throbber
Rational Design and Engineering of a Modified
`Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV1)-Based Vector
`System for Enhanced Retrograde Gene Delivery
`BACKGROUND: After injection into muscle and peripheral nerves, a variety of viral
`vectors undergo retrograde transport to lower motor neurons. However, because of its
`attractive safety profile and durable gene expression, adeno-associated virus (AAV)
`remains the only vector to have been applied to the human nervous system for the
`treatment of neurodegenerative disease. Nonetheless, only a very small fraction of
`intramuscularly injected AAV vector arrives at the spinal cord.
`OBJECTIVE: To engineer a novel AAV vector by inserting a neuronal targeting peptide
`(Tet1), with binding properties similar to those of tetanus toxin, into the AAV1 capsid.
`METHODS: Integral to this approach was the use of structure-based design to increase
`the effectiveness of functional capsid engineering. This approach allowed the optimi-
`zation of scaffolding regions for effective display of the foreign epitope
`while minimizing disruption of the native capsid structure. We also validated an
`approach by which low-titer tropism-modified AAV vectors can be rescued by particle
`mosaicism with unmodified capsid proteins.
`RESULTS: Importantly, our rationally engineered AAV1-based vectors exhibited mark-
`edly enhanced transduction of cultured motor neurons, diminished transduction of
`nontarget cells, and markedly superior retrograde delivery compared with unmodified
`AAV1 vector.
`CONCLUSION: This approach promises a significant advancement in the rational
`engineering of AAV vectors for diseases of the nervous system and other organs.
`KEY WORDS: AAV-mediated gene delivery, Motor neuron disease, Rational design, Retrograde axonal
`transport, Vector engineering, Vector targeting
`Neurosurgery 76:216–225, 2015 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000589 www.neurosurgery-online.com
`A
`deno-associated virus (AAV) has emerged
`as a promising vector for gene delivery
`because of its broad-tissue tropism, safety,
`ability to transduce both quiescent and dividing
`cells, and ability to mediate long-term gene expres-
`sion. Recent isolation of novel AAV serotypes and
`advances in vector engineering have further
`enhanced the utility of these vectors. Gene therapy
`holds a variety of advantages for the treatment of
`a variety of neurological diseases. In several of these
`diseases, an optimal therapeutic response is facil-
`itated by vectors that are capable of efficient
`retrograde axonal transport. In Parkinson disease,
`preservation and repair of the nigrostriatal pathway
`may require the expression of trophic genes in both
`the striatum (postsynaptic) and substantia nigra
`(presynaptic).
`1 This type of targeting is facilitated
`by the ability of viral vectors to undergo retrograde
`axonal transport from the postsynaptic site into
`the presynaptic neurons. Similarly, retrograde
`transport can facilitate the delivery of genes to
`target neurons that are widely disbursed as in the
`case of treating corticospinal neurons to enhance
`spinal cord regeneration. Finally, retrograde vector
`Adam S. Davis, PhD‡ *
`Thais Federici, PhD§*
`William C. Ray, PhD¶k
`Nicholas M. Boulis, MD§
`Deirdre O’Connor, PhD§
`K. Reed Clark, PhD‡ k#
`Jeffrey S. Bartlett, PhD**
`‡ Gene Therapy Center and ¶Battelle
`Center for Mathematical Medicine, The
`Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s
`Hospital, Nationwide Children’s Hospital,
`Columbus, Ohio; §Department of Neuro-
`surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
`kDepartment of Pediatrics, College of
`Medicine and Public Health and #Depart-
`ment of Molecular Virology, Immunology,
`and Medical Genetics, College of Medicine
`and Public Health, The Ohio State Univer-
`sity Columbus, Ohio; **Calimmune, Inc,
`Tucson, Arizona
`*These authors have contributed equally
`to this article.
`Correspondence:
`Adam S. Davis, PhD,
`Center for Gene Therapy,
`The Research Institute at Nationwide
`Children’s Hospital,
`700 Children’s Drive, W210,
`Columbus, OH 43205.
`E-mail: Adam.
`Davis@NationwideChildrens.org
`Received, March 6, 2014.
`Accepted, September 26, 2014.
`Published Online, December 29, 2014.
`Copyright © 2014 by the
`Congress of Neurological Surgeons.
`WHAT IS THIS BOX?
`A QR Code is a matrix
`barcode readable by QR
`scanners, mobile phones
`with cameras, and
`smartphones. The QR
`Code above links to
`Supplemental Digital
`Content from this
`article.
`ABBREVIATIONS: AAV, adeno-associated virus;
`ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; DMEM,
`Dulbecco-modified Eagle medium; DRG, dorsal
`root ganglia; DRP ,DNase-resistant particle; MOI,
`multiplicity of infection; PBS, phosphate-buffered
`saline; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; rAAV, re-
`combinant adeno-associated virus
`Supplemental digital content is available for this article.
`Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are
`provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on
`the journal’s Web site (www.neurosurgery-online.com).
`RESEARCH—LABORATORY
`RESEARCH—LABORATORY
`216 |V O L U M E 7 6|N U M B E R 2|F E B R U A R Y 2 0 1 5 www.neurosurgery-online.com
`Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`Sarepta Exhibit 1021, page 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`delivery provides a minimally invasive means to access neurons in
`remote or sensitive structures, as is the case for dorsal root ganglia
`(DRG) in the treatment of neuropathy and pain or spinal cord
`motor neurons in the treatment of motor neuron diseases. Our
`laboratory has focused on both idiopathic and genetic motor
`neuron diseases. However, AAV-mediated retrograde gene delivery
`to motor neurons remains limited by inefficient axon binding and
`poor retrograde axonal transport.
`2,3
`Previously, we isolated Tet1, a 12-mer linear peptide that binds
`selectively to differentiated pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells,
`primary motor neurons, and DRG in vitro.4 We showed that
`Tet1 binds to the tetanus toxin GT1b receptor and described the
`in vivo neuronal binding properties and spinal cord uptake of Tet1
`after peripheral delivery,
`5 suggesting that insertion of this epitope
`into the AAV capsid might allow the generation of modified
`vectors with enhanced axon terminal binding and uptake.
`Although several studies have demonstrated genetic incorporation
`of peptide epitopes into the AAV2 capsid and subsequent
`modification of vector tropism,
`6-9 our group has defined sites
`amenable to peptide insertion in other serotype AAV capsids10 and
`has demonstrated that these peptide-modified vectors can also
`transduce target cells via these engineered interactions10-13 Because
`AAV1 vectors have proven superior to AAV2 vectors for neuronal
`gene delivery and retrograde axonal transport, we sought to modify
`the AAV1 capsid by Tet1 peptide insertion.
`2 Computational
`modeling was used to analyze capsid structure and conformation
`and to visualize and determine the optimal structural context for
`peptide display. This approach was instrumental in our ability to
`produce Tet1-modified AAV1 vectors and for these vectors to
`function properly and direct gene transduction to motor neurons.
`Through this work, we have combined the goals and approaches
`of computational molecular design and capsid structure analysis to
`provide tools for the rational mutagenesis and functional modi-
`fication of AAV vector particles. This approach used the analysis of
`3-dimensional capsid structure to guide the selection of appropri-
`ate amino acid sequences to create a desired property or function.
`The convergence of high-speed computing, a tremendous increase
`in capsid structural information, and a growing understanding of
`the forces that control protein structure and maintain essential
`viral functions has resulted in dramatic advances in our ability to
`engineer protein function and structure and to create novel,
`rationally designed virus-basedg e n et r a n s f e rv e c t o r s .S u c ha n
`enhancement in our ability to engineer vectors for specific
`functions may prove critical to the practical application of gene
`transfer for a variety of therapeutic paradigms in addition to the
`studies described here for sensory and motor neuron gene
`delivery.
`METHODS
`Construction of Modified AAV Helper Plasmids
`Modified AAV1 helper constructs encoding capsid proteins with Tet1
`motif insertions were generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-
`based site-directed mutagenesis as previously described.10 Briefly, DNA
`primers were designed to encode the Tet1 motif and scaffolding
`sequences (Table) and used to direct PCR-based mutagenesis of the
`AAV helper plasmid pXR1.14,15 This plasmid contains the entire AAV
`genome, encoding AAV2 Rep proteins and AAV1 Cap proteins, less the
`2 viral inverted terminal repeats. PCR products were digested withDpnI
`endonuclease to eliminate the parental plasmid template and were
`propagated in DH-5a bacteria (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Grand
`Island, New York). The nonhomologous linker sequences included in
`the PCR primers to encode the Tet1 scaffolding sequences were also
`designed to contain restriction sites. Therefore, mini-prep plasmid DNA
`could be extracted from ampicillin-resistant colonies and screened by
`restriction endonuclease digestion for confirmation of epitope insertion.
`Furthermore, all constructs were also subsequently sequenced to confirm
`epitope insertion and lack of second-site mutations.
`Vectors
`AAV1eGFP or AAV1RFP (dsRed2) vectors were produced by triple
`transfection as previously described. 10 To produce AAV vectors
`comprising Tet1-modified capsid proteins, HEK 293 cells were trans-
`fected with modified AAV helper plasmids, constructed as described
`above, in place of unmodified pXR1. In instances when mosaic particles
`were generated, unmodified pXR1 was included at a 20% molar
`equivalent of Tet1-modified AAV helper plasmid as described
`previously.13 Transfections were carried out at 37/C176C with the use of
`the calcium phosphate transfection system (Invitrogen Life Technolo-
`gies) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Forty-eight hours
`after transfection, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 500g for
`10 minutes and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and
`vector was released in 3 freeze-thaw cycles. The crude lysate was clarified
`by centrifugation at 500g 10 minutes, and viscosity was reduced by the
`addition of Benzonase (250 U/mL) and incubation at 37 /C176C for
`30 minutes. Lysate was then fractionated on an iodixanol step gradient
`16
`and further purified by high-performance liquid chromatography as
`described previously.
`17 Final vector preparations were stored at220/C176C
`in PBS containing 20% glycerol. DNase-resistant particle (DRP) values
`were determined by real-time PCR assay.
`10
`Cell Lines
`Low-passage-number (passage number 20-40) HEK 293 cells18 and
`HeLa C12 cells19 were grown in Dulbecco-modified Eagle medium
`(DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum,
`penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 U/mL) at 37/C176C and 5%
`CO2. PC12 pheochromocytoma cells were grown in DMEM supple-
`mented with 10% horse serum, 5% fetal bovine serum, and penicillin
`(100 U/mL). For differentiation, cells were exposed for 2 to 3 days to
`100 ng/mL of nerve growth factor (nerve growth factor 2.5S, Invitrogen
`TABLE. Summary of Tet1 Insertion Mutantsa
`Vector Designation
`Upstream
`Linker
`Tet1 Peptide
`Epitope
`Downstream
`Linker
`AAV1.D590_P591insTet1a AS HLNILSTLWKYR GLS
`AAV1.D590insTet1b ASDA HLNILSTLWKYR GLS
`AAV1.D590_P591insTet1c ASDA HLNILSTLWKYR ADGLS
`aAAV, adeno-associated virus; AS, alanine-serine; GLS, glycine-leucine-serine.
`AAV VECTOR FOR RETROGRADE DELIVERY
`NEUROSURGERY VOLUME 76 | NUMBER 2 | FEBRUARY 2015 |217
`Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`Sarepta Exhibit 1021, page 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Life Technologies) in DMEM with 2% horse serum and 1% fetal
`bovine serum. C2C12 cells20 were cultured in Corning 6-well plates
`(Fisher, 07-200-80) with 1 · DMEM (Gibco, 11965-092) supple-
`mented with 10% Hyclone Cosmic Calf Serum (GE, SH30087.04IR)
`and 10 mg/mL ciprofloxacin.
`Primary Cell Cultures
`Spinal cords were obtained under sterile conditions from 15-day-old
`Sprague-Dawley rat embryos following an established protocol.21 DRG
`and perineural membranes were removed, and cords were cut into 2-mm
`sections, which were then trypsinized. Cells were collected, centrifuged,
`pelleted, and then resuspended in complete growth medium made in
`supplemented Neurobasal Medium (Invitrogen Life Technologies).
`Cells were plated on glass coverslips in multiwell culture plates precoated
`with poly-
`L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri).
`Campenot Chambers
`Campenot Teflon chamber dividers (Tyler Research, Edmonton,
`Alberta, Canada) were carefully attached to Collagen/Matrigel-coated
`35-mm culture dishes using silicone vacuum grease (Dow Corning,
`Midland, Michigan). Scratches were made in the Collagen/Matrigel with
`a pin rake. One drop of medium containing methylcellulose (1%) was
`placed onto the plate before the divider was set on the culture dish, which
`facilitated axon growth underneath the silicon grease barriers.
`22 DRG
`explants were plated into one of the compartments of the chambers in
`a small volume of media and allowed to adhere for 2 hours. The
`compartment was then filled with growth medium. The adjacent
`compartments were filled with media supplemented with 100 ng/mL
`nerve growth factor to encourage neurite growth into these compartments.
`Modeling
`Modeling of modified AAV capsid structures was carried out first
`with SWISS-Model (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/)23,24 and later with
`I-TASSER (http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/).25-27 The
`capsid protein was initially modeled as a monomer and extended to
`a trimer after automated modeling. SWISS- Model experienced difficulty
`in finding adequate loop structures for the Tet1c mutant in the
`automated mode and generally produced results that did not appear
`physiologically relevant even when using the alignment mode with
`a forced alignment to the relevant region of PDB 1LP3. I-TASSER
`successfully predicted several potential structures for each Tet1 structure
`with no constraints on the modeling. The SWISS-Model results and the
`I-TASSER results agreed on the probable structure of the inserted Tet1
`sequence itself, including the location of the turn between the
`antiparallel b sheets. I-TASSER, however, positioned the Tet1 mutant
`insertions in physiologically realistic locations folded against the surface
`of the monomer, whereas SWISS-Model preferred to leave the insert as
`a free strand projecting into space. Although I-TASSER produced several
`potential results for each mutant, the majority of the structural
`differences between I-TASSER models were in the predicted structure
`of the N-terminal region of the protein, quite distant from the insert site.
`The position of the Tet1 mutants was generally as described in Figure 1,
`for which we used the highest-confidence I-TASSER-predicted result.
`The trimeric forms for the structures were constructed by structurally
`aligning the mutants with PDB 1LP3 and using the capsid-creation
`rotation symmetry matrixes from that file. The trimer was constructed of
`capsid subunits 0, 19, and 45. Only the Tet1a mutant required manual
`intervention, inversion of theb-turn curl direction, to avoid physiolog-
`ically impossible topological conflicts. To increase our confidence that
`the folded positioning of the insert sequence was correct, we performed
`brief (40 000 time step, 2 femtoseconds per step) molecular minimi-
`zations of the trimer interface regions using NAMD (Theoretical and
`Computational Biophysics group at the Beckman Institute, University of
`Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
`28 Although insufficient to predict
`a lowest-energy conformation, our experience has been that these
`parameters are sufficient to detect dramatic spatial clashes caused by
`compositing independently modeled subunits. Each predicted mutant
`structure experienced some side-chain optimization during the minimi-
`zation run, but none displayed symptoms of impossibly close van der
`Walls interactions or other signs of physical implausibility. We therefore
`believe that the modeled locations of the Tet1 mutants are physiolog-
`ically reasonable possibilities for their placement.
`Immunocytochemistry
`Staining was performed with the neuronal cell marker Map-2. The
`protocol consisted of fixing the cell cultures for 40 minutes with 4%
`paraformaldehyde in 0.1 mol/L PBS (pH 7.4) and blocking them with
`0.1% Triton X-100 to 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 1 hour,
`before an overnight incubation with the primary antibodies. The next day,
`cells were washed 3 times with 1% bovine serum albumin/PBS and
`incubated for 1 hour with fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies
`at room temperature. After washing, the coverslips were mounted on slides
`using Vectashield Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories,
`Burlingame, California).
`Comparative Gene Transduction Assays
`Titer-matched vector solutions (unmodified and Tet1-modified
`recombinant AAV1 [rAAV1]) were added to cultures and rocked gently
`to ensure equal distribution of the suspension over the cells. Typically, 3
`wells per condition were used. Cells were fixed and processed for analyses
`3 days after treatment. Images of transduced cells were acquired with
`a Nikon E400 microscope using a DS-Qi1 high-sensitivity cooled
`charge-coupled device camera and analyzed by use of the NIS-Elements
`imaging software (Nikon Instruments, Inc, Melville, New York) from 10
`randomly selected fields per slide. The percentage of green fluorescent
`protein (GFP)- or red fluorescent protein-positive cells was determined
`by dividing the number of cell marker-positive, DAPI-positive cells that
`were also GFP- or red fluorescent protein-positive by the total number of
`cell marker-positive, DAPI-positive cells. Graphs of the relationship
`between dose and percentage of transduced cells were then generated.
`Data were expressed as mean6 SEM.
`For quantification of gene transduction in Campenot chambers, the
`NIS-Elements imaging software was used to compare the fluorescence
`pixel intensity within the DRG cell bodies. By drawing a region of interest
`around the explants (white lines), we limited the area that was analyzed.
`Two channels of fluorescence were captured. The first channel was an
`internal control to compensate for variability of thickness, size, or density
`of cells within the explants. It consisted of DAPI staining (seeFigure A,
`Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/NEU/A693).
`The second channel recorded levels of fluorescence resulting from gene
`expression (see Figure B, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://
`links.lww.com/NEU/A693), which was then expressed as a ratio of the
`internal control. The software calculated the area of pixel intensity within
`each region of interest (Table), and a graph was generated.
`C2C12 cells at confluence were transduced with either control
`scrAAV1.eCBA.eGFP vector or scrAAV1tet1.eCBA.eGFP vector at
`DAVIS ET AL
`218 |V O L U M E 7 6|N U M B E R 2|F E B R U A R Y 2 0 1 5 www.neurosurgery-online.com
`Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`Sarepta Exhibit 1021, page 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 000 and 33 000 in serum-free
`Gibco 1· DMEM. The cells were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for
`30 minutes at room temperature and incubated for 4 hours at 37/C176C
`and 5% CO2.A t4h o u r sa f t e rt r a n s d u c t i o n ,t h ew e l l sw e r es p i k e dt o
`af i n a lc o n c e n t r a t i o no f2 %s e r u ma n di n c u b a t e da t3 7/C176Ca n d5 %
`CO2 for approximately 48 hours. The cells were rinsed with Gibco 1·
`Hanks balanced salt solution and harvested with Hyclone 0.05%
`trypsin containing 25 mmol/L EDTA. The trypsin was neutralized
`with Gibco 1· DMEM containing 10% Hyclone Cosmic Calf Serum
`and 10mg/mL ciprofloxacin. The cells were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for
`20 minutes and resuspended in Teknova TMN200. Cells positive for GFP
`and mean florescence were determined by flow cytometry. Data were
`collected on a Becton Dickenson LSRII cytometer using BD FACSDiva
`software. A total of 30 000 events were collected for each sample, and
`viable cells were gated via a forward-scatter vs side-scatter plot. GFP-
`positive cells were subsequently gated from the viable cell population.
`Voltages were set based on autofluorescence of unlabeled cells.
`Statistical Analysis
`Cell counts were performed in 10 d ifferent fields per slide. All
`experiments were performed in triplicate. The effects of vector
`treatment and MOI were compar ed by use of 2-way analysis of
`variance; however, Tukey tests alsowere performed, and the data are
`presented as 2-way analysis of variance with the P values from the
`Tukey tests (P , .05).
`RESULTS
`Generation of AAV Capsids Containing Tet1
`Peptide Insertions
`We have previously shown that AAV1 can tolerate the insertion
`of exogenous peptides after VP1 amino acid 590.29 Importantly,
`we have also shown that the inserted sequences can be displayed
`on the surface of assembled AAV particles and can promote novel
`capsid-protein interactions.13,29 To use these findings for the
`purpose of generating Tet1-modified AAV particles, we intro-
`duced oligonucleotides encoding the Tet1 motif into the Cap
`ORF of the AAV1 helper plasmid pXR1
`14 by PCR-based site-
`directed mutagenesis, creating pXR1-Cap1.D590_P591insTet1a.
`Short peptide linkers, previously optimized for the display of
`heterologous ligands,
`11,13 were also included in an attempt to
`maintain local capsid flexibility and to promote efficient display of
`the Tet1 epitope on the surface of the assembled AAV vector
`particles (Table). In the first instance, these were made up of an
`alanine-serine upstream linker and a glycine-leucine-serine
`downstream linker flanking the Tet1 epitope (Tet1a designa-
`tion, Table).
`Tet1a-Modified AAV1 Capsid Proteins Inefficiently
`Package Vector Genomes and Fail to Mediate
`Efficient Gene Transfer
`To assess the impact of the Tet1a modification on DNA
`packaging and infectivity, we determined particle and infectious
`titers of AAV1 and Tet1a-modified AAV1, AAV1.D590_P591ins-
`Tet1a, vectors (Table). A real-time PCR assay was used to assess
`DRP titer,
`30 and transduction of HeLa C12 cells was performed
`to assess particle infectivity. Compared with unmodified AAV1
`capsids, the production of AAV1.D590_P591insTet1a capsids
`was 66.5-fold less efficient (5.956 0.41 · 10
`10 DRP per 1 mL
`for AAV1.D590_P591insTet1a vs 3.966 2.2 · 1012 DRP per 1
`mL for AAV1). Similarly, transduction of HeLa C12 cells was
`significantly impaired by roughly 3 orders of magnitude by
`the Tet1 modification (see Figure, Supplemental Digital
`Content 2, http://links.lww.com/NEU/A694).
`FIGURE 1. A molecular modeling comparison of linker sequence effect on Tet1 peptide display and perturbation of native
`structure. The adeno-associated virus (AAV) capsid 3-fold axis of symmetry is depicted as a solvent exclusion surface, with each
`monomer a unique shade of gray, whereas the Tet1 peptide and linker sequences have added van der Walls spheres and are shaded
`red and pink, respectively.A, I-TASSER modeling of Tet1 with C-terminal linker alanine-serine (AS) and n-terminal linker
`glycine-leucine-serine (GLS; Tet1a) suggests that the peptide folds into the interface between and partially beneath the interlocking
`arms of each monomer that creates the 3-fold axis of symmetry of capsid.B, the C-terminal linker ASDA and N-terminal linker
`GLS (Tet1b) slightly change the side-chain polarity and presentation geometry of the peptide so that it is more accessible to the
`capsid exterior; however, it is still partially buried under the capsid surface.C, our modeling predicts that the C-terminal linker
`ASDA and N-terminal linker ADGLS (Tet1c) provide the best opportunity for maximum surface exposure of the Tet1 peptide on
`the exterior of the capsid with the least disruption of the native capsid structure.
`AAV VECTOR FOR RETROGRADE DELIVERY
`NEUROSURGERY VOLUME 76 | NUMBER 2 | FEBRUARY 2015 |219
`Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`Sarepta Exhibit 1021, page 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Computational Modeling of Tet1-Modified AAV1
`Capsid Proteins
`We hypothesized that conformational stresses imposed on the
`AAV1 capsid by the Tet1 peptide insertion might be responsible
`for the observed decreases in titers. We therefore pursued 2
`complementary approaches to rescue titer of peptide-modified
`AAV1 particles. First, we modeled the structure of the AAV1
`capsid at the 3-fold axis of symmetry to see if sequences flanking
`the Tet1 insert could be altered either to minimize distortion of the
`native capsid structure or to promote more efficient display of the
`targeting epitope. Modeling preformed with both I-TASSER and
`SWISS-Model and validated with molecular dynamics simulations
`in NAMD indicated that the Tet1 peptide favorably forms a pair of
`antiparallel b strands. Postulating that changing the length of the
`linker sequences and the linker side chain polarity might
`predispose this shortb sheet motif toward different positioning
`on the capsid surface, we modeled the structures of 2 additional
`Tet1 peptide modifications with different linker/scaffolding
`sequences (Tet1b and Tet1c; Table). When flanked by alanine
`and serine at the C-terminus and glycine, leucine, and serine at
`the N-terminus, as in the original Tet1a construct, the Tet1
`epitope folded “downward” and packed between and under the
`VP3 monomer arms that create the 3-fold axis of symmetry. This
`not only might effectively shield the epitope from any interaction
`with its targeted receptor but also appeared to distort the native
`capsid structure at the 3-fold axis of symmetry (Figure 1A).
`Modification of the C-terminal linker to include aspartic acid and
`alanine allowed slightly better presentation of Tet1, allowing it to
`stack alongside the monomer arm into which it was inserted;
`however, it was still partially buried (Figure 1B). However, the
`Tet1c modification, which includes additional alanine and
`aspartic acid residues in the N-terminal linker sequence, allowed
`the epitope to lie on top of the arm into which it was inserted,
`resulting in unobstructed display on the capsid surface (Figure
`1C). In fact, modeling of the Tet1c modification predicted the
`presentation of a“looped” version of the Tet1 epitope, with the
`C-terminal and N-terminal residues of the inserted sequences in
`close proximity to each other. Insertions such as this,
`which minimize the induced gap in and therefore
`might minimize distortion of the native structure, although
`facilitating more effective presentation of the targeting epitope,
`could potentially increase both particle titer and the ability of the
`modified particles to interact with their targeted receptors.
`Efficient Production of Mosaic Tet1c-Modified Vectors
`Capable of Mediating Specific Gene Transfer to
`Differentiated Pheochromocytoma (PC12) Cells
`Based on our computational modeling, we generated 2 additional
`packaging constructs, pXR1- Cap1.D590_P591insTet1b and
`pXR1-Cap1.D590_P591insTet1c, for building the modified
`Tet1b and Tet1c sequences into the AAV1 capsid. As suggested
`above and described previously by our group,
`13 these constructs
`were used with AAV helper plasmid pXR1, encoding unmodified
`AAV1 capsid proteins, to generate mosaic AAV particles contain-
`ing different ratios of Tet1-modified and unmodified capsid
`proteins. Particle titers were determined by real-time PCR, and
`gene transduction was assessed on HEK 293 and differentiated
`pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells. Mosaic particles generated from
`a mixture of 80% Tet1c-modified pXR1 plasmid (pXR1-Cap1.
`D590_P591insTet1c) and 20% unmodified pXR1 plasmid into
`HEK 293 packaging cells were produced 4-fold more efficiently
`than particles made up entirely of Tet1c-modified capsid proteins
`(P , .05), and significant increases in particle titer were realized
`with the use of optimized linker/scaffolding sequences flanking
`Tet1 (P , .05; Figure 2). These findings validate the ability of
`particle mosaicism to rescue titer of some tropism-modified AAV
`vector particles, as well as our computational modeling approach to
`rationally engineer modified AAV capsids. However, the real
`benefit of this strategy was evidenced by the ability of Tet1c-
`modified mosaic AAV1 vectors (Tet1c-rAAV) to mediate signif-
`icantly enhanced transduction of PC12 cells and significantly lower
`transduction of HEK 293 cells (Figure 3). Transduction of
`HEK 293 cells at 100 DRPs per cell decreased.55-fold from
`32.32 6 6.98% (mean6 SEM) to only 0.586 1.29% (P , .05),
`whereas at 1000 DRPs per cell, transduction decreased from
`FIGURE 2. Particle titers of Tet1-modified recombinant adeno-associated virus
`1 (rAAV1) vectors. DNase-resistant particle (DRP) titers were determined by
`real-time polymerase chain reaction assay.30 Particles comprising entirely Tet1-
`modified AAV1 capsids proteins are compared with mosaic particles assembled
`from HEK 293 cells transfected with an 80:20 mixture of plasmid DNA en-
`coding Tet1-modified AAV1 capsid proteins and unmodified AAV1 capsid
`proteins. All data are shown as the mean of triplicate determinations. Bars
`indicate the standard error of the mean. A 2-way analysis of variance test revealed
`that a significant effect depended on both capsid mosaicism and linker/scaffolding
`sequences flanking the Tet1 epitope (*P , .05).
`DAVIS ET AL
`220 |V O L U M E 7 6|N U M B E R 2|F E B R U A R Y 2 0 1 5 www.neurosurgery-online.com
`Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`Sarepta Exhibit 1021, page 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`57.42 6 6.84% to only 9.396 4.03% (P , .05; Figure 3A).
`Transduction of PC12 cells at 100 DRPs per cell increased from
`6.5 6 2.32% to 18.136 5.51% (P , .05) and at 1000 DRPs per
`cell from 14.216 3.02% to 25.726 10.92% (P , .05; Figure
`3B). By simultaneously increasing the transduction of PC12 cells
`while decreasing transduction of nonneuronal HEK 293 cells,
`a .155-fold (P , .05) increase in specificity is realized at the lower
`MOI, suggesting the utility of t hese engineered particles.
`Because axonal uptake and retrograde delivery depend equally
`on axon terminal affinity (neuronal binding) and available titer
`(lack of binding to surrounding muscle), increased neuronal
`specificity is likely more important than affinity alone.
`Although the technical ease of using immortalized cell lines
`led us to initially screen Tet1-modified vectors on PC12 and
`HEK 293 cells, having demonstrated increased specificity, we
`moved on to assess gene transduction in primary spinal cord
`cultures.
`Tet1c-Modified Vectors Mediate Enhanced Gene
`Transfer to Primary Spinal Neurons
`Embryonic day 15 spinal cord cultures (neuron/glia ratio, 8:2)
`were used to assess gene transduction mediated by Tet1c-modified
`AAV particles. To evaluate the specificity of Tet1c-rAAV-
`mediated gene transfer, cells were stained with antibodies against
`neuron-specific markers (MAP-2). Figure 4A illustrates an
`apparent increase in neuronal GFP expression in the Tet1c-
`rAAV treated cultures. At an MOI of 1000 Tet1c-rAAV1eGFP
`DRPs per cell, transgene expression was observed in 61.096
`13.23% of spinal cord neurons, whereas only 17.486 7.54% of
`spinal cord neurons in these cultures were transduced with
`unmodified rAAV1eGFP (P , .05; Figure 4B).
`Tet1c-Modified Vectors Mediate Enhanced Retrograde
`Axonal Transport to Primary DRG Neurons
`It has previously been demonstrated that wild-type AAV
`undergoes uptake and retrograde transport with limited
`efficiency.
`31 We hypothesized that modifying AAV using
`peptides with high affinity for motor neuron receptors might
`enhance axon terminal uptake. We evaluated retrograde gene
`delivery using the Tet1c-modified AAV1 vector in vitro. Axon
`terminals of DRG explants plated in Campenot chambers were
`exposed to Tet1c- and unmodified rAAV1 vectors. The
`percentage of transduced cell bodies in the DRG explants was
`counted to estimate the tendency of individual vectors to bind
`axon terminals, to undergo uptake, and to be transported in
`a retrograde fashion to the cell bodies. We were able to
`demonstrate that the uptake of Tet1c-rAAV1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket