throbber
68Ga-Complex Lipophilicity and the Targeting Property of a Urea-
`Based PSMA Inhibitor for PET Imaging
`Matthias Eder,*,† Martin Schä fer,† Ulrike Bauder-Wü st,† William-Edmund Hull,‡ Carmen Wä ngler,§
`Walter Mier,∥ Uwe Haberkorn,∥ and Michael Eisenhut†
`†Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, ‡Molecular Structure Analysis, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
`§Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
`∥Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
`*S Supporting Information
`ABSTRACT: Urea-based inhibitors of the prostate-specific
`membrane antigen (PSMA) represent low-molecular-weight
`pepidomimetics showing the ability to image PSMA-expressing
`prostate tumors. The highly efficient, acyclic Ga(III) chelator
`N,N′-bis [2-hydroxy-5-(carboxyethyl)benzyl] ethylenediamine-
`N,N′- diacetic acid (HBED-CC) was introduced as a lipophilic
`side chain into the hydrophilic pharmacophore Glu-NH-CO-NH-
`Lys which was found favorable to interact with the PSMA“active
`binding site”. This report describes the syntheses, in vitro binding
`analyses, and biodistribution data of the radiogallium labeled
`PSMA inhibitor Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC in com-
`parison to the corresponding DOTA conjugate. The binding
`properties were analyzed using competitive cell binding and
`enzyme-based assays followed by internalization experiments. Compared to the DOTA-conjugate, the HBED-CC derivative
`showed reduced unspecific binding and considerable higher specific internalization in LNCaP cells. The
`68Ga complex of the
`HBED-CC ligand exhibited higher specificity for PSMA expressing tumor cells resulting in improved in vivo properties.68Ga
`labeled Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC showed fast blood and organ clearances, low liver accumulation, and high specific
`uptake in PSMA expressing organs and tumor. It could be demonstrated that the PET-imaging property of a urea-based PSMA
`inhibitor could significantly be improved with HBED-CC.
`■ INTRODUCTION
`It is still a challenge to select appropriate treatment options for
`disseminated prostate cancer because of the lack of sensitive
`imaging agents for diagnosis and therapy monitoring.
`1 Prostate-
`specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed in nearly all
`prostate cancers with increased expression in poorly differ-
`entiated, metastatic, and hormone-refractory carcinomas.
`2 Its
`expression level is about 1000-fold higher compared to the
`physiologic levels found in other tissues such as kidney, small
`intestine, or brain.
`3 PSMA is primarily restricted to the prostate,
`it is abundantly expressed at all stages of disease, it is presented
`on the cell surface, and it is not shed into the circulation.4 As a
`consequence, PSMA can be considered a promising target for
`specific prostate cancer imaging and therapy.
`5−7
`The radiohalogenated inhibitors of PSMA exhibiting Glu-
`NH-CO-NH-Lys as a pharmacophore showed the ability to
`image PSMA-expressing prostate tumor xenografts.
`8,9 More
`recently, a corresponding DOTA-conjugate was labeled with
`68Ga which represents an attractive generator-based alternative
`to cyclotron-based PET radiopharmaceuticals.10,11 The readily
`available 68Ga decays with 89% probability by positron emission
`allowing high-resolution PET images with the option of
`accurate quantification. N,N′-Bis[2-hydroxy-5-(carboxyethyl)-
`benzyl]ethylenediamine-N,N′- diacetic acid (HBED-CC) was
`recently proposed as an efficient 68Ga chelator with fast
`complexing kinetics and a high in vitro as well as in vivo
`complex stability.12,13
`Besides the efficient Ga(III) complexing characteristics,
`HBED-CC was selected because of its lipophilic nature. It
`was found that the“active binding site” of PSMA is composed
`of two structural motifs, one representing a lipophilic pocket
`and the other interacting with urea-based inhibitors.
`14 A study
`comparing a series of linkers located between the urea-based
`motif and a
`99mTc chelator revealed a clear dependency of
`binding properties in favor of the more lipophilic compounds.14
`Further studies described t he binding site as a pocket
`interacting with the carboxylic groups and the zinc complexing
`urea on one hand and with hydrophobic, mostly aromatic
`groups on the other hand.
`15
`Received: June 1, 2011
`Revised: February 6, 2012
`Published: February 28, 2012
`Article
`pubs.acs.org/bc
`© 2012 American Chemical Society 688 dx.doi.org/10.1021/bc200279b | Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 688−697
`Downloaded via FURMAN DEMARIS on March 1, 2024 at 20:32:23 (UTC).
`See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1030, p. 688
`B~conjugak-------~­Chem,stry
`PSMA- binding motif
`'V ACS Publications
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This report describes the syntheses of Glu-NH-CO-NH-
`Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC (7 ) and Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys(Ahx)-
`DOTA ( 8) together with a reference PSMA inhibitor
`previously published by Banerjee et al.10 After 68Ga complex-
`ation, these compounds were evaluated in vitro and in vivo to
`study the influence of these two chelators and side chain
`variations.
`■ MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Reagents. All commercially available chemicals were of
`analytical grade and were used without further purification.
`68Ga was obtained from a 68Ge/68Ga generator based on
`pyrogallol resin support. 12,16 Protected amino acids were
`obtained from Novabiochem (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)
`or IRIS Biotech (Marktredwitz, Germany).
`The preparations were analyzed using reversed-phase high-
`performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC; Chromolith
`RP-18e, 100 × 4.6 mm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Runs
`were performed using a linear A−B gradient (0% B to 100% B
`in 6 min) at a flow rate of 4 mL/min. Solvent A consisted of
`0.1% aqueous TFA and solvent B was 0.1% TFA in CH
`3CN or
`MeOH (in case of determination of radiochemical yield (RCY)
`or analysis of serum stability).
`For all preparative purifications, a Chromolith RP-18e
`column (100 × 10 mm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was
`used with a 6 min gradient starting at 0% raised to 50% and
`followed by a 1 min increase to 100% B. The flow rate was 6
`mL/min. The HPLC system (L6200 A; Merck-Hitachi,
`Darmstadt, Germany) was equipped with a variable UV and a
`gamma detector (Bioscan; Washington, USA). UV absorbances
`were measured at 214 and 254 nm. Mass spectrometry was
`performed with a MALDI-MS Daltonics Microflex (Bruker
`Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) system. High-resolution mass
`spectrometry was performed using a system equipped with a
`mass spectrometer supporting Orbitrap technology (Exactive,
`Thermo Fisher Scientific). Full-scan single mass spectra were
`obtained by scanning m/z = 200−4000. NMR data were
`obtained with Bruker Avance NMR Spectrometers, AV(I)-600
`(600 MHz) and AV(III)-400 (400 MHz). The chemical shifts
`are referenced to solvent signals (DMSO-d
`5 = 2.50/39.757
`ppm, DMSO-d6 = 39.50).
`Synthesis of Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC (7).In
`a first step, the isocyanate 2 of the glutamyl moiety was
`generated in situ by adding a mixture of 3 mmol of bis(tert-
`butyl) L-glutamate hydrochloride (Bachem, Switzerland) (1)
`and 1.5 mL ofN-ethyldiisopropylamine (DIPEA) in 200 mL of
`dry CH2Cl2 to a solution of 1 mmol triphosgene in 10 mL of
`dry CH2Cl2 at 0 °C over 4 h. After agitation of the reaction
`mixture for one further hour at 25°C, 0.5 mmol of a resin-
`immobilized (2-chloro-tritylresin, Merck, Darmstadt)ε-allylox-
`ycarbonyl protected lysine was added in one portion (in 4 mL
`DCM) and reacted for 16 h with gentle agitation leading to
`compound 3. The resin was filtered off and the allyloxy-
`protecting group was removed using 100 mg tetrakis-
`(triphenyl)palladium(0) (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and 400
`μL morpholine in 4 mL CH
`2Cl2 for 3 h resulting in compound
`4. The following coupling of the aminohexanoic moiety was
`performed using 2 mmol of the Fmoc-protected 6-amino-
`hexanoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), 1.96 mmol of HBTU
`(Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and 2 mmol of N-ethyl-
`diisopropylamine in a final volume of 4 mL DMF. The product
`5 was cleaved from the resin by reacting with 4 mL of a 30%
`1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropanole (HFIP) in CH
`2Cl2 for two
`hours at ambient temperature resulting in the tert-butyl
`protected crude product6 which was purified via RP-HPLC.
`To conjugate HBED-CC, the purified product6 was reacted
`with an equimolar amount of HBED-CC-TFP-ester synthesized
`as previously described
`12 in the presence of 2 equiv of DIPEA
`in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF; final volume of 1 mL).
`After HPLC purification, the remainingtert-butyl groups were
`cleaved at room temperature for one hour using 2 mL
`trifluoroacetic acid to obtain7 in ∼35% yield after purification
`by HPLC. High-resolution mass spectrometry was used to
`confirm the identity (Table 1), and purity was analyzed via
`analytical HPLC at λ = 206 nm (Supporting Information).
`Complete and unequivocal NMR
`1H and 13C signal assign-
`ments were obtained (Supporting Information).
`Synthesis of Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys(Ahx)-DOTA (8). Pre-
`cursor 5 was synthesized as mentioned before. After activation
`with 3.95 equiv of HBTU and DIPEA for 2 h, 4 equiv of tris(t-
`bu)-DOTA (Chematech, Dijon, France) relative to the resin
`loading were reacted with 5 after removal of the Fmoc-
`protecting group in a final volume of 3 mL DMF. The product
`was cleaved from the resin in a 2 mL mixture consisting of
`trifluoroacetic acid, triisopropylsilane, and water (95:2.5:2.5).
`The product was purified via semipreparative RP-HPLC
`resulting in compound8 (∼30% yield). High-resolution mass
`spectrometry was used to confirm the identity (Table 1) and
`purity was analyzed via analytical HPLC at λ = 206 nm
`(Supporting Information). Complete and unequivocal
`1H and
`13C NMR signal assignments were obtained (Supporting
`Information).
`Synthesis of Reference Compound (12). Synthesis of
`the DOTA conjugate previously published by Banerjee et al.10
`was performed using a modified solid-phase method. Five
`equivalents of suberic-acid-bis-( N-hydroxysuccinimideester)
`(Sigma-Aldich, Germany) was conjugated to the side chain of
`the lysine moiety of compound4 in the presence of 5 equiv of
`triethylamine in 3 mL DMF. After 2 h, the resin was washed
`with DMF. In the presence of five equiv of triethylamine, five
`equiv of Fmoc-Lys-oAll was coupled to the immobilized NHS-
`ester of intermediate9 in a final volume of 3 mL DMF for 16 h
`resulting in 10. The remaining conjugations of two phenyl-
`alanine building blocks and tris(t-bu)-DOTA were performed
`Table 1. Analytical and PSMA-Binding Data
`Ga-peptide
`complexes m/za
`m/z calculated as
`[M+H]+
`analytical HPLC
`retentionb
`affinity related IC50 [nM] determined in
`enzyme-based assayc
`affinity related Ki [nM] determined in
`cell-based assayc
`[Ga]7 947.4257 947.4250 3.1 min 7.5 ± 2.2 12.0 ± 2.8
`[Ga]8 819.4104 819.4100 2.4 min 19.4 ± 7.1 37.6 ± 14.3
`[Ga]12 1284.6368 1284.6364 3.7 min 8.7 ± 3.9 11.1 ± 1.8
`aHigh-resolution mass spectrometry data of the free ligands ([M+H]+). bCompounds were labeled with68Ga; runs were performed using a linear
`A−B gradient (0% B to 100% B in 6 min) at a flow rate of 4 mL/min. Solvent A was 0.1% aqueous TFA and solvent B was MeOH.cCompounds
`were complexed withnatGa.
`Bioconjugate Chemistry Article
`dx.doi.org/10.1021/bc200279b | Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 688−697689
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1030, p. 689
`-----------------------'-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`according to standard Fmoc-protocols resulting in11. Cleavage
`from resin was performed using a 3 mL mixture of
`trifluoroacetic acid, triisopropylsilane, and water (95:2.5:2.5).
`The product was purified via RP-HPLC to obtain12 in ∼8%
`yield. High-resolution mass spectrometry was used to confirm
`the identity (Table 1), and purity was analyzed via analytical
`HPLC at λ = 206 nm (Supporting Information).
`68Ga-Labeling. Typically, 0.1−1 nmol of Glu-NH-CO-NH-
`Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC (7, in 0.1 M HEPES buffer pH 7.5) or 1
`nmol of the DOTA conjugates (8/12, in 0.1 M HEPES buffer
`pH 7.5) were added in a volume of 100μL to a mixture of 10
`μL 2.1 M HEPES solution and 10μL[ 68Ga]Ga3+ eluate (50−
`100 MBq). The pH of the labeling solution was adjusted to 4.2.
`Depending on the chelator, the reaction mixture was incubated
`either at ambient temperature or at 80 °C for 2 min. The
`radiochemical yield (RCY) was determined using RP-HPLC.
`67Ga-Labeling. 67Ga was purchased from MDS Nordion
`(Fleurus, Belgium) as [67Ga]GaCl3 in 0.1 N HCl. Typically, 0.1
`nmol of Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC (7) was added
`in a volume of 100μL to a mixture of 10μL 2.1 M HEPES
`solution, 2μL 1 N HCl, and 10μL[ 67Ga]GaCl3 (∼100 MBq)
`in 0.1 N HCl resulting in a solution with a pH of 4.2. The
`reaction mixture was incubated for 2 min at ambient
`temperature. The RCY was determined using RP-HPLC.
`natGa-Complexes. A1 0× molar excess of Ga(III)-nitrate
`(Sigma Aldrich, Germany) in 0.1 N HCl (10μL) was reacted
`with the compounds7, 8,o r12 (1 mM in 0.1 M HEPES buffer
`pH 7.5, 40μL) in a mixture of 10μL 2.1 M HEPES solution
`and 2 μL 1 N HCl for 2 min at 80°C.
`Radiochemical Stability. The radiochemical stability of
`the 68Ga-labeled compounds 7, 8, and 12 was determined by
`incubating in both PBS and human serum for 2 h at 37°C. An
`equal volume of MeCN was added to the samples to precipitate
`serum proteins. Subsequently, the samples were centrifuged for
`5 min at 13 000 rpm. An aliquot of the supernatant and the PBS
`sample was analyzed by RP-HPLC. In addition, serum samples
`of compound [
`68Ga]7 were run on a Superdex 200 GL 5/150
`gel filtration column (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany) to
`analyze protein binding. To analyze the complex stability
`against human transferrin, a 400 μL aliquot of [
`68Ga]7 was
`added to 250μg apo-transferrin in PBS at pH 7 and incubated
`at 37 °C (water bath) for 2 h. The complex stability was
`determined using a Superdex 200 GL 5/150 short column with
`PBS pH 7 as eluent.
`Naaladase Assay. Recombinant human PSMA (rhPSMA,
`R&D systems, Wiesbaden, Germany) was diluted in assay
`buffer (50 mM HEPES, 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7.5) to 0.4μg/mL.
`The substrate Ac-Asp-Glu (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany, 40
`μM final concentration) was mixed with [
`natGa]7,[ natGa]8,o r
`[natGa]12 at concentrations ranging from 0.05 nM to 1000 nM
`in a final volume of 125μL assay buffer. The mixtures were
`combined with 125μL of the rhPSMA solution (0.4μg/mL)
`and incubated for one hour at 37°C. The reaction was stopped
`by heating at 95°C for 5 min. 250μL of a 15 mM solution of
`ortho-phthaldialdehyde (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) was
`added to all vials and incubated for 10 min at ambient
`temperature. Finally, 200μL aliquots of the reaction solutions
`were loaded onto a F16 Black Maxisorp Plate (Nunc,
`Langenselbold, Germany) and read at excitation and emission
`wavelengths of 330 and 450 nm, respectively, using a
`microplate reader (DTX-880, Beckman Coulter, Krefeld,
`Germany). The data were analyzed by a one-site total binding
`regression algorithm of GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software,
`California, USA).
`Cell Binding Studies.Cell binding studies were performed
`using PSMA
`+ LNCaP cells (metastatic lesion of human
`prostatic adenocarcinoma, ATCC CRL-1740) and PSMA −
`PC-3 cells (bone metastasis of a grade IV prostatic
`adenocarcinoma, ATCC CRL-1435) cultured in DMEM
`medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 2
`mmol/L
`L-glutamine (all from Invitrogen). During cell culture,
`cells were grown at 37°C in an incubator with humidified air,
`equilibrated with 5% CO 2. The cells were harvested using
`trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (trypsin-EDTA; 0.25%
`trypsin, 0.02% EDTA, all from Invitrogen).
`In order to determine the binding affinity, a competitive cell
`binding assay was performed. LNCaP cells (10
`5 per well) were
`incubated with a 0.2 nM solution of [67Ga]7 in the presence of
`12 different concentrations of [natGa]7,[ natGa]8,o r[ natGa]12
`(0−5000 nM, 200 μL/well). After incubation at ambient
`temperature for 1 h with gentle agitation, the binding buffer
`was removed using a multiscreen vacuum manifold (Millipore,
`Billerica, MA). After washing twice with 100μL and once with
`200 μL ice-cold binding buffer, the cell-bound radioactivity was
`measured with a gamma counter (Packard Cobra II, GMI,
`Minnesota, USA). The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC
`50)
`values were calculated by fitting the data using a nonlinear
`regression algorithm (GraphPad Software). Experiments were
`performed at least three times including quadruplicate sample
`measurements.
`Determination of Binding Specificity and Internal-
`ization. Internalization experiments were performed as
`previously described.
`17 Briefly, 105 LNCaP or PC-3 cells were
`seeded in poly(L-lysine)-coated 24-well cell culture plates 24 h
`before incubation. After washing with PBS, the cells were
`incubated with the radiolabeled compounds [
`68Ga]7,[ 68Ga]8,
`and [68Ga]12 (25 nM final concentration) for 45 min at 37°C
`and at 4 °C, respectively. To determine specific cell uptake,
`cells were blocked with 2-(phosphonomethyl)-pentanedioic
`acid (PMPA, Axxora, Loerrach, Germany) to a final
`concentration of 100 μM. Cellular uptake was terminated by
`washing 4 times with 1 mL of ice-cold PBS. To remove surface-
`bound radioactivity, cells were incubated twice with 0.5 mL
`glycine-HCl in PBS (50 mM, pH 2.8) for 5 min at room
`temperature. The cells were washed with 1 mL of ice-cold PBS
`and lysed using 0.5 mL of 0.3 M NaOH. The surface-bound
`and internalized fractions were measured in a gamma counter.
`Specificity of binding was additionally analyzed in a
`concentration-dependent cell uptake experiment. Solutions of
`[
`68Ga]7,[ 68Ga]8,o r[68Ga]12 at final concentrations of 2.5, 25,
`and 250 nM were added to 7× 105 cells suspended in 50μL
`OPTIMEM medium (Gibco, Auckland, New Zealand). After
`45 min at 37°C, the samples were briefly vortexed and a 10μL
`aliquot was transferred to a 400μL microcentrifuge tube (Roth,
`Germany) containing 350μL of a 75:25 mixture of silicon oil,
`density 1.05 (Sigma Aldrich, Germany), and mineral oil, density
`0.872 (Acros, Nidderau, Germany). Separation of cells from the
`medium was performed by centrifugation at 12 000 rpm for 2
`min. After freezing the tubes using liquid nitrogen, the bottom
`tips containing the cell pellet were cut off. The cell pellets and
`the supernatants were separately counted in a gamma counter.
`Biodistribution and PET Imaging. Five ×10
`6 cells of
`either LNCaP or PC-3 in 50% Matrigel (Becton Dickinson,
`Heidelberg, Germany) were subcutaneously inoculated into the
`right trunk of male 7- to 8-week-old BALB/c nu/nu mice
`Bioconjugate Chemistry Article
`dx.doi.org/10.1021/bc200279b | Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 688−697690
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1030, p. 690
`-----------------------'-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Charles River Laboratories). The tumors were allowed to grow
`for 3 to 4 weeks until approximately 1 cm3 in size.
`The 68Ga-radiolabeled compounds of 7, 8, and 12 were
`injected via tail vein (1−2 MBq per mouse; 0.1−0.2 nmol). At
`1 h after injection, the animals were sacrificed. Organs of
`interest were dissected, blotted dry, and weighed. The
`radioactivity was measured with a gamma counter and
`calculated as % ID/g.
`For the microPET studies, 10 −25 MBq of compounds
`[
`68Ga]7 and [68Ga]8 in a volume of 0.15 mL (∼0.5 nmol) were
`injected via a lateral tail vein into mice bearing LNCaP tumor
`xenografts. The anesthetized animals (2% sevoflurane, Abbott,
`Wiesbaden, Germany) were placed in prone position into the
`Inveon small animal PET scanner (Siemens, Knoxville, Tenn,
`USA) to perform a 50 min dynamic microPET scan starting at
`1 min post injection followed by a 20 min static scan.
`Statistical Aspects. All experiments were performed at
`least in triplicate. Quantitative data were expressed as mean±
`SD. If applicable, means were compared using Student’s t-test.
`P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
`■ RESULTS
`Chemistry. The synthesis of the resin-bound intermediate5
`was performed using solid-phase chemistry as outlined in
`Scheme 1. To couple the respective chelators, compound5 was
`either cleaved from resin and reacted with an equimolar
`amount of HBED-CC-TFP-ester resulting in7 or coupled with
`HBTU activated tris(t-bu)DOTA resulting in the DOTA-
`conjugate 8. The preparation of the reference compound12
`previously published by Banerjee et al.
`10 was performed using a
`modified solid-phase method as outlined in Scheme 2. Briefly,
`disuccinimidyl suberate was conjugated to theε-amino group of
`the lysine group of4. After Fmoc-Lys-OAll was coupled to the
`resulting immobilized NHS-ester, the conjugation of two
`phenylalanine building blocks and tris( t-bu)-DOTA were
`performed according to standard Fmoc-protocols. Analytical
`data of compounds7, 8, and 12 are summarized in Table 1.
`Radiolabeling and Stability.Radiolabeling with
`68Ga was
`performed at pH 4.2 by incubating the conjugates7, 8,o r12 in
`a mixture consisting of 50−100 MBq [68Ga]Ga3+ and HEPES.
`Radiochemical yields were determined by RP-HPLC analysis of
`the reaction mixtures. The retention times obtained for each
`compound are shown in Table 1. An amount of 0.1 nmol of the
`Scheme 1. Syntheses of Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC (7) and Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys(Ahx)-DOTA (8)
`(a) Triphosgene, DIPEA, CH2Cl2,0 °C; (b) H-Lys(Alloc)-2CT-Resin, CH2Cl2; (c) Pd[P(C6H5)3]4, morpholine, CH2Cl2; (d) Fmoc-6-Ahx-OH,
`HBTU, DIPEA, DMF; (e) 20% piperidine, DMF; (f) hexafluoroisopropanol/CH2Cl2; (g) HBED-CC-TFP ester, DIPEA, DMF; (h) TFA; (i) tris(t-
`bu)DOTA, HBTU, DIPEA; (j) TFA.
`Bioconjugate Chemistry Article
`dx.doi.org/10.1021/bc200279b | Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 688−697691
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1030, p. 691
`-------------------------------'-
`a
`-
`7 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HBED-CC conjugate 7 in a final concentration of 1.7μM led
`to a radiochemical yield of more than 99% in less than 1 min at
`room temperature. As a consequence, specific activities in the
`range 500−1000 GBq/μmol were obtained. In order to achieve
`comparable high radiochemical yields with the DOTA-
`conjugates 8 and 12, the compounds were incubated for 2
`min at 80°C using 1 nmol precursor.
`Incubation of the 68Ga-labeled compounds 7, 8, and 12 in
`human serum for 2 h at 37°C resulted in no detectable changes
`in the radiograms. Stability of the 68Ga-labeled HBED-CC-
`Scheme 2. Modified Solid-Phase Synthesis of the DOTA Conjugate Previously Published by Banerjee et al.10
`(a) Disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS), TEA, DMF; (b) Fmoc-Lys-oAll, TEA, DMF; (c) 20% piperidine, DMF; (d) Fmoc-Phe-OH, HBTU, DIPEA,
`DMF; (e) tris(t-bu)DOTA, HBTU, DMF; (f) Pd[P(C6H5)3]4, morpholine, CH2Cl2; (g) TFA, triisopropylsilane, H2O (95/2.5/2.5).
`Figure 1. Determination of binding affinity of compounds [natGa]7,[ natGa]8, and [natGa]12 by competitive titration on LNCaP cells (A) and
`purified receptor using an enzyme-based assay (B). Data are expressed as mean± SD (n = 4). cpm = counts per minute; FI = fluorescence intensity.
`Bioconjugate Chemistry Article
`dx.doi.org/10.1021/bc200279b | Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 688−697692
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1030, p. 692
`b
`-------
`A
`1500000
`E 1000000
`fr
`500000
`4
`• [natGa]7
`'" [natGa]8
`♦ [natGa]12
`104
`9
`B
`800 • [natGa]7
`.. [natGa]S
`600 ♦ [natGa]12
`u:::
`400
`200
`10 -1 100 10 1 103
`C [nM]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conjugate 7 could additionally be demonstrated by transferrin
`challenging and incubation in human serum. No activity was
`exchanged in presence of 250μg transferrin or transferred to
`other serum proteins.
`Determination of PSMA Affinity. The variants were
`competitively analyzed in terms of their binding capacity by
`performing an enzyme-based assay on rhPSMA (Naaladase-
`Assay) and a binding assay on LNCaP cells with
`67Ga-labeled 7
`(RCY > 99%; specific activity ∼1000 GBq/μmol) as radio-
`ligand. The affinity related IC50 and the calculatedKi values of
`both assays were determined by analyzing the respective
`binding curves (Figure 1) withGraphPad Prism. The data are
`summarized in Table 1. Compared to the DOTA conjugate
`[
`natGa]8, the HBED-CC conjugate [ natGa]7 and the more
`lipophilic reference compound [natGa]12 showed slightly better
`affinities to both the purified extracellular receptor rhPSMA
`and LNCaP cells.
`Specific Cell Binding and Internalization.Comparative
`cell uptake and internalization experiments with LNCaP
`(PSMA positive) and PC-3 (PSMA negative) cells revealed
`unspecific cell uptake of [
`68Ga]8 and [68Ga]12 in both cell lines
`which could not be blocked with excess PMPA (Figure 2A). In
`contrast, the HBED-CC conjugate ([68Ga]7) showed almost
`no uptake in PSMA-negative PC-3 cells or in LNCaP cells
`blocked with PMPA. Furthermore, [ 68Ga]7 significantly
`revealed higher specific internalization and cell surface
`accumulation as compared to the DOTA conjugates (Figure
`2B). In another cell uptake experiment, three different
`concentrations of the radiolabeled compounds (2.5 nM, 25
`nM, and 250 nM) were incubated with either LNCaP (Figure
`3A) or PC-3 cells (Figure 3B). In accordance with the results
`received from the internalization experiments, [
`68Ga]7 showed
`a considerably higher uptake in LNCaP cells. Furthermore, the
`unspecific uptake in PC-3 cells was lower as compared to the
`DOTA derivatives [
`68Ga]8 and [68Ga]12.
`Biodistribution Studies. The organ and tumor uptake
`values of the complexes [ 68Ga]7,[ 68Ga]8, and [ 68Ga]12
`differed in accordance with the aforementioned in vitro data
`(Figure 4). The HBED-CC conjugated compound [68Ga]7 was
`cleared rapidly from the circulation and PSMA negative tissue.
`Remarkably, the liver activity of [
`68Ga]7 amounted to only 0.87
`± 0.05% ID/g as early as one hour after injection. The high
`kidney, spleen, and lung uptake of 139.4± 21.4% ID/g, 17.90
`± 2.87% ID/g, and 2.49± 0.27% ID/g was nearly completely
`blocked to 4.02± 1.14% ID/g, 1.54± 0.33% ID/g, and 0.64±
`0.32% ID/g, respectively, after the coinjection of 2 mg/kg 2-
`PMPA (Figure 4B). The tumor uptake amounted to 7.70±
`1.45% ID/g on LNCaP and 1.30± 0.12% ID/g on PC-3.
`The DOTA complex [
`68Ga]8 showed a completely different
`uptake pattern. The liver uptake of the DOTA-conjugate was
`enhanced by a factor of 5.7, the tumor uptake was reduced by
`factor 2.6, and the kidney uptake was surprisingly lowered to
`background values. The uptake values of PSMA-negative PC-3
`tumors were low for all compounds (1.30 ± 0.13% ID/g
`([
`68Ga]7), 0.60 ± 0.06% ID/g ([68Ga]8), and 0.58 ± 0.07%
`ID/g ([68Ga]12), respectively) (Figure 4C).
`PET-Imaging. The tumor-targeting efficiency of [68Ga]7
`and [68Ga]8 was evaluated by 50 min dynamic microPET scans
`followed by a 20 min static scan. The differences observed in
`biodistribution could have also been visualized by PET imaging.
`The complexes [
`68Ga]7 and [ 68Ga]8 were injected intra-
`venously into LNCaP tumor-bearing mice, and microPET scans
`were carried out for up to 70 min p.i. A coronal PET slice after
`injection of [
`68Ga]7 is shown in Figure 5a. The DOTA complex
`[68Ga]8 failed to image the tumor proven by the time activity
`curves over tumor and muscle (Figure 5B).
`Comparison of Biological Properties of L- and D-
`Forms of [68Ga]7. The 68Ga complex ofD-Glu-NH-CO-NH-
`Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC was synthesized and compared with the
`corresponding L-isomer. Time−activity curves obtained from
`dynamic PET measurements revealedD-[68Ga]7 to be cleared
`from the kidneys into the urinary bladder whileL-[68Ga]7 is
`retained in this organ (Figure 6). This finding is supported by
`the ∼10
`3 times lower PSMA affinity of D-[68Ga]7 (data not
`shown).
`■ DISCUSSION
`PSMA is strongly expressed on prostate cancer cells 18 and
`therefore represents a promising target for the development of
`imaging agents for tumor staging and followup. Among the
`currently used radioisotopes,
`68Ga exhibits several favorable
`properties as there are the availability and the facile labeling
`technology by means of complexation.
`11 A series of chelators
`are available for the complexation of68Ga which are conjugated
`to targeting carrier molecules. Besides some reported stabilizing
`Figure 2. Cell binding and internalization of compounds [68Ga]7,
`[68Ga]8, and [68Ga]12 (A). Specific cell uptake was evaluated by
`blockade with 100 μM PMPA. Specificity of cell uptake (B) was
`calculated by subtracting the respective signals resulting from PMPA-
`blockage. Values are expressed as % of applied radioactivity bound to
`106 cells. Data are expressed as mean± SD (n = 3).
`Bioconjugate Chemistry Article
`dx.doi.org/10.1021/bc200279b | Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 688−697693
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1030, p. 693
`-----------------------------
`A
`C.
`ra
`u 10
`z
`...J
`C:
`0
`Cl
`.5 5
`"C
`C:
`:ci
`'?F-
`0 u u <( <( u
`~ ~ a. a. ~ .., :. :. ..,
`a. a.
`+ +
`p u
`.. ~ ..,
`[6aGa]7
`B
`10
`C. .. 8 (.)
`z
`...J
`C: 6
`0
`Cl)
`C: 4
`'ti
`C:
`:a 2
`'?F-
`0 u u
`~ ~ ..,
`u <( <(
`~ a. a.
`:. :. a. a.
`+ +
`p u
`.. ~ ..,
`[68Ga]8
`u u
`~ ~ ..,
`u u <( <(
`~ ~ a. a. .., :. :. a. a.
`+ +
`p u
`.. ~ ..,
`[68Ga]12
`u u
`~ ~ ..,
`D 1st glycine \/"lash
`■ 2nd glycine \/"lash
`• Lysate
`□ 1st glycine wash
`■ 2nd glycine wash
`-
`Lysate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`effects or pretargeting approaches, 17,19 the function of the
`chelator in radiopharmaceuticals is usually restricted to serving
`as a complexing agent without influencing the receptor binding.
`However, the size-demanding radiometal complexes often exert
`their influence on the targe ting molecule by changing
`lipophilicity or charge. In particular, the pharmacological
`property of small molecules can strongly be influenced or
`abolished with respect to its target binding properties.
`An interesting study comparing various linkers located
`between the PSMA binding group 2-[3-(1,3-dicarboxyprop-
`yl)-ureido]pentanedioic acid (DUPA) and a
`99mTc complex
`showed that the lipophilicity of the linker significantly
`correlates with improved binding properties.14 Crystal structure
`investigations also indicated that, besides the electrostatic
`interactions of urea and carboxylic groups at the active, Zn(II)-
`containing center of PSMA, there are lipophilic interactions
`resulting from a hydrophobic pocket located next to the active
`site.
`8,20 A further study substantiates the PSMA active site as a
`pocket with multiple interactions as well. The pharmacophore
`was proposed to present three carboxylic groups able to interact
`with the respective side chains of PSMA, an oxygen as part of
`zinc complexation in the active center and an aromatic structure
`able to interact with a hydrophobic part of the binding pocket
`composed of tyrosines.
`15 This work suggests that these
`interactions are additive in terms of functional efficiency.
`Only inhibitors which interact with all parts of the binding site
`displayed a tight binding mode and a high rate of internal-
`Figure 3. Binding of [68Ga]7,[ 68Ga]8, and [68Ga]12 to LNCaP (PSMA+) cells (A) and PC-3 (PSMA−) cells (B) depending on68Ga-complex
`concentration. Values were normalized with respect to added radioactivity of each compound. Data are expressed as mean± SD (n = 3).
`Figure 4.Organ distribution expressed as % ID/g tissue one hour post injection. (A) Comparison of the compounds [68Ga]7 (PSMA-binding motif
`coupled to HBED-CC), [68Ga]8 (PSMA-binding motif coupled to DOTA), and [68Ga]12. (B) PSMA-blocking by coadministration of 2 mg/kg
`body weight PMPA indicating PSMA-specific uptake in kidney and spleen. (C) Uptake in PC-3 tumors and LNCaP tumors 1 h after injection. Data
`are expressed as mean± SD (n = 3).
`Figure 5. Whole-body coronal microPET image of an athymic male nude mice bearing LNCaP tumor xenografts. The tumor-targeting efficacy of
`[68Ga]7 was demonstrated by dynamic microPET scan (B) followed by a static scan (A). The static scan up to 1 h post injection of [68Ga]7 is shown
`in (A). Approximately 15 MBq/mouse was injected. Graph B shows the respective time−activity curves in muscle and tumor for [68Ga]7 and [68Ga]
`8.
`Bioconjugate Chemistry Article
`dx.doi.org/10.1021/bc200279b | Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 688−697694
`Petitioner GE Healthcare – Ex. 1030, p. 694
`A =
`60000 LNCaP I!!!!!!!
`-
`40000
`E
`C.
`u
`20000
`0
`[68 Ga)7 [68Ga)8 [68Ga)12
`D [68Ga]7
`- [68 Ga ]8
`- [68 Ga ]12
`2.5nM 8
`25 nM
`250 nM
`E
`C.
`u
`B
`4
`60000
`40000
`20000
`0
`[68Ga)7
`D [68 Ga ]7
`- [68G a]7 +
`2 mg/kg PM PA
`C 10
`9
`8
`7
`~ 6
`C 5
`~ 4
`3
`2
`PC-3
`[68 Ga)8 [68 Ga)12
`1
`o -'--J____u_._._ ,__--1_.1..
`=
`11!!!!1
`--2.5 nM
`25 nM
`250 nM
`D [68 Ga]7
`- [68 Ga]8
`lililil [68 Ga ]12
`P C-3 Tum or LNCa P Tumo r
`-+- Muscle
`-+- Tumor
`-+- Muscle
`-+- Tumor
`0-,...------.--------r-----,
`0 20 40 60
`time after injection [min]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ization. Molecules lacking one of these interactions showed
`other modes of action and weaker binding.15
`These results led to the development of the amphiphilic,
`PSMA-specific tracer [ 68Ga]7 consisting of the urea-based
`pharmacophore and the 68Ga-HBED-CC complex able to
`interact with the hydrophobic binding pocket. Two 68Ga-
`DOTA complexes, the hydrophilic [68Ga]8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket