`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`INARI MEDICAL, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`IMPERATIVE CARE, INC., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 24-cv-03117-EKL
`
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT &
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On December 19, 2024, the parties appeared before Judge Eumi K. Lee for a case
`
`management conference. The Court ORDERS as follows:
`
`(1)
`
`The parties shall comply with this Court’s standing orders, which are available on
`
`the Court’s website and in the Clerk’s Office.
`
`(2)
`
`The presumptive limits on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure shall apply to this case unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
`
`(3)
`
`All disputes with respect to disclosures or discovery are referred to the assigned
`
`Magistrate Judge.
`
`(4)
`
`The close of fact discovery is the date by which all discovery must be completed,
`
`including motions to compel, hearings on discovery motions, and any additional
`
`discovery resulting from orders on discovery motions. Accordingly, all discovery
`
`requests shall be served sufficiently in advance of the close of fact discovery to
`
`allow the discovering party enough time prior to the cut-off date to challenge
`
`allegedly deficient responses via motion to compel and to receive the necessary
`
`responses if the motion is granted. Depositions must be noticed at least 30 days
`
`prior to the close of fact discovery.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`Imperative Care v. Inari Medical
`US Patent 11,969,333
`Imperative Care Ex. 1044
`
`
`
`Case 5:24-cv-03117-EKL Document 54 Filed 12/19/24 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred to private mediation. Within six
`
`weeks after the Court’s claims construction ruling, the parties shall hold an initial ADR session
`
`with their chosen mediator. Within seven days after the initial ADR session, the parties shall file a
`
`joint status report identifying the parties’ mediator and confirming that the initial ADR session
`
`was completed. The status report shall state the outcome of the session and the parties’ proposals
`
`for further ADR efforts if the initial ADR session was unsuccessful.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a claim construction tutorial is scheduled for July 10,
`
`2025, at 1:30 p.m. via Zoom video. The Court expects to allocate up to one hour per side for the
`
`tutorial. A claim construction hearing is scheduled for July 24, 2025, at 1:30 p.m. in person. The
`
`parties shall meet and confer regarding the format, scope, and content of both the tutorial and the
`
`claim construction hearing, including but not limited to the permissible subjects of discussion at
`
`each, whether experts will testify, and what audio-visual equipment, if any, will be needed by the
`
`parties.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following schedule and deadlines shall apply to this
`
`case:
`
`Initial case management conference held
`
`December 19, 2024
`
`Event
`
`Deadline
`
`Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures
`
`January 13, 2025
`
`Infringement Contentions & Accompanying Production
`
`Pat. L.R. 3-1 & 3-2
`
`January 13, 2025
`
`Deadline to Amend Pleadings Without Leave of Court
`
`February 7, 2025
`
`Invalidity Contentions & Accompanying Production
`
`Pat. L.R. 3-3 & 3-4
`
`Exchange of Terms for Construction
`
`Pat. L.R. 4-1
`
`Exchange of Preliminary Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Pat. L.R. 4-2
`
`February 27, 2025
`
`March 13, 2025
`
`April 3, 2025
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`Case 5:24-cv-03117-EKL Document 54 Filed 12/19/24 Page 3 of 4
`
`Event
`
`Deadline
`
`
`
`Damages Contentions
`
`Pat. L.R. 3-8
`
`Joint Claim Construction & Prehearing Statement; Claim
`Construction Expert Reports
`
`Pat. L.R. 4-3
`
`Responsive Damages Contentions
`
`Pat. L.R. 3-9
`
`Completion of Claim Construction Discovery
`
`Pat. L.R. 4-4
`
`Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction Brief
`
`Pat. L.R. 4-5(a)
`
`Defendant’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief
`
`Pat. L.R. 4-5(b)
`
`Plaintiff’s Reply Claim Construction Brief
`
`Pat. L.R. 4-5(c)
`
`Claim Construction Tutorial
`
`Damages Contentions Meeting and Damages Meeting
`Certification
`
`Pat. L.R. 3-10
`
`Claim Construction Hearing
`
`Pat. L.R. 4-6
`
`April 18, 2025
`
`April 28, 2025
`
`May 19, 2025
`
`May 28, 2025
`
`June 12, 2025
`
`June 26, 2025
`
`July 3, 2025
`
`July 10, 2025
`
`July 18, 2025
`
`July 24, 2025
`
`Deadline to Complete Initial ADR Session
`
`Six weeks after the Court’s
`claim construction ruling
`
`
`
`
`
`//
`
`//
`
`3
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`From: noreply@courtdrive.com <noreply@courtdrive.com>
`Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 3:01 PM
`To: Lit TSPVL.107L <LitTSPVL.107L@knobbe.com>
`Subject: TSPVL.107L
`
`
`This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND
`to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
`***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits
`attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic
`copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer.
`PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each
`document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free
`copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
`
`U.S. District Court
`
`California Northern District
`
`Notice of Electronic Filing
`
`The following transaction was entered on 12/19/2024 at 2:58 PM PST and filed on 12/19/2024
`Case Name:
`Inari Medical, Inc. v. Imperative Care, Inc., et al
`Case Number:
`5:24-cv-03117-EKL
`
`Filer:
`Document Number: 54
`
`Docket Text:
`CASE MANAGEMENT & SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Eumi K. Lee on 12/19/2024.
`(lrt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2024)
`
`
`5:24-cv-03117-EKL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
`
`Amanda Tessar atessar@perkinscoie.com, Atessar-efile@perkinscoie.com, katerose@perkinscoie.com
`
`Bingjie Li bli@perkinscoie.com
`
`Daniel Tyler Keese DKeese@perkinscoie.com, docketpor@perkinscoie.com, KFlores@perkinscoie.com,
`smarquand@perkinscoie.com
`
`Joseph Robert Re jre@kmob.com, KnobbeAdmin@ecf.courtdrive.com, litigation@kmob.com
`
`Joshua Jan Stowell joshua.stowell@knobbe.com, 2tms@knobbe.com, litigation@kmob.com
`
`Nicholas Andrew Belair nick.belair@knobbe.com
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Ramsey M. Al-Salam ralsalam@perkinscoie.com, docketsea@perkinscoie.com, jstone@perkinscoie.com
`
`5:24-cv-03117-EKL Please see Local Rule 5-5; Notice has NOT been electronically mailed to:
`
`The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
`
`Document description:Main Document
`Original filename:C:\fakepath\24-cv-03117-ekl-
`case_management_scheduling_order.638691176366390780.pdf
`Electronic document Stamp:
`[STAMP CANDStamp_ID=977336130 [Date=12/19/2024] [FileNumber=21969737-0
`] [6dbe9ad197472ba0d4c3374f26c99e1196d1fdb1d2b1abca909878b47799ddfc0ed
`1e330fd58a5d1dc058fc07bb1ebd309181a1204f31a7e74e1fea9a144f06f]]
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 5:24-cv-03117-EKL Document 54 Filed 12/19/24 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`The parties may not modify these dates by stipulation without leave of court. Civil L.R. 6-1(b).
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: December 19, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Eumi K. Lee
`United States District Judge
`
`4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`



