throbber
ChemComm
`
`COMMUNICATION
`
`[18F]–NHC–BF3 adducts as water stable
`radio-prosthetic groups for PET imaging†‡
`
`Kantapat Chansaenpak,§a Mengzhe Wang,§b Zhanhong Wu,b Rehmat Zaman,a
`Zibo Li¶*b and François P. Gabbaı¨¶*a
`
`Received 3rd June 2015,
`Accepted 25th June 2015
`
`DOI: 10.1039/c5cc04545b
`
`www.rsc.org/chemcomm
`
`The radiofluorination of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) boron trifluoride
`adducts affords novel [18F]–positron emission tomography probes
`which resist hydrolytic fluoride release. The labelling protocol relies
`on an 18F–19F isotopic exchange reaction promoted by the Lewis acid
`SnCl4. Modification of the NHC backbone with a maleimide function-
`ality provides access to a model peptide conjugate which shows no
`evidence of defluorination when imaged in vivo.
`
`Positron emission tomography (PET) is a rapidly growing imaging
`technique that relies on the use of molecular radiotracers contain-
`ing a positron emitting isotope.1 To date, a great deal of attention
`has been devoted to the use of fluorine-18 (18F), a radionuclide
`that can be easily generated from [18O]–water and whose nuclear
`decay characteristics are ideally suited for applications in PET
`imaging.2 One difficulty faced in the synthesis of 18F-containing
`molecular radiotracers is the short half-life of the isotope (110 min).
`It follows that the best methods to access 18F-containing molecular
`radiotracers should be fast and preferably carried out in the late
`stages of the synthesis of the radiopharmaceutical probe.3 An
`attractive approach that provides a possible solution to these
`challenges is based on molecules containing a boron atom as a
`fluoride binding site.4 This approach was pioneered by Perrin
`who showed that arylboronic acids or esters featuring electron-
`withdrawing groups quickly react with fluoride ions to form the
`corresponding aryltrifluoroborates.5 Over the years, Perrin and
`other groups have investigated a number of backbones designed
`to stabilize the trifluoroborate unit and prevent its decomposi-
`tion in vivo (Chart 1).6 Although the rate of hydrolysis can be
`
`a Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843,
`USA. E-mail: gabbai@mail.chem.tamu.edu
`b Department of Radiology, Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of
`North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599, USA. E-mail: ziboli@med.unc.edu
`† This work is dedicated to Manfred Scheer on the occasion of his 60th birthday.
`‡ Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental, character-
`ization and imaging data. CCDC 1402916–1402918. For ESI and crystallographic
`data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c5cc04545b
`§ Contributed equally to the work.
`¶ Jointly conceived the study.
`
`Chart 1
`
`slowed down drastically, all fluoroborates investigated to date
`are unstable toward hydrolysis. This hydrolysis reaction is
`potentially problematic because the fluoride ions liberated by
`hydrolysis of the radiotracer lead to unwanted background
`signal in particular from the skeleton.
`Recently we introduced a strategy based on the use of zwitter-
`ionic trifluoroborates.6f, g In particular, we found that the trifluoro-
`borate moiety can be significantly stabilized against hydrolysis by a
`proximal cationic functionality such as a phosphonium unit as in
`the case of D and E.6g This approach is further validated by the
`recent work of Perrin who showed that ammonium trifluoroborate
`moieties of type C show sufficient stability for in vivo imaging.6b,c As
`part of our continuing interest in this chemistry, we were drawn by
`the remarkable stability of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) boron
`fluoride adducts7 such as 1.8 Compound 1, which can also be
`described as a zwitterionic imidazolium trifluoroborate is highly
`resistant to hydrolysis and can be recrystallized from boiling water.
`Encouraged by these properties, we questioned whether such
`NHC–BF3 adducts could be radiofluorinated and used as prosthetic
`groups for PET imaging. In this paper, we describe the initial
`results that we have obtained while working toward this goal.
`
`This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
`
`Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 12439--12442 | 12439
`
`Cite this: Chem. Commun., 2015,
`51, 12439
`
`Published on 26 June 2015. Purchased by kushan@me.com on 11 March 2025.
`
`View Article Online
`
`View Journal
`
` | View Issue
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1043, p. 12439
`
`

`

`Communication
`
`ChemComm
`
`Scheme 1 Synthesis of 2.
`
`As a starting point for these studies, we synthesized the
`carbene–BF3 adduct 2 as a model compound. Using the method
`recently employed by for the monoethyl analog (1),8 compound
`2 was obtained by thermolysis of 1,3-dimethyl-1H-imidazolium
`tetrafluoroborate under reduced pressure (Scheme 1).8 The presence
`of the trifluoroborate moiety is confirmed by the detection of a
`quartet in both the 11B NMR spectrum (0.21 ppm, JB–F = 37.0 Hz)
`and the 19F NMR spectrum (139.2 ppm, JB–F = 37.0 Hz). The
`1H NMR spectrum shows two singlets at 3.85 ppm and 7.11 ppm
`corresponding to the methyl and the methine groups, respectively.
`The structure of this compound has also been studied by single
`crystal X-ray diffraction (Fig. 1). The B(1)–C(1) bond connecting the
`NHC ligand to the boron center (1.641(3) Å) is comparable to the
`boron–carbon bond of 1 (1.644(3) Å),8 indicating a strong coordina-
`tion of the NHC ligand to the boron atom.
`Next, we turned our attention toward the synthesis of a NHC–BF3
`adduct that could be easily conjugated with biomolecules for
`targeted disease imaging. After reviewing different functionalization
`possibilities, we decided to synthesize the amino-substituted deriva-
`tive 5 (Scheme 2). We successfully accessed this new derivative by
`reaction of the known nitrocarbene–AgI complex 39 with BF3–OEt2.
`This reaction afforded the nitrocarbene–BF3 adduct 4 as a white
`solid in 83% yield. Hydrogenation of 4 over palladium afforded 5 in
`a 78% yield. The 1H NMR spectrum of 4 and 5 display two singlets
`(3.94 ppm and 4.16 ppm for 4 and 3.61 and 3.73 ppm for 5)
`corresponding to the methyl group and a singlet (8.21 ppm for 4 and
`6.37 ppm for 5) corresponding to the methine proton. The presence
`of an amino group in 5 is confirmed by the detection of a broad
`signal at 4.02 ppm. As in the case of 2, quartets are observed
`in the 11B NMR and 19F NMR spectra of 4 and 5 (11B NMR:
`0.13 ppm, JB–F = 33.5 Hz for 4 and 0.27 ppm, JB–F = 37.2 Hz for 5;
`19F NMR: 137.9 ppm, JB–F = 33.5 Hz for 4 and 138.0 ppm,
`JB–F = 37.2 Hz for 5). The crystal structure of 4 has also been
`determined. The carbene–BF3 moiety is essentially analogous
`to that in 2 (Fig. 1). The only notable difference is observed in
`the B(1)–C(1) separation (1.657(2) Å) which is slightly longer than
`in 2 (1.637(5) Å). This elongation is assigned to the electron
`
`Fig. 1 Crystal structures of the Arduengo carbene borane adducts 2, 4,
`and 7. Ellipsoids are scaled to the 50% probability level and hydrogen
`atoms have been omitted for clarity.
`
`Scheme 2 Synthesis of the maleimide derivative 7.
`
`withdrawing properties of the nitro group and the associated
`weaker donor properties of the carbene–carbon atom.
`Compound 5 can be easily converted into the maleimide
`derivative 7 in two steps as illustrated in Scheme 2. The spectro-
`scopic properties of 7 are close to those of 5. The methine signal is
`observed at 7.08 ppm. The trifluoroborate moiety gives rise to a
`quartet at 0.29 ppm in the 11B NMR spectrum ( JB–F = 35.6 Hz) as
`well as a quartet at 138.5 ppm in the 19F NMR spectrum ( JB–F =
`35.6 Hz). The structure of this derivative has also been confirmed
`by X-ray diffraction (Fig. 1). The B(1)–C(1) separation (1.656(9) Å) is
`close to that in 4, a characteristic consistent with the electron
`withdrawing properties of the maleimide functional group.
`Next, we decided to investigate the rates of hydrolysis of these
`new NHC–BF3 adducts (2, 4, 5, 7). This hydrolysis reaction, which is
`expected to produce the corresponding boronic acid according to a
`first order rate process (n = kobs[NHC–BF3]), was monitored by 19F
`NMR spectroscopy in D2O/CD3CN (8/2 vol) at pH 7.5 ([phosphate
`buffer] = 500 mM, [NHC–BF3] = 20 mM).4d,10 Surprisingly, we found
`that the hydrolysis of the adducts was extremely slow. After a
`week, we did not observe any free fluoride for 4 and 7 indicating
`that these two derivatives are essentially immortal. Their stability
`is assigned to the electron withdrawing nature of the nitro or
`maleimide functionality which increases the Lewis acidity of
`the boron center thereby preventing fluoride anion dissociation.
`Compounds 2 and 5 are also surprisingly stable and only show a
`trace amount of free fluoride after a week in D2O/CD3CN (8/2 vol)
`at pH 7.5. By extending this experiment to a longer timescale,
`we have been able to calculate the rate of hydrolysis for these
`two compounds. These rates, which are respectively equal to kobs =
`1.2  106 min1 for 2 and 1.1  106 for 5 are lower than those
`measured under the same conditions for the phosphonium borane
`D. Altogether, these results illustrate the remarkable resistance of
`NHC–BF3 adducts to hydrolysis and suggest that they could be used
`as prosthetic groups for PET imaging.
`Employing the approach developed by our group for the
`preparation of [18F]BODIPY dyes,11 we decided to investigate the
`radiofluorination of these NHC–BF3 adducts via 18F–19F isotopic
`exchange using SnCl4 as a Lewis acid promoter. We first tested
`this approach with the non-functionalized NHC–BF3 adduct 2
`which was mixed with SnCl4 (5–15 eq.) in MeCN and combined
`with a solution of [18F]–fluoride (as the tetra-n-butylammonium
`salt) in MeCN (Scheme 3 and Table 1). The reaction mixture was
`
`12440 | Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 12439--12442
`
`This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
`
`Published on 26 June 2015. Purchased by kushan@me.com on 11 March 2025.
`
`View Article Online
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1043, p. 12440
`
`

`

`ChemComm
`
`Communication
`
`Scheme 3 Scheme showing the radiolabeling of 2 via SnCl4 assisted
`isotopic 18F–19F exchange.
`
`Table 1 Radiosynthetic results for [18F]2
`
`Entry
`
`[2]
`(mM)
`
`SnCl4
`(equiv.)
`
`Temp.
`(1C)
`
`Time
`(min)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`
`15
`30
`60
`30
`30
`30
`30
`30
`30
`
`5
`5
`5
`10
`15
`5
`5
`5
`5
`
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`40
`60
`25
`25
`
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`20
`30
`
`SAa
`(mCi mmol1)
`26.4
`40.6
`40.8
`47.5
`47.8
`45.5
`49.5
`53.5
`36.8
`
`RCYb
`(%)
`
`35.5
`42.1
`47.3
`48.4
`48.1
`56.4
`53.4
`49.9
`39.9
`
`a Specific activity is determined by dividing the product activity by the
`amount of the product (based on the integration of UV-HPLC and compare
`with the UV chromatogram of the standard). b RCY = activity of the
`isolated product/starting 18F activity. All yields are decay corrected.
`
`then shaken for 10 min before being quenched by addition of
`water. The radiolabeled compound ([18F]2) was immobilized on a
`Sep-Pak cartridge (Sep-Pak Plus tC18) and washed with water.
`[18F]2 was eluted off the cartridge with MeCN. An aliquot of the
`resulting MeCN solution was subjected to HPLC analysis.
`The radiochemical yield (RCY) was calculated based on the
`radio-activity of the isolated product and the starting radio-activity.
`As shown in Table 1, the RCY ranges from 35–56% for different
`reaction conditions. It was found that increasing the concentration
`of precursor leads to higher isolation yield (entries 1–3). Interest-
`ingly, variation in the concentration of the Lewis acid promoter
`(entries 3–5) or in the temperature (entries 6 and 7) of the reaction
`had little impact on the RCY. When a long reaction time was
`employed as in entries 8 and 9, a decreased isolation yield was
`observed due to product decomposition. The highest specific
`activity of the final product obtained in this experiment was
`calculated to be 53.5 mCi mmol1 (entry 8).
`Using conditions from entry 7, we have also been able to prepare
`[18F]7 with a specific activity of 51.3 mCi mmol1 (RCY = 54%,
`Scheme 4). The identity of [18F]7 was confirmed by co-injection with
`the non-radiolabeled standard (Fig. 2). This radiofluorinated NHC–
`BF3 adduct could be conveniently conjugated with the model peptide
`H–Cys–Phe–OH via a thiol-Michael addition reaction. This synthesis
`was carried out by mixing a solution of [18F]7 in MeCN with an
`aqueous solution of H–Cys–Phe–OH (400 mg, 1.5 mmol) (Scheme 4).
`After shaking for 10 min at room temperature, a portion of the
`reaction mixture (0.01 mCi) was loaded onto the HPLC for purification
`affording [18F]7–H–Cys–Phe–OH with a 95.7% purity. The identity of
`[18F]7–H–Cys–Phe–OH peptide was confirmed by its mass spectrum
`(Fig. S11, ESI‡) as well as by co-injection with the independently
`synthesized non-radiolabeled standard (Fig. 3). The specific activity of
`[18F]7–H–Cys–Phe–OH peptide was calculated as 40.8 mCi mmol1.
`
`Scheme 4 Scheme showing the preparation of the [18F]7–H–Cys–Phe–
`OH conjugate.
`
`Fig. 2 Left: UV trace of 7 as the standard reference. Right: Crude radio-
`HPLC profile for the 18F-labeling of 7.
`
`Fig. 3 Left: UV traces of [18F]7–H–Cys–Phe–OH as the standard refer-
`ence. Right: Crude radio-HPLC profile for the 18F-labeling of [18F]7–H–
`Cys–Phe–OH.
`
`Encouraged by these radiofluorination and conjugation
`results, the stability of [18F]7–H–Cys–Phe–OH was investigated
`in vivo. As a prelude to these studies, we first tested the stability
`of the conjugate in a 1 PBS buffer at 37 1C (Fig. S14, ESI‡).
`Even after 2 hours, the conjugate is not compromised as shown
`by the fact that its purity remains 490% pure. In vivo PET/CT
`imaging in a normal nude mouse afford consistent results. The
`microPET/CT images collected 1 h, 2 h, and 4 h post injection
`show liver and urinary track clearance of the conjugate. More
`importantly, no bone uptake is observed even 4 h post injec-
`tions. Indicating that [18F]–fluoride release by the radiofluori-
`nated carbene unit is negligible (Fig. 4).
`In summary, we have identified a new boron-based fluoride
`captor with an unusually high resistance to hydrolytic fluoride
`release. The stability of this new probe is ascribed to its
`zwitterionic nature, with the cationic charge of the imidazo-
`lium unit acting as an electrostatic anchor for the boron-bound
`fluoride anions. These NHC–BF3 fluoride captors are a new
`
`This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
`
`Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 12439--12442 | 12441
`
`Published on 26 June 2015. Purchased by kushan@me.com on 11 March 2025.
`
`View Article Online
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1043, p. 12441
`
`

`

`Communication
`
`ChemComm
`
`4 (a) R. Ting, M. J. Adam, T. J. Ruth and D. M. Perrin, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
`2005, 127, 13094–13095; (b) C. W. Harwig, R. Ting, M. J. Adam,
`T. J. Ruth and D. M. Perrin, Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49, 3152–3156;
`(c) R. Ting, C. Harwig, U. auf dem Keller, S. McCormick, P. Austin,
`C. M. Overall, M. J. Adam, T. J. Ruth and D. M. Perrin, J. Am. Chem.
`Soc., 2008, 130, 12045–12055; (d) R. Ting, C. W. Harwig, J. Lo, Y. Li,
`M. J. Adam, T. J. Ruth and D. M. Perrin, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73,
`4662–4670; (e) R. Ting, J. Lo, M. J. Adam, T. J. Ruth and D. M. Perrin,
`J. Fluorine Chem., 2008, 129, 349–358; ( f ) Z. Li, T.-P. Lin, S. Liu, C.-W.
`Huang, T. W. Hudnall, F. P. Gabbaı¨ and P. S. Conti, Chem. Commun.,
`2011, 47, 9324–9326; (g) J. A. Hendricks, E. J. Keliher, D. Wan,
`S. A. Hilderbrand, R. Weissleder and R. Mazitschek, Angew. Chem.,
`Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 4603–4606; (h) S. Liu, D. Li, H. Shan, F. P. Gabbaı¨,
`Z. Li and P. S. Conti, Nucl. Med. Biol., 2014,41 , 120–126.
`5 (a) Y. Li, A. Asadi and D. M. Perrin, J. Fluorine Chem., 2009, 130,
`377–382; (b) U. auf dem Keller, C. L. Bellac, Y. Li, Y. Lou, P. F. Lange,
`R. Ting, C. Harwig, R. Kappelhoff, S. Dedhar, M. J. Adam, T. J. Ruth,
`F. Be´nard, D. M. Perrin and C. M. Overall, Cancer Res., 2010, 70,
`7562–7569; (c) Y. Li, R. Ting, C. W. Harwig, d. K. U. auf, C. L. Bellac,
`P. F. Lange, J. A. H. Inkster, P. Schaffer, M. J. Adam, T. J. Ruth,
`C. M. Overall and D. M. Perrin, Med. Chem. Commun., 2011, 2,
`942–949; (d) Z. Liu, Y. Li, J. Lozada, J. Pan, K.-S. Lin, P. Schaffer and
`D. M. Perrin, J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm., 2012, 55, 491–496;
`(e) Z. Liu, Y. Li, J. Lozada, P. Schaffer, M. J. Adam, T. J. Ruth and
`D. M. Perrin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 2303–2307.
`6 (a) Z. Liu, N. Hundal-Jabal, M. Wong, D. Yapp, K. S. Lin, F. Benard
`and D. M. Perrin, Med. Chem. Commun., 2014, 5, 171–179; (b) Z. Liu,
`M. Pourghiasian, M. A. Radtke, J. Lau, J. Pan, G. M. Dias, D. Yapp,
`K.-S. Lin, F. Be´nard and D. M. Perrin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014,
`53, 11876–11880; (c) Z. Liu, M. A. Radtke, M. Q. Wong, K.-S. Lin,
`D. T. Yapp and D. M. Perrin, Bioconjugate Chem., 2014, 25,
`1951–1962; (d) M. Pourghiasian, Z. Liu, J. Pan, Z. Zhang, N. Colpo,
`K.-S. Lin, D. M. Perrin and F. Be´nard, Biorg. Med. Chem., 2015, 23,
`1500–1506; (e) Z. Liu, D. Chao, Y. Li, R. Ting, J. Oh and D. M. Perrin,
`Chem. Eur. J., 2015, 21, 3924–3928; ( f ) C. R. Wade, H. Zhao and
`F. P. Gabbaı¨, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 6380–6381; (g) Z. Li,
`K. Chansaenpak, S. Liu, C. R. Wade, H. Zhao, P. S. Conti and F. P.
`Gabbaı¨, Med. Chem. Commun., 2012, 3, 1305–1308; (h) J. Bernard,
`R. Malacea-Kabbara, G. S. Clemente, B. P. Burke, M.-J. Eymin,
`S. J. Archibald and S. Juge´, J. Org. Chem., 2015, 80, 4289–4298.
`7 (a) M. M. Brahmi, M. Malacria, D. P. Curran, L. Fensterbank and
`E. Lacoˆte, Synlett, 2013, 1260–1262;
`(b) A.
`J. Arduengo,
`III,
`F. Davidson, R. Krafczyk, W. J. Marshall and R. Schmutzler,Monatsh.
`Chem., 2000, 131, 251–265.
`8 C. Tian, W. Nie, M. V. Borzov and P. Su, Organometallics, 2012, 31,
`1751–1760.
`9 D. M. Khramov, V. M. Lynch and C. W. Bielawski, Organometallics,
`2007, 26, 6042–6049.
`10 A. J. J. Lennox and G. C. Lloyd-Jones, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134,
`7431–7441.
`11 S. Liu, T.-P. Lin, D. Li, L. Leamer, H. Shan, Z. Li, F. P. Gabbaı¨ and
`P. S. Conti, Theranostics, 2013, 3, 181–189.
`
`Fig. 4 Decay-corrected whole-body microPET/CT sagittal images of a
`nude mice from a static scan at 1, 2 h and 4 h after injection of [18F]7–H–
`Cys–Phe–OH.
`
`incarnation of the concepts underlying the stability of the
`phosphonium trifluoroborates of type D and E developed by
`us or ammonium trifluoroborates of type C recently reported by
`the Perrin group.
`This work was supported by the Cancer Prevention Research
`Institute of Texas (RP130604), the National Institute of Biomedical
`Imaging and Bioengineering (1R01EB014354-01A1), the National
`Cancer Institute (P30-CA016086-35-37), and the Biomedical Research
`Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. K.C.
`gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Development
`and Promotion of Science and Technology (DPST) program
`administered by the Royal Thai Government.
`
`Notes and references
`1 P. W. Miller, N. J. Long, R. Vilar and A. D. Gee, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
`2008, 47, 8998–9033.
`2 (a) F. Dolle, D. Roeda, B. Kuhnast and M.-C. Lasne, Fluorine-18
`chemistry for molecular imaging with positron emission tomo-
`graphy, in Fluorine and Health, ed. A. Tressaud, Elsevier, Amsterdam,
`2008, pp. 3–65; (b) L. Cai, S. Lu and V. W. Pike,Eur. J. Org. Chem. , 2008,
`2853–2873.
`3 R. Bhalla, C. Darby, W. Levason, S. K. Luthra, G. McRobbie, G. Reid,
`G. Sanderson and W. Zhang, Chem. Sci., 2014, 5, 381–391.
`
`12442 | Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 12439--12442
`
`This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
`
`Published on 26 June 2015. Purchased by kushan@me.com on 11 March 2025.
`
`View Article Online
`
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1043, p. 12442
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket