throbber
Clinical Science (2005) 108, 1–16 (Printed in Great Britain)
`
`1
`
`R
`
`E
`
`V
`
`I
`
`E
`
`W
`
`Dipeptidyl peptidase IV and related enzymes
`in cell biology and liver disorders
`
`Mark D. GORRELL
`A.W. Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Centenary Institute of Cancer Medicine and
`Cell Biology and Discipline of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
`
`A B S T R A C T
`
`DP (dipeptidyl peptidase) IV is the archetypal member of its six-member gene family. Four members
`of this family, DPIV, FAP (fibroblast activation protein), DP8 and DP9, have a rare substrate speci-
`ficity, hydrolysis of a prolyl bond two residues from the N-terminus. The ubiquitous DPIV glyco-
`protein has proved interesting in the fields of immunology, endocrinology, haematology and
`endothelial cell and cancer biology and DPIV has become a novel target for Type II diabetes
`therapy. The crystal structure shows that the soluble form of DPIV comprises two domains, an
`α/β-hydrolase domain and an eight-blade β-propeller domain. The propeller domain contains the
`ADA (adenosine deaminase) binding site, a dimerization site, antibody epitopes and two open-
`ings for substrate access to the internal active site. FAP is structurally very similar to DPIV, but FAP
`protein expression is largely confined to diseased and damaged tissue, notably the tissue remodel-
`ling interface in chronically injured liver. DPIV has a variety of peptide substrates, the best studied
`being GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1), NPY (neuropeptide Y) and CXCL12. The DPIV family has
`roles in bone marrow mobilization. The functional interactions of DPIV and FAP with extra-
`cellular matrix confer roles for these proteins in cancer biology. DP8 and DP9 are widely distri-
`buted and indirectly implicated in immune function. The DPL (DP-like) glycoproteins that lack
`peptidase activity, DPL1 and DPL2, are brain-expressed potassium channel modulators. Thus the
`six members of the DPIV gene family exhibit diverse biological roles.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Few proteinases are capable of cleaving the post-proline
`bond and very few can cleave a prolyl bond two pos-
`itions from the N-terminus. The latter small subset of
`serine proteinases, the post-proline dipeptidyl aminopep-
`tidases, consists of the four enzymes of the DP (di-
`peptidyl peptidase) IV gene family, DPIV, FAP (fibro-
`
`blast activation protein), DP8 and DP9 [1], and DP-II
`(E.C. 3.4.14.2) [2]. DPIV (E.C. 3.4.14.5) is a ubiquitous,
`multifunctional homodimeric glycoprotein with roles in
`nutrition, metabolism, the immune and endocrine sys-
`tems, bone marrow mobilization, cancer growth and cell
`adhesion. DPIV ligands include ADA (adenosine de-
`+
`+
`/H
`ion exchanger 3 [4] and
`aminase) [3], kidney Na
`fibronectin [5]. Important DPIV substrates include at
`
`Key words: adenosine deaminase, CD26, diabetes, dipeptidyl peptidase IV, fibroblast activation protein, post-proline amino-
`peptidase.
`Abbreviations: ADA, adenosine deaminase; DP, dipeptidyl peptidase; DPL, DP-like; ECM, extracellular matrix; FAP, fibroblast
`activation protein; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide; GKO, gene
`knockout; GLP, glucagon-like peptide; GRP, gastrin-releasing peptide; HSC, hepatic stellate cell; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin;
`MAb, monoclonal antibody; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; NPY, neuropeptide Y; PACAP, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating
`peptide; POP, prolyl oligopeptidase; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; sCD26, soluble CD26; SREBP, sterol
`regulatory element-binding protein; srhCD26, soluble recombinant human CD26; uPA, urokinase plasminogen activator; VIP,
`vasoactive intestinal peptide.
`Correspondence: Dr Mark D. Gorrell (email M.Gorrell@centenary.usyd.edu.au).
`
`C(cid:1) 2005 The Biochemical Society
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1041, p. 1
`
`

`

`2
`
`M. D. Gorrell
`
`Table 1 Some natural substrates of DPIV
`MDC, macrophage-derived chemokine; Mig, monokine induced by IFN γ ;
`IP10,
`IFN γ -induced protein;
`IFN-inducible T-cell α chemoattractant;
`IGF-1,
`I-TAC,
`insulin-like growth factor-1; hCGα, human chorionic gonadotrophin α chain;
`GHRF, growth hormone releasing factor; LHα leutinizing hormone α chain.
`
`Substrate
`
`GLP-1
`GLP-2
`GIP
`GRP
`Substance P
`NPY
`Peptide YY(1–36)
`PACAP38
`CCL5/RANTES
`CCL11/eotaxin
`CCL22/MDC
`CXCL9/Mig
`CXCL10/IP10
`CXCL11/I-TAC
`CXCL12/SDF-1
`IGF-1
`Prolactin
`hCGα
`GHRF
`LHα
`Thyrotropin α
`Peptide histidine methionine
`Enkephalins
`Vasostatin-1
`
`N-terminus
`
`His-Ala-Glu-
`His-Ala-Asp-
`Tyr-Ala-Asp-
`Val-Pro-Leu-
`Arg-Pro-Lys-
`Tyr-Pro-Ser-
`Tyr-Pro-Ile-
`His-Ser-Asp-
`Ser-Pro-Tyr-
`Gly-Pro-Gly-
`Gly-Pro-Tyr-
`Thr Pro-Val-
`Val-Pro-Leu-
`Phe-Pro Met-
`Lys-Pro-Val-
`Gly-Pro-Glu-
`Thr-Pro-Val-
`Ala-Pro-Asp-
`Tyr-Ala-Glu-
`Phe-Pro-Asn-
`Phe-Pro-Asp-
`His-Ala-Asp-
`Tyr-Pro-Val-
`Leu-Pro-Val-
`
`Reference
`
`[19]
`[20]
`[19]
`[21,22]
`[21]
`[23]
`[23]
`[22,24]
`[25]
`[25]
`[25]
`[26]
`[25,26]
`[26]
`[27]
`[28]
`[21]
`[21]
`[19,24]
`[28]
`[28]
`[19,24]
`[29]
`[30]
`
`least nine chemokines, NPY (neuropeptide Y), pep-
`tide YY, GLP (glucagon-like peptide)-1, GLP-2 and
`GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide; Table 1).
`DPIV inhibitors are in clinical trials as a new therapy
`for non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (Type II di-
`abetes) [6,7]. Therapeutic benefit is derived from reduced
`inactivation of GLP-1 and GIP by DPIV-mediated cleav-
`age, thus stimulating greater insulin production. Further-
`more, on a high-fat diet, the DPIV GKO (gene knock-
`out) mouse has reduced appetite and increased energy
`expenditure compared with wild-type animals [8], sug-
`gesting that DPIV-selective inhibitors may be useful as
`anti-obesity agents that might combat liver steatosis.
`Lymphocytes and endothelial and epithelial cells express
`DPIV (for review, see [9]). In addition to the integral
`membrane form, a soluble form of DPIV occurs in serum
`[10].
`DPIV has a post-proline dipeptidyl aminopeptidase
`activity preferentially cleaving Xaa-Pro or Xaa-Ala di-
`peptides (where Xaa is any amino acid) from the N-ter-
`minus of polypeptides. The POP (prolyl oligopeptidase;
`EC 3.4.21.26) family, a group of aminopeptidases and
`
`C(cid:1) 2005 The Biochemical Society
`
`COLOUR
`
`Figure 1 Schematic presentation of the proteins of the
`DPIV family and of POP
`The arrangement of structural domains is depicted. Approximate positions of
`N-glycosylation sites, cysteine residues and some residues required for enzyme
`activity and ADA or antibody binding are depicted. Not to scale.
`
`endopeptidases able to hydrolyse the post-proline bond,
`includes the DPIV gene family. The DPIV gene family
`is distinguished by a pair of glutamate residues that are
`distant from the catalytic serine in the primary struc-
`ture (Figure 1) [1], but within the catalytic pocket in
`the tertiary structure [11]. These glutamate residues, at
`positions 205 and 206 in DPIV, are essential for DP
`activity [12,13]. The DPIV gene family has six members,
`including FAP, DP8, DP9 and the two non-enzymes
`DPL1 and DPL2 (Table 2).
`This review complements recent reviews [14–18] in
`discussing the structure, activities and roles of the DPIV
`gene family in T-cell function, chemoattraction of leuco-
`cytes, cancer, angiogenesis, fibrinolysis, haematopoiesis
`and energy metabolism.
`
`IN VIVO EXPRESSION OF DPIV/CD26
`
`DPIV is expressed in all organs, by capillary endothelial
`cells and activated lymphocytes and on apical surfaces
`of epithelial, including acinar, cells. In humans, DPIV is
`present in the gastrointestinal tract, biliary tract, exocrine
`pancreas, kidney, thymus, lymph node, uterus, placenta,
`prostate, adrenal, parotid, the sweat, salivary and mam-
`mary glands and endothelia of all organs examined,
`including liver, spleen, lungs and brain (reviewed pre-
`viously, see [9,14]). DPIV is a 110 kDa glycoprotein
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1041, p. 2
`
`

`

`Table 2 Enzymes of the human DPIV family
`Key: (cid:1), yes;×, no; ?, not known.
`Characteristic
`
`Hydrolysis of H-Gly-Pro
`Hydrolysis of H-Ala-Pro
`Hydrolysis of H-Arg-Pro
`Cleavage of chemokines
`Gelatinase activity (collagen I)
`Dimeric form
`Binding to adenosine deaminase
`mRNA expression in normal adult tissues
`Protein expression in normal adult
`Protein expression by activated fibroblasts
`Expression by fetal mesenchymal cells
`Expression by activated hepatic stellate cells
`Expression by lymphocytes
`
`DP8
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`Poor
`?



`Ubiquitous
`?
`?
`?
`?
`(cid:1)
`
`that is catalytically active only as a dimer. CD26 cell-
`surface expression on T-cells increases 5–10- fold follow-
`ing antigenic or mitogenic stimulation.
`Human DPIV overexpression in mice produces fewer
`thymocytes and peripheral blood leucocytes
`from
`+
`thymocytes
`2 months of age, more single positive CD8
`+
`+
`and CD4
`peripheral blood
`and more apoptotic CD8
`lymphocytes [31].
`Many epithelial tumours and cancer cell lines express
`DPIV, but DPIV expression is down-regulated or absent
`in tumour cells [1]. However, solid tumours contain
`DPIV in the stromal fibroblasts [1,32].
`
`FAP
`
`FAP has 52 % amino acid identity with DPIV, but FAP
`and DPIV differ in expression patterns and substrate
`specificities (Table 2). FAP has a collagen type I-specific
`gelatinase activity [33,34]. In contrast, we have detected
`no gelatinase activity from recombinant human DPIV
`in zymograms of transfected CHO (Chinese-hamster
`ovary) cells or of purified protein [33] or in gelatinase
`assays of transfected monkey fibroblastic [14] or human
`epithelial [35] cell lines. Like DPIV, catalysis depends
`upon dimerization [33,36]. Interestingly, DPIV and FAP
`form heterodimers [37]. A soluble form of FAP has
`been isolated from normal bovine and human serum but,
`curiously, despite the abundance of serum DPIV, serum
`FAP is homodimeric [38,39].
`Controlling gelatinases is vital for organ structure.
`Unlike MMPs (matrix metalloproteinases), which have
`a proenzyme form, the gelatinase activity of FAP is con-
`stitutive. FAP is normally restricted to a subset of glu-
`cagon: producing α-cells in pancreatic islets [32]. FAP
`is strongly expressed by activated HSCs (hepatic stellate
`cells), notably near lipid accumulation, called steatosis,
`
`Dipeptidyl peptidase IV gene family
`
`3
`
`DPIV
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`×(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`Ubiquitous
`Ubiquitous
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)

`(cid:1)
`
`FAP
`
`poor
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`?
`
`(cid:1)

`Ubiquitous
`Serum, pancreas
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)

`
`DP9
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`Poor
`?



`Ubiquitous
`?
`?
`?
`?
`(cid:1)
`
`COLOUR
`
`Figure 2 Schematic representation of FAP and DPIV in
`cirrhotic liver
`In cirrhotic nodules, FAP is expressed by myofibroblasts (mf) in the septum and by
`HSCs following activation in the portal–parenchymal interface. DPIV is expressed
`on activated T-cells, capillary endothelium and the bile canalicular surface of
`hepatocytes. Not to scale.
`
`in liver and by mesenchymal cells in other sites of
`tissue remodelling such as stromal fibroblasts of epithelial
`tumours and healing wounds and embryonic mesen-
`chymal cells [32–34,40,41]. The FAP GKO mouse has
`a normal phenotype for body weight, organ weights,
`histological examination of major organs and haemato-
`logical analysis [42].
`The HSC has an important role in the pathogenesis
`of cirrhosis. Following liver injury, HSCs undergo activ-
`ation and transdifferentiation to become myofibroblasts.
`Significant functional changes accompany this pheno-
`typic change, including alterations in ECM (extracellular
`matrix) production and expression of various MMPs and
`their inhibitors. FAP is expressed by myofibroblasts
`and a subset of activated human HSCs at the tissue–re-
`modelling interface, which is the PPI (portal–paren-
`chymal
`interface), of cirrhotic liver [33] (Figure 2).
`
`C(cid:1) 2005 The Biochemical Society
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1041, p. 3
`
`

`

`4
`
`M. D. Gorrell
`
`Table 3 Physical attributes of human DPIV-related proteins
`(cid:1), yes;×, no; ?, not known.
`∗
`The long form is a splice variant.
`Attribute
`DPIV
`
`DP8
`
`FAP
`
`Synonyms
`GenBank® accession
`
`CD26, ADAbp
`M80536
`
`References
`Gene location
`Human
`Mouse
`Number of exons
`Gene size (kb)
`Transmembrane domain
`Monomer mobility
`Number of amino acids
`
`[57]
`
`2q24.2
`2
`26
`81.8
`(cid:1)
`110 kDa
`766
`
`Seprase
`U09278
`
`[37]
`
`2q24.3
`2
`26
`72.8
`(cid:1)
`95 kDa
`760
`
`–
`AF221634
`NM 130434
`[45,48]
`
`15q22.32
`9
`20
`71

`100 kDa
`882
`
`DP9
`
`–
`AY374518
`NM 139159
`[13,48,49]
`
`19q13.3
`17
`19
`47.3

`110 kDa
`863
`
`∗
`DP9 long
`
`–
`AF542510
`AF452102
`[35]
`
`22
`48.6

`?
`971
`
`DPL1
`
`DPL2
`
`POP
`
`DPP6, DPPX
`M96859
`M96860
`[52]
`
`7q36.2
`5
`26
`911
`(cid:1)
`97 kDa
`∗
`, 803
`865
`
`PEP, PREP
`AB020018
`
`DPP10
`AY387785
`NM 1004360
`[48,50,51]
`
`2q14.1
`1
`26
`1402
`(cid:1)
`97 kDa
`∗
`796
`
`6q21
`10
`15
`40.2

`80 kDa
`712
`
`FAP-positive cells are present in early stages of liver
`injury, and FAP immunostaining intensity strongly cor-
`relates with the histological severity of fibrosis in chronic
`liver disease [40].
`Conferring FAP expression upon a human epithelial
`cell line increases tumorigenicity in mice, but has the
`opposite effect on a melanoma cell line [43,44]. The bio-
`logical importance of these observations is unknown
`because tumour cells do not naturally express FAP
`in vivo.
`
`DP8 AND DP9
`
`The discovery of DP8 and DP9, which are ubiquitously
`expressed enzymes with DPIV-like peptidase activity
`[35,45], means that previous studies using DPIV inhi-
`bitors to infer functions of DPIV will require reinter-
`pretation where the inhibitor is found to also inhibit
`DP8 or DP9 [46]. However, little is known about the
`expression or functional significance of DP8 or DP9.
`DP8 and DP9 are both soluble proteins localized in the
`cytoplasm. Both are DPs that are active as monomers
`and hydrolyse H-Ala-Pro- and H-Gly-Pro-derived sub-
`strates, although less efficiently than DPIV. Neither
`DP8 nor DP9 exhibit gelatinase activity and no natural
`substrates are known.
`
`DP8
`DP8 has 26 % amino acid identity with the protein
`sequences of DPIV and FAP and is a dipeptidyl amino-
`peptidase, hydrolysing the prolyl bond after a penulti-
`mate proline [45]. However, some biochemical charac-
`teristics of DP8 are similar to the endopeptidase POP
`(Table 3). Like DP8, POP is a soluble cytoplasmic protein,
`is active as a monomer and lacks N-linked and O-linked
`
`C(cid:1) 2005 The Biochemical Society
`
`glycosylation sites. Like DPIV, DP8 mRNA expression
`is ubiquitous. DP8 mRNA levels are elevated in both
`activated and transformed lymphocytes. DPIV traverses
`the TGN (trans-Golgi network), which is in a secretion
`pathway, enters secretory vesicles then moves to the cell
`surface [47]. Despite finding DP8 in Golgi as well as
`elsewhere in cytoplasm, we have not found evidence
`of secretion of DP8 by transfected COS or 293T cells
`[35].
`
`DP9
`DP9 is the closest relative to DP8, having 61 % amino acid
`identity. DP9 has two forms, having open reading frames
`of 2589 bp and 2913 bp. A ubiquitous predominant DP9
`mRNA transcript at 4.4 kb represents the short form and
`a less abundant 5.0 kb transcript present predominantly
`in muscle represents the long form (Table 3) [35,48,49].
`DP9 has only two potential N-linked glycosylation sites.
`Paradoxically for a cytoplasmic protein, DP9 contains an
`RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) potential cell attachment sequence,
`which is the best characterized integrin-binding motif,
`near its N-terminus. In contrast, the RGD motif in mouse
`DPIV has a different location, on propeller blade four
`where ADA binds to human DPIV. We obtain DP9 sizes
`on SDS/PAGE of 110 kDa and 95 kDa [35], whereas
`others report a single band at about 95–100 kDa [48,49].
`DP9 has a predicted polypeptide size of 98 263 Da, so
`we propose that intact fully glycosylated DP9 runs at
`110 kDa.
`Northern blot analysis on normal tissues shows DP9
`mRNA expression predominantly in muscle, liver and
`leucocytes. However, in silico examination of 255 human
`DP9 ESTs (expressed sequence tags; UniGene Cluster
`Hs.237617) indicate that DP9 mRNA expression is most
`abundant in leucocytic cell lines and diseased and tumour-
`bearing tissues including melanoma [35].
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1041, p. 4
`
`

`

`Dipeptidyl peptidase IV gene family
`
`5
`
`Table 4 In vivo immunological and haematopoietic effects of DPIV inhibitors
`∗
`GKO mouse was not inhibitor treated.
`
`Outcome
`
`Name of inhibitor
`
`Type of inhibitor
`
`Wild-type mouse
`
`DPIV GKO mouse
`
`Reference
`
`Pro-Pro Diphenyl phosphonate ester
`Ala-Pro-nitrobenzoylhydroxylamine
`Lyz-[Z-(NO2)]-thiazolidide
`Isoleucyl-thiazolidide
`Val-boro-Pro
`Val-boro-Pro
`Diprotin A (Ile-Pro-Ile)
`Diprotin A or valine-pyrrolidide
`
`Irreversible, competitive
`Irreversible, suicide
`Reversible, competitive
`Reversible, competitive
`Irreversible
`Irreversible
`Reversible, competitive
`Reversible, competitive
`
`Prolonged cardiac allograft survival
`Suppression of experimental arthritis
`Suppression of experimental arthritis
`Exacerbates NPY + Con A-stimulated paw inflammation
`Tumour Regression
`Accelerates recovery from neutropenia
`Impaired G-CSF-induced haematopoiesis
`Increased bone marrow transplant efficiency
`
`Not done
`Same as wild type
`Same as wild type
`Not done
`Same as wild type
`Same as wild type
`∗
`GKO same as inhibitor
`∗
`GKO same as inhibitor
`
`[63]
`[58]
`[58]
`[65]
`[66]
`[61]
`[67]
`[64]
`
`THE NON-ENZYME DPIV GENE FAMILY
`MEMBERS: DPL1 AND DPL2
`
`Like DPL1, DPL2 associates with and modulates A-type
`potassium channels [56].
`
`Two enzymatically inactive proteins closely related to
`DPIV lack DPIV catalytic activity due to mutations of the
`catalytic serine residue and its neighbouring tryptophan
`residue, giving a surrounding sequence of Gly-Lys-Asp-
`Tyr-Gly-Gly instead of the motif Gly-Trp-Ser-Tyr-Gly-
`Gly. Since we cloned the second human DPIV paralogue
`that lacks the catalytic serine, we use the names DPL (DP-
`like) 1 and 2 for these proteins to simplify the nomen-
`clature [1,50]. As restoring the enzyme activity of DPL1
`or DPL2 would very likely require both the serine and
`tryptopan residues, their biological activities are probably
`exerted via binding interactions. It is very unlikely that
`provision only of a serine residue could rescue an enzyme
`activity in DPL2, as has been hypothesized [51].
`DPL1 was previously called DPPX or DPP6 [52]. Ex-
`pression of neuronal DPL1 increases in response to
`kainic acid injection into the hippocampus, suggesting
`possible involvement in CNS (central nervous system)
`plasticity [53]. DPL1 has a crucial role in the traffick-
`ing, membrane targeting and function of A-type potas-
`sium channels in somatodendritic compartments of
`neurons, which are important in neuronal function and
`in dysfunction, such as Parkinson’s disease [54]. Despite
`the absence of DP activity, DPL1 exerts an important
`developmental function. The mouse rump white mu-
`tation, which lacks expression of the DPL1 gene, is em-
`bryonic lethal in homozygotes and causes a pigmentation
`defect in heterozygotes [55].
`DPL2 has been cloned by others and called DPP10
`[48,51,56]. Like DPL1, DPL2 is alternatively spliced. The
`DPL2, DPIV and FAP genes are all on chromosome 2,
`and DPL2 is more closely related to DPIV and FAP than
`is DPL1. Intronic portions of the DPL2 gene link to
`asthma [51]. DPL2 mRNA expression occurs in brain,
`adrenal gland and pancreas [48,50]. This is similar to the
`expression pattern of the long form of DPL1 [52,53].
`
`INHIBITOR DATA INDICATE IMPORTANCE
`OF DPIV-RELATED DPs
`
`It is likely that many DPIV inhibitors are selective for
`the DPIV family rather than DPIV itself [48]. Therefore
`some potential functions of DP8 and DP9 may be
`inferred from studies in which a function has been at-
`tributed to DPIV by observing diminution of that func-
`tion in cells or animals treated with a DPIV inhibitor.
`In several paradigms, DPIV inhibitor treatment elicits
`similar responses in cells and animals irrespective of pos-
`session or lack of DPIV expression (Table 4). For example,
`DPIV inhibitors suppress collagen-induced and alkyl-
`diamine-induced arthritis to similar extents in DPIV-
`deficient German Fischer344 and wild-type rats [58].
`Moreover, T-cell proliferation in vitro [59] and immune
`responses in vivo [58] are diminished in the presence
`of DPIV inhibitors; however, the DPIV-deficient rat has
`normal immune responses [60]. These data imply that the
`peptidase activities of DP8 and/or DP9 have important
`functions in activated lymphocytes. FAP is excluded from
`consideration because it is not present in leucocytes.
`The DPIV/DP-II inhibitor Val-boro-Pro stimulates
`haematopoiesis to similar extents in DPIV GKO and
`wild-type mice [61], indicating that bone marrow ex-
`presses important DPIV-related enzymes. In animal
`models, DPIV inhibitors suppress antibody production
`[62] and prolong the survival of heart transplants [63]. It is
`possible that these phenomena also relate to functions of
`DP8 and/or DP9, rather than DPIV. Therapeutic DPIV
`inhibitors should either avoid inhibition of DP8 and
`DP9, or the effects of inhibiting DP8 and DP9 should
`be understood.
`Recently, the non-selective DPIV inhibitors valine-
`pyrrolidide and diprotin A have been shown to greatly
`
`C(cid:1) 2005 The Biochemical Society
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1041, p. 5
`
`

`

`6
`
`M. D. Gorrell
`
`COLOUR
`
`Figure 3 Secondary, tertiary and quaternary structure of DPIV
`(A) The DPIV homodimer as a ribbon diagram with each monomer coloured blue to red, carbohydrates are depicted in ball-and-stick representation and positions
`of important amino acids as spheres. The orange and yellow residues Leu294 and Val341 are essential for ADA binding, whereas the red positively charged residues
`Arg343 and Lys441 are important in epitopes of antibodies that inhibit ADA binding [86]. Glu205 and Glu206, coloured blue, are essential for enzyme activity [12].
`Both domains contribute to the dimerization interface, the β-propeller contributing two β-strands that protrude from blade 4. Substrate access to the catalytic site
`occurs via the side openings that face each other and are between the eight-blade β-propeller (bottom) and α/β hydrolase (top) domains. The transmembrane
`
`C(cid:1) 2005 The Biochemical Society
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1041, p. 6
`
`

`

`Dipeptidyl peptidase IV gene family
`
`7
`
`enhance the efficiency of bone marrow cell transplant-
`ation [64]. The administration of DPIV inhibitor to the
`−/−
`mouse in this model would be interesting.
`DPIV
`
`(Figure 3). A single amino acid point mutation near the
`C-terminus, His750 → Glu, is sufficient to prevent dimer-
`ization [79].
`
`THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE
`OF DPIV
`
`The seven DPIV crystal structures recently reported
`reflect a sudden global interest in the pharmaceutical
`design of DPIV inhibitors [11,72–77]. The DPIV glyco-
`protein is a dimer (Figure 3). Each monomer subunit
`consists of two domains, an α/β-hydrolase domain (re-
`sidues 39–51 and 501–766) and an eight-blade β-propeller
`domain (residues 59–497), that enclose a large cavity of
`(1 A˚ = 0.1 nm) in diameter. Access to
`approx. 30–45 A˚
`this cavity is provided by a large side opening of ap-
`prox. 15 A˚ [76]. However, only elongated peptides, or
`unfolded or partly unfolded protein fragments, can reach
`the small pocket within this cavity that contains the
`active site. DPIV contains nine N-linked glycosylation
`sites that lie predominantly on the propeller domain near
`the dimerization interface [75] and perhaps shield this
`trypsin-resistant extracellular protein from proteolysis.
`
`The active site and catalytic mechanism
`The residues forming the catalytic triad are Ser630, Asp708
`and His740. In addition, Tyr547 in the hydrolase domain is
`essential for catalytic activity and in the crystal structure
`appears to stabilize the tetrahedral oxyanion intermediate
`form of a substrate [78]. Two glutamate residues in the
`catalytic pocket, Glu205 and Glu206 (Figure 3A), align
`the substrate peptide by forming salt bridges to its N-ter-
`minus, leaving room for only two amino acids before the
`peptide reaches the active serine residue, thus explain-
`ing its dipeptide-cleaving activity. Furthermore, in the
`substrate second position only amino acids with smaller
`side chains such as proline, alanine and glycine can fit
`into the narrow hydrophobic pocket. Thus the crystal
`structures have helped to explain the substrate specificity
`of DPIV and the mutation data showing that Glu205 and
`Glu206 are essential for catalysis [12,13].
`An intriguing aspect of DPIV biochemistry is the de-
`pendence of peptidase activity upon homodimerization.
`Dimerization requires the hydrolase domain [13] and
`a protrusion from the fourth blade of the β-propeller
`
`The unusual propeller of DPIV
`β-Propellers have four to eight blades formed by a
`repeated subunit containing at least 30 and generally
`50 amino acids in a β-sheet of four anti-parallel strands.
`Propellers commonly act as scaffolding for protein–pro-
`tein interactions [80,81]. The points of contact with
`ligand and antibodies are formed by loops contributed
`by adjacent propeller blades such that binding epitopes
`depend upon tertiary structure. DPIV has all of these
`characteristics.
`The structure of DPIV is unique among leucocyte
`surface molecules. Other leucocyte surface antigens that
`include a β-propeller domain are CD100 [82] and integrin
`α-chain [83], which have seven-blade propellers. As
`DPIV is a type II protein, the propeller domain points
`its lower face towards the extracellular milieu (see Fig-
`ure 3A). The eight-blade β-propeller domain of DPIV is
`more disordered than other propellers.
`
`The ADA binding site on DPIV
`ADA (EC 3.5.4.4) is a soluble globular 43 kDa enzyme
`present in all mammalian tissues. ADA catalyses the
`irreversible deamination of adenosine to inosine and of
`(cid:4)
`(cid:4)
`-deoxyadenosine to 2
`-deoxyinosine. ADA derived
`2
`from rabbits, cattle and humans binds to human, but not
`mouse, DPIV. ADA binds human DPIV with a KA of
`4–20 nM. Both monomeric and dimeric DPIV bind
`ADA [13,77]. Localizing ADA to the cell surface by its
`binding to CD26 probably reduces inhibition of T-cell
`proliferation by extracellular adenosine.
`Three charged residues on ADA, Glu139, Arg142 and
`Asp143 [84,85], have been identified by point mutation as
`important for ADA–DPIV binding. The crystal structure
`of DPIV with ADA shows that the ADA binding is
`located, as predicted from the model [86], on the outer
`edges of the fourth and fifth blades on the lower side
`near the lower face of the β-propeller domain of DPIV.
`Only one salt bridge binds ADA to DPIV (Figure 3C).
`Most of the involved residues on DPIV are hydrophobic
`and most of the 13 involved residues on ADA, which
`are all polar, are charged [77]. Generally, protein–protein
`binding primarily involves hydrophobic surfaces with
`
`domain (residues 7–28) is above the molecule in this view of the extracellular portion, residues 39–766, of human DPIV. The Figure was prepared using the atomic
`co-ordinates having Protein Data Bank code 1N1M [11], MOLSCRIPT and Canvas v. 8.06. (B) A surface representation of the DPIV monomer with the negatively charged
`surface coloured red and positively charged surface coloured blue. Viewed side-on (on left) and towards the propeller lower face (on right). An inhibitor is coloured
`yellow to indicate the position of the catalytic pocket. Reproduced from [11] with permission. (C) In these surface representations of DPIV and its ligand, ADA amino
`acids in the binding interface are labelled. Positively and negatively charged residues are blue and red, and non-polar and polar uncharged residues are yellow and
`orange respectively. The helices 1 and 2 of ADA are labelled α1 and α2. The DPIV monomer is oriented similarly to the monomer at the right in (A). In each image,
`c(cid:1) (2004) American Society for Biochemistry
`a large arrow points towards the central opening of the propeller lower face. Reproduced from [77] with permission.
`and Molecular Biology.
`
`C(cid:1) 2005 The Biochemical Society
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1041, p. 7
`
`

`

`8
`
`M. D. Gorrell
`
`some salt bridges that are mostly peripheral in the binding
`interface. Thus the amino acid composition of the ADA–
`DPIV binding site is unusual, perhaps due to the short
`evolutionary time that it has undergone selective pressure.
`ADA binding to human DPIV is blocked by certain
`anti-DPIV MAb (monoclonal antibodies) that define a
`similar epitope. MAb that block ADA binding rely upon
`Val341 and Thr440-Lys441 of DPIV for binding [86]. The
`DPIV structure shows that these amino acids are on one
`side of the propeller and distant from both of the open-
`ings, which explains the lack of interference from either
`ADA or MAb with the catalytic activity of DPIV
`or ADA. This location of ADA binding also positions
`ADA away from the cell surface and perhaps increases
`accessibility to ligands such as A1-adenosine receptor [87]
`and plasminogen-2 [85].
`
`Protein structure in the DPIV family
`Relating the structures of the DPIV family members to
`their substrate specificities will be valuable in designing
`selective inhibitors. Arg125 in propeller blade 2 contacts
`inhibitors and substrates [11,72–77]. Arg125 is conserved
`in DPIV in all species from bacteria to human, but is
`absent from DP8 and DP9. The sequence motif of the
`Glu205-containing α-helix that limits DPIV to cleavage
`after the second amino acid of substrates [11] is conserved
`in all six proteins of the DPIV gene family in all species
`[1]. The structures of FAP, DP8, DP9, DPL1 and DPL2
`can now be predicted using DPIV as a template, but
`solving their structures will provide precise information
`concerning mechanisms of substrate specificity and pro-
`tein–protein interaction in this gene family.
`
`SOLUBLE DPIV
`
`The naturally occurring dimeric soluble form of DPIV
`exists in extracellular fluids, including serum, seminal
`fluid, saliva and bile. The richest natural sources of soluble
`DPIV are seminal fluid [88,89] and kidney [75].
`Altered serum DPIV levels occur in many diseases
`[14,90]. ADA binding assays are specific for CD26 and
`show that at least 90 % of serum DPIV activity on H-Gly-
`Pro is derived from CD26 [10]. The origin(s) of the
`remaining DPIV activity is unknown, but could include
`FAP [39]. The naturally occurring soluble form of CD26
`starts at Ser39 [10] and is derived from cell-surface
`CD26 [35]. The mechanism of shedding sCD26 (sol-
`uble CD26) from the cell surface is unknown, but is
`thought to be proteolytic [47].
`The level of DPIV in serum from healthy adults is
`−1 · ml−1, which cor-
`
`about 22 nmol p-nitroanilide · min
`responds to approx. 7 µg/ml. It may derive from all
`DPIV-expressing cells that contact blood, generally endo-
`thelial cells and lymphocytes. Serum DPIV levels
`generally decrease in disease unless liver injury or ex-
`
`C(cid:1) 2005 The Biochemical Society
`
`tensive lymphocyte proliferation is involved [14]. Serum
`CD26 measurement has no diagnostic value by itself.
`However, it may be useful in combination with other
`disease makers such as with α-l-fucosidase for colon
`cancer [91]. Perhaps the function of serum DPIV is to
`inactivate and thereby prevent systemic effects from bio-
`active peptides following their local production.
`
`Functions of soluble DPIV
`The functions of sCD26 have been studied only in
`relation to T-cell proliferation. Exogenous srhCD26 (re-
`combinant human sCD26) is not itself mitogenic, but
`is able to enhance proliferation of activated peripheral
`blood lymphocytes [59,92]. Concentrations of srhCD26
`greater than the optimum (0.5 µg/ml) diminish this effect
`[92]. We have obtained concordant data using uninfected
`subjects and Herpes simplex virus as the recall antigen [9].
`Thus sCD26 exerts regulatory effects on in vitro T-cell
`memory responses, generally decreasing strong responses
`and increasing weak responses.
`sCD26 is taken up via binding to mannose 6-phosphate
`+
`monocytes, leading to an increase in
`receptor by CD14
`their antigen-presenting activity that involves calveolin-1
`binding [93]. DPIV activity probably does not contribute
`as the DPIV inhibitor concentrations needed to diminish
`T-cell proliferation in vitro are well above the Ki. More-
`over, we found that srhCD26 rendered catalytically inert
`by point mutation produced the same effects on T-cell
`proliferation as wild-type srhCD26 [9].
`
`FUNCTIONS OF DPIV
`
`CD26/DPIV in activated and
`memory T-cells
`Both the percentage of cells expressing CD26 and the
`number of molecules/cell are increased following activ-
`ation of T-cells [94]. The strongest lymphocytic CD26
`expression is found on cells co-expressing high densities
`of other activation markers such as CD25, CD71,
`+
`CD45RO and CD29 [95,96]. The CD26brightCD4
`popu-
`+
`+
`CD29
`memory/helper subset.
`lation is the CD45RO
`The immunological synapse contains cholesterol-rich
`rafts and at least some CD26 lies in these rafts [97].
`The signal transduced by CD26 overlaps with the T-cell
`receptor/CD3 pathway, increasing tyrosine phosphoryl-
`ation of p56lck, p59fyn, ZAP-70, phospholipase C-γ ,
`MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) and c-Cbl in
`that pathway (for review, see [14]).
`The co

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket