 149Pm, 177Lu (68-
`73) and divalent radionuclides, 27Mg,47Ca,64Cu (74).
`Two different approaches for DOTA conjugation with
`peptides have been developed. In the first approach one
`of the four carboxy groups in DOTA is activated to
`facilitate the reaction with primary amines in the peptide
`and form a stable amide bond linkage. In the second
`approach DOTA derivatives with additional side chains
`are used. A peptide ligand is attached to the side chain
`of DOTA derivative. Several DOTA derivatives have been
`synthesized so far, like PA-DOTA (R-[2-(4-aminophenyl)-
`ethyl]-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraace-
`tic acid) and p-NCS-Bz-DOTA ((2-(4-isothiocyanatoben-
`zyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N¢ ,N¢¢
`,N¢¢¢
`-
`tetraacetic acid)
`(Figure 8b and 8c)
`(69). Recently
`Eisenwiener et al. (44) have introduced two new DOTA
`derivatives, DOTASA(t-Bu)4, (1-(1-carboxy-2-carbo-tert-
`butoxyethyl)-4,7,10-(carbo-tert-butoxymethyl)-1,4,7,10-
`tetraazacyclododecane) and DOTAGA(t-Bu)4, (1-(1-carboxy-
`3-carbo-tert-butoxypropyl)-4,7,10-(carbo-tert-butoxymethyl)-
`1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane) (Figure 8d), which con-
`venient synthesis is outlined in Figure 9. The conjugation
`of all DOTA derivatives to a peptide is performed through
`an amino group of a peptide.
`Fully eight coordinate structure has been reported for
`all DOTA complexes (60) using four amino and four
`carboxy groups. In the case when one carboxy group is
`used for conjugation, the amide carbonyl oxygen occupies
`the eighth position around the radionuclide.
`DOTA and derivatives were successfully conjugated to
`a number of somatostatin analogues, and obtained ra-
`diopharmaceuticals had good pharmacological param-
`eters (72-78). DOTA conjugates are especially suitable
`for radionuclide therapy, as they can be radiolabeled with
`67Ga (75), 90Y (71, 76), and 111In (73). De Jong et al. (68)
`have demonstrated that 90Y-DOTA conjugates have very
`good pharmacokinetic properties in vivo. However, in
`these conjugates the chelate is situated closer to the
`peptide, the labeled conjugate is more rigid and less
`flexible, which makes binding with the receptor more
`difficult. Reubi et al. (79) reported the best pharmacologi-
`cal properties for 67Ga-DOTA complexes. The radionu-
`clide coordination geometry, including the number of
`uncomplexed carboxy and amino groups, increases the
`flexibility of a ligand and allows its better adjustment to
`the receptor binding site.
`TETA. TETA (1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,4,8,-
`11-tetraacetic acid) (Figure 10) is one of the most studied
`chelating agents for copper in peptide targeted radio-
`
`Figure 4. Synthesis of DTPA-octreotide, starting with cDTPA.
`
`tion, as they compete with radionuclides in the process
`of labeling. For that reason a significant, 40- to 70-fold
`molar excess of peptide conjugate and ultrapure radio-
`nuclide derivative of the highest possible specific activity
`are required (55).
`DTPA conjugates have been shown to form 111In-
`chelate structures (Figure 6), which are eight coordinate,
`using all three amino and four carboxy groups, while the
`eighth position around the radionuclide is occupied by
`the amide carbonyl oxygen (58). 111In-DTPA conjugates
`possess excellent in vivo stability (59-61).
`Many research groups put much effort in the synthesis
`of kinetically stable DTPA-peptide conjugates that form
`complexes with 90Y (62). Substitutions, particularly in the
`carbon atoms of the DTPA backbone, sterically hinder
`the opening of the chelate ring that must occur during
`radionuclide complex dissociation and increase the in vivo
`stability of the radiopharmacutical. The first class of
`modified DTPA conjugates was constructed by attaching
`p-isothiocyanatobenzyl moiety to one DTPA backbone
`ethylene group and appending methyl to another ethyl-
`ene group in the same backbone (Figure 7a,b). The second
`class of modified DTPA conjugates was developed by
`replacing one of the ethylene groups by a cyclohexyl
`moiety (Figure 7c). Such modifications increase the
`rigidity in the DTPA backbone and the in vivo stability
`of obtained radiopharmaceuticals (62-64). Synthesis of
`new derivatives constructed on DTPA core has been
`recently reported (65, 66).
`99mTc is less suitable for the labeling of DTPA-peptide
`conjugates, as this radionuclide, even at high concentra-
`tions, has low affinity and poor selectivity to the binding
`sites of this BFCA (67).
`DOTA.
`DOTA
`(1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-
`N,N¢,N¢¢,N¢¢¢-tetraacetic acid) (Figure 8a) and its deriva-
`tives proved to be a good alternative for DTPA. They play
`an important role in clinical applications, as they form
`
`Figure 5. Reaction scheme for synthesis of mDTPA.
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1018, p. 6
`
`

`

`Reviews
`
`Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 14, No. 1, 2003 7
`
`Figure 6. Possible structure of In3+-DTPA-peptide.
`
`Figure 7. Structures of DTPA derivatives: (a) 2-(p-isothiocy-
`anatobenzyl) diethylenetriaminopentaacetic acid; (b) 2-(p-iso-
`thiocyanatobenzyl)-6-methyldiethylene-triaminopentaacetic acid
`(1B4H-DTPA); (c) 2-(p-isothiocyanatobenzyl) cyclohexyldieth-
`ylene-triaminopentaacetic acid (CHX-DTPA).
`
`therapy. TETA has been successfully used as a BFCA
`with somatostatin analogues (30).
`NOTA. NOTA (1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic
`acid) (Figure 11a), its phosphonate analogue NOTP
`(1,4,7-triazacyclononane-N,N¢ ,N¢¢ -tris(methylenephospho-
`nic) acid) (Figure 11b) and the monoethyl ester of NOTP,
`NOTPME (1,4,7-triazacyclononane-N,N¢ ,N¢¢ -tris(methyl-
`enephosphonate-monoethyl ester)) (Figure 11c) were
`studied for possible use in radiopharmaceuticals. Com-
`plexes with 67Ga (80) and 111In (81) were reported.
`A monoreactive NOTA derivative, NODAGA(tBu)3 (1-
`(1-carboxy-3-carbo-tert-butoxypropyl)-4,7-(carbo-tert-bu-
`toxymethyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane) (Figure 11d) was
`synthesized by Eisenwiener et al. (82). The synthesis is
`outlined in Figure 12. This BFCA is useful for the
`coupling to the N-terminus of peptides on solid-phase and
`in solution. The NODAGA-peptide conjugates were
`labeled with 67Ga and 111In in high yields and good
`specific activities. NODAGA-based derivatives carry a
`spacer function between the BFCA and the peptide which
`improves the receptor binding affinity.
`HYNIC. HYNIC (2-hydrazinonicotinic acid) (Figure
`13), first described by Abrams et al. (83) has been used
`as a BFCA for radiolabeling of different groups of
`molecules, such as (cid:231)-globulins (83, 84), chemotactic
`peptides (85, 86), and somatostatin analogues (87-90).
`Structural organization of HYNIC determines its ap-
`plication, as it can only occupy one or two coordination
`sites of the radionuclide. That is why a coligand such as
`tricine or EDDA (ethylenediaminodiacetic acid) should
`be also coordinated to complete the coordination sphere
`
`Figure 8. Structures of DOTA and its derivatives: (a) DOTA;
`(b) PA-DOTA; (c) p-NCS-Bz-DOTA; (d) DOTASA(t-Bu)4, n )
`1 and DOTAGA(t-Bu)4, n ) 2.
`
`of a radionuclide (91, 92) (Figure 14). The conjugation of
`coligands helps in modifying the properties of obtained
`radiopharmaceutical, such as hydrophilicity or pharma-
`cokinetics. However, the requirement for the use of
`coligands makes the chemistry of the synthesis more
`complicated, and multiple possible products and side-
`products can be obtained.
`HYNIC-coligand conjugates were reported to have low
`stability (22). The search for stable HYNIC-coligand
`complexes is now carried on and phosphines seem to be
`the most promising coligands so far (92, 93). HYNIC
`derivatives, together with phosphines and tricine, form
`ternary complexes [99mTc(HYNIC-TM)(tricine)(phosphine)]
`(TM-targeting molecule). Such complexes are stable in
`solution, and their hydrophilicity can be modified by
`changing functional groups attached to phosphine back-
`bone or by substitution of tricine by other glycine deriva-
`tives.
`HYNIC is often used as a BFCA for somatostatin
`analogues. The desired amide bond formation should
`occur between the carboxy group of HYNIC and the
`N-terminal amino group of a peptide. However, in soma-
`tostatin analogues the presence of lysine makes it dif-
`ficult to obtain a monosubstituted product. Krois et al.
`(87) have compared available methods of HYNIC-oct-
`reotide conjugation, and none of them seemed efficient
`enough. The method of protecting the lysine amino group
`with (Boc)2O reported by Bakker et al. (55) proved to be
`unsatisfactory, as the final product was contaminated
`with Boc-disubstituted derivative, difficult to separate.
`The activation of HYNIC to N-hydroxysuccinimide ester
`to facilitate the conjugation step, a method suggested by
`Abrams et al. (83), also produced poor results. An
`improved method of HYNIC-octreotide conjugation,
`reported by Krois et al. (87), is based on the incorporation
`of the chelator at an early stage of ab ovo peptide
`synthesis performed by solution method. That approach
`produced high yield of conjugate, practically free of any
`contamination.
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1018, p. 7
`
`

`

`8 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 14, No. 1, 2003
`
`Fichna and Janecka
`
`Figure 9. Synthesis of DOTASA(t-Bu)4 and DOTAGA(t-Bu)4.
`
`Figure 10. Structure of TETA.
`
`Figure 11. Structures of NOTA and its derivatives: (a) NOTA,
`(b) NOTP, (c) NOTPME, (d) NODAGA(t-Bu)3.
`
`Multidentate Chelators. The class of tetradentate
`chelators includes N3S triamidothiols, N2S2 diamidodithi-
`ols (94), and N2S4 diaminotetrathiols (26) (Figure 15) and
`a number of their derivatives, containing sulfur and
`nitrogen atoms, incorporated into chelating backbones.
`N2S4 chelators contain two amino and four thiol donors
`and they have been used for 99mTc- and 186Re-labeling of
`antibodies (95, 96). N2S2 containing two amido and two
`thiol donors have been used for 99mTc- and 186Re-labeling
`of proteins, peptides, and oligonucleotides. Since most of
`the N2S2 derivatives form highly lipophilic rhenium and
`technetium complexes, they are used whenever hydro-
`phobic targeting systems are applied (97). Both N3S- and
`
`N2S2-derived BFCAs form high specific activity com-
`plexes, and for that reason they can be used in the
`preformed chelate labeling method. In case of small
`molecules (steroids, low molecular weight peptides) these
`BFCAs complex 186/188Re in the postconjugation labeling
`process (28). BFCAs based on N3S backbone are used for
`the synthesis of 168/188Re radiopharmaceuticals (98).
`The most frequently applied BFCAs from that group
`are MAG3 (mercaptoacetyl-glycylglycylglycine) and MAG2-
`GABA (mercaptoacetylglycylglycyl-(cid:231)-butyric acid), con-
`taining the spacer groups glycine and GABA, respectively
`(Figure 16). GABA spacer group is two carbon units
`longer than glycine; therefore, it may exhibit more useful
`properties, such as higher yield in radionuclide labeling
`or better receptor binding due to the changes in intramo-
`lecular organization (99-101).
`BFCAs listed above have been widely used as metal
`chelating agents in both diagnostic and therapeutic
`procedures. Attempts to design new derivatives with
`improved properties are still under way (66, 102).
`
`RADIONUCLIDES
`Each radionuclide is characterized by a specific coor-
`dination chemistry and therefore must be conjugated
`with a specific BFCA with specific donor atoms and
`ligand frameworks to retain its own radioactivity.
`The selection of an appropriate radionuclide is an
`inherent determinant in developing any therapeutic
`radiopharmaceutical. Important factors to consider in-
`clude half-life of the radioactive nuclide, its mode of
`decay, and its cost and availability (Table 2). The half-
`life is a critical factor. For diagnostic imaging the half-
`life of a radionuclide must be long enough to enable the
`synthesis of the labeled compound and to facilitate the
`accumulation in the target tissue, while allowing clear-
`
`Figure 12. Synthesis of NODAGA(t-Bu)3.
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1018, p. 8
`
`

`

`Reviews
`
`Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 14, No. 1, 2003 9
`
`Table 2. (cid:231)-, (cid:226)--, and (cid:226)+-Emitting Radionuclidesa Used for Radiolabeling of Radiopharmaceuticals (103)
`(cid:226)--energy (keV)
`(cid:226)+-energy (keV)
`radionuclide
`(cid:231)-energy (keV)
`t1/2 (h)
`64Cu
`12.7
`579
`
`653
`
`-
`
`66Ga
`
`67Ga
`68Ga
`
`86Y
`
`90Y
`99mTc
`111In
`149Pm
`177Lu
`
`9.5
`
`78.3
`1.1
`
`14.7
`
`64.1
`6.0
`67.9
`53.0
`160.8
`
`-
`
`91, 93, 185, 296, 388
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`141
`245, 172
`286
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`-
`
`-
`
`2288
`-
`-
`1070
`236
`
`4150, 935
`
`-
`1880, 770
`
`2335, 2019, 1603, 1248, 1043
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`
`decay mode
`(cid:226)+ (17.4%)
`(cid:226)- (39%)
`EC
`(cid:226)+ (56%)
`EC (44%)
`EC (100%)
`(cid:226)+ (90%)
`EC (10%)
`(cid:226)+ (33%)
`EC (66%)
`(cid:226)- (72%)
`IT (100%)
`EC (100%)
`(cid:226)- (95.9%)
`(cid:226)- (100%)
`
`Figure 13. Structure of HYNIC.
`
`Figure 14. Structures of HYNIC-technetium complexes: (a)
`[Tc(HYNIC)(tricine)2]; (b) [Tc(HYNIC)(EDDA)Cl]; (c) [Tc(HYNIC)-
`(tricine)(L)].
`
`Figure 15. Structures of multidentate chelators: (a) N3S tri-
`amidethiol; (b) N2S4 diaminotetrathiol; (c) N2S2 diamidodithiol.
`
`Figure 16. Structures of: (a) MAG3; (b) MAG2-GABA.
`
`ance through the nontarget organs. Ideally, the half-life
`should be as short as possible to reach these two goals.
`Radionuclides most commonly used in radiopharmaceu-
`ticals range in half-lives from minutes (62Cu) to days (177-
`Lu).
`
`Copper (64Cu). There are two radionuclides of copper
`used in the radiopharmaceutical labeling. 64Cu (t0.5)12,7
`h) is a (cid:226)+-, 0.653 MeV (17.4% abundance), and (cid:226)--emitter,
`0.579 MeV (39% abundance), and it decays by electron
`capture. A good review on the biological chemistry of
`copper is a book by Linder (104).
`Gallium (66Ga, 67Ga, 68Ga). Gallium radionuclides can
`be either used for (cid:231)-scintigraphy or positron emission
`tomography (PET) imaging. 66Ga (t0.5 ) 9.5 h) is a
`medium half-life (cid:226)+-emitting radionuclide obtained from
`66Zn(p,n)66Ga cyclotron, applied in the limited number
`of cases. 67Ga (t0.5 ) 78.3 h) is produced in 68Zn(p,2n)67Ga
`cyclotron. 68Ga (t0.5 ) 1.1 h) is obtained from the 68Ge/68-
`Ga generator and it has been used in a limited number
`of clinical studies (105, 106).
`Yttrium (86Y, 90Y). There are two radionuclides of
`yttrium used in the radiopharmaceutical labeling. 86Y (t0.5
`) 14.7 h) is a (cid:226)+-emitting radionuclide, often used as an
`equivalent for 90Y in the PET imaging. 90Y (t0.5 ) 64 h) is
`a (cid:226)--emitter, which is probably the most frequently used
`radionuclide for targeted radiotherapy in human studies.
`It has a relatively high energy transfer and therefore can
`be used for imaging of bulky disease sites of solid tumors.
`90Y can be relatively easily obtained in a high-specific
`activity from 90Sr (107-109). 90Y is also available as a
`GMP commercial product.
`Technetium (99mTc). 99mTc is used in about 85% of
`all diagnostic applications. It has ideal properties for
`diagnostic imaging. The half-life of 6 h is long enough to
`synthesize the 99mTc-labeled radiopharmaceuticals and
`perform imaging studies, yet short enough to minimize
`the radiation dose to a patient. 99mTc emits a 140 keV
`(cid:231)-ray with 89% abundance which is close to optimum for
`imaging with the present (cid:231) cameras. This energy is
`sufficient for emerging from inside the body and for
`imaging internal organs. 99mTc is readily available at low
`costs from its parent nuclide 99Mo (t0.5 ) 66 h) from a
`99Mo/99mTc generator. At the concentration levels used for
`imaging (<10-6 M) neither its (cid:231)-radiation nor the soft
`(cid:226)-decay is hazardous (110).
`Indium (111In). 111In has the half-life of 67 h which
`makes this isotope ideal for labeling immunoglobulins,
`where imaging is performed over intervals of several
`days. This nuclide decays by electron capture with
`emission of (cid:231)-photons of 173 and 247 keV (89% and 95%
`abundance, respectively), which allows its use in (cid:231)-scin-
`tigraphy.
`The first peptide radiopharmaceutical approved for
`clinical use was the 111In labeled somatostatin analogue
`OctreoScan. Nevertheless, because of its less favorable
`half-life, 111In is inferior to 99mTc for diagnosis. 111In is
`often used as an equivalent for 90Y in scintigraphic
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1018, p. 9
`
`

`

`10 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 14, No. 1, 2003
`
`Table 3. Regulatory Peptides
`
`regulatory peptide
`SST (somatostatin)
`
`BN/GRP (bombesin/gastrin
`releasing peptide)
`VIP (vasoactive
`intestinal peptide)
`RGD-containing
`peptides/RGD-peptidomimetics
`R-MSH (R-melanocyte
`stimulating hormone)
`NT (neurotensin)
`
`SP (substance P)
`
`no. of amino acid
`residues
`14
`
`14
`
`28
`
`-
`
`13
`
`13
`
`11
`
`Fichna and Janecka
`
`receptor type (subtypes)
`SST receptors (sst1/sst2/sst3/sst4/sst5)
`
`BN/GRP receptors (GRP, NMB, BRS-3)
`
`VIP receptors (-)
`
`GPIIb/IIIa/platelet and
`vitronectin/integrin receptors
`R-MSH receptors (-)
`
`NT receptors (NT1, NT2, NT3)
`
`SP receptors (NK1)
`
`in vivo activity
`inhibition of hormone and
`exocrine secretion
`gut hormone release,
`regulation of exocrine secretion
`vasodilation, water, and
`electrolyte secretion in the gut
`inhibition of adhesive and
`aggregatory functions of platelets
`melanogenesis
`
`vasoconstriction, regulation of cardiac
`activity raise in vascular permeability
`hypotension, salivary gland secretion,
`transmission of pain
`
`BFCA
`DTPA
`TETA
`HYNIC
`TETA
`HYNIC
`S-S (direct)
`HYNIC
`N2S2
`HYNIC
`MAG3
`HYNIC
`
`targeted disease
`tumor (neuroendocrine)
`
`tumor (neuroendocrine)
`
`tumor (neuroendocrine)
`
`tumor
`tumor
`tumor
`thrombosis
`
`ref
`(3, 113)
`(152, 153)
`(61, 118)
`(152, 153)
`(114, 115)
`(116)
`(117)
`(94)
`(119)
`(120-122)
`(40, 41, 123, 124)
`
`VIP analogues
`RGD-containing peptides/
`RGD-peptidomimetics
`S-S (direct)
`R-MSH analogues
`(125, 126)
`tumor (breast, prostate)
`CCMSH
`(127, 128)
`tumor
`DTPA
`SP
`SP analogues
`(129, 130)
`in

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket