throbber

`John Marquis; Jian Wang; Kevin Maresca; Shawn Hillier; Craig Zimmerman; John Joyal; John Babich
`
`Author & Article Information
`Cancer Res (2009) 69 (9_Supplement): 4467.
`
`Split-Screen
`
` Share 
`
` Tools 
`
` Versions 
`
`Abstract
`
`Seprase, also know as fibroblast activating protein alpha (FAP\#945;) is a key component of the
`tumor microenvironment. Its expression is normally restricted to fetal mesenchymal tissue and sites
`of wound healing, but is selectively over expressed in the tumor stroma. It is expressed in cancer-
`associated fibroblasts of greater than 90% of human primary epithelial tumors including breast, lung,
`colorectal, gastric, cervical and ovarian cancers, making it an attractive target to exploit for
`noninvasive radioimaging, as well as targeted radiotherapy of cancer. Seprase is an 88 kDa, type II,
`intregral membrane peptidase in the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-IV) family of prolyl peptidases. We
`designed, synthesized and evaluated a series of iodine substituted benzamido-glycine-
`boronoproline analogs as seprase antagonists, with the potential to be radiolabeled with either 123I or
`131I for radiodiagnostic or radiotherapeutic use, respectively. Iodine was substituted at the three
`positions of the benzene ring, and compounds were assessed for their ability to inhibit the enzymatic
`activity of recombinant human seprase in a fluorescence based assay. Among the most active
`compounds, an ortho-iodine analog (MIP-1231) displayed an IC 50 of 6 nM, whereas even more
`potent para- (MIP-1232) and meta-substituted (MIP-1233) analogs both had IC 50 values of 0.6 nM.
`To examine the selectivity for seprase over other prolyl peptidases, compounds were tested for their
`ability to inhibit the enzymatic activity of prolyl oligopeptidase (POP), the only other endopeptidase
`in this family of peptidases. The IC50 values of MIP-1231, MIP-1232, and MIP-1233 for POP were
`58, 19, and 7 nM, respectively, with POP/FAP ratios of 10, 32, and 12, respectively. These data
`demonstrate that although the para- and meta- substituted compounds have similar ability to inhibit
`seprase activity, the para- substituted analog displayed better selectivity. To examine binding to
`Skip to Main Content
`seprase in vivo, human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cells were stably transfected with the human
`seprase gene, and highly expressing clones were selected and verified by Western blotting. MIP-
`1232 was radiolabeled with 123I for saturation binding analysis using the stable seprase expressing
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1035, p. 1
`
`ARTICLE NAVIGATION
`CANCER CHEM ISTRY | MAY 0 1 2009
`Abstract #4467: Targeting tumor microenvironment with
`radiolabeled inhibitors of seprase (FAP\#945;)
`
`
`

`

`cells. The Kd of MIP-1232 for seprase was determined to be 30 nM, whereas there was no specific
`binding to a non-expressing clone. The Bmax of the seprase expressing cells was determined to be
`approximately 8 pmol/106 cells. In addition, MIP-1232 was shown to inhibit the seprase enzymatic
`activity of the stable seprase expressing cells. These radiolabeled seprase inhibitors are currently
`being evaluated for tumor uptake and tissue distribution in mice bearing seprase expressing HEK-
`293 xenografts, as well as tumors that promote seprase expression in the tumor associated stroma.
`Radiolabeled seprase inhibitors could be exploited for the diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and
`potential treatment of solid tumors.
`
`Citation Information: In: Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res; 2009 Apr 18-22; Denver, CO. Philadelphia
`(PA): AACR; 2009. Abstract nr 4467.
`
`100th AACR Annual Meeting-- Apr 18-22, 2009; Denver, CO
`
`American Association for Cancer Research
`
`Advertisement
`
`View Metrics
`
`Citing Articles Via
`
`Email Alerts
`
`Article Activity Alert
`
`Skip to Main Content
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1035, p. 2
`
`
`

`

`eTOC Alert
`
`Latest News
`
`Investigators Note Hazards of Cutting NIH Indirect
`Costs
`
`CAR T Cells Can Arm Other Immune Cells By “Nibbling”
`Them
`
`HER3-Targeted Bispecific Shrinks Rare Cancers with
`NRG1 Fusions
`View more recent articles 
`
`Breaking
`
`Judge Extends Freeze on Proposed NIH Cuts
`
`CDC Vaccine Meeting, First Under RFK Jr.’s Tenure,
`Postponed
`
`Woman Remains Cancer-Free 18-Plus Years After CAR
`T-Cell Therapy
`View more recent articles 
`
`Research Watch
`
`Neuroendocrine Differentiation Promotes Lung
`Tumorigenesis Via Electrical Activity
`
`Disruption of the SKI Complex Confers Dependency on
`PELO in Cancer
`
`Early Progenitor Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells
`Promote Glioblastoma
`
`Skip to Main Content
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1035, p. 3
`
`

`

`View more recent articles 
`
`Issues
`
`Online First
`
`Collections
`
`News
`
`Twitter
`
`Online ISSN 1538-7445
`
` Print ISSN 0008-5472
`
`Blood Cancer
`Discovery
`Cancer Discovery
`Cancer
`Epidemiology,
`Biomarkers &
`Prevention
`Cancer Immunology
`Research
`Cancer Prevention
`Research
`
`Cancer Research
`Cancer Research
`Communications
`Clinical Cancer
`Research
`Molecular Cancer
`Research
`Molecular Cancer
`Therapeutics
`
`Information on
`Advertising & Reprints
`
`Information for
`Institutions/Librarians
`
` RSS Feeds
`
`Privacy Policy
`
`   
`
`Copyright © 2025 by the American Association for Cancer Research.
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1035, p. 4
`
`AACR Journals
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket