throbber
Safety and Tolerability of Glatiramer Acetate - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov
`
`A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health
`
`Example: "Heart attack" AND "Los Angeles"
` Search for studies:
`
`Advanced Search Help Studies by Topic Glossary
`
`Find Studies
`
`About Clinical Studies
`
`Submit Studies
`
`Resources
`
`About This Site
`
`Home
`
`Find Studies Study Record Detail
`
`Text Size
`
`Safety and Tolerability of Glatiramer Acetate (GLACIER)
`
` This study has been completed.
`
`Sponsor:
` Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
`
`Information provided by (Responsible Party):
`Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
`
`ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
`NCT01874145
`First received: June 6, 2013
`Last updated: December 10, 2015
`Last verified: December 2015
`History of Changes
`
`Full Text View
`
`Tabular View
`
`Study Results
`
`Disclaimer
`
`How to Read a Study Record
`
` Purpose
`
`This is an open-label, randomized, multi-center, parallel-arm study to assess the safety and tolerability of a daily dose of Glatiramer Acetate (GA)
` 40 mg/mL three times a week (TIW) administered subcutaneously (SC) as compared to GA 20 mg/mL every day (QD) administered SC.
`
`Condition
`
` Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
`
`Intervention
`
` Drug: GA 20 mg/mL
` Drug: GA 40 mg/mL
`
`Phase
`
` Phase 3
`
` Interventional
`Study Type:
`Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
`Endpoint Classification: Safety Study
`Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
`Masking: Open Label
`Primary Purpose: Treatment
`
`Official Title:
`
`An Open-Label, Randomized, Multi-Center, Parallel-Arm Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Glatiramer Acetate 40
` mg/mL Three Times a Week Compared to 20 mg/mL Daily Subcutaneous Injections in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple
` Sclerosis
`
`Resource links provided by NLM:
`
`Genetics Home Reference related topics: multiple sclerosis
`
`MedlinePlus related topics: Multiple Sclerosis
`
`Drug Information available for: Glatiramer Glatiramer acetate
`
`U.S. FDA Resources
`
`Further study details as provided by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries:
`
`Primary Outcome Measures:
`Adjusted Mean Estimates for Injection-Related Adverse Event Rate Per Year in the Core Period [ Time Frame: Day 1 to Month 4 ]
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01874145[2/5/2016 1:43:49 PM]
`
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. Exhibit 1005 Page 1
`
`

`
`Safety and Tolerability of Glatiramer Acetate - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov
`
` [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`Injection-related (IR) adverse events refers to all local injection site reactions and/or symptoms or events related to immediate post injection
` reaction (flushing, chest pain, palpitations, anxiety, dyspnea, throat constriction, and/or urticaria). Rate was calculated as # IR events/the total
` exposure to study drug in years. For cases in which more than 1 IR adverse event started on the same date for the same patient, these were
` counted as 1 IR adverse event for that patient. Parameter statistics were generated from a Poisson regression model with natural log of
` treatment duration (years) as an offset variable, and adjusted for baseline EDSS score, treatment group, age, sex, number of relapses in the 2
` years prior to screening, in which a contrast comparing treatment groups were constructed. Adjusted mean estimates were adjusted estimates
` of event rates within treatment group.
`
`Injection-Related Adverse Event Rate Per Year in the Extension Period [ Time Frame: Month 5 up to Month 10 ]
` [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`Injection-related (IR) adverse events refers to all local injection site reactions and/or symptoms or events related to immediate post injection
` reaction (flushing, chest pain, palpitations, anxiety, dyspnea, throat constriction, and/or urticaria). Rate was calculated as # IR events/the total
` exposure to study drug in years. For cases in which more than 1 IR adverse event started on the same date for the same patient, these were
` counted as 1 IR adverse event for that patient.
`
`Injection-Related Adverse Events in the Extension Period [ Time Frame: Month 5 up to Month 10 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`Injection-related (IR) adverse events refers to all local injection site reactions and/or symptoms or events related to immediate post injection
` reaction (flushing, chest pain, palpitations, anxiety, dyspnea, throat constriction, and/or urticaria).
`
`Secondary Outcome Measures:
`Adjusted Mean Estimates for Injection Site Reaction Event Rate Per Year in the Core Period [ Time Frame: Day 1 to Month 4 ]
` [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`This outcome includes injection-related adverse events referring to all local injection site reactions (ISR). Rate was calculated as # ISR
` events/the total exposure to study drug in years. For cases in which more than 1 ISR adverse event started on the same date for the same
` patient, these were counted as 1 ISR adverse event for that patient. Parameter statistics were generated from a Poisson regression model with
` natural log of treatment duration (years) as an offset variable, and adjusted for baseline EDSS score, treatment group, age, sex, number of
` relapses in the 2 years prior to screening, in which a contrast comparing treatment groups were constructed. Adjusted mean estimates were
` adjusted estimates of event rates within treatment group.
`
`Change From Baseline to Month 4 in in the Adjusted Mean Participant-Reported Impact on Physical Wellbeing Using Multiple Sclerosis Impact
` Scale (MSIS-29 PRO) in the Core Period [ Time Frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 4 (or early termination visit) ]
` [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
`The physical wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 is comprised of 20 questions in which participants rate the impact of MS on their
` day-to-day life during the past two weeks from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact for a total score of 20-100. Negative change from baseline
` scores indicate improvement in physical wellbeing over time. The estimated change from baseline to month 4 adjusted for months 1 and 2 was
` generated using a mixed model repeated measures analysis adjusted for baseline MSIS-29 physical score, treatment group, month, treatment
` by month interaction.
`
`Change From Baseline to Month 4 in in the Adjusted Mean Participant-Reported Impact on Psychological Wellbeing Using Multiple Sclerosis
` Impact Scale (MSIS-29 PRO) in the Core Period [ Time Frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2 4 (or early termination visit) ]
` [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
`The psychological wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 is comprised of 9 questions in which participants rate the impact of MS on their
` day-to-day life during the past two weeks from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact for a total score of 9-45. Negative change from baseline
` scores indicate improvement in psychological wellbeing over time. The estimated change from baseline to month 4 adjusted for months 1 and 2
` was generated using a mixed model repeated measures analysis adjusted for baseline MSIS-29 psychological score, treatment group, month,
` treatment by month interaction.
`
`Change From Baseline to Month 4 in in the Adjusted Mean Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9)
` Convenience Score in the Core Period [ Time Frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2 4 (or early termination visit) ]
` [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
`The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) is a psychometric measure of a patient's satisfaction with medication. It
` consists of 3 subscales: effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain, i.e. 1
` to 3 for effectiveness, 4 - 6 for convenience and 7 to 9 for global satisfaction. This outcome focuses on convenience items 4-6, with each
` question graded on a scale of 1 (extreme dissatisfaction) to 7 (extreme satisfaction). TSQM-9 participant perception of convenience score was
` calculated as: ([sum (Item 4 to Item 6) - 3] divided by 18) * 100. The full range was -100 to 100, with positive change from baseline indicating
` improvement. The estimated change from baseline to month 4 adjusted for months 1 and 2 was generated using a mixed model repeated
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01874145[2/5/2016 1:43:49 PM]
`
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. Exhibit 1005 Page 2
`
`

`
`Safety and Tolerability of Glatiramer Acetate - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov
`
` measures analysis adjusted for baseline TSQM convenience score, treatment group, month, treatment by month interaction.
`
`Change From Baseline to Month 4 in in the Adjusted Mean Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9)
` Satisfaction Score in the Core Period [ Time Frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2 4 (or early termination visit) ]
` [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
`The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) is a psychometric measure of a patient's satisfaction with medication. It
` consists of 3 subscales: effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain, i.e. 1
` to 3 for effectiveness, 4 - 6 for convenience and 7 to 9 for global satisfaction. This outcome focuses on global satisfaction, items 7-9. TSQM-9
` participant perception of satisfaction score was calculated as: ([sum(Item 7 to Item 9) - 3] divided by 14) * 100. The full range was -100 to 100,
` with positive change from baseline indicating improvement satisfaction with medication. The estimated change from baseline to month 4
` adjusted for months 1 and 2 was generated using a mixed model repeated measures analysis adjusted for baseline TSQM convenience score,
` treatment group, month, treatment by month interaction.
`
`Injection Site Reaction Event Rate Per Year in the Extension Period [ Time Frame: Month 5 up to Month 10 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`This outcome includes injection-related adverse events referring to all local injection site reactions (ISR). Rate was calculated as # ISR
` events/the total exposure to study drug in years. For cases in which more than 1 ISR adverse event started on the same date for the same
` patient, these were counted as 1 ISR adverse event for that patient.
`
`Injection Site Reaction Events in the Extension Period [ Time Frame: Month 5 up to Month 10 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`This outcome includes injection-related adverse events referring to all local injection site reactions (ISR). For cases in which more than 1 ISR
` adverse event started on the same date for the same patient, these were counted as 1 ISR adverse event for that patient.
`
`Change From Start of Extension Period (Month 4) to Month 8 (and to Endpoint Visit) in the Participant-Reported Impact on Physical Wellbeing
` Using Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29 PRO) [ Time Frame: Month 4 (baseline for extension period), Month 8, endpoint visit ]
` [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
`The physical wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 is comprised of 20 questions in which participants rate the impact of MS on their
` day-to-day life during the past two weeks from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact for a total score of 20-100. Negative change from baseline
` scores indicate improvement in physical wellbeing. The Extension Period endpoint visit was defined as the last observed post-baseline data of
` the Extension Period.
`
`Change From Start of Extension Period (Month 4) to Month 8 (and to Endpoint Visit) in the Participant-Reported Impact on Psychological
` Wellbeing Using Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29 PRO) [ Time Frame: Month 4 (baseline for extension period), Month 8, endpoint
` visit ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
`The psychological wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 is comprised of 9 questions in which participants rate the impact of MS on their
` day-to-day life during the past two weeks from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact for a total score of 9-45. Negative change from baseline
` scores indicate improvement in psychological wellbeing. The Extension Period endpoint visit was defined as the last observed post-baseline
` data of the Extension Period.
`
`Change From Start of Extension Period to Month 8 (and to Endpoint Visit) in in the Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire
` for Medication (TSQM-9) Convenience Score [ Time Frame: Month 4 (baseline for extension period), Month 8, endpoint visit ]
` [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
`The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) is a psychometric measure of a patient's satisfaction with medication. It
` consists of 3 subscales: effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain, i.e. 1
` to 3 for effectiveness, 4 - 6 for convenience and 7 to 9 for global satisfaction. This outcome focuses on convenience items 4-6, with each
` question graded on a scale of 1 (extreme dissatisfaction) to 7 (extreme satisfaction). TSQM-9 participant perception of convenience score was
` calculated as: ([sum (Item 4 to Item 6) - 3] divided by 18) * 100. The full range was -100 to 100, with positive change from baseline indicating
` improvement. The Extension Period endpoint visit was defined as the last observed post-baseline data of the Extension Period.
`
`Change From Start of Extension Period to Month 8 (and to Endpoint Visit) in in the Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire
` for Medication (TSQM-9) Satisfaction Score [ Time Frame: Month 4 (baseline for extension period), Month 8, endpoint visit ]
` [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
`The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) is a psychometric measure of a patient's satisfaction with medication. It
` consists of 3 subscales: effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain, i.e. 1
` to 3 for effectiveness, 4 - 6 for convenience and 7 to 9 for global satisfaction. This outcome focuses on global satisfaction, items 7-9. TSQM-9
` participant perception of satisfaction score was calculated as: ([sum(Item 7 to Item 9) - 3] divided by 14) * 100. The full range was -100 to 100,
` with positive change from baseline indicating improvement satisfaction with medication. The Extension Period endpoint visit was defined as the
` last observed post-baseline data of the Extension Period.
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01874145[2/5/2016 1:43:49 PM]
`
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. Exhibit 1005 Page 3
`
`

`
`Safety and Tolerability of Glatiramer Acetate - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov
`
`Other Outcome Measures:
`Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Other Than Injection Related Reactions During the Core Period and the Extension Period
` [ Time Frame: Day 1 to Month 4 (core period); Month 5 to 10 (extension period) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient that developed or worsened in severity during
` the conduct of the clinical study of a pharmaceutical product and did not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. This outcome
` summarizes the % of participants who had AEs other than injection related reactions. Injection-related (IR) adverse events referring to all local
` injection site reactions and/or symptoms or events related to immediate post injection reaction (flushing, chest pain, palpitations, anxiety,
` dyspnea, throat constriction, and/or urticaria).
`
`209
` Enrollment:
`June 2013
` Study Start Date:
` Study Completion Date: May 2014
` Primary Completion Date: April 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
`
` Arms
`
` Assigned Interventions
`
` Active Comparator: GA 20 mg/mL every day
`Glatiramer acetate (GA) 20 mg in 1 mL SC injection
` administered every day (QD) for the 4 months of the core
` study.
`
` Drug: GA 20 mg/mL
`Glatiramer acetate (GA) 20 mg/mL subcutaneous (SC) injection, the
` commercial product, is a single-use pre-filled syringe (PFS) containing 1.0 ml
` of a clear, colorless to slightly yellow, sterile, non-pyrogenic solution.
`Other Names:
`Glatiramer Acetate
`Copaxone®
`
` Experimental: GA 40 mg/mL 3 times a week
`Glatiramer acetate (GA) 40 mg in 1 mL SC injection
` administered three times a week (TIW) for the 4 months of the
` core study.
`During the Extension period, all participants to continue
` treatment with GA 40 mg/mL TIW until this dose regimen is
` commercially available for the treatment of RRMS patients.
`
` Drug: GA 40 mg/mL
`Glatiramer acetate (GA) 40 mg/mL subcutaneous (SC) injection, is a single-
`use pre-filled syringe (PFS) containing 1.0 ml of a clear, colorless to slightly
` yellow, sterile, non-pyrogenic solution.
`Other Names:
`Glatiramer Acetate
`Copaxone®
`
` Detailed Description:
`The study will comprise of a Core study and an Extension phase. During the Core study, subjects will be evaluated at study sites for 5 scheduled
` visits at Months: -1 (Screening), 0 (Baseline), 1, 2, and 4 (Termination/Early Termination). Subjects who complete all scheduled visits will have final
` procedures and assessments performed at the final visit (Month 4, Termination visit). Subjects who withdraw from the study before completing the
` 4 months evaluation period will have Early Termination (ET) procedures and assessments performed at their final visit.
`During the Extension phase, all subjects will be offered to continue treatment with GA 40 mg/mL TIW. Subjects will be evaluated every 4 months
` until this dose strength is commercially available for the treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) patients or until the
` development of this GA dose regimen is stopped by the Sponsor, the last visit of this phase will be called Termination/ET-Extension visit.
`
` Eligibility
`
`18 Years and older
`Ages Eligible for Study:
`Genders Eligible for Study:
`Both
`Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
`
`Criteria
`Inclusion Criteria:
`1. Men or women at least 18 years of age or older
`2. Subjects must have a confirmed and documented RRMS diagnosis as defined by the Revised McDonald criteria, with relapse onset disease
` or a relapsing-remitting disease course
`3. Subjects must be ambulatory with a Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-5.5 in both the Screening and Baseline
` visits.
`4. Subjects must be in a stable neurological condition, relapse-free and free of any corticosteroid treatment [intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM)
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01874145[2/5/2016 1:43:49 PM]
`
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. Exhibit 1005 Page 4
`
`

`
`Safety and Tolerability of Glatiramer Acetate - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov
`
` and/or per os (PO)] or adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), 60 days prior to randomization.
`5. Subjects must be treated with Glatiramer Acetate (GA) 20mg/mL QD SC injection for a minimum of 6 months prior to screening.
`6. Women of child-bearing potential must practice an acceptable method of birth control [acceptable methods of birth control in this study
` include: surgical sterilization, intrauterine devices, oral contraceptives, contraceptive patch, long-acting injectable contraceptive, partner's
` vasectomy or a double-barrier method (condom or diaphragm with spermicide)].
`7. Subjects must be able to sign and date a written informed consent prior to entering the study.
`8. Subjects must be willing and able to comply with the protocol requirements for the duration of the study
`Exclusion Criteria:
`1. Subject has any contraindication to Glatiramer Acetate therapy
`2. Subjects with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).
`3. Subjects with Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO).
`4. Use of experimental or investigational drugs, and/or participation in drug clinical studies within the 6 months prior to screening.
`5. Concomitant use of other disease modifying drug for MS ((Fingolimod (Gilenya®), dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera®), Teriflunomide (Aubagio®)
` or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)) within 6 months prior to screening
`6. Previous use of mitoxantrone, cladribine, alemtuzumab, rituximab, natalizumab.
`7. Chronic (more than 30 consecutive days) systemic (IV, PO or IM) corticosteroid treatment within 6 months prior to screening visit.
`8. Previous total body irradiation or total lymphoid irradiation.
`9. Previous stem-cell treatment, autologous bone marrow transplantation or allogenic bone marrow transplantation.
`10. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
`11. Subjects with a clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition that would preclude safe and complete study participation, as
` determined by medical history, physical exams, ECG and abnormal laboratory tests. Such conditions may include hepatic, renal or
` metabolic diseases, systemic disease, acute infection, current malignancy or recent history (5 years) of malignancy, major psychiatric
` disorder, history of drug and/or alcohol abuse and allergies that could be detrimental according to the investigator's judgment.
`12. Subjects who underwent endovascular treatment for Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI).
`13. Employees of the clinical study site or any other individuals involved with the conduct of the study, or immediate family members of such
` individuals -
`
` Contacts and Locations
`
` Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a
` study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general
` information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.
`
` Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01874145
`
` Show 35 Study Locations
`
`Sponsors and Collaborators
`Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
`
` More Information
`
` Publications:
`
`Wolinsky JS, Borresen TE, Dietrich DW, Wynn D, Sidi Y, Steinerman JR, Knappertz V, Kolodny S; GLACIER Study Group. GLACIER: An open-
`label, randomized, multicenter study to assess the safety and tolerability of glatiramer acetate 40 mg three-times weekly versus 20 mg daily in
` patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015 Jul;4(4):370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun
` 14.
`
`Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
`Responsible Party:
`ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01874145 History of Changes
`Other Study ID Numbers:
` GA-MS-303
`Study First Received:
`June 6, 2013
`Results First Received:
`October 12, 2015
`Last Updated:
`December 10, 2015
`Health Authority:
`United States: Food and Drug Administration
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01874145[2/5/2016 1:43:49 PM]
`
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. Exhibit 1005 Page 5
`
`

`
`Safety and Tolerability of Glatiramer Acetate - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov
`
` Keywords provided by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries:
` Multiple Sclerosis
` Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
` Glatiramer Acetate
` Glatiramer
`
` Additional relevant MeSH terms:
` Multiple Sclerosis
` Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
` Sclerosis
` Autoimmune Diseases
` Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
` Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS
` Demyelinating Diseases
` Immune System Diseases
`
`ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on February 04, 2016
`
` Nervous System Diseases
` Pathologic Processes
` Copolymer 1
` Adjuvants, Immunologic
` Immunologic Factors
` Immunosuppressive Agents
` Pharmacologic Actions
` Physiological Effects of Drugs
`
`TO TOP
`
`For Patients and Families
`
`
`
`For Researchers
`
`
`
`For Study Record Managers
`
`HOME
`
` RSS FEEDS
`
` SITE MAP
`
` TERMS AND CONDITIONS
`
` DISCLAIMER
`
` CONTACT NLM HELP DESK
`
` Privacy
`Copyright
`U.S. National Library of Medicine
`
` Viewers and Players
` Accessibility
` U.S. National Institutes of Health
`
` USA.gov
` Freedom of Information Act
` U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01874145[2/5/2016 1:43:49 PM]
`
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. Exhibit 1005 Page 6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket