throbber

`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
` Paper: 20
`
` Entered: January 17, 2018
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`EXOSECT LIMITED,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`Case PGR2017-00018
`Patent 9,380,739 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY, CHRISTOPHER M. KAISER,
`and MICHELLE N. ANKENBRAND, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KAISER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Termination of the Proceedings
`35 U.S.C. § 327(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PGR2017-00018
`Patent 9,380,739 B2
`
`
`On January 15, 2018, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Terminate this
`proceeding pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327(a). Paper 18 (“Joint Motion to
`Terminate”). In addition, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74(c), the parties filed a copy of a Settlement Agreement, Paper 19,
`along with a Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as Business
`Confidential Information and to Keep the Agreement Separate, Paper 20.
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 327(a), “[a] post-grant review instituted under this
`chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided
`the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” In
`this case, the Board instituted trial on October 11, 2017. Paper 9. By
`stipulation of the parties, the Patent Owner Response is not due until January
`29, 2018, and the Board has not yet decided the merits of the proceeding.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.72, “[t]he Board may terminate a trial without
`rendering a final written decision, where appropriate, including . . . pursuant
`to a joint request under 35 U.S.C. . . . [§] 327(a).” After reviewing the Joint
`Motion to Terminate and the Settlement Agreement, we determine that it is
`appropriate to terminate the proceeding without rendering a final written
`decision. Therefore, the Joint Motion to Terminate is GRANTED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PGR2017-00018
`Patent 9,380,739 B2
`
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as
`Business Confidential Information is GRANTED, and the Settlement
`Agreement will be kept separate from the patent files; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate is
`GRANTED and this proceeding is hereby TERMINATED.
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Susan E. Shaw McBee
`David L. Vanik
`Stephanie R. Amoroso
`MCBEE MOORE WOODWARD & VANIK IP, LLC
`ptab-pgr@mmwvlaw.com
`dvanik@mmwvlaw.com
`samoroso@mmwvlaw.com
`PTAB-PGR@mmwvlaw.com
`
`Andrew S. Baluch
`SMITH BALUCH LLP
`andrew@baluchlaw.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Deborah A. Sterling
`Robert W. Esmond
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`dsterlin-PTAB@skgf.com
`resmond-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket